to Evaluate Antimicrobial Effect of Eco-friendly ToothbrushNCT07365748
Evaluation of Bacterial Contamination and Antimicrobial Efficacy on Charcoal-Infused vs, Standard Nylon Toothbrush Bristles.
A study testing Eco-friendly toothbrush for children, nylon bristles toothbrush in children and Nylon bristles toothbrush in adults in people with to Evaluate Antimicrobial Effect of Eco-friendly Toothbrush, run by MTI University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This study compares two types of toothbrushes to see which one stays cleaner after use. Researchers want to know if toothbrushes with charcoal-infused bristles have fewer bacteria than standard toothbrushes with nylon bristles. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- to Evaluate Antimicrobial Effect of Eco-friendly Toothbrush
- What is being tested?
- Eco-friendly toothbrush for children, nylon bristles toothbrush in children and Nylon bristles toothbrush in adults
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 11 Nov 2025to 1 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 35 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants free of any systemic diseases.
- Participants falling into one of two specific age groups:
- Children aged 8 to 11 years.
- Adults aged 18 to 35 years.
- Willingness to use the assigned toothbrush type (Eco-friendly charcoal or standard nylon).
- Ability to follow study instructions regarding brushing technique and storage.
Who cannot join
- Patients with open carious lesions.
- Participants with poor oral hygiene, defined as plaque index scores greater than 2.
- Participants with severe gingivitis, defined as gingival index score greater than 2.
- Current throat infections.
- Irregular brushing frequency (not brushing twice daily).
- Current use of mouthwash or antibacterial toothpastes.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Current smokers.
- Medically compromised individuals.
- Unwillingness to use a charcoal Eco-friendly toothbrush.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study compares two types of toothbrushes to see which one stays cleaner after use. Researchers want to know if toothbrushes with charcoal-infused bristles have fewer bacteria than standard toothbrushes with nylon bristles.
Participants in this study are adults and children who do not have gum disease or other major health issues. Everyone in the study will be assigned one of two types of toothbrushes:
Read more
- An eco-friendly toothbrush with charcoal bristles.
- A standard toothbrush with nylon bristles. Participants will use their assigned toothbrush at home for two specific time periods (one day and one week). They will follow simple instructions on how to brush and store the toothbrush. After each time period, they will return the toothbrush to the researchers.
The research team will test the bristles in a lab to count the bacteria. They will also measure how well the charcoal bristles stop bacteria from growing compared to the nylon bristles. This will help determine if charcoal toothbrushes are a more sanitary and eco-friendly option for daily oral care.
Read the detailed description
Study Design and Randomization This study employs a randomized, parallel-group, ex-vivo microbiological design to assess bacterial retention and antimicrobial efficacy. Participants are stratified by age (children and adults) and randomized to receive either an eco-friendly charcoal-infused toothbrush or a standard nylon toothbrush. Allocation is managed using computer-generated random sequences concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque envelopes. To maintain blinding, laboratory outcome assessors are unaware of group assignment, and participants are instructed not to disclose their intervention to the assessment team.
Standardized Usage Protocol
To minimize variability in bacterial load due to behavioral factors, all participants adhere to a strict hygiene protocol:
- Brushing Technique: Participants brush twice daily (morning and evening) for two minutes using a standardized method (45-degree angle to the gingiva with short back-and-forth strokes, and vertical strokes for anterior lingual surfaces).
- Storage and Maintenance: Post-brushing, bristles are rinsed under running water without digital manipulation. Toothbrushes must be stored upright, uncovered, and positioned at least two feet away from sanitary fixtures (e.g., toilets) to minimize aerosol contamination.
- Restrictions: The use of antimicrobial mouthrinses, medicated toothpastes, or bristle covers is prohibited during the active study phases.
Sample Collection Timeline
The study involves two distinct usage periods separated by a washout phase:
- Phase 1 (24-Hour Assessment): Participants use the assigned toothbrush for one day, followed by immediate return in a sterile pouch.
- Washout: A 7-day period occurs where participants revert to their non-study oral hygiene routine.
- Phase 2 (7-Day Assessment): Participants receive a new toothbrush of the same allocation, use it for 7 days, and return it in a sterile pouch for analysis.
Microbiological Analysis Returned samples are processed under aseptic laboratory conditions. Approximately one-third of the bristle field is excised using sterile instrumentation and transferred to test tubes containing 5 mL of sterile saline. The tubes are agitated to elute adherent microorganisms into suspension. A 0.1 mL aliquot is inoculated onto blood agar plates using a sterile spreader.
Plates are incubated in anaerobic gas pack jars at 37°C. Colony Forming Units (CFUs) are quantified after 48 hours of incubation to determine total bacterial load. Additionally, the intrinsic antimicrobial activity of the bristles is evaluated by measuring the zone of inhibition (in millimeters) surrounding bristle samples placed on agar plates after 7days of incubation.
- Being tested
- Eco-friendly toothbrush for children, nylon bristles toothbrush in children, Nylon bristles toothbrush in adults, Eco-friendly toothbrush in adults
- Keywords
- Eco-Friendly toothbrush , Charcoal toothbrush , Antimicrobial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Eco-friendly toothbrush for childrenDevice
it is an eco-friendly charcoal toothbrush assumed to have antibacterial property in children
nylon bristles toothbrush in childrenDevice
a normal man made toothbrush used by children
Nylon bristles toothbrush in adultsDevice
a normal man made toothbrush used by adults
Eco-friendly toothbrush in adultsDevice
to see the antimicrobial effect of eco-friendly toothbrush in adults
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobial effect of Eco-friendly tooth brush in children | Experimental | this arm will use the Eco-friendly toothbrush and will be evaluated for its antimicrobial effect Receives: Device: Eco-friendly toothbrush for children |
| Antimicrobial effect of Eco-friendly tooth brush in adults | Experimental | this arm will use the eco-friendly toothbrush and tested for its antimicrobial effect in adults Receives: Device: Eco-friendly toothbrush in adults |
| Nylon bristles toothbrush in children | Active comparator | this arm will use the nylon toothbrush bristles and be evaluated for its antibacterial effect Receives: Device: nylon bristles toothbrush in children |
| nylon toothbrush bristles in adults | Active comparator | this arm will use the nylon bristles toothbrush and be evaluated for its antimicrobial effect Receives: Device: Nylon bristles toothbrush in adults |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Colony-forming units (CFU)
Bacterial load will be quantified as CFU per milliliter (CFU/mL) from toothbrush bristles after 1 day and 1 week of use. One-third of the bristles will be aseptically cut, placed in 5 mL sterile saline, mixed to elute bacteria, then 0.1 mL will be plated onto blood agar. Plates will be incubated under anaerobic conditions for 48 hours, then colonies will be counted and recorded as CFU/mL.
Measured: 10 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jan 2026
- Study start11 Nov 2025
- Primary completion20 Dec 2025
- Study completion1 Jan 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for to Evaluate Antimicrobial Effect of Eco-friendly ToothbrushStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- MTI University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Esraa Hamed Aly, MTI University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07365748
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SUEZ Med - IRB Approval No: 95
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 26 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: age, gender
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Bacterial Contamination and Antimicrobial Efficacy on Charcoal-Infused vs, Standard Nylon Toothbrush Bristles.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07365748
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SUEZ Med - IRB Approval No: 95
- Keywords
- Eco-Friendly toothbrush , Charcoal toothbrush , Antimicrobial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- MTI UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study compares two types of toothbrushes to see which one stays cleaner after use. Researchers want to know if toothbrushes with charcoal-infused bristles have fewer bacteria than standard toothbrushes with nylon bristles.
Participants in this study are adults and children who do not have gum disease or other major health issues. Everyone in the study will be assigned one of two types of toothbrushes:
- An eco-friendly toothbrush with charcoal bristles.
- A standard toothbrush with nylon bristles. Participants will use their assigned toothbrush at home for two specific time periods (one day and one week). They will follow simple instructions on how to brush and store the toothbrush. After each time period, they will return the toothbrush to the researchers.
The research team will test the bristles in a lab to count the bacteria. They will also measure how well the charcoal bristles stop bacteria from growing compared to the nylon bristles. This will help determine if charcoal toothbrushes are a more sanitary and eco-friendly option for daily oral care.
Detailed description
Study Design and Randomization This study employs a randomized, parallel-group, ex-vivo microbiological design to assess bacterial retention and antimicrobial efficacy. Participants are stratified by age (children and adults) and randomized to receive either an eco-friendly charcoal-infused toothbrush or a standard nylon toothbrush. Allocation is managed using computer-generated random sequences concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque envelopes. To maintain blinding, laboratory outcome assessors are unaware of group assignment, and participants are instructed not to disclose their intervention to the assessment team.
Standardized Usage Protocol
To minimize variability in bacterial load due to behavioral factors, all participants adhere to a strict hygiene protocol:
- Brushing Technique: Participants brush twice daily (morning and evening) for two minutes using a standardized method (45-degree angle to the gingiva with short back-and-forth strokes, and vertical strokes for anterior lingual surfaces).
- Storage and Maintenance: Post-brushing, bristles are rinsed under running water without digital manipulation. Toothbrushes must be stored upright, uncovered, and positioned at least two feet away from sanitary fixtures (e.g., toilets) to minimize aerosol contamination.
- Restrictions: The use of antimicrobial mouthrinses, medicated toothpastes, or bristle covers is prohibited during the active study phases.
Sample Collection Timeline
The study involves two distinct usage periods separated by a washout phase:
- Phase 1 (24-Hour Assessment): Participants use the assigned toothbrush for one day, followed by immediate return in a sterile pouch.
- Washout: A 7-day period occurs where participants revert to their non-study oral hygiene routine.
- Phase 2 (7-Day Assessment): Participants receive a new toothbrush of the same allocation, use it for 7 days, and return it in a sterile pouch for analysis.
Microbiological Analysis Returned samples are processed under aseptic laboratory conditions. Approximately one-third of the bristle field is excised using sterile instrumentation and transferred to test tubes containing 5 mL of sterile saline. The tubes are agitated to elute adherent microorganisms into suspension. A 0.1 mL aliquot is inoculated onto blood agar plates using a sterile spreader.
Plates are incubated in anaerobic gas pack jars at 37°C. Colony Forming Units (CFUs) are quantified after 48 hours of incubation to determine total bacterial load. Additionally, the intrinsic antimicrobial activity of the bristles is evaluated by measuring the zone of inhibition (in millimeters) surrounding bristle samples placed on agar plates after 7days of incubation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobial effect of Eco-friendly tooth brush in children | Experimental | Device: Eco-friendly toothbrush for childrenthis arm will use the Eco-friendly toothbrush and will be evaluated for its antimicrobial effect |
| Antimicrobial effect of Eco-friendly tooth brush in adults | Experimental | Device: Eco-friendly toothbrush in adultsthis arm will use the eco-friendly toothbrush and tested for its antimicrobial effect in adults |
| Nylon bristles toothbrush in children | Active comparator | Device: nylon bristles toothbrush in childrenthis arm will use the nylon toothbrush bristles and be evaluated for its antibacterial effect |
| nylon toothbrush bristles in adults | Active comparator | Device: Nylon bristles toothbrush in adultsthis arm will use the nylon bristles toothbrush and be evaluated for its antimicrobial effect |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Participants free of any systemic diseases.
- Participants falling into one of two specific age groups:
- Children aged 8 to 11 years.
- Adults aged 18 to 35 years.
- Willingness to use the assigned toothbrush type (Eco-friendly charcoal or standard nylon).
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with open carious lesions.
- Participants with poor oral hygiene, defined as plaque index scores greater than 2.
- Participants with severe gingivitis, defined as gingival index score greater than 2.
- Current throat infections.
- Irregular brushing frequency (not brushing twice daily).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Eco-friendly toothbrush for childrenit is an eco-friendly charcoal toothbrush assumed to have antibacterial property in children | Device | Antimicrobial effect of Eco-friendly tooth brush in children |
| nylon bristles toothbrush in childrena normal man made toothbrush used by children | Device | Nylon bristles toothbrush in children |
| Nylon bristles toothbrush in adultsa normal man made toothbrush used by adults | Device | nylon toothbrush bristles in adults |
| Eco-friendly toothbrush in adultsto see the antimicrobial effect of eco-friendly toothbrush in adults | Device | Antimicrobial effect of Eco-friendly tooth brush in adults |
Primary outcome
Colony-forming units (CFU)
Time frame: 10 days
Bacterial load will be quantified as CFU per milliliter (CFU/mL) from toothbrush bristles after 1 day and 1 week of use. One-third of the bristles will be aseptically cut, placed in 5 mL sterile saline, mixed to elute bacteria, then 0.1 mL will be plated onto blood agar. Plates will be incubated under anaerobic conditions for 48 hours, then colonies will be counted and recorded as CFU/mL.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. age, gender
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Eco-friendly toothbrush for children, nylon bristles toothbrush in children and Nylon bristles toothbrush in adults in people with to Evaluate Antimicrobial Effect of Eco-friendly Toothbrush, run by MTI University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Colony-forming units (CFU) (time frame: 10 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2026.