Effect of I-PRF Application on ALP and MMP-9 Levels in Teeth With Apical Periodontitis

The study was conducted with 60 volunteer patients aged 18-64, classified as ASA I, who presented to the Department of Endodontics at the Faculty of Dentistry, Kırıkkale University. They had chronic apical periodontitis in the upper or lower jaw and a periapical lesion diameter of less than 1 cm on either incisor or premolar. Before starting root canal treatment, GCF samples were collected from the included teeth. Plaque on the tooth surface from which GCF samples were to be collected was removed with cotton pellets, and then isolated with a cotton roll. The teeth were dried with compressed air. Paper strips were inserted into the pocket from the mesiobuccal and distobuccal surfaces of the tooth. They were advanced until pressure was felt at the pocket base. GCF was collected by holding the paper strips in the sulcus for 30 seconds. The GCF volume of the paper strips was measured using a Periotron 8000 device, and the researcher recorded the volumes. Paper strips contaminated with blood or saliva were excluded from the study. The paper strips included in the study were placed in Eppendorf tubes and stored at -20°C, then at -80°C, until the ELISA experiments were performed.

Sterile paper points were used to collect periapical exudate samples from teeth after the shaping and irrigation protocols were completed. The root canals were dried to the working length using a #40 paper point. The #20 paper points, adjusted to a length 2 mm longer than the working length, were moved 2 mm from the apical stop and held for 1 minute. The process was repeated three times. A 4-mm cut was made at the ends of the periapical exudate-impregnated paper points with sterile surgical scissors, and the resulting segments were transferred to the Eppendorf tubes. After collecting the periapical sample, calcium hydroxide paste was placed in the canal. The tooth was temporarily sealed with composite resin to prevent contamination between sessions.

The procedures described above were performed identically in both groups. In the i-PRF group, five cc of blood was collected from the patients' antecubital vein into a glass-coated plastic tube without anticoagulant. I-PRF was centrifuged at 700 rpm for 3 minutes. After centrifugation, the i-PRF obtained at the top of the tube was collected using a syringe. The canal length measured during treatment was used to apply i-PRF at the point closest to the tooth apex. To ensure standardization across all patients, 0.5 cc of i-PRF was injected submucosally at the designated site. In the second session, following isolation and disinfection as described in the first session, GCF samples were collected, and after the final irrigation procedure, PAE samples were collected. The root canals were obturated by the lateral condensation method using gutta-percha cones and root canal sealer. Permanent restorations were made with composite resin. The samples were analyzed with ELISA. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 27.0, and a 95% confidence level was achieved. Frequency and percentage (n (%)) are given for categorical (qualitative) variables, while mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and median values are given for numerical (quantitative) variables. The dependent-samples t-test and the Wilcoxon test were used for repeated measurements in the study. The independent-samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare groups. The Spearman correlation test was used for relationships between measurements.