AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic Dissection AneurysmNCT07362901

Effects of Precise Education on Postoperative Discomfort Symptoms in Patients With Aortic Disease Undergoing Endovascular Intervention: a Single-center Randomized Controlled Study

An observational study of Aortic Dissection Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection Rupture, run by First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University at 1 site in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The incidence and severity of post-procedural discomfort were evaluated in patients undergoing endovascular repair for aortic dissection across six symptom-related dimensions: immobilization-related issues, puncture site discomfort, adhesive-induced skin reactions, post-stent implantation syndrome, impairment in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
postoperative precise education
How many people
132 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2026to 1 Dec 2028
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with aortic dissection undergoing endovascular treatment

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with thoracoabdominal aortic disease
  • Patients who underwent endovascular treatment of the thoracoabdominal aorta via the femoral artery approach

Who cannot join

  • Aortic disease caused by infection
  • Aortic disease caused by trauma
  • Aortic disease treated by open abdominal surgery
  • Presence of systemic diseases uncontrollable by current medical standards (e.g., severe cardiac, pulmonary or hepatic dysfunction; advanced malignancy; cachexia; refractory severe coronary artery disease symptoms; coagulation disorders caused by genetic diseases, etc.)
  • Patients who have undergone endovascular aortic treatment via femoral artery access prior to this procedure due to other diseases (not related to the current aortic disease)
  • Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, symptomatic stroke, myocardial infarction, or gastrointestinal bleeding within the past 6 months; patients under 18 years old; or those who refuse to participate in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site
  • The first affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Study of Discomfort Symptoms in Patients With Aortic Disease After

The incidence and severity of post-procedural discomfort were evaluated in patients undergoing endovascular repair for aortic dissection across six symptom-related dimensions: immobilization-related issues, puncture site discomfort, adhesive-induced skin reactions, post-stent implantation syndrome, impairment in self-care ability, and physical/psychological stress responses.

Read the detailed description

In this study, a customized postoperative discomfort symptom assessment questionnaire was developed based on patient-reported outcomes, with the objective of systematically evaluating common discomfort symptoms experienced by patients with aortic disease after endovascular intervention. The questionnaire covers six core dimensions: immobilization-related discomfort, puncture site-related discomfort, adhesive-related skin reactions, post-stent implantation syndrome, decline in self-care ability, and psychosomatic stress responses. Each symptom within these dimensions was scored on a 0-4 scale according to severity: 0 indicates no symptoms; 1 indicates mild symptoms that are tolerable; 2 indicates moderate symptoms that affect daily life but remain tolerable; 3 indicates severe symptoms requiring medical intervention; and 4 indicates extremely severe symptoms that are intolerable and require emergency treatment.

Pain was evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Skin reactions such as lesions, blisters, bruises, erythema, and rashes were quantified by measuring the longest and widest dimensions of the lesion using a flexible measuring tape. Self-care ability was assessed using the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale combined with patient self-evaluation, focusing on four aspects: changing clothes, controlling bowel and bladder function, eating and drinking, and turning in bed.clothes, controlling bowel and bladder, eating and drinking, and turning in bed. Scoring ranged from 0 to 4, where 0 represented no impact, 1 represented mild impact, 2 indicated moderate impact (partial assistance needed but most activities completed independently), 3 indicated severe impact (major assistance needed, only a few activities independently completed), and 4 indicated almost complete loss of self-care ability.

Sleep disturbances were also rated from 0 to 4: 0 for no impact; 1 for mild disturbance with ability to fall asleep without special treatment; 2 for moderate disturbance, requiring a quiet environment to fall asleep; 3 for severe disturbance needing sleep medications; and 4 for complete inability to sleep. Abnormal sweating was similarly rated from 0 to 4: 0 for no sweating; 1 for slight perspiration; 2 for sweating in multiple areas such as armpits and back; 3 for soaked clothes or bed linens once; and 4 for soaking more than once.

Each discomfort dimension was clinically defined with clear inclusion criteria. Immobilization-related discomfort referred to symptoms resulting from postoperative limb immobilization, such as lower back soreness, which typically resolved after the immobilization was lifted. Puncture site-related discomfort was caused by pressure bandaging or sandbag compression, and included local pain, itching, bruising, erythema, or rash around the puncture site (excluding complications such as hematoma or pseudoaneurysm). Adhesive-related skin reactions included blisters, erosions, rashes, redness, itching, and bruising due to the use of pressure bandages or adhesive dressings.

Aortic disease-related discomfort symptoms included postoperative chest tightness, new chest or back pain different from the initial presentation, and abdominal bloating or pain (after excluding cardiovascular or gastrointestinal causes), which may be related to post-stent inflammatory responses or systemic stress. Decline in self-care ability referred to reduced independence compared to the preoperative state, including inability to change clothes independently, difficulty with toileting in bed, impaired eating or drinking, and inability to turn over in bed. Psychosomatic stress responses involved changes in psychological and physical states not present before surgery, such as sleep disturbances, fear of movement due to anxiety about puncture site bleeding, and profuse sweating.

Through this questionnaire, we aim to quantify patients' subjective discomfort from multiple dimensions in a systematic manner, providing a foundation for optimizing perioperative nursing interventions, improving patient comfort, and promoting enhanced recovery after endovascular treatment.

Being tested
postoperative precise education
Keywords
Nursing care, Postoperative complication management
Medical subject headings
Aortic Dissection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • postoperative precise educationBehavioural

    Whether to implement precise education

Study groups in NCT07362901
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Patients with a Precise patient education involves distributing illustrated manuals that explain the specific circumstances related to six dimensions: surgical procedures, pain management, early mobilization, preoperative preparations, and potential discomfort symptoms.ortic dissection who received endovascular treatment
Receives: Behavioral: postoperative precise education
2Routine nursing education involves distributing illustrated manuals to explain surgical procedures, pain management, early mobilization, preoperative preparations, and other relevant topics.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Immobilization-Related Score

    The immobilization-related score is used to assess the degree of discomfort resulting from limb immobilization implemented for medical purposes. Major symptoms include lower back soreness, lower back pain, back soreness, and back pain. The score ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe immobilization-related discomfort.

    Measured: Perioperative

  2. Puncture Site-Related Score

    The puncture site-related score is used to evaluate the degree of discomfort at and around the puncture site following transfemoral endovascular intervention. Main manifestations include pain around the puncture site, local erythema, and puncture site-related pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, or bleeding. The score ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe puncture site-related discomfort.

    Measured: perioperative

  3. Medical Adhesive-Related Skin Injury (MARSI) Score

    The MARSI score is used to assess the severity of adverse skin reactions caused by the use of medical adhesive products or devices (e.g., catheter fixation tapes, dressings, compression bandages). Manifestations include blistering, skin breakdown, pain, erythema, and pruritus. The score ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe skin injury.

    Measured: perioperative

  4. Aortic Disease-Related Score

    The aortic disease-related score is used to evaluate the degree of discomfort following endovascular aortic repair attributable to surgical manipulation, implanted devices (e.g., stents or stent grafts), or the progression of aortic pathology itself. Main symptoms include chest tightness or discomfort, chest or back pain, abdominal distension, and abdominal pain. The score ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe aortic disease-related discomfort.

    Measured: perioperative

  5. Self-Care Ability-Related Score

    Based on Orem's self-care theory, the self-care ability-related score is used to assess the extent of impaired self-care resulting from physiological, psychological, or social limitations. Major aspects include difficulty with dressing and personal hygiene, restricted toileting in bed, impaired eating or drinking, inability to turn over independently, and negative impact on personal social image. The score ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe self-care ability impairment.

    Measured: perioperative

  6. Psychosomatic Stress-Related Score

    The psychosomatic stress-related score is used to assess the severity of psychosomatic stress responses induced by internal or external stressors such as disease, trauma, or psychological pressure. Manifestations mainly include sleep disturbances, fear of movement due to excessive concern about puncture site or wound bleeding, and excessive sweating beyond usual levels. The score ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe psychosomatic stress.

    Measured: perioperative

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Length of hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay from admission to discharge

    Measured: perioperative

  2. Patient satisfaction score

    Patient satisfaction score ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater patient satisfaction.

    Measured: perioperative

  3. Observation of complications

    Incidence of inguinal puncture site bleeding, hematoma, and pseudoaneurysm

    Measured: perioperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
132 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07362901
Sponsor's protocol ID
IIT20250170C-R1
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
12 Dec 2025
Last updated
23 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in