AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Lymphobkastic LeukemiaNCT07330141

Optimizing Recovery in Pediatric ALL Survivors: A Training Comparison

A study testing Constant-load Aerobic Exercise, Graded Aerobic exercise and Structured Exercise regemin in people with Acute Lymphobkastic Leukemia, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compared the effects of constant-load aerobic exercise (CL-AEx) and graded aerobic exercise (G-AEx) on cardiopulmonary fitness and functional capacity in pediatric survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Lymphobkastic Leukemia
What is being tested?
Constant-load Aerobic Exercise, Graded Aerobic exercise and Structured Exercise regemin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteSaudi Arabia
Study dates
3 Dec 2023to 31 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 10 and 18 years old
  • Complete maintenance chemotherapy
  • Normal cardiac structure and function
  • Absence of lower limb deformities
  • Not engaging in regular exercise regimens

Who cannot join

  • Secondary cancers
  • Neurodegenerative impairments affecting memory, attention, or executive functioning
  • Neuro-musculoskeletal conditions are likely to impede the training.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Saudi Arabia1 site
  • Ragab K. Elnaggar

    Al Kharj, Riyadh Region

Other trials in Saudi Arabia

About this study

Official title: Optimizing Post-Chemotherapy Recovery: A Head-to-Head Trial of Graded vs. Constant-Load Aerobic Exercise in Pediatric ALL Survivors

This study compared the effects of constant-load aerobic exercise (CL-AEx) and graded aerobic exercise (G-AEx) on cardiopulmonary fitness and functional capacity in pediatric survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

A cohort of 72 pediatric ALL survivors was randomly assigned to one of three groups: a CL-AEx group (n=24), a G-AEx group (n=24), or a control group (n=24). All groups participated in a structured exercise regimen. The CL-AEx group performed additional moderate-intensity aerobic training at a fixed load, while the G-AEx group performed additional aerobic training with progressive increases in intensity and duration. The control group performed the structured exercise regimen only. Interventions were administered three times per week for 12 consecutive weeks.

Cardiopulmonary fitness and functional capacity were assessed in all three groups at baseline and following the completion of the 12-week intervention.

Read the detailed description

Seventy-two pediatric ALL survivors were recruited from the Pediatric Oncology and Hematology departments of three referral hospitals in the Riyadh region, Saudi Arabia. Inclusion criteria required participants to be aged 10-18 years, have completed chemotherapy, present with secondary sarcopenia, and possess normal cardiac structure and function without lower limb deformities. Participants were also required to be non-regular exercisers. Exclusion criteria included a history of secondary cancers, neurodegenerative impairments affecting memory, attention, or executive function, or any neuromusculoskeletal condition likely to impede training compliance (e.g., recurrent intensive cramps or impaired proprioceptive function).

Outcome Measures

Cardiopulmonary Fitness: Peak oxygen uptake (VO₂ peak) was assessed using the McMaster cycle ergometer protocol.

Functional Capacity: This was evaluated via three performance-based tests: the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the Timed Up and Down Stairs Test (TUDS), and the 4x10 Meter Shuttle Run Test.

Interventions

All interventions were delivered three times per week for 12 consecutive weeks under close supervision by an experienced pediatric physical therapist.

Constant-Load Aerobic Exercise (CL-AEx) Group: This group (n=24) performed a structured exercise regimen plus a moderate-intensity aerobic training program. The aerobic component was maintained at a constant intensity of 65% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 45 minutes per session, each preceded by a 5-minute warm-up and followed by a 5-minute cool-down.

Graded Aerobic Exercise (G-AEx) Group: This group (n=24) performed the same structured exercise regimen plus an aerobic program with progressive intensity and duration. Starting at 50% of maximum age-predicted heart rate for 25 minutes, the parameters were increased every two weeks, culminating at 75% for 50 minutes in the final two weeks. Each session also included a 5-minute warm-up and cool-down.

Control Group: This group (n=24) performed only the structured exercise regimen for 45 minutes per session. The regimen included flexibility exercises, progressive resistance training, balance training, and conditioning activities.

Being tested
Constant-load Aerobic Exercise, Graded Aerobic exercise, Structured Exercise regemin

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Constant-load Aerobic ExerciseOther

    The CL-AEx group completed a 12-week, moderate-intensity aerobic training program in addition to the structured exercise regimen. The aerobic component was performed three times per week at a fixed intensity of 65% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 45 minutes per session. Each session included a 5-minute warm-up and a 5-minute cool-down. The intensity and duration remained constant throughout the intervention period.

  • Graded Aerobic exerciseOther

    The G-AEx group completed a 12-week aerobic training program that progressively increased in intensity and duration, in addition to the structured exercise regimen. Sessions were conducted three times per week. The program commenced at an intensity of 50% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 25 minutes. Parameters were increased every two weeks, culminating in an intensity of 75% for 50 minutes during the final two weeks. Each session included a standard 5-minute warm-up and 5-minute cool-down.

  • Structured Exercise regeminOther

    The structured exercise regimen was conducted three times per week for 45 minutes per session over 12 consecutive weeks. Each session consisted of flexibility exercises, progressive resistance training, balance training, and low-intensity conditioning activities.

Study groups in NCT07330141
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CL-AEx groupExperimentalThe CL-AEx group received a 12-week constant-load aerobic training besides a structured exercise program.
Receives: Other: Constant-load Aerobic Exercise
G-AEx groupExperimentalThe G-AEx group received a 12-week intensity- and duration-graded aerobic training in addition to a structured exercise program.
Receives: Other: Graded Aerobic exercise
Control groupActive comparatorThe control group received the structured exercise program only for 12 consecutive weeks.
Receives: Other: Structured Exercise regemin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Peak oxygen uptake

    The peak oxygen uptake (mL/kg/min) was assessed through a symptom-free exercise tolerance test (i.e., the McMaster cycling protocol).

    Measured: 2 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Six-minute walk test

    This test identified the maximum distance (m) that each patient was able to cover over six minutes on a straight flat 30-m walkway, without running or jogging. Walking is regarded as more efficient in line with a longer distance coverage.

    Measured: 2 months

  2. 4x10 meter Shuttle Run test

    This test identified the maximum distance (m) that each patient was able to cover over six minutes on a straight flat 30-m walkway, without running or jogging. Walking is regarded as more efficient in line with a longer distance coverage.

    Measured: 2 months

  3. Timed up and down stairs test

    This test measured the time (seconds) that each patient took to climb up and down a 14-step stair flight (each 20 cm in height). Better performance is indicated by a shorter time.

    Measured: 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jan 2026
  2. Study start3 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A prospective, three-arm, randomized controlled trial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
72 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07330141
Sponsor's protocol ID
RHPT/0023/0029
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
29 Dec 2025
Last updated
26 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Constant-load Aerobic Exercise, Graded Aerobic exercise and Structured Exercise regemin in people with Acute Lymphobkastic Leukemia, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Peak oxygen uptake (time frame: 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in