Cannabis UseNCT07354412
Investigating Cannabis Use Parameters on Anesthesia and Inflammation in Lumbar Spinal Surgeries
An observational study of Cannabis Use, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States with reported rates of use increasing from approximately 50 million in 2020 to 61.8 million in 2023 among individuals aged 12 or older. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cannabis Use
- How many people
- 210 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 Dec 2025to 30 May 2027
- How long will I take part?
- 6 Weeks
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Ambulatory and short-stay lumbar spine surgery patients
Who may be able to join
- Undergoing ambulatory or short-stay lumbar spine surgery.
- English speaking.
- Ability to consent for themselves.
- Aged 18 years and above.
- Access to a smartphone or computer/laptop (to be determined on the day of consent).
- Any lifetime use of cannabis products irrespective of the strain, CBD/THC content, or frequency of use.
Who cannot join
- Non-English speaking.
- Inability to consent for themselves.
- Actively pregnant (SOC) or planning to become pregnant in the next 2 months (research only). Urine testing will be done as SOC prior to undergoing surgery.
- Active or past severe psychiatric instability (e.g., active psychosis, acute suicidality)
- Active, uncontrolled use of illicit drugs use such as methamphetamine, cocaine, opioids, etc., as listed in their clinical charts.
- History of major neurological illnesses.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Presence of an untreated illness or serious medical condition.
- Any other concern that in the investigator's opinion would impact participant safety, study instruction compliance, or confound the interpretation of the study results.
- No access to a smartphone or computer/laptop.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites
Missouri Orthopaedic Institute
Columbia, Missouri, 65211
University Hospital
Columbia, Missouri, 65212
About this study
Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States with reported rates of use increasing from approximately 50 million in 2020 to 61.8 million in 2023 among individuals aged 12 or older. This rise can be attributed to a combination of growing social acceptance and expanding legalization for recreational and medical use of cannabis. Consequently, this has led to increased commercially available cannabis products with heterogeneous concentrations of cannabinoids (i.e., THC:CBD ratios) and new methods of administration becoming more available (e.g., vaping and gummies). Taken together, this rapidly shifting landscape further contributes to the significant variability in individual use patterns (i.e., frequency, duration, and route of administration) resulting in diverse clinical responses, which poses significant challenges for anesthetic management. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis have quantitatively demonstrated that cannabis users require higher dosages during anesthesia induction, experience greater hemodynamic instability, and report higher opioid consumption and pain scores post-operatively. These findings have led to the prevailing notion that cannabis exposure adversely affect anesthetic management. Yet, key cannabis exposure parameters in individual use patterns (i.e., variations in THC:CBD ratios, route of administration, frequency, and duration of use) remain poorly characterized and could confound observed clinical effects in relation to their effects on pain modulation and anesthetic requirements. Current perioperative assessments do not account for these critical variables, creating a gap that limits the development of more accurate and personalized anesthetic protocols. Failure to account for individual cannabis exposure parameters may lead to inappropriate anesthetic dosing - where underdosing could result in intraoperative awareness, pain, or patient movement, while overdosing might cause cardiovascular depression, respiratory failure, or prolonged recovery from anesthesia. Concomitantly, researchers have discovered that cannabis consumption modulates immune function such that early life exposure to cannabis produces a long-lasting and persistent inflammatory state characterized by reduced serum levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-2. In contrast, recent research demonstrates that cannabinoid exposure improves skin healing in patients with cutaneous disorders. However, the effects of altered inflammatory responses, and the diverse actions of various cannabinoids on postoperative wound healing remain largely unexplored. Our long-term goal is to elucidate the mechanistic impact of chronic cannabis use parameters on anesthetic and analgesic requirements, thereby enabling the development of personalized, evidence-based perioperative management strategies. The investigators hypothesize that chronic cannabis exposure leads to impaired endogenous pain and immune modulation, resulting in increased intraoperative anesthetic dosing, heightened hemodynamic variability, and elevated postoperative pain and inflammation.
Read the detailed description
Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States with reported rates of use increasing from approximately 50 million in 2020 to 61.8 million in 2023 among individuals aged 12 or older. This rise can be attributed to a combination of growing social acceptance and expanding legalization for recreational and medical use of cannabis. Consequently, this has led to increased commercially available cannabis products with heterogeneous concentrations of cannabinoids (i.e., THC:CBD ratios) and new methods of administration becoming more available (e.g., vaping and gummies). Taken together, this rapidly shifting landscape further contributes to the significant variability in individual use patterns (i.e., frequency, duration, and route of administration) resulting in diverse clinical responses, which poses significant challenges for anesthetic management. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis have quantitatively demonstrated that cannabis users require higher dosages during anesthesia induction, experience greater hemodynamic instability, and report higher opioid consumption and pain scores post-operatively. These findings have led to the prevailing notion that cannabis exposure adversely affect anesthetic management. Yet, key cannabis exposure parameters in individual use patterns (i.e., variations in THC:CBD ratios, route of administration, frequency, and duration of use) remain poorly characterized and could confound observed clinical effects in relation to their effects on pain modulation and anesthetic requirements. Current perioperative assessments do not account for these critical variables, creating a gap that limits the development of more accurate and personalized anesthetic protocols. Failure to account for individual cannabis exposure parameters may lead to inappropriate anesthetic dosing - where underdosing could result in intraoperative awareness, pain, or patient movement, while overdosing might cause cardiovascular depression, respiratory failure, or prolonged recovery from anesthesia. Concomitantly, researchers have discovered that cannabis consumption modulates immune function such that early life exposure to cannabis produces a long-lasting and persistent inflammatory state characterized by reduced serum levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-2. In contrast, recent research demonstrates that cannabinoid exposure improves skin healing in patients with cutaneous disorders. However, the effects of altered inflammatory responses, and the diverse actions of various cannabinoids on postoperative wound healing remain largely unexplored. Our long-term goal is to elucidate the mechanistic impact of chronic cannabis use parameters on anesthetic and analgesic requirements, thereby enabling the development of personalized, evidence-based perioperative management strategies. The investigators hypothesize that chronic cannabis exposure leads to impaired endogenous pain and immune modulation, resulting in increased intraoperative anesthetic dosing, heightened hemodynamic variability, and elevated postoperative pain and inflammation. To test this hypothesis, the investigators propose the following specific aims: Specific aim 1: Assess cannabis use parameters of individual use patterns in relation to anesthetic and analgesic requirements during elective spine surgeries. The investigators will conduct a prospective study in patients undergoing ambulatory or short-stay lumbar spine surgery asking them to fill out a survey detailing their individual cannabis use patterns (e.g., frequency, duration, and method of use) and attach pictures of their products (to obtain variations in THC:CBD ratios and product type). The investigators will compare intraoperative anesthetic dosing (e.g., propofol and opioid anesthetics) and evaluate hemodynamic parameters (e.g., blood pressure fluctuations and vasopressor requirements), and assess postoperative pain intensity and analgesic needs between cannabis users and non-users. This aim will provide direct clinical evidence linking specific chronic cannabis exposure parameters to intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic requirements, thereby laying the groundwork for tailored anesthetic protocols to reduce complications during surgery. Specific aim 2: Determine the inflammatory mechanisms by which chronic cannabis use alters pain processing and wound repair. The investigators will measure serum biomarkers of inflammation, including IL-6, TNF-α, IL-2, and CRP before and after surgery, and again at 2- and 6-week follow-up, to assess how chronic cannabis exposure modulates immune responses and wound healing in elective spine surgeries. In parallel, the investigators will obtain subjective pain assessments using validated scales and correlate these with intraoperative anesthetic dosing and inflammatory biomarker levels, thereby elucidating the interplay between cannabis-induced immune modulation in altering pain processing and wound healing. Impact: If successful, these studies will fill critical gaps in our understanding by: • Precisely characterizing how individual cannabis exposure parameters affect perioperative anesthetic and analgesic needs, thereby enabling personalized dosing protocols that reduce the risk of intraoperative awareness, cardiovascular instability, and prolonged recovery. • Defining the immunologic alterations associated with chronic cannabis use and their relationship to wound healing and postoperative pain, which may pave the way for novel interventions to optimize surgical outcomes. This integrative approach will advance the fields of anesthesiology, and surgical perioperative patient care and addiction research.
- Conditions
- Cannabis Use
- Keywords
- cannabis, anesthesia, inflammation, cytokines
- Medical subject headings
- Marijuana Abuse, Inflammation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Never users | Patients who have never used cannabis products | |
| Current users | Individuals who have used cannabis products in the last 30 days | |
| Past users | Individuals who have used cannabis products in the past but not in the last 30 days |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intraoperative Propofol dose (mg/kg/hr)
Our primary outcome is intraoperative anesthetic dose (i.e., propofol mg/kg/hr), which will be extracted from anesthesia records and entered into each patient's individual REDCap record by the study personnel.
Measured: Duration of surgery
Change in serum inflammatory biomarker IL-2 (pg/mL)
The investigators will measure serum biomarker of inflammation IL-2 (pg/mL) before and after surgery, and again at 2- and 6-week follow-ups, to assess how cannabis exposure modulates immune responses.
Measured: From enrollment to 6 week post-surgery
Change in serum inflammatory biomarker IL-6 (pg/mL)
The investigators will measure serum biomarker of inflammation IL-6 (pg/mL) before and after surgery, and again at 2- and 6-week follow-ups, to assess how cannabis exposure modulates immune responses.
Measured: From enrollment to 6 week post-surgery
Change in serum inflammatory biomarker TNF-α (pg/mL)
The investigators will measure serum biomarker of inflammation TNF-α (pg/mL) before and after surgery, and again at 2- and 6-week follow-ups, to assess how cannabis exposure modulates immune responses.
Measured: From enrollment to 6 week post-surgery
Change in serum inflammatory biomarker CRP (pg/mL)
The investigators will measure serum biomarker of inflammation CRP (pg/mL) before and after surgery, and again at 2- and 6-week follow-ups, to assess how cannabis exposure modulates immune responses.
Measured: From enrollment to 6 week post-surgery
Secondary outcomes (11)
Intraoperative opioid dose (MME)
Intraoperative opioid dose (MME) will be extracted from anesthesia records and entered into each patient's individual REDCap record by the study personnel.
Measured: Duration of surgery
Wound healing (cm^2)
Wound healing will be assessed with the aid of the surgical team using the elliptical method, estimating area as (π × length × width)/4 from standardized incision measurements. The investigators will obtain these with the help of the surgical team in the operating room, and then remeasure at follow-up visits.
Measured: From end of surgery to 6 week post-surgery
Postoperative pain scores (0-10)
Postoperative pain scores will be assessed with the participant using a visual analog scale 0-10, with 0 as no pain and 10 as the greatest amount of pain imaginable. The pain score will be obtained by nurses at 6 hour intervals after surgery till discharge. The data will be extracted from patient health records and entered into their respective records on REDCap.
Measured: Post-operative day 0
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) variability minutes
Intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) variability will be measured as the number of minutes the MAP falls under 65 mmHg (i.e., hypotensive) during the surgery. The data will be extracted from patient electronic records and entered into their respective records on REDCap.
Measured: Duration of surgery
Heart rate (HR) variability in minutes
Intraoperative heart rate (HR) variability will be measured as the number of minutes the HR falls under 65 bpm (i.e., bradycardia) or goes above 110 bpm (i.e., tachycardia) during the surgery. The data will be extracted from patient electronic records and entered into their respective records on REDCap.
Measured: During surgery
Total intraoperative vasopressor use (microgram/kg/min)
Intraoperative vasopressor can be administered using multiple different drugs, so the investigators will sum all amounts used into a unified total amount adjusted to micrograms/kg/min. The information will be extracted from anesthesia records and entered into each patient's individual REDCap record by the study personnel.
Measured: During surgery
Postoperative opioid consumption (MME) during hospital stay
Postoperative opioid consumption (MME) will be extracted patient electronic records and entered into their respective records on REDCap by study personnel.
Measured: Post-operative day 0
Pain assessment following discharge
The investigators will use ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) to administered questions remotely in two phases: phase 1 will have EMAs sent once daily for the 1st week following discharge from surgery, and phase 2 will have EMAs sent once weekly between the 2-week and 6-week follow-up sessions. The EMAs will ask patients about pain assessment using the same visual analog scale of 0-10, with 0 as no pain and 10 as the greatest amount of pain imaginable.
Measured: Post-operative day 0 to 6 week post-surgery
Opioid consumption (MME) following discharge
The investigators will use ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) to administered questions remotely in two phases: phase 1 will have EMAs sent once daily for the 1st week following discharge from surgery, and phase 2 will have EMAs sent once weekly between the 2-week and 6-week follow-up sessions. The EMAs will ask patients about medication adherence, patients will be asked to indicate if they took more than their prescribed amount of discharge opiate/analgesic medications and how much (measured in MME).
Measured: Post-operative day 0 to 6 week post-surgery
Cannabis use following discharge
The investigators will use ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) to administered questions remotely in two phases: phase 1 will have EMAs sent once daily for the 1st week following discharge from surgery, and phase 2 will have EMAs sent once weekly between the 2-week and 6-week follow-up sessions. The EMAs will ask participants about if and how much cannabis the participant used (measured in mg) going back 24 hours for phase 1, and 1 week for phase 2.
Measured: Post-operative day 0 to 6 week post-surgery
Cannabis cravings following discharge
The investigators will use ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) to administered questions remotely in two phases: phase 1 will have EMAs sent once daily for the 1st week following discharge from surgery, and phase 2 will have EMAs sent once weekly between the 2-week and 6-week follow-up sessions. The EMAs will ask participants about cannabis cravings with a 4-item Craving Questionnaire going back 24 hours for phase 1, and 1 week for phase 2. The craving questionnaire will ask the participants about intensity, frequency, and length of time of cravings on a scale of 0-4 (0 = None at all; 1= Slight; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Considerable; 4 = Extreme). The fourth question will ask about the total number of times the participants had cravings in the last 24 hours.
Measured: Post-operative day 0 to 6 week post-surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jan 2026
- Study start11 Dec 2025
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cannabis UseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Missouri-ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 6 Weeks
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Missouri-Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Pias Malaker, University of Missouri-Columbia
- Investigators
- Antoinette Burger, PhD, Study director, University of Missouri-ColumbiaRandi Foraker, PhD, Study director, University of Missouri-Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07354412
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2128606
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 21 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigating Cannabis Use Parameters on Anesthesia and Inflammation in Lumbar Spinal Surgeries
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07354412
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2128606
- Conditions
- Cannabis Use
- Keywords
- cannabis, anesthesia, inflammation, cytokines
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Missouri-ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States with reported rates of use increasing from approximately 50 million in 2020 to 61.8 million in 2023 among individuals aged 12 or older. This rise can be attributed to a combination of growing social acceptance and expanding legalization for recreational and medical use of cannabis. Consequently, this has led to increased commercially available cannabis products with heterogeneous concentrations of cannabinoids (i.e., THC:CBD ratios) and new methods of administration becoming more available (e.g., vaping and gummies). Taken together, this rapidly shifting landscape further contributes to the significant variability in individual use patterns (i.e., frequency, duration, and route of administration) resulting in diverse clinical responses, which poses significant challenges for anesthetic management. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis have quantitatively demonstrated that cannabis users require higher dosages during anesthesia induction, experience greater hemodynamic instability, and report higher opioid consumption and pain scores post-operatively. These findings have led to the prevailing notion that cannabis exposure adversely affect anesthetic management. Yet, key cannabis exposure parameters in individual use patterns (i.e., variations in THC:CBD ratios, route of administration, frequency, and duration of use) remain poorly characterized and could confound observed clinical effects in relation to their effects on pain modulation and anesthetic requirements. Current perioperative assessments do not account for these critical variables, creating a gap that limits the development of more accurate and personalized anesthetic protocols. Failure to account for individual cannabis exposure parameters may lead to inappropriate anesthetic dosing - where underdosing could result in intraoperative awareness, pain, or patient movement, while overdosing might cause cardiovascular depression, respiratory failure, or prolonged recovery from anesthesia. Concomitantly, researchers have discovered that cannabis consumption modulates immune function such that early life exposure to cannabis produces a long-lasting and persistent inflammatory state characterized by reduced serum levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-2. In contrast, recent research demonstrates that cannabinoid exposure improves skin healing in patients with cutaneous disorders. However, the effects of altered inflammatory responses, and the diverse actions of various cannabinoids on postoperative wound healing remain largely unexplored. Our long-term goal is to elucidate the mechanistic impact of chronic cannabis use parameters on anesthetic and analgesic requirements, thereby enabling the development of personalized, evidence-based perioperative management strategies. The investigators hypothesize that chronic cannabis exposure leads to impaired endogenous pain and immune modulation, resulting in increased intraoperative anesthetic dosing, heightened hemodynamic variability, and elevated postoperative pain and inflammation.
Detailed description
Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States with reported rates of use increasing from approximately 50 million in 2020 to 61.8 million in 2023 among individuals aged 12 or older. This rise can be attributed to a combination of growing social acceptance and expanding legalization for recreational and medical use of cannabis. Consequently, this has led to increased commercially available cannabis products with heterogeneous concentrations of cannabinoids (i.e., THC:CBD ratios) and new methods of administration becoming more available (e.g., vaping and gummies). Taken together, this rapidly shifting landscape further contributes to the significant variability in individual use patterns (i.e., frequency, duration, and route of administration) resulting in diverse clinical responses, which poses significant challenges for anesthetic management. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis have quantitatively demonstrated that cannabis users require higher dosages during anesthesia induction, experience greater hemodynamic instability, and report higher opioid consumption and pain scores post-operatively. These findings have led to the prevailing notion that cannabis exposure adversely affect anesthetic management. Yet, key cannabis exposure parameters in individual use patterns (i.e., variations in THC:CBD ratios, route of administration, frequency, and duration of use) remain poorly characterized and could confound observed clinical effects in relation to their effects on pain modulation and anesthetic requirements. Current perioperative assessments do not account for these critical variables, creating a gap that limits the development of more accurate and personalized anesthetic protocols. Failure to account for individual cannabis exposure parameters may lead to inappropriate anesthetic dosing - where underdosing could result in intraoperative awareness, pain, or patient movement, while overdosing might cause cardiovascular depression, respiratory failure, or prolonged recovery from anesthesia. Concomitantly, researchers have discovered that cannabis consumption modulates immune function such that early life exposure to cannabis produces a long-lasting and persistent inflammatory state characterized by reduced serum levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-2. In contrast, recent research demonstrates that cannabinoid exposure improves skin healing in patients with cutaneous disorders. However, the effects of altered inflammatory responses, and the diverse actions of various cannabinoids on postoperative wound healing remain largely unexplored. Our long-term goal is to elucidate the mechanistic impact of chronic cannabis use parameters on anesthetic and analgesic requirements, thereby enabling the development of personalized, evidence-based perioperative management strategies. The investigators hypothesize that chronic cannabis exposure leads to impaired endogenous pain and immune modulation, resulting in increased intraoperative anesthetic dosing, heightened hemodynamic variability, and elevated postoperative pain and inflammation. To test this hypothesis, the investigators propose the following specific aims: Specific aim 1: Assess cannabis use parameters of individual use patterns in relation to anesthetic and analgesic requirements during elective spine surgeries. The investigators will conduct a prospective study in patients undergoing ambulatory or short-stay lumbar spine surgery asking them to fill out a survey detailing their individual cannabis use patterns (e.g., frequency, duration, and method of use) and attach pictures of their products (to obtain variations in THC:CBD ratios and product type). The investigators will compare intraoperative anesthetic dosing (e.g., propofol and opioid anesthetics) and evaluate hemodynamic parameters (e.g., blood pressure fluctuations and vasopressor requirements), and assess postoperative pain intensity and analgesic needs between cannabis users and non-users. This aim will provide direct clinical evidence linking specific chronic cannabis exposure parameters to intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic requirements, thereby laying the groundwork for tailored anesthetic protocols to reduce complications during surgery. Specific aim 2: Determine the inflammatory mechanisms by which chronic cannabis use alters pain processing and wound repair. The investigators will measure serum biomarkers of inflammation, including IL-6, TNF-α, IL-2, and CRP before and after surgery, and again at 2- and 6-week follow-up, to assess how chronic cannabis exposure modulates immune responses and wound healing in elective spine surgeries. In parallel, the investigators will obtain subjective pain assessments using validated scales and correlate these with intraoperative anesthetic dosing and inflammatory biomarker levels, thereby elucidating the interplay between cannabis-induced immune modulation in altering pain processing and wound healing. Impact: If successful, these studies will fill critical gaps in our understanding by: • Precisely characterizing how individual cannabis exposure parameters affect perioperative anesthetic and analgesic needs, thereby enabling personalized dosing protocols that reduce the risk of intraoperative awareness, cardiovascular instability, and prolonged recovery. • Defining the immunologic alterations associated with chronic cannabis use and their relationship to wound healing and postoperative pain, which may pave the way for novel interventions to optimize surgical outcomes. This integrative approach will advance the fields of anesthesiology, and surgical perioperative patient care and addiction research.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 6 Weeks
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Never users | – | –Patients who have never used cannabis products |
| Current users | – | –Individuals who have used cannabis products in the last 30 days |
| Past users | – | –Individuals who have used cannabis products in the past but not in the last 30 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Ambulatory and short-stay lumbar spine surgery patients
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Undergoing ambulatory or short-stay lumbar spine surgery.
- English speaking.
- Ability to consent for themselves.
- Aged 18 years and above.
- Access to a smartphone or computer/laptop (to be determined on the day of consent).
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Non-English speaking.
- Inability to consent for themselves.
- Actively pregnant (SOC) or planning to become pregnant in the next 2 months (research only). Urine testing will be done as SOC prior to undergoing surgery.
- Active or past severe psychiatric instability (e.g., active psychosis, acute suicidality)
- Active, uncontrolled use of illicit drugs use such as methamphetamine, cocaine, opioids, etc., as listed in their clinical charts.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Intraoperative Propofol dose (mg/kg/hr)
Time frame: Duration of surgery
Our primary outcome is intraoperative anesthetic dose (i.e., propofol mg/kg/hr), which will be extracted from anesthesia records and entered into each patient's individual REDCap record by the study personnel.
Change in serum inflammatory biomarker IL-2 (pg/mL)
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 week post-surgery
The investigators will measure serum biomarker of inflammation IL-2 (pg/mL) before and after surgery, and again at 2- and 6-week follow-ups, to assess how cannabis exposure modulates immune responses.
Change in serum inflammatory biomarker IL-6 (pg/mL)
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 week post-surgery
The investigators will measure serum biomarker of inflammation IL-6 (pg/mL) before and after surgery, and again at 2- and 6-week follow-ups, to assess how cannabis exposure modulates immune responses.
Change in serum inflammatory biomarker TNF-α (pg/mL)
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 week post-surgery
The investigators will measure serum biomarker of inflammation TNF-α (pg/mL) before and after surgery, and again at 2- and 6-week follow-ups, to assess how cannabis exposure modulates immune responses.
Change in serum inflammatory biomarker CRP (pg/mL)
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 week post-surgery
The investigators will measure serum biomarker of inflammation CRP (pg/mL) before and after surgery, and again at 2- and 6-week follow-ups, to assess how cannabis exposure modulates immune responses.
11 secondary outcomes
Intraoperative opioid dose (MME)
Time frame: Duration of surgery
Wound healing (cm^2)
Time frame: From end of surgery to 6 week post-surgery
Postoperative pain scores (0-10)
Time frame: Post-operative day 0
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) variability minutes
Time frame: Duration of surgery
Heart rate (HR) variability in minutes
Time frame: During surgery
Total intraoperative vasopressor use (microgram/kg/min)
Time frame: During surgery
Postoperative opioid consumption (MME) during hospital stay
Time frame: Post-operative day 0
Pain assessment following discharge
Time frame: Post-operative day 0 to 6 week post-surgery
Opioid consumption (MME) following discharge
Time frame: Post-operative day 0 to 6 week post-surgery
Cannabis use following discharge
Time frame: Post-operative day 0 to 6 week post-surgery
Cannabis cravings following discharge
Time frame: Post-operative day 0 to 6 week post-surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cannabis Use
Not yet recruiting
Substance Use and Media Preferences
Substance Use Behavior, Cannabis Intoxication
RecruitingObservational study
Study of an Oral Fluid Testing Approach
Cannabis Use, Cannabis Intoxication
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Psilocybin-assisted Treatment for Cannabis Use Disorder
Cannabis Use Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Assessing Benefits and Harms of Cannabis/Cannabinoid Use Among Cancer Patients Treated in Community Oncology Clinics
Breast Carcinoma, Colorectal Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Lung Health and Breath Biomarkers: Acute Effects of Inhaled Cannabis
Cannabis Use, Tobacco
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Antoinette Burger, PhD study director
University of Missouri-Columbia
Randi Foraker, PhD study director
University of Missouri-Columbia
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cannabis Use, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intraoperative Propofol dose (mg/kg/hr) (time frame: Duration of surgery). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jan 2026.