AzTrials
AzTrials

Patient ReadmissionNCT07349901

Predicting Hospital Readmission for Surgical Patients Using Deep Learning Models With Smart Watch and Smart Ring Sensors Data

An observational study of Patient Readmission, run by Getúlio Vargas University Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hospital readmissions are an important measure of healthcare quality and safety. These events create a substantial burden for patients, families, and health systems because they may increase costs, extend recovery time, and lead to more serious postoperative complications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Patient Readmission
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
4 Mar 2026to Jun 2028
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population will consist of adult patients scheduled for medium- and large-scale elective surgeries at the Hospital Universitário Getúlio Vargas, a tertiary referral center in Amazonas. Patients are initially evaluated at the affiliated outpatient clinic, Ambulatório Araújo Lima. Eligible individuals will be invited to participate during preoperative consultations with the attending surgeon, approximately 15 days before hospital admission. Study procedures, information delivery, and informed consent will be conducted by the surgical specialists responsible for outpatient care.

Who may be able to join

  • Adults over 18 years of age;
  • Hospitalization for medium and/or large elective surgery at HUGV;
  • Conscious and oriented patients who have sufficient understanding to answer questionnaires and use wearable devices for the study;
  • Have minimal skills in the use of wearable technologies;
  • Patients who have agreed to participate voluntarily in the research by signing the Informed Consent Form (ICF).
  • Non-inclusion Criteria:
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Presence of tattoos or any other skin condition (skin pathologies or skin diseases such as vitiligo, lupus, and atopic dermatitis, among others) that affects the area of the wrist or finger where the wearable sensors are located;
  • Presence of any type of sensitivity or allergic reaction, of any degree, to the materials of the wearables (smartwatch and smartring);
  • Pregnant and lactating women;
  • Participants with implantable cardiac devices, such as pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and resynchronization devices;
  • Participants in drugs abuse;

Who cannot join

  • Severe medical conditions and decompensations prior to surgery;
  • Patients who die before hospital discharge;
  • Patients with an expected postoperative hospital stay of more than 10 days.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Robson Luís Oliveira de Amorim, PhD contact

+55 92 99403-4101

robsonamorim@ufam.edu.br

Maria Elizete de Almeida Araújo, Doctor of Health Science- DHSc contact

+55 92 99114-3693

elizetemanaus@ufam.edu.br

Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Getúlio Vargas University Hospital

    Manaus, Amazonas, 69020-170

    Plinío José Cavalcante Monteiro, +55 (92) 3305-4813, plinio.monteiro@ebserh.gov.br

    Recruiting

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Hospital readmissions are an important measure of healthcare quality and safety. These events create a substantial burden for patients, families, and health systems because they may increase costs, extend recovery time, and lead to more serious postoperative complications. Predicting which patients are at higher risk of readmission remains difficult, as many complications begin silently and are not easily identified in routine clinical evaluations.

This study aims to evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) can help predict hospital readmissions in surgical patients by analyzing physiological and behavioral data collected before and after surgery. To achieve this, participants will use wearable devices-specifically a smartwatch and a smart ring-capable of continuously monitoring health biomarkers such as heart rate, electrocardiogram (ECG), oxygen saturation, sleep patterns, blood pressure trends, body composition through bioimpedance, and stress indicators. These devices are provided through a technology partnership and sponsorship from Samsung, which supports the study with advanced health technologies.

Read more

This is a prospective, single-center cohort study conducted at the main tertiary hospital in the state of Amazonas. Approximately 225 to 300 adults undergoing medium- or large-scale elective surgeries will be invited to participate over a 25-month period. All participants will provide informed consent. After enrollment, the study will collect demographic information, preoperative assessments, validated sleep questionnaires, comorbidity indexes such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index, laboratory exams, pulmonary function tests, intraoperative and postoperative data, and hospital discharge information.

Participants will be continuously monitored using wearable devices during their hospital stay-including the first 48 hours in the intensive care unit when applicable-and for 30 days after hospital discharge. These physiological data will be integrated with clinical and laboratory information to create a comprehensive dataset.

The primary objective is to develop and test artificial intelligence models capable of predicting 30-day hospital readmission following elective surgery. Both deep learning approaches and classical machine-learning techniques will be evaluated. By analyzing large volumes of continuous physiologic data, these models may identify early signs of postoperative deterioration that would otherwise go unnoticed.

If successful, this study may improve postoperative care, support earlier clinical intervention, reduce complications, and help healthcare teams provide safer recovery pathways for surgical patients.

Read the detailed description

Hospital readmissions are well established as key indicators of healthcare quality, particularly in the postoperative setting. Unplanned readmissions often reflect complications that were not fully predicted or adequately managed, generating substantial financial and clinical burden for health systems. In the United States, 3.8 million adult readmissions occurred within 30 days in 2018, with an average cost of US$15,200 per event. In Brazil, similarly high readmission rates have been reported, with 13.4% of more than 22,000 hospitalizations resulting in return visits, largely due to hospital infection, obstructive sleep apnea, and cardiac arrhythmias. Sleep disturbances-including obstructive sleep apnea-are among the most significant contributors to postoperative complications and readmissions. They delay recovery, increase pain sensitivity, impair cognition, and elevate cardiovascular risk. Vascular comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia further worsen outcomes by increasing the likelihood of ischemic events, impaired wound healing, and respiratory instability. Understanding how physiologic, behavioral, and sleep-related variables interact to influence postoperative recovery is essential for designing early detection and prevention strategies.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown increasing promise in predicting clinical deterioration and identifying high-risk patients across multiple surgical fields. A recent systematic review of 26 studies demonstrated that AI-based models-including natural language processing, classical machine-learning algorithms, and deep learning methods-can accurately predict hospital readmissions following major surgery. However, most available datasets do not combine preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and continuous physiologic signals collected in real time from wearable devices, representing a major gap in the literature. This prospective cohort study aims to address this gap by integrating high-resolution physiologic and behavioral data captured from wearable devices-specifically smartwatches and smart rings-into a unified perioperative database, with the overarching goal of developing AI models capable of predicting unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days after surgery.

The study seeks to build a comprehensive database of patients undergoing medium- to large-scale elective surgeries, capturing physiologic and behavioral data from wearables and multiparametric monitors during the pre- and post-operative periods, including continuous monitoring in the first 48 hours of intensive care when indicated. Data collection will include continuous wearable monitoring via a web-based interface developed by CETELI/UFAM, pre- and post-operative clinical assessments, laboratory tests, imaging studies, pulmonary function evaluations, polysomnography, and validated sleep questionnaires. The study will evaluate correlations between physiologic and sleep-related variables derived from smartwatches and smart rings and the risk of hospital readmission.

Additionally, the study will develop applications for smartwatch and smart ring use in perioperative data capture and employ machine learning approaches-including deep architectures such as causal convolutional networks and recurrent neural networks, as well as classical methods such as support vector machines and decision trees-to predict hospital readmissions. Associations between wearable-derived sleep parameters and 30-day readmission risk will be analyzed, pre- and post-operative sleep data will be correlated with polysomnography and questionnaire results, and sleep quality will be compared between preoperative and post-operative periods.

This research is conducted through a multidisciplinary collaboration between the Hospital Universitário Getúlio Vargas (HUGV-UFAM/Ebserh), and the Center for Research and Development in Electronic and Information Technology (CETELI/UFAM). CETELI will be responsible for developing the data-collection software, storage architecture, and predictive algorithms, while clinical oversight, recruitment, and protocol execution will be led by HUGV.

Beyond scientific relevance, this project has significant practical importance. In geographically complex regions such as the Amazon, continuous remote monitoring using wearable devices can enhance follow-up, reduce disparities in access to postoperative care, and enable earlier identification of complications. Integrating AI-based prediction models with hospital workflows may ultimately reduce costs, optimize patient flow, and improve the safety and quality of surgical care.

Keywords
Hospital Readmission, Postoperative Complications, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Wearable Electronic Devices, Physiological Monitoring, Sleep Disorders, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Perioperative Care, Amazon Region, Predictive Modeling
Medical subject headings
Postoperative Complications, Sleep Wake Disorders

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 30-day hospital readmission

    Occurrence of any unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days after discharge following medium- and large-scale surgical procedures. The outcome is binary (Yes/No).

    Measured: Within 30 days post-surgery

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Length of hospital stay

    Total number of days from hospital admission to discharge following the surgical procedure.

    Measured: From hospital admission through hospital discharge, up to postoperative day 10

  2. Need for reoperation

    Any surgical reintervention required during hospitalization or within the 30-day post-operative period.

    Measured: Up to 30 days after surgery

  3. Number of Participants With Surgical Site Infection

    Measured: Up to 30 days post-surgery (or up to hospital discharge if earlier)

  4. 30-day mortality

    All-cause death occurring within 30 days after the surgical procedure.

    Measured: Up to 30 days post-surgery

  5. Subjective Sleep Quality Assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score

    Subjective sleep quality will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) total score, which ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.

    Measured: Pre-operative baseline (2 days before admission) and post-operative follow-up at 14 days after hospital discharge.

  6. Insomnia Severity Assessed by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Total Score

    Insomnia severity will be assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) total score, which ranges from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating more severe insomnia

    Measured: Pre-operative baseline (2 days before hospital admission) and post-operative follow-up at 14 days after hospital discharge.

  7. Risk of Sleep-Disordered Breathing Assessed by the Neck, Obesity, Snoring, Age, Sex (NoSAS) Score

    Risk of sleep-disordered breathing will be assessed using the Neck, Obesity, Snoring, Age, Sex (NoSAS) score, which ranges from 0 to 17, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of sleep-disordered breathing.

    Measured: Pre-operative baseline (2 days before hospital admission) and post-operative follow-up at 14 days after hospital discharge.

  8. Daytime Sleepiness Assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score

    Daytime sleepiness will be assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) total score, which ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness.

    Measured: Pre-operative baseline (2 days before hospital admission) and post-operative follow-up at 14 days after hospital discharge.

  9. Total Sleep Time Assessed by Polysomnography

    Total sleep time measured in minutes using overnight polysomnography.

    Measured: Pre-operative baseline (2 days before hospital admission) and post-operative follow-up at 14 days after hospital discharge.

  10. Sleep Efficiency Assessed by Polysomnography

    Sleep efficiency measured as a percentage (%) using overnight polysomnography.

    Measured: Pre-operative baseline (2 days before hospital admission) and post-operative follow-up at 14 days after hospital discharge.

  11. Sleep Latency Assessed by Polysomnography

    Sleep latency measured in minutes using overnight polysomnography.

    Measured: Pre-operative baseline (2 days before hospital admission) and post-operative follow-up at 14 days after hospital discharge.

  12. Wake After Sleep Onset Assessed by Polysomnography

    Wake after sleep onset measured in minutes using overnight polysomnography.

    Measured: Pre-operative baseline (2 days before hospital admission) and post-operative follow-up at 14 days after hospital discharge.

  13. Apnea-Hypopnea Index Assessed by Polysomnography

    Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), measured as the number of events per hour of sleep using overnight polysomnography. Higher values indicate more severe sleep-disordered breathing

    Measured: Pre-operative baseline (2 days before hospital admission) and post-operative follow-up at 14 days after hospital discharge.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jan 2026
  2. Study start4 Mar 2026
  3. Primary completionAug 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07349901
Sponsor's protocol ID
91090825.8.0000.5020
Other IDs
Convênio No 03/2025
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
2 Dec 2025
Last updated
17 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Iucif N Jr, Rocha JS. [Study of inequalities in hospital mortality using the Charlson comorbidity index]. Rev Saude Publica. 2004 Dec;38(6):780-6. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102004000600005. Epub 2004 Dec 10. Portuguese.

    PubMed 15608895
  • Duarte RL, Magalhaes-da-Silveira FJ, Oliveira-E-Sa TS, Silva JA, Mello FC, Gozal D. Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening with a 4-Item Instrument, Named GOAL Questionnaire: Development, Validation and Comparative Study with No-Apnea, STOP-Bang, and NoSAS. Nat Sci Sleep. 2020 Jan 23;12:57-67. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S238255. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32158294
  • Bertolazi AN, Fagondes SC, Hoff LS, Pedro VD, Menna Barreto SS, Johns MW. Portuguese-language version of the Epworth sleepiness scale: validation for use in Brazil. J Bras Pneumol. 2009 Sep;35(9):877-83. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132009000900009. English, Portuguese.

    PubMed 19820814
  • Yanagimori M, Fernandes MD, Grad GF, Monare AB, Garcia BMSP, Rosanelli I, Mariano PMMS, Drummond SPA, O'Driscoll DM, Edwards BA, Lorenzi-Filho G, Genta PR. Abbreviated versions of the insomnia severity index to screen for comorbid insomnia among obstructive sleep apnea patients. Sleep Med. 2025 Feb;126:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.11.035. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

    PubMed 39615273
  • Bertolazi AN, Fagondes SC, Hoff LS, Dartora EG, Miozzo IC, de Barba ME, Barreto SS. Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Sleep Med. 2011 Jan;12(1):70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2010.04.020. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

    PubMed 21145786
  • Hegab Z, Gibbons S, Neyses L, Mamas MA. Role of advanced glycation end products in cardiovascular disease. World J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 26;4(4):90-102. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v4.i4.90.

    PubMed 22558488
  • Vistoli G, De Maddis D, Cipak A, Zarkovic N, Carini M, Aldini G. Advanced glycoxidation and lipoxidation end products (AGEs and ALEs): an overview of their mechanisms of formation. Free Radic Res. 2013 Aug;47 Suppl 1:3-27. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2013.815348.

    PubMed 23767955
  • Atzeni IM, van de Zande SC, Westra J, Zwerver J, Smit AJ, Mulder DJ. The AGE Reader: A non-invasive method to assess long-term tissue damage. Methods. 2022 Jul;203:533-541. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

    PubMed 33636313
  • Amorim RL, Oliveira LM, Malbouisson LM, Nagumo MM, Simoes M, Miranda L, Bor-Seng-Shu E, Beer-Furlan A, De Andrade AF, Rubiano AM, Teixeira MJ, Kolias AG, Paiva WS. Prediction of Early TBI Mortality Using a Machine Learning Approach in a LMIC Population. Front Neurol. 2020 Jan 24;10:1366. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01366. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 32038454
  • Hale AT, Stonko DP, Lim J, Guillamondegui OD, Shannon CN, Patel MB. Using an artificial neural network to predict traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019 Feb 1;23(2):219-226. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.PEDS18370. Epub 2018 Nov 2.

    PubMed 30485240
  • Fares MY, Liu HH, da Silva Etges APB, Zhang B, Warner JJP, Olson JJ, Fedorka CJ, Khan AZ, Best MJ, Kirsch JM, Simon JE, Sanders B, Costouros JG, Zhang X, Jones P, Haas DA, Abboud JA; Avant-Garde Health and Codman Society Value-Based Care Group. Utility of Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing, and Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Hospital Readmissions After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JBJS Rev. 2024 Aug 22;12(8). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00075. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.

    PubMed 39172864
  • Shameer K, Johnson KW, Yahi A, Miotto R, Li LI, Ricks D, Jebakaran J, Kovatch P, Sengupta PP, Gelijns S, Moskovitz A, Darrow B, David DL, Kasarskis A, Tatonetti NP, Pinney S, Dudley JT. PREDICTIVE MODELING OF HOSPITAL READMISSION RATES USING ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD-WIDE MACHINE LEARNING: A CASE-STUDY USING MOUNT SINAI HEART FAILURE COHORT. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2017;22:276-287. doi: 10.1142/9789813207813_0027.

    PubMed 27896982
  • Min X, Yu B, Wang F. Predictive Modeling of the Hospital Readmission Risk from Patients' Claims Data Using Machine Learning: A Case Study on COPD. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 20;9(1):2362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39071-y.

    PubMed 30787351
  • Majumder S, Mondal T, Deen MJ. Wearable Sensors for Remote Health Monitoring. Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jan 12;17(1):130. doi: 10.3390/s17010130.

    PubMed 28085085
  • Rumalla K, Srinivasan VM, Gaddis M, Kan P, Lawton MT, Burkhardt JK. Readmission following extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery in the United States: nationwide rates, causes, risk factors, and volume-driven outcomes. J Neurosurg. 2020 Nov 6;135(2):431-439. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.JNS202117. Print 2021 Aug 1.

    PubMed 33157529

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Patient Readmission, run by Getúlio Vargas University Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Robson Luís Oliveira de Amorim, PhD (+55 92 99403-4101, robsonamorim@ufam.edu.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

30-day hospital readmission (time frame: Within 30 days post-surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07349901, which also lists 21 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in