Coronary Artery DiseaseCONQUERNCT07308496
Computed Tomography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve vs. Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio in Management of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
A study testing CT-FFR guided strategy and QFR guided strategy in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases.
Trial summary
This is a multi-center, randomized controlled trial to compare the clinical outcomes between CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) guided strategy and angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio (QFR) guided strategy among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- CT-FFR guided strategy and QFR guided strategy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,402 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2026to 1 Jul 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Patient-level inclusion criteria:
- Adults aged ≥18 years.
- Patients with stable angina, unstable angina, or post-myocardial infarction ≥72 hours.
- Patients are able and willing to provide written informed consent.
Lesion-level inclusion criteria:
(1) Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) shows at least one coronary artery with 70%-90% diameter stenosis and vessel diameter ≥2.5 mm.
Patient-level exclusion criteria:
- Previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- Suspected acute myocardial infarction (ECG or biomarkers indicating acute phase).
- Moderate to severe chronic kidney disease, defined as serum creatinine >150 μmol/L or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73 m².
- Severe valvular heart disease, aortic disease, or large ventricular aneurysm requiring surgery.
- Atrial fibrillation or other severe cardiac arrhythmias.
- Refusal or inability to sign informed consent.
Lesion-level exclusion criteria:
- Poor-quality CCTA images that prevent CT-FFR analysis.
- Severe coronary vessel tortuosity, overlapping segments, or other factors expected to cause poor-quality invasive angiography, hindering QFR measurement.
- Combined with chronic total occlusion lesions.
- The stenosis degree of the left main coronary artery was ≥50%.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
This is a multi-center, randomized controlled trial to compare the clinical outcomes between CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) guided strategy and angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio (QFR) guided strategy among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Participants who have at least one coronary stenosis of 70%-90% (vessel diameter ≥2.5 mm) detected by coronary CT angiography will be enrolled and are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to CT-FFR guided group or QFR guided group. In CT-FFR group, the decisions of invasive angiography and revascularization will be guided by CT-FFR. In QFR group, the decision of invasive angiography will be made as usual care, and revascularization will be guided by QFR. The primary endpoint is the 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- CT-FFR guided strategy, QFR guided strategy
- Keywords
- CT-derived fractional flow reserve, Angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CT-FFR guided strategyDiagnostic test
Patients in this group will undergo CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) analysis. If the CT-FFR value is ≤0.80, patients will subsequently undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and receive coronary revascularization. If the CT-FFR values of all vessels are >0.80, patients will not undergo invasive angiography.
QFR guided strategyDiagnostic test
Patients in this group will undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA) according to routine clinical indications. During the procedure, quantitative flow ratio (QFR) analysis will be performed. If the QFR value is ≤0.80, coronary revascularization will be performed. If the QFR value is >0.80, coronary revascularization will be forwent.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CT-FFR group | Experimental | The decisions of invasive angiography and revascularization will be guided by CT-FFR. Receives: Diagnostic Test: CT-FFR guided strategy |
| QFR group | Active comparator | The decision of invasive angiography will be made as usual care, and revascularization will be guided by QFR. Receives: Diagnostic Test: QFR guided strategy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs) within 12 Months Post-Procedure
MACEs is defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization.
Measured: 12 Months Post-Procedural Follow-Up
Secondary outcomes (12)
All-cause death
Death from any cause during the follow-up period.
Measured: 12 Months After Randomization
Cardiac death
Death due to myocardial infarction, heart failure, or other cardiac causes.
Measured: 12 Months After Randomization
Myocardial infarction (MI)
Defined according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.
Measured: 12 Months After Randomization
Repeat revascularization
Any planned or unplanned revascularization of the target vessel or graft.
Measured: 12 Months After Randomization
Rehospitalization
Any hospital readmission for cardiac causes, recurrent angina, or other medical reasons.
Measured: 12 Months After Randomization
Rate of invasive coronary angiography avoidance
The proportion of patients who avoided invasive coronary angiography after CT-FFR-based evaluation without adverse clinical outcomes.
Measured: 12 Months After Randomization
Revascularization rate
The proportion of patients undergoing any coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG).
Measured: 12 Months After Randomization
Number of stents implanted or bypass grafts performed
to assess procedural extent and resource utilization
Measured: 12 Months After Randomization
Rate of optimal medical therapy
The proportion of patients treated conservatively without revascularization.
Measured: 12 Months After Randomization
PCI rate
The proportion of patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention.
Measured: 12 Months After Randomization
CABG rate
The proportion of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Measured: 12 Months After Randomization
Total cost
Including outpatient and inpatient diagnostic and treatment expenses, index hospitalization cost.
Measured: 12 Months After Randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Dec 2025
- Study start1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jul 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,402 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital, Central China Fuwai Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Shenzhen Sun Yat-sen Cardiovascular Hospital, Ruijin Hospital, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07308496
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025-2855
- Acronym
- CONQUER
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Computed Tomography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve vs. Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio in Management of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07308496
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CONQUER / 2025-2855
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- CT-derived fractional flow reserve, Angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,402 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- China National Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesOther government
- Collaborators
- Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital, Central China Fuwai Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Shenzhen Sun Yat-sen Cardiovascular Hospital, Ruijin Hospital, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multi-center, randomized controlled trial to compare the clinical outcomes between CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) guided strategy and angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio (QFR) guided strategy among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Participants who have at least one coronary stenosis of 70%-90% (vessel diameter ≥2.5 mm) detected by coronary CT angiography will be enrolled and are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to CT-FFR guided group or QFR guided group. In CT-FFR group, the decisions of invasive angiography and revascularization will be guided by CT-FFR. In QFR group, the decision of invasive angiography will be made as usual care, and revascularization will be guided by QFR. The primary endpoint is the 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CT-FFR group | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: CT-FFR guided strategyThe decisions of invasive angiography and revascularization will be guided by CT-FFR. |
| QFR group | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: QFR guided strategyThe decision of invasive angiography will be made as usual care, and revascularization will be guided by QFR. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CT-FFR guided strategyPatients in this group will undergo CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) analysis. If the CT-FFR value is ≤0.80, patients will subsequently undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and receive coronary revascularization. If the CT-FFR values of all vessels are >0.80, patients will not undergo invasive angiography. | Diagnostic test | CT-FFR group |
| QFR guided strategyPatients in this group will undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA) according to routine clinical indications. During the procedure, quantitative flow ratio (QFR) analysis will be performed. If the QFR value is ≤0.80, coronary revascularization will be performed. If the QFR value is >0.80, coronary revascularization will be forwent. | Diagnostic test | QFR group |
Primary outcome
Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs) within 12 Months Post-Procedure
Time frame: 12 Months Post-Procedural Follow-Up
MACEs is defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization.
12 secondary outcomes
All-cause death
Time frame: 12 Months After Randomization
Cardiac death
Time frame: 12 Months After Randomization
Myocardial infarction (MI)
Time frame: 12 Months After Randomization
Repeat revascularization
Time frame: 12 Months After Randomization
Rehospitalization
Time frame: 12 Months After Randomization
Rate of invasive coronary angiography avoidance
Time frame: 12 Months After Randomization
Revascularization rate
Time frame: 12 Months After Randomization
Number of stents implanted or bypass grafts performed
Time frame: 12 Months After Randomization
Rate of optimal medical therapy
Time frame: 12 Months After Randomization
PCI rate
Time frame: 12 Months After Randomization
CABG rate
Time frame: 12 Months After Randomization
Total cost
Time frame: 12 Months After Randomization
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD
Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Late Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in Testicular Cancer Survivors
Testicular Cancer, Survivorship
Recruiting
Intracoronary Cryotherapy Effect on Stabilization of Vulnerable Plaque in Patients With Stable Angina or ACS - A Traditional Feasibility Study
Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Plaque
Recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Value of Coronary CT Angiography in the Understanding and Management of Coronary Calcium (The Optimal Trial)
Cardiovascular Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia
Enrolling by invitation
Optical Coherence Tomography in Acute Vessel Evaluation
Ischemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CT-FFR guided strategy and QFR guided strategy in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Zhe Zheng, MD, PhD (+86 88396051, zhengzhe@fuwai.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs) within 12 Months Post-Procedure (time frame: 12 Months Post-Procedural Follow-Up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.