Lateral EpicondylitisLE-LLRT-BFRNCT07351942
Effectiveness of Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction in Lateral Epicondylitis
A study testing Low-Load Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction in people with Lateral Epicondylitis, run by Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Lateral epicondylitis, commonly known as tennis elbow, is a frequent musculoskeletal condition that causes pain, reduced grip strength, and functional limitations in daily activities. Exercise-based rehabilitation is a key component of treatment; however, the optimal exercise approach remains uncertain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lateral Epicondylitis
- What is being tested?
- Low-Load Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 14 Jul 2025to 15 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a clinical diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis established by a physician
- Presence of symptoms consistent with lateral epicondylitis for more than 2 weeks and less than 12 weeks
- Adults aged 18 to 65 years
- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score ≥ 3
- Willingness to participate in the study and provision of written informed consent
Who cannot join
- History of major trauma to the elbow or surrounding region within the past 1 month
- Receipt of physical therapy for the elbow or surrounding region within the past 1 year
- History of corticosteroid or other injection therapies to the elbow or surrounding region within the past 1 year
- History of fracture involving the elbow or surrounding region
- History of surgery involving the elbow or surrounding region
- Presence of rheumatologic diseases affecting the elbow or surrounding region
Show all 18Show fewer
- History of peripheral vascular disease
- History of coagulation disorders
- History of severe cardiovascular disease
- History of uncontrolled hypertension
- History of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- Clinical findings consistent with cervical radiculopathy causing elbow pain or muscle weakness in the affected upper extremity
- Clinical findings consistent with shoulder pathologies causing elbow pain or muscle weakness in the affected upper extremity
- Restricted range of motion of the elbow joint detected on clinical examination
- History of severe psychiatric disorders
- History of malignancy
- Pregnancy
- Unwillingness to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, 34418
About this study
Official title: Clinical and Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
Lateral epicondylitis, commonly known as tennis elbow, is a frequent musculoskeletal condition that causes pain, reduced grip strength, and functional limitations in daily activities. Exercise-based rehabilitation is a key component of treatment; however, the optimal exercise approach remains uncertain. Low-load resistance training combined with blood flow restriction (LLRT-BFR) has emerged as a promising method that may enhance training effects while using lower exercise loads, potentially reducing mechanical stress on the affected tissues while providing benefits comparable to high-load resistance training.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and ultrasonographic effects of LLRT-BFR in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Adults aged 18-65 years with a recent diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis who meet predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two exercise-based treatment groups. Both groups will participate in the same supervised low-load resistance exercise program, while one group will perform the exercises with blood flow restriction and the other group will receive a sham application without meaningful blood flow restriction.
Read more
Participants will undergo supervised exercise sessions twice weekly for six weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, on the first day after completion of treatment, and at 4 and 12 weeks during follow-up. The primary outcome will focus on functional status, while secondary outcomes will include pain intensity, pain sensitivity, grip strength, ultrasonographic measurements of tendon and muscle structure, and patient-reported treatment satisfaction.
By comparing these two exercise approaches, this study aims to provide evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of LLRT-BFR and to clarify its potential role in the rehabilitation of patients with lateral epicondylitis.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction (LLRT-BFR) in patients with lateral epicondylitis using clinical and ultrasonographic assessments.
Patients aged 18-65 years who present to the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic at Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital with elbow pain lasting longer than 2 weeks and shorter than 12 weeks will be screened for eligibility. A clinical diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis will be established by a physician based on localized pain at the tenoperiosteal junction of the common extensor tendon (CET) at the lateral epicondyle (LE) and its surrounding area, tenderness on palpation, pain elicited by provocation tests, including resisted wrist extension and resisted third finger extension, reduced grip strength, and impairment in activities of daily living. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and provide informed consent will be enrolled.
Eligible participants will be randomly allocated into two groups using a computerized randomization program, with stratification based on sex, age, and upper extremity dominance. These two groups will be an experimental group receiving low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction (LLRT-BFR) and a control group receiving the same low-load resistance training with sham blood flow restriction (LLRT-Sham BFR).
In the LLRT-BFR treatment group, individualized arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) will be determined prior to each session. A pneumatic cuff will be placed at the most proximal region of the upper extremity, just distal to the deltoid muscle insertion. During exercise, cuff pressure will be set at a standardized level corresponding to 40% of the measured AOP, in accordance with previously published protocols. Participants in this group will undergo supervised LLRT-BFR sessions twice weekly for 6 weeks, totaling 12 sessions.
In the LLRT-Sham BFR control group, individualized arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) will also be determined prior to each session. A pneumatic cuff will be placed at the most proximal region of the upper extremity, just distal to the deltoid muscle insertion, in the same manner as in the experimental group. During exercise, the cuff will be applied without intentional inflation; any pressure present will be limited to that resulting from cuff placement alone and will be substantially lower than the individually determined arterial occlusion pressure (AOP), and insufficient to induce meaningful blood flow restriction. Participants in this group will undergo supervised LLRT-Sham BFR sessions twice weekly for 6 weeks, totaling 12 sessions.
AOP will be assessed while the patient is seated comfortably, using a pneumatic cuff and Doppler ultrasonography with a linear ultrasound probe suitable for musculoskeletal examination to detect radial artery pulsation. Care will be taken to apply minimal probe pressure to avoid influencing AOP measurements. The cuff pressure at which Doppler activity due to radial artery pulsation is no longer detectable will be recorded as the AOP. During exercise, cuff pressure will be applied according to group allocation and maintained throughout each exercise set, and released between different exercises, allowing continued arterial inflow while temporarily restricting venous outflow in a controlled and safe manner.
Each treatment session will include approximately 45 minutes of supervised exercise therapy conducted in accordance with routine clinical practice. The exercise program will consist of low-load strengthening exercises for wrist flexion and extension, forearm pronation and supination, and wrist radial and ulnar deviation, as well as stretching exercises targeting the wrist flexor and extensor muscle groups. Exercises will be performed in a 3x10 repetition scheme, with 30-second rest intervals between sets and 90-second rest intervals between exercises targeting different muscle groups.
Clinical and ultrasonographic assessments will be conducted at baseline (pre-treatment), on the first day after treatment completion, and at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment. The primary outcome measure will be functional status assessed using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures will include pain intensity assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) during movement, at rest, at night, and during maximal grip; pain sensitivity assessed as pressure pain threshold using an algometer; maximal and pain-free grip strength assessed using a handheld dynamometer; ultrasonographic measurements of common extensor tendon thickness obtained at standardized anatomical locations (1 cm distal to the lateral epicondyle, capitellar region, and radiocapitellar region); cross-sectional area measurements of the extensor carpi radialis brevis and extensor digitorum communis muscles performed at a standardized level corresponding to 40% of the forearm length measured distally from the lateral epicondyle toward the Lister tubercle; the Total Ultrasonography Scale Score evaluating predefined tendon characteristics (e.g., hypoechogenicity, neovascularization, heterogeneity, and bony abnormalities); and treatment satisfaction assessed using the Roles-Maudsley Score.
The influence of demographic and anthropometric variables, including sex, age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and upper extremity dominance, on outcome measures will also be analyzed.
Randomization will be performed using a computerized randomization program by a non-evaluating research assistant who will be aware of group allocation and responsible for data recording. Blinding will be ensured by keeping participants unaware of their group assignment and by maintaining outcome assessors blinded to group allocation throughout the study. The study is designed as a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.
- Conditions
- Lateral Epicondylitis
- Being tested
- Low-Load Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction, Low-Load Resistance Training with Sham Blood Flow Restriction
- Keywords
- Lateral Epicondylitis, Tennis Elbow, Blood Flow Restriction Training, BFR, Low-Load Resistance Training, Exercise Therapy, Ultrasonography
- Medical subject headings
- Tennis Elbow
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Low-Load Resistance Training with Blood Flow RestrictionOther
Also called BFR Training
A supervised low-load resistance training program performed with a blood flow restriction procedure applied to the affected upper extremity.
Low-Load Resistance Training with Sham Blood Flow RestrictionOther
A supervised low-load resistance training program performed with a sham blood flow restriction procedure applied to the affected upper extremity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Low-Load Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction | Experimental | Participants receive a low-load resistance exercise program performed with a blood flow restriction procedure. Receives: Other: Low-Load Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction |
| Low-Load Resistance Training with Sham Blood Flow Restriction | Active comparator | Participants receive the same low-load resistance exercise program performed with a sham blood flow restriction procedure. Receives: Other: Low-Load Resistance Training with Sham Blood Flow Restriction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) Total Score
The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire is used to assess pain and functional disability related to lateral epicondylitis. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater pain and functional impairment.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Secondary outcomes (7)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Intensity Scores
Pain intensity assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain, with higher scores representing greater pain intensity, for pain during activity, at rest, at night, and during maximal grip.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Pressure Pain Threshold
Pressure pain threshold is assessed using an algometer applied over the lateral epicondyle region to evaluate pain sensitivity.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Grip Strength
Maximal grip strength and pain-free grip strength are measured using a handheld dynamometer to assess functional hand strength.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Common Extensor Tendon Thickness
Ultrasonographic measurement of common extensor tendon thickness performed at three standardized locations: 1 cm distal to the lateral epicondyle, the capitellar region, and the midpoint of the radiocapitellar joint line.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Cross-Sectional Area of the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis and Extensor Digitorum Communis Muscles
Ultrasonographic measurement of the cross-sectional area of the extensor carpi radialis brevis and extensor digitorum communis muscles performed at a standardized level corresponding to 40% of the forearm length, measured distally from the lateral epicondyle toward the Lister tubercle. Measurements are performed separately for each muscle.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Total Ultrasonography Scale Score (TUSS)
Structural changes of the common extensor tendon assessed using the Total Ultrasonography Scale Score (TUSS), a composite ultrasonographic score ranging from 0 to 8, based on predefined tendon characteristics including hypoechogenicity (0-3), neovascularization (0-3), heterogeneity (0-1), and bony abnormalities (0-1). Higher scores represent greater structural tendon pathology.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Roles-Maudsley Score (RMS)
Pain and functional limitation during daily activities assessed using the Roles-Maudsley Score (RMS), a four-point ordinal scale based on patient self-assessment, ranging from 1 to 4, where 1 indicates excellent function with no pain and 4 indicates poor function with severe pain, with higher scores representing greater pain and functional limitation.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jan 2026
- Study start14 Jul 2025
- Primary completion15 Mar 2026
- Study completion15 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lateral EpicondylitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants are randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups and receive the same low-load resistance exercise program either with a blood flow restriction procedure or with a sham blood flow restriction procedure throughout the study period.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Süleyman Çağlar Tekin, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
- Investigators
- Süleyman Çağlar Tekin, MD, Principal investigator, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07351942
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LE-LLRT-BFR-TR-34-SE-01
- Acronym
- LE-LLRT-BFR
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 27 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be shared, as this is a single-center, academic study, and there is no plan or requirement to make the raw dataset publicly available.
Publications
Krogh TP, Fredberg U, Ammitzboll C, Ellingsen T. Clinical Value of Ultrasonographic Assessment in Lateral Epicondylitis Versus Asymptomatic Healthy Controls. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(8):1873-1883. doi: 10.1177/0363546520921949. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
PubMed 32484714Toprak U, Baskan B, Ustuner E, Oten E, Altin L, Karademir MA, Bodur H. Common extensor tendon thickness measurements at the radiocapitellar region in diagnosis of lateral elbow tendinopathy. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):566-70. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.5575-12.2. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
PubMed 22498913Bechan Vergara I, Puig-Divi A, Amestoy Alonso B, Mila-Villarroel R. Effects of low-load blood flow restriction training in healthy adult tendons: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Jul;39:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.11.048. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
PubMed 38876617Karanasios S, Korakakis V, Moutzouri M, Xergia SA, Tsepis E, Gioftsos G. Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Is Effective for Managing Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Dec;52(12):803-825. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2022.11211. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
PubMed 36099170
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07351942
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LE-LLRT-BFR / LE-LLRT-BFR-TR-34-SE-01
- Conditions
- Lateral Epicondylitis
- Keywords
- Lateral Epicondylitis, Tennis Elbow, Blood Flow Restriction Training, BFR, Low-Load Resistance Training, Exercise Therapy, Ultrasonography
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lateral epicondylitis, commonly known as tennis elbow, is a frequent musculoskeletal condition that causes pain, reduced grip strength, and functional limitations in daily activities. Exercise-based rehabilitation is a key component of treatment; however, the optimal exercise approach remains uncertain. Low-load resistance training combined with blood flow restriction (LLRT-BFR) has emerged as a promising method that may enhance training effects while using lower exercise loads, potentially reducing mechanical stress on the affected tissues while providing benefits comparable to high-load resistance training.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and ultrasonographic effects of LLRT-BFR in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Adults aged 18-65 years with a recent diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis who meet predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two exercise-based treatment groups. Both groups will participate in the same supervised low-load resistance exercise program, while one group will perform the exercises with blood flow restriction and the other group will receive a sham application without meaningful blood flow restriction.
Participants will undergo supervised exercise sessions twice weekly for six weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, on the first day after completion of treatment, and at 4 and 12 weeks during follow-up. The primary outcome will focus on functional status, while secondary outcomes will include pain intensity, pain sensitivity, grip strength, ultrasonographic measurements of tendon and muscle structure, and patient-reported treatment satisfaction.
By comparing these two exercise approaches, this study aims to provide evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of LLRT-BFR and to clarify its potential role in the rehabilitation of patients with lateral epicondylitis.
Detailed description
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction (LLRT-BFR) in patients with lateral epicondylitis using clinical and ultrasonographic assessments.
Patients aged 18-65 years who present to the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic at Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital with elbow pain lasting longer than 2 weeks and shorter than 12 weeks will be screened for eligibility. A clinical diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis will be established by a physician based on localized pain at the tenoperiosteal junction of the common extensor tendon (CET) at the lateral epicondyle (LE) and its surrounding area, tenderness on palpation, pain elicited by provocation tests, including resisted wrist extension and resisted third finger extension, reduced grip strength, and impairment in activities of daily living. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and provide informed consent will be enrolled.
Eligible participants will be randomly allocated into two groups using a computerized randomization program, with stratification based on sex, age, and upper extremity dominance. These two groups will be an experimental group receiving low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction (LLRT-BFR) and a control group receiving the same low-load resistance training with sham blood flow restriction (LLRT-Sham BFR).
In the LLRT-BFR treatment group, individualized arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) will be determined prior to each session. A pneumatic cuff will be placed at the most proximal region of the upper extremity, just distal to the deltoid muscle insertion. During exercise, cuff pressure will be set at a standardized level corresponding to 40% of the measured AOP, in accordance with previously published protocols. Participants in this group will undergo supervised LLRT-BFR sessions twice weekly for 6 weeks, totaling 12 sessions.
In the LLRT-Sham BFR control group, individualized arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) will also be determined prior to each session. A pneumatic cuff will be placed at the most proximal region of the upper extremity, just distal to the deltoid muscle insertion, in the same manner as in the experimental group. During exercise, the cuff will be applied without intentional inflation; any pressure present will be limited to that resulting from cuff placement alone and will be substantially lower than the individually determined arterial occlusion pressure (AOP), and insufficient to induce meaningful blood flow restriction. Participants in this group will undergo supervised LLRT-Sham BFR sessions twice weekly for 6 weeks, totaling 12 sessions.
AOP will be assessed while the patient is seated comfortably, using a pneumatic cuff and Doppler ultrasonography with a linear ultrasound probe suitable for musculoskeletal examination to detect radial artery pulsation. Care will be taken to apply minimal probe pressure to avoid influencing AOP measurements. The cuff pressure at which Doppler activity due to radial artery pulsation is no longer detectable will be recorded as the AOP. During exercise, cuff pressure will be applied according to group allocation and maintained throughout each exercise set, and released between different exercises, allowing continued arterial inflow while temporarily restricting venous outflow in a controlled and safe manner.
Each treatment session will include approximately 45 minutes of supervised exercise therapy conducted in accordance with routine clinical practice. The exercise program will consist of low-load strengthening exercises for wrist flexion and extension, forearm pronation and supination, and wrist radial and ulnar deviation, as well as stretching exercises targeting the wrist flexor and extensor muscle groups. Exercises will be performed in a 3x10 repetition scheme, with 30-second rest intervals between sets and 90-second rest intervals between exercises targeting different muscle groups.
Clinical and ultrasonographic assessments will be conducted at baseline (pre-treatment), on the first day after treatment completion, and at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment. The primary outcome measure will be functional status assessed using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures will include pain intensity assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) during movement, at rest, at night, and during maximal grip; pain sensitivity assessed as pressure pain threshold using an algometer; maximal and pain-free grip strength assessed using a handheld dynamometer; ultrasonographic measurements of common extensor tendon thickness obtained at standardized anatomical locations (1 cm distal to the lateral epicondyle, capitellar region, and radiocapitellar region); cross-sectional area measurements of the extensor carpi radialis brevis and extensor digitorum communis muscles performed at a standardized level corresponding to 40% of the forearm length measured distally from the lateral epicondyle toward the Lister tubercle; the Total Ultrasonography Scale Score evaluating predefined tendon characteristics (e.g., hypoechogenicity, neovascularization, heterogeneity, and bony abnormalities); and treatment satisfaction assessed using the Roles-Maudsley Score.
The influence of demographic and anthropometric variables, including sex, age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and upper extremity dominance, on outcome measures will also be analyzed.
Randomization will be performed using a computerized randomization program by a non-evaluating research assistant who will be aware of group allocation and responsible for data recording. Blinding will be ensured by keeping participants unaware of their group assignment and by maintaining outcome assessors blinded to group allocation throughout the study. The study is designed as a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants are randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups and receive the same low-load resistance exercise program either with a blood flow restriction procedure or with a sham blood flow restriction procedure throughout the study period.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Low-Load Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction | Experimental | Other: Low-Load Resistance Training with Blood Flow RestrictionParticipants receive a low-load resistance exercise program performed with a blood flow restriction procedure. |
| Low-Load Resistance Training with Sham Blood Flow Restriction | Active comparator | Other: Low-Load Resistance Training with Sham Blood Flow RestrictionParticipants receive the same low-load resistance exercise program performed with a sham blood flow restriction procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with a clinical diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis established by a physician
- Presence of symptoms consistent with lateral epicondylitis for more than 2 weeks and less than 12 weeks
- Adults aged 18 to 65 years
- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score ≥ 3
- Willingness to participate in the study and provision of written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- History of major trauma to the elbow or surrounding region within the past 1 month
- Receipt of physical therapy for the elbow or surrounding region within the past 1 year
- History of corticosteroid or other injection therapies to the elbow or surrounding region within the past 1 year
- History of fracture involving the elbow or surrounding region
- History of surgery involving the elbow or surrounding region
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Low-Load Resistance Training with Blood Flow RestrictionAlso: BFR TrainingA supervised low-load resistance training program performed with a blood flow restriction procedure applied to the affected upper extremity. | Other | Low-Load Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction |
| Low-Load Resistance Training with Sham Blood Flow RestrictionA supervised low-load resistance training program performed with a sham blood flow restriction procedure applied to the affected upper extremity. | Other | Low-Load Resistance Training with Sham Blood Flow Restriction |
Primary outcome
Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire is used to assess pain and functional disability related to lateral epicondylitis. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater pain and functional impairment.
7 secondary outcomes
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Intensity Scores
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Pressure Pain Threshold
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Grip Strength
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Common Extensor Tendon Thickness
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Cross-Sectional Area of the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis and Extensor Digitorum Communis Muscles
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Total Ultrasonography Scale Score (TUSS)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Roles-Maudsley Score (RMS)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 32484714Krogh TP, Fredberg U, Ammitzboll C, Ellingsen T. Clinical Value of Ultrasonographic Assessment in Lateral Epicondylitis Versus Asymptomatic Healthy Controls. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(8):1873-1883. doi: 10.1177/0363546520921949. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
- Background: PubMed 22498913Toprak U, Baskan B, Ustuner E, Oten E, Altin L, Karademir MA, Bodur H. Common extensor tendon thickness measurements at the radiocapitellar region in diagnosis of lateral elbow tendinopathy. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):566-70. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.5575-12.2. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
- Background: PubMed 38876617Bechan Vergara I, Puig-Divi A, Amestoy Alonso B, Mila-Villarroel R. Effects of low-load blood flow restriction training in healthy adult tendons: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Jul;39:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.11.048. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
- Background: PubMed 36099170Karanasios S, Korakakis V, Moutzouri M, Xergia SA, Tsepis E, Gioftsos G. Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Is Effective for Managing Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Dec;52(12):803-825. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2022.11211. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be shared, as this is a single-center, academic study, and there is no plan or requirement to make the raw dataset publicly available.
Related trials for Lateral Epicondylitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Investigation of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Patients With Elbow Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis, Medial Epicondylitis
Recruiting
A Comparison of the Effects of Combining ESWT With Blood Flow Restriction Therapy in Patients Diagnosed With Lateral Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis
Recruiting
Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Posterior Cutaneous Nerve of the Forearm Epicondylar Branch Block on Pain and Function in Lateral Epicondylitis (PCNF-BrEpi)
Lateral Epicondylitis
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Surgical and Nonsurgical Outcomes of Tennis Elbow
Lateral Epicondylitis
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Tenoxicam and Corticosteroid Injections for Lateral Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Süleyman Çağlar Tekin, MD principal investigator
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Low-Load Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction in people with Lateral Epicondylitis, run by Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) Total Score (time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), Day 1 post-treatment, Week 4 post-treatment, and Week 12 post-treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07351942, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2026.