HyperkalaemiaAIDE-KNCT07307729
AI-Enabled ECG Stratification and Timing of Potassium-Lowering Therapy in Patients With Hyperkalemia: A Target Trial Emulation Study
A study testing Timely treatment and Delayed treatment in people with Hyperkalaemia, run by National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan.
Trial summary
Hyperkalemia is a common and potentially life-threatening electrolyte disorder, yet there is limited evidence guiding the optimal timing of potassium-lowering therapy in routine clinical practice. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hyperkalaemia
- What is being tested?
- Timely treatment and Delayed treatment
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5,000 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2026to 31 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients visit to emergency department
- serum potassium ≥5.5 mEq/L
- had a standard 12-lead ECG performed within 1 hour of the qualifying potassium measurement
Who cannot join
- potassium-lowering therapy administered before the index blood draw
- no potassium-lowering therapy initiated within 4 hours after the index draw
- duplicate encounters
- missing key covariates
About this study
Hyperkalemia is a common and potentially life-threatening electrolyte disorder, yet there is limited evidence guiding the optimal timing of potassium-lowering therapy in routine clinical practice. Although electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities are recommended to inform treatment decisions, such findings are often subtle and difficult to recognize consistently by clinicians.
This study aims to emulate a target trial to evaluate the association between the timing of potassium-lowering therapy (timely versus delayed initiation) and short-term mortality among patients with laboratory-confirmed hyperkalemia presenting to the emergency department. In addition, the study examines whether artificial intelligence-enabled ECG (AI-ECG) stratification identifies patient subgroups that may differentially benefit from earlier treatment.
Read more
Using observational electronic health record data from multiple healthcare systems, including publicly available critical care databases and institutionally governed hospital datasets, treatment strategies are compared using causal inference methods designed to approximate randomized assignment. The primary outcome is 90-day all-cause mortality.
The results of this study are intended to inform clinical decision-making regarding treatment timing in hyperkalemia and to evaluate the potential role of AI-ECG as a risk stratification tool in real-world settings.
Read the detailed description
Hyperkalemia is a frequent and clinically important electrolyte abnormality associated with increased risk of arrhythmia and mortality. Current clinical guidelines recommend considering electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities when determining the urgency of potassium-lowering therapy; however, specific ECG criteria prompting treatment are not uniformly defined, and subtle ECG changes are often difficult for clinicians to recognize consistently in real-world practice. As a result, substantial variability exists in the timing of treatment initiation for hyperkalemia, and randomized trials directly comparing timely versus delayed therapy are ethically and practically challenging to conduct. This study is designed as an observational study emulating a target trial to evaluate the association between treatment timing and short-term mortality among patients with laboratory-confirmed hyperkalemia.
The target trial protocol was specified a priori and submitted to the Institutional Review Board of Tri-Service General Hospital and explicitly defined all major design components required to address the causal question of interest. The protocol explicitly defined all major design components prior to analysis, including the data sources, eligibility criteria, treatment strategies, assignment procedures, time zero, follow-up, outcomes, causal contrasts, and analytic methods.
The emulation was conducted using routinely collected electronic health record data from three sources: Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH), a tertiary academic medical center in Taiwan with longitudinal emergency department and inpatient records spanning January 2011 to December 2024; the Military Hospital Research Database (MHRD), which aggregates patient-level data from multiple regional military-affiliated hospitals across Taiwan during calendar year 2023; and the publicly available MIMIC-IV database, including linked emergency department, intensive care, and electrocardiogram datasets. Data from these sources were extracted, harmonized, and analyzed using a common protocol.
Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years or older who presented to the emergency department with laboratory-confirmed hyperkalemia, defined by a serum potassium concentration at or above the prespecified threshold, and who underwent a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram within a defined time window around the index potassium measurement. Encounters in which potassium-lowering therapy was initiated prior to the index measurement, in which no therapy was administered within the allowable exposure window, or in which key baseline covariates required for emulating treatment assignment were unavailable were excluded.
The protocol specified two treatment strategies: timely initiation of potassium-lowering therapy within a prespecified early time window following the index potassium measurement, and delayed initiation of therapy after this early window but within a maximum allowable delay period. In the hypothetical target trial, eligible patients would be randomly assigned to one of these treatment strategies at baseline. In the emulated trial, treatment assignment followed routine clinical practice and was approximated using propensity score-based methods to balance measured baseline characteristics between groups and emulate randomization. The pre-specified variables in propensity score included serum potassium (continuous), AI-ECG prediction (positive vs. negative), age (years), gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).
A common time zero was defined as the time of the index potassium measurement. Follow-up began at time zero and continued for a fixed duration of 90 days or until death, whichever occurred first. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days of the index event, ascertained through linkage to national death registries or in-database mortality records, depending on the data source.
The primary causal contrast of interest was defined on an intention-to-treat basis, comparing the counterfactual outcomes that would have been observed had all eligible patients initiated potassium-lowering therapy in a delayed manner versus had all eligible patients initiated therapy in a timely manner. The protocol further prespecified assessment of effect modification by artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) based risk stratification, with subgroup contrasts defined according to AI-ECG prediction status.
Analytic methods were prespecified to estimate these causal contrasts using time-to-event analyses appropriate for observational data, following emulation of random assignment. Additional sensitivity analyses were defined to assess the robustness of findings to key assumptions and potential sources of bias, including analyses designed to mitigate immortal time bias arising from limitations in the temporal resolution of mortality data.
- Conditions
- Hyperkalaemia
- Being tested
- Timely treatment, Delayed treatment
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, electrocardiogram, emergency department, hyperkalemia, potassium, treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Hyperkalemia, Emergencies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Timely treatmentBehavioural
Also called Timely treatment of potassium-lowering treatment
Initiation of any potassium-lowering intervention within 1 hour of the index potassium measurement
Delayed treatmentBehavioural
Initiation of any potassium-lowering intervention in 1 to 4 hours of the index potassium measurement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Timely treatment | Experimental | Initiation of any potassium-lowering intervention within one hour of the index potassium measurement Receives: Behavioral: Timely treatment |
| Delayed treatment | Experimental | Initiation of any potassium-lowering intervention in 1 to 4 hours of the index potassium measurement Receives: Behavioral: Delayed treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality
Measured: 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Dec 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HyperkalaemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chin Lin, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07307729
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B202505066
- Acronym
- AIDE-K
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 15 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 29 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The MIMIC-IV database used in this study is publicly available and can be accessed by qualified researchers upon completion of the required training and data use agreements through PhysioNet. Data from TSGH and the MHRD are not publicly available due to institutional and ethical restrictions. Access to these datasets may be granted for research purposes upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Such requests will be reviewed by the Medical Affairs Bureau, Taiwan and are subject to approval by the Institutional Review Board of Tri-Service General Hospital prior to data release.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- AI-Enabled ECG Stratification and Timing of Potassium-Lowering Therapy in Patients With Hyperkalemia: A Target Trial Emulation Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07307729
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AIDE-K / B202505066
- Conditions
- Hyperkalaemia
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, electrocardiogram, emergency department, hyperkalemia, potassium, treatment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 5,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Defense Medical Center, TaiwanUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hyperkalemia is a common and potentially life-threatening electrolyte disorder, yet there is limited evidence guiding the optimal timing of potassium-lowering therapy in routine clinical practice. Although electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities are recommended to inform treatment decisions, such findings are often subtle and difficult to recognize consistently by clinicians.
This study aims to emulate a target trial to evaluate the association between the timing of potassium-lowering therapy (timely versus delayed initiation) and short-term mortality among patients with laboratory-confirmed hyperkalemia presenting to the emergency department. In addition, the study examines whether artificial intelligence-enabled ECG (AI-ECG) stratification identifies patient subgroups that may differentially benefit from earlier treatment.
Using observational electronic health record data from multiple healthcare systems, including publicly available critical care databases and institutionally governed hospital datasets, treatment strategies are compared using causal inference methods designed to approximate randomized assignment. The primary outcome is 90-day all-cause mortality.
The results of this study are intended to inform clinical decision-making regarding treatment timing in hyperkalemia and to evaluate the potential role of AI-ECG as a risk stratification tool in real-world settings.
Detailed description
Hyperkalemia is a frequent and clinically important electrolyte abnormality associated with increased risk of arrhythmia and mortality. Current clinical guidelines recommend considering electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities when determining the urgency of potassium-lowering therapy; however, specific ECG criteria prompting treatment are not uniformly defined, and subtle ECG changes are often difficult for clinicians to recognize consistently in real-world practice. As a result, substantial variability exists in the timing of treatment initiation for hyperkalemia, and randomized trials directly comparing timely versus delayed therapy are ethically and practically challenging to conduct. This study is designed as an observational study emulating a target trial to evaluate the association between treatment timing and short-term mortality among patients with laboratory-confirmed hyperkalemia.
The target trial protocol was specified a priori and submitted to the Institutional Review Board of Tri-Service General Hospital and explicitly defined all major design components required to address the causal question of interest. The protocol explicitly defined all major design components prior to analysis, including the data sources, eligibility criteria, treatment strategies, assignment procedures, time zero, follow-up, outcomes, causal contrasts, and analytic methods.
The emulation was conducted using routinely collected electronic health record data from three sources: Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH), a tertiary academic medical center in Taiwan with longitudinal emergency department and inpatient records spanning January 2011 to December 2024; the Military Hospital Research Database (MHRD), which aggregates patient-level data from multiple regional military-affiliated hospitals across Taiwan during calendar year 2023; and the publicly available MIMIC-IV database, including linked emergency department, intensive care, and electrocardiogram datasets. Data from these sources were extracted, harmonized, and analyzed using a common protocol.
Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years or older who presented to the emergency department with laboratory-confirmed hyperkalemia, defined by a serum potassium concentration at or above the prespecified threshold, and who underwent a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram within a defined time window around the index potassium measurement. Encounters in which potassium-lowering therapy was initiated prior to the index measurement, in which no therapy was administered within the allowable exposure window, or in which key baseline covariates required for emulating treatment assignment were unavailable were excluded.
The protocol specified two treatment strategies: timely initiation of potassium-lowering therapy within a prespecified early time window following the index potassium measurement, and delayed initiation of therapy after this early window but within a maximum allowable delay period. In the hypothetical target trial, eligible patients would be randomly assigned to one of these treatment strategies at baseline. In the emulated trial, treatment assignment followed routine clinical practice and was approximated using propensity score-based methods to balance measured baseline characteristics between groups and emulate randomization. The pre-specified variables in propensity score included serum potassium (continuous), AI-ECG prediction (positive vs. negative), age (years), gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).
A common time zero was defined as the time of the index potassium measurement. Follow-up began at time zero and continued for a fixed duration of 90 days or until death, whichever occurred first. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days of the index event, ascertained through linkage to national death registries or in-database mortality records, depending on the data source.
The primary causal contrast of interest was defined on an intention-to-treat basis, comparing the counterfactual outcomes that would have been observed had all eligible patients initiated potassium-lowering therapy in a delayed manner versus had all eligible patients initiated therapy in a timely manner. The protocol further prespecified assessment of effect modification by artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) based risk stratification, with subgroup contrasts defined according to AI-ECG prediction status.
Analytic methods were prespecified to estimate these causal contrasts using time-to-event analyses appropriate for observational data, following emulation of random assignment. Additional sensitivity analyses were defined to assess the robustness of findings to key assumptions and potential sources of bias, including analyses designed to mitigate immortal time bias arising from limitations in the temporal resolution of mortality data.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Timely treatment | Experimental | Behavioral: Timely treatmentInitiation of any potassium-lowering intervention within one hour of the index potassium measurement |
| Delayed treatment | Experimental | Behavioral: Delayed treatmentInitiation of any potassium-lowering intervention in 1 to 4 hours of the index potassium measurement |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients visit to emergency department
- serum potassium ≥5.5 mEq/L
- had a standard 12-lead ECG performed within 1 hour of the qualifying potassium measurement
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- potassium-lowering therapy administered before the index blood draw
- no potassium-lowering therapy initiated within 4 hours after the index draw
- duplicate encounters
- missing key covariates
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Timely treatmentAlso: Timely treatment of potassium-lowering treatmentInitiation of any potassium-lowering intervention within 1 hour of the index potassium measurement | Behavioural | Timely treatment |
| Delayed treatmentInitiation of any potassium-lowering intervention in 1 to 4 hours of the index potassium measurement. | Behavioural | Delayed treatment |
Primary outcome
All-cause mortality
Time frame: 90 days
All-cause mortality
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Dec 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The MIMIC-IV database used in this study is publicly available and can be accessed by qualified researchers upon completion of the required training and data use agreements through PhysioNet. Data from TSGH and the MHRD are not publicly available due to institutional and ethical restrictions. Access to these datasets may be granted for research purposes upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Such requests will be reviewed by the Medical Affairs Bureau, Taiwan and are subject to approval by the Institutional Review Board of Tri-Service General Hospital prior to data release.
Related trials for Hyperkalaemia
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
AK+ Guard™ Pilot Study in Chronic Kidney Disease: Outpatient Diagnostic Accuracy and Remote Monitoring
Hyperkalemia, Chronic Kidney Disease (Stage 3-4)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of WS016 for the Treatment of Hyperkalemia
Hyperkalemia
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Minimally vs. Ultra-Processed Diets on Potassium (K) Handling in CKD
Chronic Kidney Disease
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Rapid and Simultaneous Initiation of Four Guideline-Directed CKD Therapies (RAPID-CKD)
Chronic Kidney Disease, Type 2 Diabetes
Recruiting
Safety of a Healthy Plant-based Diet With Higher Potassium Content, Compared to a Healthy Plant-based Diet With Limited Potassium Content in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pilot Study
Hyperkalemia, Chronic Kidney Disease (Stages 4 and 5)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Timely treatment and Delayed treatment in people with Hyperkalaemia, run by National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
All-cause mortality (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2025.