ADHD - Attention Deficit Disorder With HyperactivityDASHNCT07339696
Danish Access to Support and Help (DASH): Increasing Access to an Evidence-based Intervention for Children With ADHD and Their Parents
An observational study of ADHD - Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity and Attention Concentration Difficulty, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to devise implementation strategies for the New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP) to support a community implementation model (NFPP-CIM) and test its feasibility and acceptability for parents and stakeholders. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 12 years
- Conditions the study is for
- ADHD - Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity, Attention Concentration Difficulty
- What is being tested?
- New Forest Parenting Programme
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 15 Feb 2022to 31 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 12 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: The study population includes families receiving services through municipal child and family clinics in Denmark. Participating families have children aged 3-12 years who present with parent-perceived difficulties related to attention and activity regulation, including diagnosed or suspected ADHD. All custodial parents provide informed consent and complete the quantitative outcome measures. In addition, the study includes community practitioners, managers, and other stakeholders involved in delivering and supporting the New Forest Parenting Programme - Community Implementation Model (NFPP-CIM). These participants complete semistructured interviews and contribute qualitative data related to feasibility, acceptability, and implementation processes and do not complete quantitative outcome questionnaires (see detailed study description).
Who may be able to join
- Families receiving services through municipal child and family clinics in Denmark
- Child aged 3-12 years
- Parent-perceived difficulties with attention and activity regulation, including those with a diagnosis or suspected diagnosis of ADHD.
- All custodial parents willing and able to provide informed consent
- Parents interested in participating in the New Forest Parenting Programme - Community Implementation Model (NFPP-CIM)
Who cannot join
- Families not receiving services through municipal child and family clinics
- Parents unable to provide informed consent
- Families unable to participate in the intervention due to severe child or family circumstances that preclude engagement (e.g. acute crisis requiring alternative services, Parents or children with severe mental or physical illness that would prevent active participation in the intervention)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Denmark1 site
Forskningsafdelingen - Børne- og Ungdomspsykiatrisk Afdeling, Psykiatrien-Skejby
Aarhus, 8200
About this study
Official title: DANISH TITLE: Projekt Rette hjælp Til børn Med ADHD Eller Udfordringer Med Uro og Koncentration
The aim of this study is to devise implementation strategies for the New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP) to support a community implementation model (NFPP-CIM) and test its feasibility and acceptability for parents and stakeholders.
Read the detailed description
Background Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental condition associated with substantial individual and societal costs. Although effective behavioural interventions such as the New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP) are available, access to evidence-based parent training remains limited in community settings. The current study addresses the gap between research and practice by supporting the implementation of NFPP within local Child and Family Services in Danish municipalities.
Purpose and Rationale The primary aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a community implementation model for the New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP-CIM). The project is designed as a Hybrid Type II feasibility study, focusing on both implementation processes and perceived effects in real-world community contexts. The study seeks to determine whether the NFPP-CIM can support feasible, acceptable, and sustainable delivery of NFPP by local practitioners, thereby informing future large-scale implementation.
Objectives
The study objectives are guided by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework and include:
To develop an NFPP Community Implementation Model (NFPP-CIM) tailored to Danish municipal contexts.
To assess the feasibility and acceptability of the NFPP-CIM among families of children with ADHD or difficulties related to attention and activity regulation, as well as among community-level stakeholders (e.g. practitioners and managers).
To explore perceived changes in family functioning and everyday life associated with participation in NFPP-CIM, and to consider how these experiences align with findings previously reported in specialist settings.
Study Design and Setting The study will employ a pre-post hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. NFPP-CIM will be delivered in three Danish municipalities by trained community practitioners in collaboration with local child and family services. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected to examine implementation outcomes and user experiences. The project emphasizes co-creation, user participation, and interagency collaboration to strengthen local ownership and sustainability.
Implementation Outcomes Consistent with the study's implementation focus, feasibility and acceptability constitute central outcomes of the project.
Feasibility of implementing the NFPP-CIM will be assessed using quantitative implementation indicators, including:
Recruitment rate, defined as the proportion of eligible families who consent to participate (assessed from initial contact to enrollment).
Completion rate, defined as the proportion of enrolled families who complete the intervention and post-intervention assessment.
Practitioner adherence, defined as fidelity to the NFPP-CIM manual, assessed through session checklists completed throughout the intervention period (approximately 16 weeks).
Acceptability of the NFPP-CIM will be examined using qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews and brief open-ended satisfaction questionnaires completed by parents. These data will explore the perceived practicality, usefulness, and overall experience of participating in the intervention. Acceptability data will be collected at post-intervention, within six weeks after completion of the programme.
Expected Outcomes and Significance Findings will provide insight into how NFPP can be effectively implemented and scaled up in community settings. Specifically, the study will inform refinement of NFPP training models for local practitioners, strategies for user involvement, and approaches to sustaining cross-sector collaboration. By focusing on real-world feasibility and stakeholder experiences, the study aims to bridge the gap between evidence-based ADHD interventions and community-based practice and to support improved access to high-quality services for families.
- Being tested
- New Forest Parenting Programme
- Keywords
- ADHD parent training
- Medical subject headings
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
New Forest Parenting ProgrammeBehavioural
Parent training for children who has difficulties with attention and activity or ADHD
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NFPP-CIM Implementation Group | The group includes families with children aged 3-12 years with ADHD or attention and activity difficulties, as well as community practitioners, managers, and other local stakeholders involved in delivering the New Forest Parenting Programme - Community Implementation Model (NFPP-CIM). The study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and perceived outcomes of implementing NFPP-CIM in municipal child and family services. Receives: Behavioral: New Forest Parenting Programme |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Outcome (exploratory clinical signal): ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Danish Version - parent ratings
This outcome is included solely as an exploratory signal of change to inform the design of a future fully powered trial; the current study is not powered to detect statistically significant effects.The ADHD-RS is an 18-item questionnaire that addresses child symptoms of ADHD and symptoms of oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder on a four point scale ('not at all' to 'very often') (DuPaul, G.J., et al., Parent ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms: Factor structure and normative data. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 1998. 20(1): p. 83-102.)
Measured: Change in ADHD symptoms measured by ADHD-RS from baseline to post-intervention. I.e. From T1: enrolment (baseline) to T2: T2 (End of treatment): approximately 16 weeks after T1 to T3 (Follow-up): approximately 36 weeks after T2.
Secondary outcomes (3)
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - Danish parent version
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief, validated screening measure of emotional and behavioural difficulties in children and adolescents aged 2-17 years. It consists of 25 items rated on a 3-point scale (0 = Not true, 1 = Somewhat true, 2 = Certainly true). The following scores are used in this study:
- Total Difficulties Score: Sum of four subscales (Emotional Symptoms, Conduct Problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer Problems; 20 items).
Score range: 0-40. Higher scores indicate greater difficulties (worse outcome).
- Conduct Problems Subscale: Five items assessing behavioural difficulties. Score range: 0-10. Higher scores indicate greater conduct problems (worse outcome).
- Impact Score (SDQ Impact Supplement): Assesses perceived distress and functional impairment related to the child's difficulties in everyday life.
Score range: 0-10. Higher scores indicate greater impact and impairment (worse outcome).
Measured: Change in SDQ scores from baseline (T1) at enrollment, to post-intervention (T2) approximately 16 weeks after T1, and to follow-up (T3) approximately 36 weeks after T2.
The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) Danish version - parent ratings
The Parent Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) is a widely used questionnaire assessing parents' perceived competence in their parenting role. There are separate mother and father versions of the PSOC. The PSOC consists of 16 items rated on a 6-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and yields two subscale scores:
Satisfaction subscale: 9 items assessing parental satisfaction, anxiety, motivation, and frustration.
Efficacy subscale: 7 items assessing perceived parenting competence, capability, and problem-solving ability.
Score range:
Total score: 16-96 (Satisfaction and Efficacy subscales scored separately)
Interpretation:
Higher scores indicate greater parental competence and confidence / better outcome.
Measured: Change in PSOC scores from baseline (T1) at enrollment, to post-intervention (T2) approximately 16 weeks after T1, and to follow-up (T3) approximately 36 weeks after T2.
Family Strain Index (FSI) - parent ratings
The Family Strain Index (FSI) is a 6-item questionnaire measuring the impact of the child's ADHD-related difficulties on family life, including stress, strain, and burden.
Score range: 0-24 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater family strain and burden / worse outcome.
Measured: Change in FSI scores from baseline (T1) at enrollment, to post-intervention (T2) approximately 16 weeks after T1, and to follow-up (T3) approximately 36 weeks after T2.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jan 2026
- Study start15 Feb 2022
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025
- Study completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ADHD - Attention Deficit Disorder With HyperactivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Aalborg University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anne-Mette Lange, Principal investigator, Aarhus University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07339696
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 152531
- Other IDs
- 152531
- Acronym
- DASH
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 14 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be shared due to data protection regulations
Publications
Alexandre, J.L., et al., The ADHD rating scale-IV preschool version: Factor structure, reliability, validity, and standardisation in a Danish community sample. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2018. 78: p. 125-135. Arnfred, J., et al., Danish norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Danish medical journal, 2019. 66(6). Borrelli, B., The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. 2011. p. S52-S63. Bowen, D.J., et al., How we design feasibility studies. American journal of preventive medicine, 2009. 36(5): p. 452-457. Cohen, A.N., et al., Improving care quality through hybrid implementation/effectiveness studies: Best practices in design, methods, and measures. Implementation Science, 2015. 10(1): p. A29. Curran, G.M., et al., Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Medical care, 2012. 50(3): p. 217. Damschroder, L.J., et al., Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 2009. 4(1): p. DuPaul, G.J., et al., Parent ratings of attention-deficit/hyperFactor structure and normative data. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 1998. 20(1): p. 83-102. Fixsen, D., et al., Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional children, 2013. 79(2): p. 213. Fixsen, D., et al., Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional Children, 2013. Goodman, R., et al., Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2000. 177(6): p. 534.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- DANISH TITLE: Projekt Rette hjælp Til børn Med ADHD Eller Udfordringer Med Uro og Koncentration
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07339696
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DASH / 152531
- Keywords
- ADHD parent training
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Aalborg University Hospital
- Study start
- 15 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to devise implementation strategies for the New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP) to support a community implementation model (NFPP-CIM) and test its feasibility and acceptability for parents and stakeholders.
Detailed description
Background Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental condition associated with substantial individual and societal costs. Although effective behavioural interventions such as the New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP) are available, access to evidence-based parent training remains limited in community settings. The current study addresses the gap between research and practice by supporting the implementation of NFPP within local Child and Family Services in Danish municipalities.
Purpose and Rationale The primary aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a community implementation model for the New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP-CIM). The project is designed as a Hybrid Type II feasibility study, focusing on both implementation processes and perceived effects in real-world community contexts. The study seeks to determine whether the NFPP-CIM can support feasible, acceptable, and sustainable delivery of NFPP by local practitioners, thereby informing future large-scale implementation.
Objectives
The study objectives are guided by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework and include:
To develop an NFPP Community Implementation Model (NFPP-CIM) tailored to Danish municipal contexts.
To assess the feasibility and acceptability of the NFPP-CIM among families of children with ADHD or difficulties related to attention and activity regulation, as well as among community-level stakeholders (e.g. practitioners and managers).
To explore perceived changes in family functioning and everyday life associated with participation in NFPP-CIM, and to consider how these experiences align with findings previously reported in specialist settings.
Study Design and Setting The study will employ a pre-post hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. NFPP-CIM will be delivered in three Danish municipalities by trained community practitioners in collaboration with local child and family services. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected to examine implementation outcomes and user experiences. The project emphasizes co-creation, user participation, and interagency collaboration to strengthen local ownership and sustainability.
Implementation Outcomes Consistent with the study's implementation focus, feasibility and acceptability constitute central outcomes of the project.
Feasibility of implementing the NFPP-CIM will be assessed using quantitative implementation indicators, including:
Recruitment rate, defined as the proportion of eligible families who consent to participate (assessed from initial contact to enrollment).
Completion rate, defined as the proportion of enrolled families who complete the intervention and post-intervention assessment.
Practitioner adherence, defined as fidelity to the NFPP-CIM manual, assessed through session checklists completed throughout the intervention period (approximately 16 weeks).
Acceptability of the NFPP-CIM will be examined using qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews and brief open-ended satisfaction questionnaires completed by parents. These data will explore the perceived practicality, usefulness, and overall experience of participating in the intervention. Acceptability data will be collected at post-intervention, within six weeks after completion of the programme.
Expected Outcomes and Significance Findings will provide insight into how NFPP can be effectively implemented and scaled up in community settings. Specifically, the study will inform refinement of NFPP training models for local practitioners, strategies for user involvement, and approaches to sustaining cross-sector collaboration. By focusing on real-world feasibility and stakeholder experiences, the study aims to bridge the gap between evidence-based ADHD interventions and community-based practice and to support improved access to high-quality services for families.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NFPP-CIM Implementation Group | – | Behavioral: New Forest Parenting ProgrammeThe group includes families with children aged 3-12 years with ADHD or attention and activity difficulties, as well as community practitioners, managers, and other local stakeholders involved in delivering the New Forest Parenting Programme - Community Implementation Model (NFPP-CIM). The study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and perceived outcomes of implementing NFPP-CIM in municipal child and family services. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- The study population includes families receiving services through municipal child and family clinics in Denmark. Participating families have children aged 3-12 years who present with parent-perceived difficulties related to attention and activity regulation, including diagnosed or suspected ADHD. All custodial parents provide informed consent and complete the quantitative outcome measures. In addition, the study includes community practitioners, managers, and other stakeholders involved in delivering and supporting the New Forest Parenting Programme - Community Implementation Model (NFPP-CIM). These participants complete semistructured interviews and contribute qualitative data related to feasibility, acceptability, and implementation processes and do not complete quantitative outcome questionnaires (see detailed study description).
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Families receiving services through municipal child and family clinics in Denmark
- Child aged 3-12 years
- Parent-perceived difficulties with attention and activity regulation, including those with a diagnosis or suspected diagnosis of ADHD.
- All custodial parents willing and able to provide informed consent
- Parents interested in participating in the New Forest Parenting Programme - Community Implementation Model (NFPP-CIM)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Families not receiving services through municipal child and family clinics
- Parents unable to provide informed consent
- Families unable to participate in the intervention due to severe child or family circumstances that preclude engagement (e.g. acute crisis requiring alternative services, Parents or children with severe mental or physical illness that would prevent active participation in the intervention)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| New Forest Parenting ProgrammeParent training for children who has difficulties with attention and activity or ADHD | Behavioural | NFPP-CIM Implementation Group |
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome (exploratory clinical signal): ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Danish Version - parent ratings
Time frame: Change in ADHD symptoms measured by ADHD-RS from baseline to post-intervention. I.e. From T1: enrolment (baseline) to T2: T2 (End of treatment): approximately 16 weeks after T1 to T3 (Follow-up): approximately 36 weeks after T2.
This outcome is included solely as an exploratory signal of change to inform the design of a future fully powered trial; the current study is not powered to detect statistically significant effects.The ADHD-RS is an 18-item questionnaire that addresses child symptoms of ADHD and symptoms of oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder on a four point scale ('not at all' to 'very often') (DuPaul, G.J., et al., Parent ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms: Factor structure and normative data. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 1998. 20(1): p. 83-102.)
3 secondary outcomes
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - Danish parent version
Time frame: Change in SDQ scores from baseline (T1) at enrollment, to post-intervention (T2) approximately 16 weeks after T1, and to follow-up (T3) approximately 36 weeks after T2.
The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) Danish version - parent ratings
Time frame: Change in PSOC scores from baseline (T1) at enrollment, to post-intervention (T2) approximately 16 weeks after T1, and to follow-up (T3) approximately 36 weeks after T2.
Family Strain Index (FSI) - parent ratings
Time frame: Change in FSI scores from baseline (T1) at enrollment, to post-intervention (T2) approximately 16 weeks after T1, and to follow-up (T3) approximately 36 weeks after T2.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jan 2026.
- BackgroundAlexandre, J.L., et al., The ADHD rating scale-IV preschool version: Factor structure, reliability, validity, and standardisation in a Danish community sample. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2018. 78: p. 125-135. Arnfred, J., et al., Danish norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Danish medical journal, 2019. 66(6). Borrelli, B., The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. 2011. p. S52-S63. Bowen, D.J., et al., How we design feasibility studies. American journal of preventive medicine, 2009. 36(5): p. 452-457. Cohen, A.N., et al., Improving care quality through hybrid implementation/effectiveness studies: Best practices in design, methods, and measures. Implementation Science, 2015. 10(1): p. A29. Curran, G.M., et al., Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Medical care, 2012. 50(3): p. 217. Damschroder, L.J., et al., Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 2009. 4(1): p. DuPaul, G.J., et al., Parent ratings of attention-deficit/hyperFactor structure and normative data. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 1998. 20(1): p. 83-102. Fixsen, D., et al., Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional children, 2013. 79(2): p. 213. Fixsen, D., et al., Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional Children, 2013. Goodman, R., et al., Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2000. 177(6): p. 534.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be shared due to data protection regulations
Related trials for ADHD - Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity
RecruitingObservational study
Psychotherapy for Irritability in Youth: Comparing Active Treatment to Nonactive Psychoeducation Supportive Psychotherapy
Irritability, Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ALKS 7290 Compared With Placebo in Adult Participants With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ALKS 7290-201)
Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity (ADHD)
RecruitingObservational study
Pharmacogenomics of Stimulant Treatment Response
Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
RecruitingObservational study
Augmenting Parent Management Training for Child Temper Outbursts Using a Digital Tool
Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Conduct Disorder
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Anne-Mette Lange principal investigator
Aarhus University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of ADHD - Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity and Attention Concentration Difficulty, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Outcome (exploratory clinical signal): ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Danish Version - parent ratings (time frame: Change in ADHD symptoms measured by ADHD-RS from baseline to post-intervention. I.e. From T1: enrolment (baseline) to T2: T2 (End of treatment): approximately 16 weeks after T1 to T3 (Follow-up): approximately 36 weeks after T2.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07339696, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2026.