Knee OANCT07351981
TcPRF for Knee Osteoarthritis
A study testing Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) Treatment for Knee Pain in people with Knee OA and Knee Osteoarthristis, run by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
Objectives Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous PRF treatment in reducing knee pain compared to a sham intervention Secondary Objectives: To assess the improvement in functional outcomes and patient satisfaction following PRF treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee OA, Knee Osteoarthristis
- What is being tested?
- Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) Treatment for Knee Pain
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2026to 1 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis according to NICE criteria.
- Chronic knee pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] ≥ 4).
- Failure to respond adequately to conventional treatments (e.g., NSAIDs, physical therapy).
- Willingness to comply with study procedures. Exclusion Criteria
- Previous PRF/RF treatment for knee pain.
- Hyaluronic acid injection for knee pain in the past 6 months
Show all 10Show fewer
- Knee surgery within the last 6 months.
- Severe cardiovascular, neurological, or psychiatric conditions.
- Active systemic infections or local skin infections at the knee.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) Treatment for Knee Pain
Objectives
- Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous PRF treatment in reducing knee pain compared to a sham intervention
- Secondary Objectives: To assess the improvement in functional outcomes and patient satisfaction following PRF treatment.
Read more
Study Design
- Type: Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study.
- Duration: 6 months
- Study Population: Adults aged 40-75 years with chronic knee pain (lasting ≥ 6 months) due to osteoarthritis (OA).
- How many patients in each group: 25 patients in each group (according to Janssens et al, 2024) Inclusion Criteria
- Diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis according to NICE criteria.
- Chronic knee pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] ≥ 4).
- Failure to respond adequately to conventional treatments (e.g., NSAIDs, physical therapy).
- Willingness to comply with study procedures. Exclusion Criteria
- Previous PRF/RF treatment for knee pain.
- Hyaluronic acid injection for knee pain in the past 6 months
- Knee surgery within the last 6 months.
- Severe cardiovascular, neurological, or psychiatric conditions.
- Active systemic infections or local skin infections at the knee.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
Read the detailed description
Randomization and Blinding
- Randomization: Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: PRF treatment or sham.
- Blinding: Both participants and investigators will be blinded to the treatment allocation. The device used for PRF treatment will have an identical appearance for both the active and sham groups, but the sham electrode will not deliver active treatment.
Intervention Both groups will receive disposable electrodes on either side of the knee: one skin electrode on the inside and one on the outside of the knee.
- PRF Group: Participants will receive PRF treatment using a specific protocol (e.g., 3 Hz, 5 ms, 15 minutes, 3 sessions with 1 week and 3 weeks interval). The output will be adjusted according to the distance between electrodes in cm. This will be between 0.7A (circumference 23cm) and 1.4A for 38cm (Spring 2, Clinical Guidelines, Table 1)
- Sham Group: Participants will receive a sham treatment using a device identical in appearance but without delivering the actual PRF therapy.
Outcome Measures Primary Outcome • Pain Reduction: Measured using the NRS (numerical rating scale) at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at follow-up intervals (2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks).
Secondary Outcomes
- Functional Improvement: Assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores.
- Patient Satisfaction: Measured using a Likert scale for overall satisfaction with treatment.
- Global Assessment: Patient's global assessment of change in pain and function.
- Medication reduction Sample Size Calculation
- Estimate: Based on previous studies and expected effect size, calculate the necessary sample size to achieve a power of 80% and a significance level of 0.05. The sample size must account for potential dropouts.
Data Collection and Management
- Data will be collected at baseline, post-treatment, and during follow-up visits.
- Use electronic case report forms (eCRFs) for data entry.
- Ensure the security and confidentiality of participant data. Statistical Analysis
- Primary Analysis: Compare the mean change in VAS scores between the PRF and sham groups using an independent t-test or ANCOVA, adjusting for baseline values.
- Secondary Analysis: Compare changes in WOMAC scores and patient satisfaction between groups using similar statistical methods.
- Responder Analysis: Define responders as those with ≥30% reduction in VAS scores from baseline and compare proportions between groups using a chi-square test.
- Intention-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis: Include all randomized participants in the analysis based on the treatment they were allocated, regardless of whether they completed the study.
Ethical Considerations
- Obtain informed consent from all participants.
- Ethical approval from a recognized Institutional Review Board (IRB) is required.
- Ensure that participants can withdraw at any time without affecting their standard care.
Monitoring and Safety
- Adverse Events: Monitor and record all adverse events during the study.
- Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB): Establish a DSMB to review safety data periodically.
Dissemination of Results
- Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences within a year after results are known. Data will be reported according to CONSORT guidelines.
Timeline
- Recruitment Period: 3 months
- Intervention Period: 4 weeks
- Follow-up Period: 3 and 6 months
- Data Analysis and Reporting: 3 months after study completion.
- Conditions
- Knee OA, Knee Osteoarthristis
- Being tested
- Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) Treatment for Knee Pain, sham treatment of pulsed rf on knee
- Keywords
- knee, osteoarthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) Treatment for Knee PainDevice
application of TcPRF patches
sham treatment of pulsed rf on kneeDevice
Transdermal patch will be connected to demo mode of the spring pulsed rf generator. no treatment will be given
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TcPRF | Active comparator | Transcutaneous pulsed RF -connected to treatment mode of the spring pulsed rf generator Receives: Device: Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) Treatment for Knee Pain |
| TcPRF sham | Sham comparator | sham of transcutaneus pRF- connected to demo mode of the spring pulsed rf generator Receives: Device: sham treatment of pulsed rf on knee |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Reduction
Measured using the NRS (numerical rating scale) at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at follow-up intervals (2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks).
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Functional Improvement
Assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores.
Measured: 12 weeks
• Patient Satisfaction
Measured using a Likert scale for overall satisfaction with treatment.
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jan 2026
- Study start15 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Knee OAStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- * Type: Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. * Duration: 6 months * Study Population: Adults aged 40-75 years with chronic knee pain (lasting ≥ 6 months) due to osteoarthritis (OA). * How many patients in each group: 25 patients in each group (according to Janssens et al, 2024)
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Martina Rekatsina, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07351981
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 695/24-07-2025
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 20 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) Treatment for Knee Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07351981
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 695/24-07-2025
- Conditions
- Knee OA, Knee Osteoarthristis
- Keywords
- knee, osteoarthritis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National and Kapodistrian University of AthensUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objectives
- Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous PRF treatment in reducing knee pain compared to a sham intervention
- Secondary Objectives: To assess the improvement in functional outcomes and patient satisfaction following PRF treatment.
Study Design
- Type: Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study.
- Duration: 6 months
- Study Population: Adults aged 40-75 years with chronic knee pain (lasting ≥ 6 months) due to osteoarthritis (OA).
- How many patients in each group: 25 patients in each group (according to Janssens et al, 2024) Inclusion Criteria
- Diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis according to NICE criteria.
- Chronic knee pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] ≥ 4).
- Failure to respond adequately to conventional treatments (e.g., NSAIDs, physical therapy).
- Willingness to comply with study procedures. Exclusion Criteria
- Previous PRF/RF treatment for knee pain.
- Hyaluronic acid injection for knee pain in the past 6 months
- Knee surgery within the last 6 months.
- Severe cardiovascular, neurological, or psychiatric conditions.
- Active systemic infections or local skin infections at the knee.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
Detailed description
Randomization and Blinding
- Randomization: Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: PRF treatment or sham.
- Blinding: Both participants and investigators will be blinded to the treatment allocation. The device used for PRF treatment will have an identical appearance for both the active and sham groups, but the sham electrode will not deliver active treatment.
Intervention Both groups will receive disposable electrodes on either side of the knee: one skin electrode on the inside and one on the outside of the knee.
- PRF Group: Participants will receive PRF treatment using a specific protocol (e.g., 3 Hz, 5 ms, 15 minutes, 3 sessions with 1 week and 3 weeks interval). The output will be adjusted according to the distance between electrodes in cm. This will be between 0.7A (circumference 23cm) and 1.4A for 38cm (Spring 2, Clinical Guidelines, Table 1)
- Sham Group: Participants will receive a sham treatment using a device identical in appearance but without delivering the actual PRF therapy.
Outcome Measures Primary Outcome • Pain Reduction: Measured using the NRS (numerical rating scale) at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at follow-up intervals (2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks).
Secondary Outcomes
- Functional Improvement: Assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores.
- Patient Satisfaction: Measured using a Likert scale for overall satisfaction with treatment.
- Global Assessment: Patient's global assessment of change in pain and function.
- Medication reduction Sample Size Calculation
- Estimate: Based on previous studies and expected effect size, calculate the necessary sample size to achieve a power of 80% and a significance level of 0.05. The sample size must account for potential dropouts.
Data Collection and Management
- Data will be collected at baseline, post-treatment, and during follow-up visits.
- Use electronic case report forms (eCRFs) for data entry.
- Ensure the security and confidentiality of participant data. Statistical Analysis
- Primary Analysis: Compare the mean change in VAS scores between the PRF and sham groups using an independent t-test or ANCOVA, adjusting for baseline values.
- Secondary Analysis: Compare changes in WOMAC scores and patient satisfaction between groups using similar statistical methods.
- Responder Analysis: Define responders as those with ≥30% reduction in VAS scores from baseline and compare proportions between groups using a chi-square test.
- Intention-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis: Include all randomized participants in the analysis based on the treatment they were allocated, regardless of whether they completed the study.
Ethical Considerations
- Obtain informed consent from all participants.
- Ethical approval from a recognized Institutional Review Board (IRB) is required.
- Ensure that participants can withdraw at any time without affecting their standard care.
Monitoring and Safety
- Adverse Events: Monitor and record all adverse events during the study.
- Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB): Establish a DSMB to review safety data periodically.
Dissemination of Results
- Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences within a year after results are known. Data will be reported according to CONSORT guidelines.
Timeline
- Recruitment Period: 3 months
- Intervention Period: 4 weeks
- Follow-up Period: 3 and 6 months
- Data Analysis and Reporting: 3 months after study completion.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- * Type: Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. * Duration: 6 months * Study Population: Adults aged 40-75 years with chronic knee pain (lasting ≥ 6 months) due to osteoarthritis (OA). * How many patients in each group: 25 patients in each group (according to Janssens et al, 2024)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TcPRF | Active comparator | Device: Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) Treatment for Knee PainTranscutaneous pulsed RF -connected to treatment mode of the spring pulsed rf generator |
| TcPRF sham | Sham comparator | Device: sham treatment of pulsed rf on kneesham of transcutaneus pRF- connected to demo mode of the spring pulsed rf generator |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis according to NICE criteria.
- Chronic knee pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] ≥ 4).
- Failure to respond adequately to conventional treatments (e.g., NSAIDs, physical therapy).
- Willingness to comply with study procedures. Exclusion Criteria
- Previous PRF/RF treatment for knee pain.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) Treatment for Knee Painapplication of TcPRF patches | Device | TcPRF |
| sham treatment of pulsed rf on kneeTransdermal patch will be connected to demo mode of the spring pulsed rf generator. no treatment will be given | Device | TcPRF sham |
Primary outcome
Pain Reduction
Time frame: 12 weeks
Measured using the NRS (numerical rating scale) at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at follow-up intervals (2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks).
2 secondary outcomes
Functional Improvement
Time frame: 12 weeks
• Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Knee OA
Not yet recruiting
Opioid Reduction and Enhanced Recovery in Orthopaedic Surgery (OREOS)-Knee
Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Partial Knee Arthroplasty
Active, not recruiting
SakuraBead Used as Resorbable Embolic for Genicular Artery Embolization
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Joint Diseases
RecruitingPhase 2
Genicular Artery Embolization for Reducing Pain in Medically Refractory Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
RecruitingPhase 4
Post-Operative Pain Relief: Zynrelef or Periarticular Injections in RATKA
Periarticular Block, Osteoarthritis (OA)
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Theory-driven Physiotherapy on Physical Activity in Knee OA.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) Treatment for Knee Pain in people with Knee OA and Knee Osteoarthristis, run by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Reduction (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jan 2026.