AzTrials
AzTrials

SleepNCT07350733

Cognitive Training for Student Sleep and Wellness

A study testing Equa in people with Sleep and Well-Being (Psychological Flourishing), run by Carnegie Mellon University at 4 sites in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized control trial (RCT) explores two potential stress reduction interventions: a digital mindfulness program personalized for first year college students and a problem-solving based stress management program. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Sleep, Well-Being (Psychological Flourishing)
What is being tested?
Equa
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
4 sitesUnited States
Study dates
12 Jan 2026to 31 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Carnegie Mellon University, Notre Dame, Columbia, or Penn State undergraduate student in their 1st year of study
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Have a data-enabled smartphone
  • Speak English
  • On campus for the duration of the Spring 2026 semester

Who cannot join

  • Under 18 years of age at time of enrollment
  • Not enrolled full-time as a student

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

United States4 sites
  • Columbia University

    New York, New York, 10027

  • University of Notre Dame

    Notre Dame, Indiana, 46556

  • Carnegie Mellon University

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Pennsylvania State University

    University Park, Pennsylvania, 16802

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Cognitive Training for First-Year Student Sleep and Wellness

This randomized control trial (RCT) explores two potential stress reduction interventions: a digital mindfulness program personalized for first year college students and a problem-solving based stress management program. These interventions were chosen because they rely on evidence-based approaches to stress management: problem-solving for cognitive coping and mindfulness for attention monitoring and acceptance with a focus on concentration, clarity, and equanimity. This selection allows for the assessment of the comparative efficacy of these methods in addressing student stress and stress-related outcomes (sleep duration, mental health, and academic success). Personalization to the college student offers the potential for greater engagement and user satisfaction by tailoring the program while maintaining the empirically driven structure of a digital mindfulness program. The investigators predict greater engagement and satisfaction will lead to higher adherence, and thus more skill-building. In this small RCT, first year college students will complete one of the two intervention conditions: Equa and MyTime. This will allow for the exploration of the effects of personalized mindfulness training compared to an active control condition.

This work has the potential for identifying effective, low-cost tools to help young adults manage their stress and stress-related health and may inform theory and future work on stress modification strategies for other populations. The main trials aims are:

Read more

Specific Aim 1. To explore whether a personalized mindfulness intervention (Equa) leads to greater adherence, engagement and use satisfaction compared to a digital stress management program.

Specific Aim 2. To explore whether a personalized mindfulness intervention leads to greater improvements in student stress and stress-related outcomes compared to a problem solving-based digital stress management program. Outcomes include perceived stress, depressive symptoms, nightly sleep duration, and grades.

Read the detailed description

A sample of 200 first-year undergraduate students enrolled at one of the following universities: Carnegie Mellon University, the University of Notre Dame, Columbia University, Pennsylvania State University, will be recruited to participate in this study for the duration of the spring semester of 2026. Participants will be randomly assigned to complete 14-days of smartphone audio-guided lessons of either mindfulness (N=100) or a stress management program (N=100). Participants will complete baseline measures of stress, psychological well-being, and health behaviors. Participants will also be given a wearable device (FitBit) that will measures sleep and physical activity throughout the semester. For the 7 days prior to the intervention start and 7 days following the completed 14 day intervention, students will complete daily diaries that assess their thoughts, feelings, and experiences throughout the day. Participants will complete two more online surveys with similar questionnaires as the baseline assessment, one within 10 days of completing the intervention, and one at the end of the semester.

Being tested
Equa, Coping Control
Keywords
Mindfulness, University Student, Sleep, Stress

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EquaBehavioural

    Mindfulness for attention monitoring and acceptance with a focus on concentration, clarity, and equanimity

  • Coping ControlBehavioural

    Problem-solving for cognitive coping

Study groups in NCT07350733
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mindfulness MeditationActive comparator14-day smartphone based mindfulness meditation training intervention consisting of a personalized introduction, a 10 to 15-minute audio-guided lesson, plus daily life homework practice (3-10 minutes) each day.
Receives: Behavioral: Equa
Stress Management TrainingActive comparator14-day smartphone based training intervention focused on coping strategies consisting of a 10 to 15-minute audio-guided lesson, plus daily life homework practice (3-10 minutes) each day.
Receives: Behavioral: Coping Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intervention Adherence

    Number of lessons completed during the intervention period

    Measured: From intervention program start at week 4 to end of treatment at week 6

  2. App Engagement

    Self-reported measure of engagement following each lesson on a scale from 1-Not at all, to 5- Extremely.

    Measured: From intervention program start at week 4 to end of treatment at week 6

  3. User Satisfaction

    Self-reported user satisfaction with the intervention lesson measured on a scale of 1- Not at all, to 5- Extremely

    Measured: From intervention program start at week 4 to end of treatment at week 6

  4. Change in Self-Reported Perceived Stress

    The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale is a self-reported assessment of perceptions of stress over the past month. Total scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived stress.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 1-week post and 2-month follow-up

  5. Change in Self-Reported Depressive Symptomatology

    The Patient Health Questionnaire is an eight-item instrument that will be utilized as a brief measure of depression severity. A total score ranges from 0 to 24 and is calculated by adding each of the nine items' scores. A higher total score signifies more severe depression levels.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 1-week post and 2-month follow-up

  6. Total Nightly Sleep Duration

    Nightly sleep duration as measured in minutes by FitBit wearable devices.

    Measured: From study week 1 through 2-month follow-up

  7. Grade Point Average

    Student university cumulative grade point average calculated at the end of the semester.

    Measured: From study week 1 through 2-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Change in Self-Reported Loneliness

    The UCLA Loneliness scale will be used to measure subjective feelings of loneliness and social isolation. A total score that ranges from 20 to 80 is calculated by summing the score of each item. A higher total score signifies increased feelings of loneliness.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 1-week post and 2-month follow-up

  2. Change in Self-Reported 2-way Social Support

    The 2-way social support scale will be used to assess experiences giving or receiving emotional and instrumental support. Total scores ranging from 0-60 and subscales (giving/receiving instrumental/emotional support) ranging from 0-15 are calculated , with a higher score indicating greater social support.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 1-week post and 2-month follow-up

  3. Change in Self-Reported Brief Resilience

    The brief resilience scale measures an individual's ability to bounce back from stress, adversity, and challenging life circumstances. An average is calculated across 6 items, with higher scores signifying greater brief resiliency. Scores can range from 1 to 5.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 1-week post and 2-month follow-up

  4. Change in Self-Reported Physical Health Symptoms

    The Cohen-Hoberman Inventory of Physical Symptoms assess how much 33 common physical symptoms have bothered or distressed an individual over the past two weeks from 0 (not bothered) to 4 (extremely bothered). Items are summed to create a composite score ranging from 0-132, with higher scores indicating more distress from physical symptoms.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 1-week post and 2-month follow-up

  5. Change in Self-Reported Sleep Quality

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index assess sleep quality over the past month. A global sleep quality score is calculated (ranging 0-21), with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 1-week post and 2-month follow-up

  6. Change in Self-Reported Sleep Reactivity

    The Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test is a 9-item measure of sleep reactivity. Participants rate how likely (1 - not likely, to 4 very likely) it is for them to have difficulty sleep in different scenarios, with total scores ranging from 9-36. Higher scores indicate greater stress-induced sleep reactivity.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 1-week post and 2-month follow-up

  7. Change in Self-Reported Anxiety

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item scale measures anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks. Participants rate how bothered they have been by problems on a scale from 0 - not at all, to 3 - nearly every day. Scores are totaled to create a composite score, with higher scores indicating greater generalized anxiety.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 1-week post and 2-month follow-up

  8. Change in Engagement of Enjoyable Activities

    The Pittsburgh Enjoyable Activities Test is a brief, ten-item measure that will be used to assess the frequency of a participant's engagement in various activities on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (every day). A total score ranges from 0 to 40 where a higher score reflects the increased frequency of participation in enjoyable activities.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 1-week post and 2-month follow-up

  9. Change in Self-Reported Mindfulness

    Evaluated using the The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, a 24-item scale measuring mindfulness. Each item is rated on a scale from 1=never or very rarely true to 5= very often or always true, with a higher total score indicating greater mindfulness tendencies.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 1-week post and 2-month follow-up

  10. Change in Self-Reported Social and Academic Fit

    The Sense of Social and Academic Fit Scale contains 17-items assessing perceptions of both social and academic fit. Participants respond from 1- Strongly Disagree to 7 - Strongly Agree, summed to create a composite score with higher values indicating higher feelings of belongingness.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 1-week post and 2-month follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jan 2026
  2. Study start12 Jan 2026
  3. Primary completion31 May 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 May 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07350733
Sponsor's protocol ID
FP00012477
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
25 Dec 2025
Last updated
20 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Equa in people with Sleep and Well-Being (Psychological Flourishing), run by Carnegie Mellon University at 4 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intervention Adherence (time frame: From intervention program start at week 4 to end of treatment at week 6). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in