AzTrials
AzTrials

Forward Head PostureNCT07317999

Effect of Scapular Retraction Exercises Versus McKenzie Method on CVA

A study testing Scapular Retraction Exercises (SRE) and McKenzie Method Exercises in people with Forward Head Posture and Craniovertebral Angle, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this quasi-experimental study is to compare the effectiveness of scapular retraction exercises versus the McKenzie method in improving craniovertebral angle (CVA), reducing neck pain, and minimizing neck disability among university students exhibiting forward head posture. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 17 to 23 years
What is being tested?
Scapular Retraction Exercises (SRE) and McKenzie Method Exercises
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
116 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Oct 2024to 7 Feb 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 17 to 23 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • University students with FHP
  • Able to participate in exercise programs
  • Free from severe musculoskeletal disorders or recent injuries

Who cannot join

  • Students with contraindication to exercise,
  • Individuals with neurological conditions affecting posture

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Nursing

    Al Mansurah

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Craniovertebral Angle and Neck Disability Among University Students With Forward Head Posture: A Comparative Study of Scapular Retraction Exercises Versus McKenzie Method

The goal of this quasi-experimental study is to compare the effectiveness of scapular retraction exercises versus the McKenzie method in improving craniovertebral angle (CVA), reducing neck pain, and minimizing neck disability among university students exhibiting forward head posture. The main question[s] it aims to answer [is/are]:

  • Which of both exercises (scapular retraction or McKenzie method exercises) will be more effective in improvement craniovertebral alignment, alleviated pain, and decreased neck disability?

Group A performed scapular retraction exercises, while Group B practiced McKenzie method exercises. Both interventions were administered for 20 minutes, three times weekly over eight weeks.

Being tested
Scapular Retraction Exercises (SRE), McKenzie Method Exercises

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Scapular Retraction Exercises (SRE)Procedure or surgery

    Strengthen upper back muscles (scapular muscles, particularly the middle and lower trapezius and rhomboids) and improve posture.

  • McKenzie Method ExercisesProcedure or surgery

    • Aim: Focus on self-treatment for neck pain and posture.
    • Duration: 20 minutes, 3 times a week
Study groups in NCT07317999
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Experimentalscapular retraction exercises
Receives: Procedure: Scapular Retraction Exercises (SRE)
2ExperimentalMcKenzie method exercises
Receives: Procedure: McKenzie Method Exercises

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Craniovertebral Angle (CVA)

    The angle is formed at the intersection of a horizontal line passing through the C7 spinous process and a line joining the midpoint of the tragus of the ear to the skin overlying the C7 spinous process.

    Measured: 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jan 2026
  2. Study start1 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion12 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion7 Feb 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
116 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07317999
Sponsor's protocol ID
Forward Head Posture 0686
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
19 Dec 2025
Last updated
6 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Salama HA, Alshawish E, Elwasefy SA, Elsherbiny OE. Craniovertebral angle and neck disability among university students with forward head posture: a comparative study of scapular retraction exercises versus McKenzie method. Sci Rep. 2026 May 14;16(1):22096. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-52224-0.

    PubMed 42135384

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Scapular Retraction Exercises (SRE) and McKenzie Method Exercises in people with Forward Head Posture and Craniovertebral Angle, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07317999, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in