Integrated Disaster Management SystemNCT07302529
The Effect of a Mixed Intervention Structured According to the Integrated Disaster Management System
A study testing Mixed Intervention in people with Integrated Disaster Management System and University Students, run by Necmettin Erbakan University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Integrated disaster management is defined as a management process that considers all hazards to create a resilient and resilient society capable of coping with disasters, and utilizes all the resources and resources of society to implement the necessary actions and measures in the prevention, mitigation, preparedness… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Integrated Disaster Management System, University Students, Disaster Risk Perception
- What is being tested?
- Mixed Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 140 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 31 Oct 2025to 10 Feb 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Registered as a student at the university where the research will be conducted
- Active participation in the disaster culture course
Who cannot join
- There are no exclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculthy of Nursing
Konya, Konya, 42130
About this study
Official title: The Effect of a Mixed Intervention Structured According to the Integrated Disaster Management System on Disaster Risk Perception, Disaster Attitude and Brief Resilience Among University Students
Integrated disaster management is defined as a management process that considers all hazards to create a resilient and resilient society capable of coping with disasters, and utilizes all the resources and resources of society to implement the necessary actions and measures in the prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery phases of disaster management. Educational interventions for disaster management are the most important initiatives in both risk reduction and crisis management. In this context, the aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a hybrid intervention structured according to the integrated disaster management system on disaster risk perception, disaster attitudes, and psychological resilience in university students. The students participating in this study will be administered a mixed intervention structured according to the integrated disaster management system (15-week disaster culture course presentation, case studies, simulation, expert conferences, and material development). Because randomization is not possible, the study adopts a quasi-experimental design. However, measures will be taken to reduce the risk of bias by creating a control group, increasing the number of measurements, using a different scale for test measurements, and ensuring that the individuals implementing the interventions, performing data analysis, and performing the measurements are different. The disaster risk perception scale, disaster attitude scale, and brief psychological resilience scale will be used to collect data. Data analysis will be evaluated at a 95% confidence interval and a significance level of p<0.05.
- Conditions
- Integrated Disaster Management System, University Students, Disaster Risk Perception, Disaster Attitude, Psychological Resilience, Perception
- Being tested
- Mixed Intervention
- Keywords
- Integrated Disaster Management System, Disaster Risk Perception, Disaster Attitude, Psychological Resilience, University Students, Nursing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mixed InterventionBehavioural
This study is distinguished by the fact that the intervention was conducted on university students, the intervention was structured according to the integrated disaster management system, case studies and simulation were included in the training content, conferences by field professionals in disaster management were included in the initiative, and the study team consisted of doctoral-level researchers.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intervention group | Experimental | Disaster culture course presentations, conferences by Red Crescent personnel and AKUT volunteers, and the integrated disaster management system were structured according to the; Case studies, disaster simulation application, and student material development will be included. Receives: Behavioral: Mixed Intervention |
| Control group | No intervention | no intervention will be implemented. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
disaster risk perception
Changes disaster risk perception scores after a structured mixed intervention based on an integrated disaster management system implemented on university students
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 15 weeks
disaster attitude
Changes disaster attitude scores after a structured mixed intervention based on an integrated disaster management system implemented on university students
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 15 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
psychological resilience
Changes psychological resilience scores after a structured mixed intervention based on an integrated disaster management system implemented on university students
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 15 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2025
- Study start31 Oct 2025
- Primary completion25 Dec 2025
- Study completion10 Feb 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Integrated Disaster Management SystemStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Necmettin Erbakan UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A 15-week mixed intervention will be implemented in the experimental group. The intervention will include lectures on disaster culture, conferences by Red Crescent staff and AKUT volunteers, case studies structured according to the integrated disaster management system, a disaster simulation application, and student material development.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Necmettin Erbakan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kübra Sultan Dengiz, Necmettin Erbakan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07302529
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025/1159
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 30 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of a Mixed Intervention Structured According to the Integrated Disaster Management System on Disaster Risk Perception, Disaster Attitude and Brief Resilience Among University Students
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07302529
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2025/1159
- Conditions
- Integrated Disaster Management System, University Students, Disaster Risk Perception, Disaster Attitude, Psychological Resilience, Perception
- Keywords
- Integrated Disaster Management System, Disaster Risk Perception, Disaster Attitude, Psychological Resilience, University Students, Nursing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Necmettin Erbakan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Feb 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Integrated disaster management is defined as a management process that considers all hazards to create a resilient and resilient society capable of coping with disasters, and utilizes all the resources and resources of society to implement the necessary actions and measures in the prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery phases of disaster management. Educational interventions for disaster management are the most important initiatives in both risk reduction and crisis management. In this context, the aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a hybrid intervention structured according to the integrated disaster management system on disaster risk perception, disaster attitudes, and psychological resilience in university students. The students participating in this study will be administered a mixed intervention structured according to the integrated disaster management system (15-week disaster culture course presentation, case studies, simulation, expert conferences, and material development). Because randomization is not possible, the study adopts a quasi-experimental design. However, measures will be taken to reduce the risk of bias by creating a control group, increasing the number of measurements, using a different scale for test measurements, and ensuring that the individuals implementing the interventions, performing data analysis, and performing the measurements are different. The disaster risk perception scale, disaster attitude scale, and brief psychological resilience scale will be used to collect data. Data analysis will be evaluated at a 95% confidence interval and a significance level of p<0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A 15-week mixed intervention will be implemented in the experimental group. The intervention will include lectures on disaster culture, conferences by Red Crescent staff and AKUT volunteers, case studies structured according to the integrated disaster management system, a disaster simulation application, and student material development.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Mixed InterventionDisaster culture course presentations, conferences by Red Crescent personnel and AKUT volunteers, and the integrated disaster management system were structured according to the; Case studies, disaster simulation application, and student material development will be included. |
| Control group | No intervention | –no intervention will be implemented. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Registered as a student at the university where the research will be conducted
- Active participation in the disaster culture course
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- There are no exclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mixed InterventionThis study is distinguished by the fact that the intervention was conducted on university students, the intervention was structured according to the integrated disaster management system, case studies and simulation were included in the training content, conferences by field professionals in disaster management were included in the initiative, and the study team consisted of doctoral-level researchers. | Behavioural | intervention group |
Primary outcome
disaster risk perception
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 15 weeks
Changes disaster risk perception scores after a structured mixed intervention based on an integrated disaster management system implemented on university students
disaster attitude
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 15 weeks
Changes disaster attitude scores after a structured mixed intervention based on an integrated disaster management system implemented on university students
1 secondary outcome
psychological resilience
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 15 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mixed Intervention in people with Integrated Disaster Management System and University Students, run by Necmettin Erbakan University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
disaster risk perception (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 15 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2026.