AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Stress Disorder SymptomsSONICUMPNCT07307937

Movement Sonification as an add-on to Immediate Post-event Psychotherapeutic Intervention in the Management of Acute Stress Disorder: a Feasibility and Acceptability Study

A study testing The sonification of movement is an act studied in this research. in people with Acute Stress Disorder Symptoms, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Natural disasters, conflicts, persecution, population displacement, often traumatic migration experiences, and terrorist attacks are all factors that currently expose a significant proportion of the world's population to potentially traumatic events (PTEs). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Stress Disorder Symptoms
What is being tested?
The sonification of movement is an act studied in this research.
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
15 Jan 2026to 30 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 18 and over
  • Who have experienced a potentially traumatic event (PTE) other than the death of a loved one
  • Who have been referred to the medical-psychological emergency unit (CUMP 93) within one month of the PTE
  • Who are experiencing acute stress disorder (ASD) according to DSM-5 criteria
  • Have health insurance
  • Have signed a written informed consent form

Who cannot join

  • Severe motor impairment rendering the use of sonification technology impractical
  • Deaf, mute, or hearing-impaired patients
  • Adults under guardianship or conservatorship, under judicial protection, or deprived of liberty
  • Suffering from chronic psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder
  • Central neurological disease defined by a medical report (including brain damage, cortical or subcortical atrophy, dementia, stroke, transient ischemic attack, head trauma, epilepsy, or seizure)
  • Presenting a proven severe risk of suicide
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Substance use disorder (excluding tobacco)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Participation in another interventional study on ESA

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Sharon Soobben Project Manager contact

+33 1 48 95 74 35

sharon.soobben@aphp.fr

France1 site
  • Hôpital Avicenne

    Bobigny, 93000

    Vladimir Adrien, +33 1 48 95 59 37, vladimir.adrien@aphp.fr

    Nicolas BOSC

Other trials in France

About this study

Natural disasters, conflicts, persecution, population displacement, often traumatic migration experiences, and terrorist attacks are all factors that currently expose a significant proportion of the world's population to potentially traumatic events (PTEs). When a person is exposed to a PTE, symptoms of acute stress disorder (ASD) may occur in the immediate aftermath of the PTB, i.e., within the month following the event. These symptoms are dominated by dissociation, which includes depersonalization, i.e., the feeling of being disconnected from one's body. Managing these symptoms can prevent the subsequent onset of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a serious illness and public health concern. The recommended treatment combines an immediate post-event psychotherapeutic intervention (IPPI) and, where appropriate, medication with anxiolytics from the antihistamine class or antipsychotics

Read the detailed description

In France, IPPI is carried out by the medical-psychological emergency units (CUMP) in each department. Patients are referred to these units by the CUMPs themselves when they are called out by the SAMU (emergency medical service) to the scene of mass accidents (attacks, fires, suicides in public places, etc.), or by departmental doctors and medico-legal emergency services for individual EPTs (sexual or physical assault, etc.). In Seine-Saint-Denis, the CUMP 93 receives 60 to 100 patients per year in the immediate post-traumatic phase.

The purpose of IPPI is to reconnect the traumatic experience with known representations. These interventions have demonstrated effectiveness,although their preventive impact on PTSD remains limited. Movement sonification is an augmented auditory reality technique that transforms a patient's movements into sound through connected wristbands and a speaker system. By enriching bodily perception, this technique may enhance the efficacy of trauma-focused psychotherapies.

This study aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility of using movement sonification in combination with IPPI for the treatment of ASD. It thereby addresses an urgent need for primary prevention of PTSD.

Being tested
The sonification of movement is an act studied in this research.
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, potentially traumatic events, transforming the patient's movement into sound information
Medical subject headings
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The sonification of movement is an act studied in this research.Device

    The sonification of movement is an act studied in this research at visit 1, visit 2 and visit 3

Study groups in NCT07307937
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SonificationExperimentalThe sonification of movement is an act studied in this research.
Receives: Device: The sonification of movement is an act studied in this research.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluate the feasibility of movement sonification in association with IPPI in the treatment of ESA.

    Success rate, defined as an individual adherence rate of at least two sessions completed with movement sonification out of the three sessions planned.

    Measured: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Dissociative symptoms

    1. Change in the severity of dissociative symptoms assessed by:

    1a) • Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale from V1 to V4. A high score on the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (range 0 to 92) indicates a more severe degree of dissociative symptoms.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Dissociative symptoms

    1. Change in the severity of dissociative symptoms assessed by:

    1b)• Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2 at V1 and V4. A high score on the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2 (range 0 to 160) reflects more developed interoceptive awareness, with an increased ability to recognize and respond adaptively to bodily sensations.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  3. Agency (sense of control over the external environment)

    Changes in agency assessed by the Fribourg Sense of Agency Scale from V1 to V4. A high score on the Fribourg Sense of Agency Scale (range 13 to 91) is associated with an increased perception of personal control and a stronger integration of conscious action with personal responsibility.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  4. The overall clinical response

    Change in clinical impression assessed by the Clinical Global Impression-Severity from V1 to V4. The scale ranges from 1 to 7, where a low value indicates no symptoms and 7 indicates a terminal stage disorder.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  5. The overall clinical response

    Change in clinical impression assessed by Clinical Global Impression-Improvement from V2 to V4. The scale ranges from 1 to 7, where a low value represents significant improvement and 7 indicates considerable deterioration.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  6. Overall functioning

    Change in overall functioning assessed by the Global Assessment of Functioning from Visit 1 to Visit 4.

    The Global Assessment of Functioning, scale is used to rate how serious a mental illness may be. It measures how much a person's symptoms affect their day-to-day life on a scale of 0 to 100.A high score on the Global Assessment of Functioning suggests very good or near-normal overall functioning.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  7. Symptoms associated with ESA in patients with initial symptoms of traumatic dissociation, compared to those without

    Comparison of changes in scale between patients according to the level of dissociation assessed by the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale. A high score on the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (range 0 to 92) indicates a more severe degree of dissociative symptoms.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  8. Symptoms associated with ESA in patients with initial symptoms of traumatic dissociation, compared to those without

    Comparison of changes in scale between patients according to the level of dissociation assessed by the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness 2. A high score on the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness 2 (range 0 to 160) reflects more developed interoceptive awareness, with an increased ability to recognize and respond adaptively to bodily sensations.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  9. Symptoms associated with ESA in patients with initial symptoms of traumatic dissociation, compared to those without

    Comparison of changes in scale between patients according to the level of dissociation assessed by Fribourg Sense of Agency Scale. A high score on the Fribourg Sense of Agency Scale (range 13 to 91) is associated with an increased perception of personal control and a stronger integration of conscious action with personal responsibility.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  10. Symptoms associated with ESA in patients with initial symptoms of traumatic dissociation, compared to those without

    Comparison of changes in scale between patients according to the level of dissociation assessed by the Global Impression-Severity. The scale ranges from 1 to 7, where a low value indicates no symptoms, and 7 indicates a terminal condition.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  11. Symptoms associated with ESA in patients with initial symptoms of traumatic dissociation, compared to those without

    Comparison of changes in scale between patients according to the level of dissociation assessed by the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement. The scale ranges from 1 to 7, where a low value represents a significant improvement, and 7 indicates a considerable deterioration.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  12. Symptoms associated with ESA in patients with initial symptoms of traumatic dissociation, compared to those without

    Comparison of changes in scale between patients according to the level of dissociation assessed by the Global Assessment Functioning. A high Global Assessment of Functioning score (range from 0 to 100) suggests very good or near-normal overall functioning.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  13. Evaluate the experience and acceptability of patients and caregivers (qualitative analysis).

    The evaluation of the experience and acceptability will be carried out using a semi-structured interview with the patient at Visit 4

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Dec 2025
  2. Study start15 Jan 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07307937
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP241593
Acronym
SONICUMP
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
20 Aug 2025
Last updated
29 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing The sonification of movement is an act studied in this research. in people with Acute Stress Disorder Symptoms, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Nicolas BOSC (+33 1 48 95 53 74, nicolas.bosc@aphp.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluate the feasibility of movement sonification in association with IPPI in the treatment of ESA. (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in