GriefSAGENCT07356635
Cardiovascular Effects of Grieving
A study testing Value-affirmation in people with Grief and Cardiovascular Health, run by University of South Florida at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Self-affirmation (SA) theory proposes that people are motivated to maintain a positive self-image of being worthy, stable, and capable. Self-affirmation (SA) manipulations have been shown to effectively increase self-worth as well as reduce cardiovascular reactivity while enhancing cardiovascular recovery in response… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Grief, Cardiovascular Health, Emotion
- What is being tested?
- Value-affirmation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 140 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Oct 2025to Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Individuals aged 18 and older who have experienced the death of family member and/or friend within the last 2 to 18 months.
- Participants must also be fluent in English as all procedures will be conducted in English.
Who cannot join
- Individuals with a history of cardiovascular disease or disorders, those who report being pregnant, or are taking medication which may alter/affect cardiovascular and/or cognitive processes.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of South Florida, Psychology and Communication Sciences and Disorders Lab Building
Tampa, Florida, 33620
Kaiyuan Luo, BS, BA, 412-708-9227, kluo@usf.edu
About this study
Official title: Investigating Cardiovascular Reactivity and Recovery of Young Adults During Grief-Recall, With Self-Affirmation as Potential Intervention
Self-affirmation (SA) theory proposes that people are motivated to maintain a positive self-image of being worthy, stable, and capable. Self-affirmation (SA) manipulations have been shown to effectively increase self-worth as well as reduce cardiovascular reactivity while enhancing cardiovascular recovery in response to stress. While SA is discussed as a way to alleviate grief, its effect on cardiovascular reactivity (CVR) and recovery to grief recall has yet to be studied within laboratory settings. This study proposes an experimental design to examine how an in-lab manipulation promoting self-affirmation can improve patients' cardiovascular responses during and after a grief recall procedure. The investigators hypothesized that grief severity (a continuous variable) interacts with condition (a categorical variable with two levels, i.e., SA intervention vs. control) to predict CV reactivity and recovery as outcomes.
Primary Objective 1: To investigate effects of self-affirmation intervention on cardiovascular responses among grieving participants during and after grief recall.
Secondary Objective 1: To investigate the relationship of grief severity with psychological stress.
Read the detailed description
Background
Grief refers to individual's emotional response to real, perceived, and anticipated loss, and is known to induce various psychological symptoms such as depression and anxiety and physical symptoms such as nausea, tension, or fatigue. If a grief reaction is prolonged and left untreated, it could lead to prolonged grief disorder and affect individuals' daily lives. More severe consequences, such as heightened mortality rates, have been observed among bereaved populations, particularly in relation to accidental, violent, and alcohol-related causes, where excess mortality ranges from 50% to 150%. These effects are more pronounced during short durations of bereavement (<6 months) compared to longer periods and are greater among younger individuals.
Grief is a kind of psychological stress that induces the fight-or-flight response, activating the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and in turn, promoting the elevation in the sympathetic nervous system which result in heightened heart rate, blood pressure, blood glucose levels, etc. Specifically, studies have revealed grief's influence on cardiovascular system. Cardiovascular biomarkers affected by short- and long-term bereavement include heightened cortisol levels, dysregulated HPA axis, and more. Many of the effects are long-lasting and highly determined by length of bereavement. For example, a previous study revealed that early bereavement is associated with increased 24-hour heart rate and decreased heart rate variability, and the effect is persistent through 6 months into bereavement. Studies have also shown that immediate grief (grief in response to death of a closed one within 6 months) is correlated with heightened cardiovascular reactivity (CVR) and impaired cardiovascular recovery.
Investigating grief within a laboratory setting presents methodological challenges; however, the Grief Recall (GR) interview offers a standardized approach to eliciting bereavement-related stress. Developed by Dr. Mary-Frances O'Connor at the University of Arizona, GR is an adaptation of the Anger Recall and Separation Recall tasks and utilizes a semi-structured interview to induce grief as the primary stressor. Findings indicate that GR elicits significant increases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from a resting state, with grief severity predicting the magnitude of SBP elevation. The present study builds upon this work by employing a larger sample size and expanding cardiovascular measurements beyond blood pressure to include heart rate (HR), respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), and cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR). This approach aims to provide a more comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular responses to grief elicitation within a controlled experimental framework.
Self-affirmation (SA) theory proposes that people are motivated to maintain a positive self-image of being worthy, stable, and capable. The theory also states that when facing threats, people engaging in self-affirmation resist negative consequences by maintaining a self-competent image. Studies have revealed that self-affirmation manipulation targets brain regions responsible for self-processing (medial prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex), as well as valuation (ventral striatum + ventral medial prefrontal cortex) systems. With increased activity in reward-related brain regions, self-affirmation has been shown in multiple studies to influence stress-related physiological responses in both laboratory and real-life settings. For example, SA significantly reduce cortisol response to laboratory stress tasks, moderated by dispositional self-resources an indicator of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity, with effects further influenced by dispositional self-resources. Studies have also been conducted to show a positive buffer effect of SA test on cardiovascular outcomes. For instance, one study revealed that SA tasks attenuate cardiovascular reactivity during negative emotion induction, as evidenced by lower maximum heart rate, higher respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), and overall reduced ratings of negative affect.
Besides blood pressure and heart rate, one key measurement in this experiment is respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). RSA is a form of heart rate variability and is defined as the variation between heart beats coincident with respiration. It is measured by calculating the R-R intervals (time between the R peaks) in the ECG waveform. RSA is controlled by the parasympathetic nervous system and has been shown to be an indicator of stress in laboratory settings. In this study, the investigators propose to measure participants' reactions to grieving stress by RSA. Consider participants' respiration pattern may be affected by sudden mood change during the grief recall task, the study team would also collect impedance cardiography data and use the measurement of respiration rate if needed. Impedance cardiography also provides measures of hemodynamic cardiovascular functioning such as cardiac output and total peripheral resistance.
While SA has been suggested to mitigate grief, its effect on grief has yet to be studied within laboratory settings. Previous studies have argued that "loss of self" is common among divorcing couples, who experience a loss that often involves grieving. Higher ratings of judge-rated loss of self are associated with higher endorsements of complicated grief symptoms among divorced couples. Given the potential for self-affirmation to enhance self-confidence and self-worth, it may also mitigate grief-related stress and physiological stress responses.
Study Protocol
Participants will be recruited from the SONA undergraduate participation pool of University of South Florida. Two RAs will be present during the lab visit. The primary RA is responsible for obtaining consent, guiding the experiment process, and conducting grief-recall interview. The secondary RA is responsible for collecting physiological data by operating the computer in the lab common area. The investigators will add RAs to the protocol through a MOD submitted the IRB.
The informed consent electronic document will be provided to the subjects as they arrive to the lab. After informed consent has been acquired, the subjects will be asked to complete several questionnaires including the Health Questionnaire, the Pre-task Grief Questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Self-Worth Questionnaire (SWQ), the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), the Inclusion of Others in the Self Scale, the Global Meaning Violation Scale, the Social Relationships Index (SRI) and the Prolonged Grief Disorder (PG-13-Revised) Scale.
Next the participants' heights and weights will be measured, after which cardiovascular measurement equipment will be attached. Then, the participants will sit quietly as they watch an emotionally neutral nature video of Alaska. This rest period will last for 10 minutes, during which ECG impedance cardiography and blood pressure will be measured.
Once resting recordings are obtained, participants will be randomly assigned to the self-affirmation (SA) task or control tasks. The self-affirmation/control task will be administered for10 minutes, during which the study team will collect ECG, impedance cardiography and blood pressure measures. After the task, the subjects will complete self-worth questionnaire (SWQ) before the primary RA enters the room to perform the grief recall (GR) interview. The GR usually will be administered for 10 minutes, during which the study team will collect ECG, impedance cardiography and blood pressure measures.
Once the GR interview is finished, participants will be left alone in the room and instructed to sit quietly for 10 minutes for a recovery period. ECG, impedance cardiography and blood pressure measures will be taken throughout. After recovery, participants will finish the third part of questionnaires, including the third Self-Worth Questionnaire (SWQ), Grief Recall Response Questionnaire, Post-Grief Interview Questionnaire, and the Brief State Rumination Inventory. The research assistant will then conclude the study, thank, and compensate the participant.
Key Methods
Grief Recall: During the Grief Recall interview the PI will conduct a guided interview to promote feelings of grief in bereaved participants. The interview takes roughly ten minutes, during which research assistants ask participants to first recall a situation that happened after they experienced their loss and to wish their lost one was there with them. The grief recall interview has been shown to efficiently promote feelings of grief and elevate blood pressure in laboratory settings. Participants' grief severity was also found to be positively associated with their blood pressure reactivity, highlighting its relevance as a method for assessing cardiovascular outcomes. The GR interview was developed by one of our collaborators, Dr.Mary-Frances O'Connor. Dr. O'Connor has informed us that she has used grief recall in a number of studies with bereaved participants without any adverse events. She will also train the PI and study staff in administering the GR interview. Dr.O'Connor's affiliation to the study will be limited only to train the study PI and the study team. Dr.O'Connor will not be involve in the study procedures or any study activities. The study team do not intend to share identifiable information with Dr.O'Connor or any other collaborators unless permissions are obtained from our respective IRBs.
Self-affirmation intervention: Participants will be randomly assigned to either a self-affirming task or a non-affirming neutral task prior to engaging in grief recall. During the ten-minute self-affirmation task, participants will be asked to rank 11 values they may find important in their lives, and write about their top-ranked feature. This method has been shown to promote participant's self-awareness of their value and self-worth. Participants in no-affirmation control group will be asked to rank their top 12 favorite jellybean flavors and write about the 3rd and 4th favorite flavor for the same duration of time. This control task has also been tested to propose same amount of workload without promoting participants' self-worth.
- Conditions
- Grief, Cardiovascular Health, Emotion
- Being tested
- Value-affirmation
- Keywords
- grief, cardiovascular reactivity, cardiovascular health, heart rate variability, psychophysiology, self-affirmation, value-affirmation, stress, mourning
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Value-affirmationBehavioural
Also called self-affirmation
Participants who are randomly assigned to the value-affirmation condition will be presented with 11 values and qualities to rank in order of importance from 1 to 11. Values presented including: being creative / artistic, government or politics, independence, learning and gaining knowledge, athletic ability, belonging to a group (such as your community, cultural group, or school club), music, career, spiritual or religious values, sense of humor.
Participants will then be asked to write about their top-ranked value/quality and how it makes them feel good about themselves for 10 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Grief-reducing intervention | Experimental | Participants will be randomly assigned to either a self-affirming task or a non-affirming neutral task prior to engaging in grief recall. Receives: Behavioral: Value-affirmation |
| Control group | No intervention | Participants will be randomly assigned to either a self-affirming task or a non-affirming neutral task prior to engaging in grief recall. Participants in no-affirmation control group will be asked to rank their top 12 favorite jellybean flavors and write about the 3rd and 4th favorite flavor for 10 minutes. This control task has also been tested to propose same amount of workload without promoting participants' self-worth. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hypothesis 1: There will be a main effect of self-affirmation condition on CV reactivity and recovery to the grief recall task
A series of one-way ANCOVAs will be conducted to compare measures of cardiovascular reactivity and recovery between the self-affirmation and control conditions, controlling for gender, race, and baseline values, using a significance level of α = .05.
CV reactivity will be operationalized as the difference between CV during grief recall and CV baseline measures.
CV recovery will be operationalized as the difference between CV recovery measures and CV baseline measures.
Measured: Two months after the last participant data collection.
Hypothesis 2: Grief severity (as measured by the PG-13 Questionnaire) will moderate the effect of the self-affirmation condition on cardiovascular reactivity and recovery.
A series of multiple regression analyses will be conducted separately for HR, SBP, DBP and HF-HRV on reactivity and recovery. Predictor variables will include grief severity (PG-13 scores), experimental condition (value-affirmation vs. control, dummy-coded), and the condition x Grief Severity interaction. Dependent variables will be cardiovascular reactivity and recovery. A significant interaction would support the hypothesis that the effect of self-affirmation on reactivity and/or recovery is dependent on grief levels. It is predicted that the stress-buffering effect of self-affirmation will be strongest for individuals with high grief severity, evidenced by a smaller HR, SBP, and HF-HRV compared to the control group. The method calculating recovery would be the same as the method used in H1.
Measured: Two months after the last participant.
Hypothesis 3 (Exploratory): There will be a mediated moderation effect: the self-report measurement of self-worth mediates the change in cardiovascular reactivity, moderated by grief severity.
A moderated mediation analysis with Hayes PROCESS model will be conducted to explore whether the effect of value-affirmation on cardiovascular reactivity is mediated by changes in self-worth and moderated by grief severity. Change in self-worth will be operationalized by the difference in scores on the Self-Worth Questionnaire (SWQ) taken at timepoint 2 and 3 (right before and after the grief recall). The research team hypothesized that the self-worth variable will mediate the relationship between experimental condition and cardiovascular reactivity, with the relationship between self-worth and reactivity moderated by the participant's level of grief severity.
Measured: Two months after the last participant data collection.
Hypothesis 4-1: Grief is related to psychological stress among young adult grieving participants: depression
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is positively associated with participant's level of depression, a bivariate correlation will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The BDI scale includes 21 questions with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 63, where higher value indicates higher levels of depression. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher in BDI, indicating greater vulnerability to depression.
Measured: Two months after the last participant.
Hypothesis 4-2: Grief is related to psychological stress among young adult grieving participants: anxiety
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is positively associated with participant's anxiety level, a bivariate correlation will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 scale includes 7 questions with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 21, where higher value indicates higher levels of anxiety. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher in GAD-7, indicating greater vulnerability to anxiety.
Measured: Two months after the last participant.
Hypothesis 4-3: Grief is related to psychological stress among young adult grieving participants: worries
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is positively associated with participant's worriness level, a bivariate correlation will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). The PSWQ scale includes 16 questions with a minimum value of 16 and a maximum value of 80, where higher value indicates higher levels of worriness. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher in PSWQ, indicating greater levels of worriness.
Measured: Two months after the last participant.
Hypothesis 4-4: Grief is related to psychological stress among young adult grieving participants: perceived stress
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is positively associated with participant's sleep quality, a bivariate correlation will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). PSS-10 scale includes 10 questions with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 40, where higher value indicates higher levels of daily stress experienced within the last month. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher in PSS, indicating greater levels of perceived stress.
Measured: Two months after the last participant.
Hypothesis 4-5: Grief is related to psychological stress among young adult grieving participants: sleep quality
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is positively associated with participant's sleep disturbance, a bivariate correlation will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the Prolonged Grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). PSQI includes a mixture of likert-scale questions and short-answer questions that is transferrable to scores, with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 21, where higher value indicates worst sleeping quality. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher in PSQI, indicating greater levels of sleep disturbance.
Measured: Two months after the last participant.
Hypothesis 4-6: Grief is related to psychological stress among young adult grieving participants: Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is positively associated with participant's PTSD symptoms, a bivariate correlation will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the Prolonged Grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). PCL-5 includes 20 questions with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 80, where higher value indicates higher PTSD symptoms. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher in PCL-5, indicating greater levels PTSD symptoms.
Measured: Two months after the last participant.
Hypothesis 5-1 (exploratory): Grief Severity is associated with meaning violation
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is associated with higher meaning violation, linear regression will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Global Meaning Violation Scale (GMVS). GMVS includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 78, where higher value indicates higher levels meaning violation brought by the death event. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher on GMVS, indicating higher level of meaning violation.
Measured: Two months after the last participant.
Hypothesis 5-2 (exploratory): Grief Severity is associated with perceived inclusion
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is associated with higher inclusion of others in one's self, a linear regression will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Inclusion of Others in the Self Scale (IOS). IOS includes 2 subscales, each with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 7, where higher value indicates higher levels of inclusion of other person or other group members to the self.
Measured: Two months after the last participant.
Hypothesis 5-3 (exploratory): Grief Severity is associated with complicated relationship
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is associated with complicated relationship, a linear regression will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Social Relationship Index (SRI). SRI includes short-answer questions and likert-scale selections, with a minimum value of 4 and a maximum value of 24, where higher value indicates more complicated relationship.
Measured: Two months after the last participant.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jan 2026
- Study start16 Oct 2025
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for GriefStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to either value-affirmation treatment or control condition.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of South Florida
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Arizona State University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kaiyuan Luo, University of South Florida
- Investigators
- Kristen Salomon, Ph.D, Study director, University of South FloridaKaiyuan Luo, BS, BA, Principal investigator, University of South Florida
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07356635
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY008302
- Acronym
- SAGE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 21 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Marchetti, I., Mor, N., Chiorri, C., Koster, E.H.W. (2024). Brief State Rumination Inventory (BSRI). In: Medvedev, O.N., Krägeloh, C.U., Siegert, R.J., Singh, N.N. (eds) Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_119-1
Campo, R.A., Uchino, B.N., Holt-Lunstad, J., Vaughn, A.A., Reblin, M., & Smith, T.W. (2009). The Assessment of Positivity and Negativity in Social Networks: The Reliability and Validity of the Social Relationships Index. Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 471-486. DOI: 10.1002/jcop.20308
Prigerson HG, Horowitz MJ, Jacobs SC, Parkes CM, Aslan M, Goodkin K, Raphael B, Marwit SJ, Wortman C, Neimeyer RA, Bonanno GA, Block SD, Kissane D, Boelen P, Maercker A, Litz BT, Johnson JG, First MB, Maciejewski PK. Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
PubMed 19652695Park, C. L., Riley, K. E., George, L. S., Gutierrez, I. A., Hale, A. E., Cho, D., & Braun, T. D. (2016). Global Meaning Violation Scale (GMVS) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t65154-000
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
PubMed 2748771Meyer TJ, Miller ML, Metzger RL, Borkovec TD. Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(6):487-95. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6.
PubMed 2076086Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
PubMed 26606250Tiwari R, Kumar R, Malik S, Raj T, Kumar P. Analysis of Heart Rate Variability and Implication of Different Factors on Heart Rate Variability. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(5):e160721189770. doi: 10.2174/1573403X16999201231203854.
PubMed 33390146Szuhany KL, Malgaroli M, Miron CD, Simon NM. Prolonged Grief Disorder: Course, Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2021 Jun;19(2):161-172. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20200052. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
PubMed 34690579Sakuragi S, Sugiyama Y, Takeuchi K. Effects of laughing and weeping on mood and heart rate variability. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2002 May;21(3):159-65. doi: 10.2114/jpa.21.159.
PubMed 12148458Saavedra Perez HC, Direk N, Milic J, Ikram MA, Hofman A, Tiemeier H. The Impact of Complicated Grief on Diurnal Cortisol Levels Two Years After Loss: A Population-Based Study. Psychosom Med. 2017 May;79(4):426-433. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000422.
PubMed 27879552Kim HG, Cheon EJ, Bai DS, Lee YH, Koo BH. Stress and Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature. Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Mar;15(3):235-245. doi: 10.30773/pi.2017.08.17. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
PubMed 29486547Fagundes CP, Wu EL. Matters of the heart: Grief, morbidity, and mortality. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2020 Jun 1;29(3):235-241. doi: 10.1177/0963721420917698. Epub 2020 May 7.
PubMed 33758475Critcher CR, Dunning D. Self-affirmations provide a broader perspective on self-threat. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Jan;41(1):3-18. doi: 10.1177/0146167214554956. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
PubMed 25319717
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigating Cardiovascular Reactivity and Recovery of Young Adults During Grief-Recall, With Self-Affirmation as Potential Intervention
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07356635
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SAGE / STUDY008302
- Conditions
- Grief, Cardiovascular Health, Emotion
- Keywords
- grief, cardiovascular reactivity, cardiovascular health, heart rate variability, psychophysiology, self-affirmation, value-affirmation, stress
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of South FloridaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Arizona State University
- Study start
- 16 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Self-affirmation (SA) theory proposes that people are motivated to maintain a positive self-image of being worthy, stable, and capable. Self-affirmation (SA) manipulations have been shown to effectively increase self-worth as well as reduce cardiovascular reactivity while enhancing cardiovascular recovery in response to stress. While SA is discussed as a way to alleviate grief, its effect on cardiovascular reactivity (CVR) and recovery to grief recall has yet to be studied within laboratory settings. This study proposes an experimental design to examine how an in-lab manipulation promoting self-affirmation can improve patients' cardiovascular responses during and after a grief recall procedure. The investigators hypothesized that grief severity (a continuous variable) interacts with condition (a categorical variable with two levels, i.e., SA intervention vs. control) to predict CV reactivity and recovery as outcomes.
Primary Objective 1: To investigate effects of self-affirmation intervention on cardiovascular responses among grieving participants during and after grief recall.
Secondary Objective 1: To investigate the relationship of grief severity with psychological stress.
Detailed description
Background
Grief refers to individual's emotional response to real, perceived, and anticipated loss, and is known to induce various psychological symptoms such as depression and anxiety and physical symptoms such as nausea, tension, or fatigue. If a grief reaction is prolonged and left untreated, it could lead to prolonged grief disorder and affect individuals' daily lives. More severe consequences, such as heightened mortality rates, have been observed among bereaved populations, particularly in relation to accidental, violent, and alcohol-related causes, where excess mortality ranges from 50% to 150%. These effects are more pronounced during short durations of bereavement (<6 months) compared to longer periods and are greater among younger individuals.
Grief is a kind of psychological stress that induces the fight-or-flight response, activating the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and in turn, promoting the elevation in the sympathetic nervous system which result in heightened heart rate, blood pressure, blood glucose levels, etc. Specifically, studies have revealed grief's influence on cardiovascular system. Cardiovascular biomarkers affected by short- and long-term bereavement include heightened cortisol levels, dysregulated HPA axis, and more. Many of the effects are long-lasting and highly determined by length of bereavement. For example, a previous study revealed that early bereavement is associated with increased 24-hour heart rate and decreased heart rate variability, and the effect is persistent through 6 months into bereavement. Studies have also shown that immediate grief (grief in response to death of a closed one within 6 months) is correlated with heightened cardiovascular reactivity (CVR) and impaired cardiovascular recovery.
Investigating grief within a laboratory setting presents methodological challenges; however, the Grief Recall (GR) interview offers a standardized approach to eliciting bereavement-related stress. Developed by Dr. Mary-Frances O'Connor at the University of Arizona, GR is an adaptation of the Anger Recall and Separation Recall tasks and utilizes a semi-structured interview to induce grief as the primary stressor. Findings indicate that GR elicits significant increases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from a resting state, with grief severity predicting the magnitude of SBP elevation. The present study builds upon this work by employing a larger sample size and expanding cardiovascular measurements beyond blood pressure to include heart rate (HR), respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), and cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR). This approach aims to provide a more comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular responses to grief elicitation within a controlled experimental framework.
Self-affirmation (SA) theory proposes that people are motivated to maintain a positive self-image of being worthy, stable, and capable. The theory also states that when facing threats, people engaging in self-affirmation resist negative consequences by maintaining a self-competent image. Studies have revealed that self-affirmation manipulation targets brain regions responsible for self-processing (medial prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex), as well as valuation (ventral striatum + ventral medial prefrontal cortex) systems. With increased activity in reward-related brain regions, self-affirmation has been shown in multiple studies to influence stress-related physiological responses in both laboratory and real-life settings. For example, SA significantly reduce cortisol response to laboratory stress tasks, moderated by dispositional self-resources an indicator of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity, with effects further influenced by dispositional self-resources. Studies have also been conducted to show a positive buffer effect of SA test on cardiovascular outcomes. For instance, one study revealed that SA tasks attenuate cardiovascular reactivity during negative emotion induction, as evidenced by lower maximum heart rate, higher respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), and overall reduced ratings of negative affect.
Besides blood pressure and heart rate, one key measurement in this experiment is respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). RSA is a form of heart rate variability and is defined as the variation between heart beats coincident with respiration. It is measured by calculating the R-R intervals (time between the R peaks) in the ECG waveform. RSA is controlled by the parasympathetic nervous system and has been shown to be an indicator of stress in laboratory settings. In this study, the investigators propose to measure participants' reactions to grieving stress by RSA. Consider participants' respiration pattern may be affected by sudden mood change during the grief recall task, the study team would also collect impedance cardiography data and use the measurement of respiration rate if needed. Impedance cardiography also provides measures of hemodynamic cardiovascular functioning such as cardiac output and total peripheral resistance.
While SA has been suggested to mitigate grief, its effect on grief has yet to be studied within laboratory settings. Previous studies have argued that "loss of self" is common among divorcing couples, who experience a loss that often involves grieving. Higher ratings of judge-rated loss of self are associated with higher endorsements of complicated grief symptoms among divorced couples. Given the potential for self-affirmation to enhance self-confidence and self-worth, it may also mitigate grief-related stress and physiological stress responses.
Study Protocol
Participants will be recruited from the SONA undergraduate participation pool of University of South Florida. Two RAs will be present during the lab visit. The primary RA is responsible for obtaining consent, guiding the experiment process, and conducting grief-recall interview. The secondary RA is responsible for collecting physiological data by operating the computer in the lab common area. The investigators will add RAs to the protocol through a MOD submitted the IRB.
The informed consent electronic document will be provided to the subjects as they arrive to the lab. After informed consent has been acquired, the subjects will be asked to complete several questionnaires including the Health Questionnaire, the Pre-task Grief Questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Self-Worth Questionnaire (SWQ), the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), the Inclusion of Others in the Self Scale, the Global Meaning Violation Scale, the Social Relationships Index (SRI) and the Prolonged Grief Disorder (PG-13-Revised) Scale.
Next the participants' heights and weights will be measured, after which cardiovascular measurement equipment will be attached. Then, the participants will sit quietly as they watch an emotionally neutral nature video of Alaska. This rest period will last for 10 minutes, during which ECG impedance cardiography and blood pressure will be measured.
Once resting recordings are obtained, participants will be randomly assigned to the self-affirmation (SA) task or control tasks. The self-affirmation/control task will be administered for10 minutes, during which the study team will collect ECG, impedance cardiography and blood pressure measures. After the task, the subjects will complete self-worth questionnaire (SWQ) before the primary RA enters the room to perform the grief recall (GR) interview. The GR usually will be administered for 10 minutes, during which the study team will collect ECG, impedance cardiography and blood pressure measures.
Once the GR interview is finished, participants will be left alone in the room and instructed to sit quietly for 10 minutes for a recovery period. ECG, impedance cardiography and blood pressure measures will be taken throughout. After recovery, participants will finish the third part of questionnaires, including the third Self-Worth Questionnaire (SWQ), Grief Recall Response Questionnaire, Post-Grief Interview Questionnaire, and the Brief State Rumination Inventory. The research assistant will then conclude the study, thank, and compensate the participant.
Key Methods
Grief Recall: During the Grief Recall interview the PI will conduct a guided interview to promote feelings of grief in bereaved participants. The interview takes roughly ten minutes, during which research assistants ask participants to first recall a situation that happened after they experienced their loss and to wish their lost one was there with them. The grief recall interview has been shown to efficiently promote feelings of grief and elevate blood pressure in laboratory settings. Participants' grief severity was also found to be positively associated with their blood pressure reactivity, highlighting its relevance as a method for assessing cardiovascular outcomes. The GR interview was developed by one of our collaborators, Dr.Mary-Frances O'Connor. Dr. O'Connor has informed us that she has used grief recall in a number of studies with bereaved participants without any adverse events. She will also train the PI and study staff in administering the GR interview. Dr.O'Connor's affiliation to the study will be limited only to train the study PI and the study team. Dr.O'Connor will not be involve in the study procedures or any study activities. The study team do not intend to share identifiable information with Dr.O'Connor or any other collaborators unless permissions are obtained from our respective IRBs.
Self-affirmation intervention: Participants will be randomly assigned to either a self-affirming task or a non-affirming neutral task prior to engaging in grief recall. During the ten-minute self-affirmation task, participants will be asked to rank 11 values they may find important in their lives, and write about their top-ranked feature. This method has been shown to promote participant's self-awareness of their value and self-worth. Participants in no-affirmation control group will be asked to rank their top 12 favorite jellybean flavors and write about the 3rd and 4th favorite flavor for the same duration of time. This control task has also been tested to propose same amount of workload without promoting participants' self-worth.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to either value-affirmation treatment or control condition.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Grief-reducing intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Value-affirmationParticipants will be randomly assigned to either a self-affirming task or a non-affirming neutral task prior to engaging in grief recall. |
| Control group | No intervention | –Participants will be randomly assigned to either a self-affirming task or a non-affirming neutral task prior to engaging in grief recall. Participants in no-affirmation control group will be asked to rank their top 12 favorite jellybean flavors and write about the 3rd and 4th favorite flavor for 10 minutes. This control task has also been tested to propose same amount of workload without promoting participants' self-worth. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Individuals aged 18 and older who have experienced the death of family member and/or friend within the last 2 to 18 months.
- Participants must also be fluent in English as all procedures will be conducted in English.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Individuals with a history of cardiovascular disease or disorders, those who report being pregnant, or are taking medication which may alter/affect cardiovascular and/or cognitive processes.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Value-affirmationAlso: self-affirmationParticipants who are randomly assigned to the value-affirmation condition will be presented with 11 values and qualities to rank in order of importance from 1 to 11. Values presented including: being creative / artistic, government or politics, independence, learning and gaining knowledge, athletic ability, belonging to a group (such as your community, cultural group, or school club), music, career, spiritual or religious values, sense of humor. Participants will then be asked to write about their top-ranked value/quality and how it makes them feel good about themselves for 10 minutes. | Behavioural | Grief-reducing intervention |
Primary outcome
Hypothesis 1: There will be a main effect of self-affirmation condition on CV reactivity and recovery to the grief recall task
Time frame: Two months after the last participant data collection.
A series of one-way ANCOVAs will be conducted to compare measures of cardiovascular reactivity and recovery between the self-affirmation and control conditions, controlling for gender, race, and baseline values, using a significance level of α = .05. CV reactivity will be operationalized as the difference between CV during grief recall and CV baseline measures. CV recovery will be operationalized as the difference between CV recovery measures and CV baseline measures.
Hypothesis 2: Grief severity (as measured by the PG-13 Questionnaire) will moderate the effect of the self-affirmation condition on cardiovascular reactivity and recovery.
Time frame: Two months after the last participant.
A series of multiple regression analyses will be conducted separately for HR, SBP, DBP and HF-HRV on reactivity and recovery. Predictor variables will include grief severity (PG-13 scores), experimental condition (value-affirmation vs. control, dummy-coded), and the condition x Grief Severity interaction. Dependent variables will be cardiovascular reactivity and recovery. A significant interaction would support the hypothesis that the effect of self-affirmation on reactivity and/or recovery is dependent on grief levels. It is predicted that the stress-buffering effect of self-affirmation will be strongest for individuals with high grief severity, evidenced by a smaller HR, SBP, and HF-HRV compared to the control group. The method calculating recovery would be the same as the method used in H1.
Hypothesis 3 (Exploratory): There will be a mediated moderation effect: the self-report measurement of self-worth mediates the change in cardiovascular reactivity, moderated by grief severity.
Time frame: Two months after the last participant data collection.
A moderated mediation analysis with Hayes PROCESS model will be conducted to explore whether the effect of value-affirmation on cardiovascular reactivity is mediated by changes in self-worth and moderated by grief severity. Change in self-worth will be operationalized by the difference in scores on the Self-Worth Questionnaire (SWQ) taken at timepoint 2 and 3 (right before and after the grief recall). The research team hypothesized that the self-worth variable will mediate the relationship between experimental condition and cardiovascular reactivity, with the relationship between self-worth and reactivity moderated by the participant's level of grief severity.
Hypothesis 4-1: Grief is related to psychological stress among young adult grieving participants: depression
Time frame: Two months after the last participant.
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is positively associated with participant's level of depression, a bivariate correlation will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The BDI scale includes 21 questions with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 63, where higher value indicates higher levels of depression. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher in BDI, indicating greater vulnerability to depression.
Hypothesis 4-2: Grief is related to psychological stress among young adult grieving participants: anxiety
Time frame: Two months after the last participant.
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is positively associated with participant's anxiety level, a bivariate correlation will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 scale includes 7 questions with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 21, where higher value indicates higher levels of anxiety. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher in GAD-7, indicating greater vulnerability to anxiety.
Hypothesis 4-3: Grief is related to psychological stress among young adult grieving participants: worries
Time frame: Two months after the last participant.
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is positively associated with participant's worriness level, a bivariate correlation will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). The PSWQ scale includes 16 questions with a minimum value of 16 and a maximum value of 80, where higher value indicates higher levels of worriness. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher in PSWQ, indicating greater levels of worriness.
Hypothesis 4-4: Grief is related to psychological stress among young adult grieving participants: perceived stress
Time frame: Two months after the last participant.
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is positively associated with participant's sleep quality, a bivariate correlation will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). PSS-10 scale includes 10 questions with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 40, where higher value indicates higher levels of daily stress experienced within the last month. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher in PSS, indicating greater levels of perceived stress.
Hypothesis 4-5: Grief is related to psychological stress among young adult grieving participants: sleep quality
Time frame: Two months after the last participant.
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is positively associated with participant's sleep disturbance, a bivariate correlation will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the Prolonged Grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). PSQI includes a mixture of likert-scale questions and short-answer questions that is transferrable to scores, with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 21, where higher value indicates worst sleeping quality. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher in PSQI, indicating greater levels of sleep disturbance.
Hypothesis 4-6: Grief is related to psychological stress among young adult grieving participants: Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Time frame: Two months after the last participant.
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is positively associated with participant's PTSD symptoms, a bivariate correlation will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the Prolonged Grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). PCL-5 includes 20 questions with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 80, where higher value indicates higher PTSD symptoms. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher in PCL-5, indicating greater levels PTSD symptoms.
Hypothesis 5-1 (exploratory): Grief Severity is associated with meaning violation
Time frame: Two months after the last participant.
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is associated with higher meaning violation, linear regression will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Global Meaning Violation Scale (GMVS). GMVS includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 78, where higher value indicates higher levels meaning violation brought by the death event. The research team proposed that participants scoring higher on PG-13 would also score higher on GMVS, indicating higher level of meaning violation.
Hypothesis 5-2 (exploratory): Grief Severity is associated with perceived inclusion
Time frame: Two months after the last participant.
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is associated with higher inclusion of others in one's self, a linear regression will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Inclusion of Others in the Self Scale (IOS). IOS includes 2 subscales, each with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 7, where higher value indicates higher levels of inclusion of other person or other group members to the self.
Hypothesis 5-3 (exploratory): Grief Severity is associated with complicated relationship
Time frame: Two months after the last participant.
To test the hypothesis that grief severity is associated with complicated relationship, a linear regression will be conducted. Grief severity, as measured by scores on the prolonged grief (PG-13) questionnaire, will serve as the predictor variable. PG-13 includes 13 questions with a minimum value of 13 and a maximum value of 65, while higher value indicates higher level of grief. The outcome variable will be the scores of the Social Relationship Index (SRI). SRI includes short-answer questions and likert-scale selections, with a minimum value of 4 and a maximum value of 24, where higher value indicates more complicated relationship.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jan 2026.
- BackgroundMarchetti, I., Mor, N., Chiorri, C., Koster, E.H.W. (2024). Brief State Rumination Inventory (BSRI). In: Medvedev, O.N., Krägeloh, C.U., Siegert, R.J., Singh, N.N. (eds) Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_119-1
- BackgroundCampo, R.A., Uchino, B.N., Holt-Lunstad, J., Vaughn, A.A., Reblin, M., & Smith, T.W. (2009). The Assessment of Positivity and Negativity in Social Networks: The Reliability and Validity of the Social Relationships Index. Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 471-486. DOI: 10.1002/jcop.20308
- Background: PubMed 19652695Prigerson HG, Horowitz MJ, Jacobs SC, Parkes CM, Aslan M, Goodkin K, Raphael B, Marwit SJ, Wortman C, Neimeyer RA, Bonanno GA, Block SD, Kissane D, Boelen P, Maercker A, Litz BT, Johnson JG, First MB, Maciejewski PK. Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
- BackgroundPark, C. L., Riley, K. E., George, L. S., Gutierrez, I. A., Hale, A. E., Cho, D., & Braun, T. D. (2016). Global Meaning Violation Scale (GMVS) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t65154-000
- BackgroundAron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
- Background: PubMed 2748771Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
- Background: PubMed 2076086Meyer TJ, Miller ML, Metzger RL, Borkovec TD. Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(6):487-95. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6.
- Background: PubMed 26606250Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
- Background: PubMed 33390146Tiwari R, Kumar R, Malik S, Raj T, Kumar P. Analysis of Heart Rate Variability and Implication of Different Factors on Heart Rate Variability. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(5):e160721189770. doi: 10.2174/1573403X16999201231203854.
- Background: PubMed 34690579Szuhany KL, Malgaroli M, Miron CD, Simon NM. Prolonged Grief Disorder: Course, Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2021 Jun;19(2):161-172. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20200052. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 12148458Sakuragi S, Sugiyama Y, Takeuchi K. Effects of laughing and weeping on mood and heart rate variability. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2002 May;21(3):159-65. doi: 10.2114/jpa.21.159.
- Background: PubMed 27879552Saavedra Perez HC, Direk N, Milic J, Ikram MA, Hofman A, Tiemeier H. The Impact of Complicated Grief on Diurnal Cortisol Levels Two Years After Loss: A Population-Based Study. Psychosom Med. 2017 May;79(4):426-433. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000422.
Related trials for Grief
Recruiting
Technology-supported Interventions for Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD)
Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD)
Recruiting
Accelerated Resolution Therapy for Early Maladaptive Grief
Grief
Not yet recruiting
Mechanisms Underlying Late-Life Prolonged Grief Disorder
Prolonged Grief Disorder
Active, not recruiting
Iyengar Yoga for Prolonged Grief Disorder
Prolonged Grief Disorder
Not yet recruiting
A Grief Support App for Adults Experiencing Bereavement
Grief
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Kristen Salomon, Ph.D study director
University of South Florida
Kaiyuan Luo, BS, BA principal investigator
University of South Florida
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Value-affirmation in people with Grief and Cardiovascular Health, run by University of South Florida at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kaiyuan Luo, BS, BA (412-708-9227, kluo@usf.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hypothesis 1: There will be a main effect of self-affirmation condition on CV reactivity and recovery to the grief recall task (time frame: Two months after the last participant data collection.). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07356635, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jan 2026.