Deficient Keratinized MucosaNCT07365865
Dimensional Changes of the Keratinized Mucosa in Edentulous Ridges Following Accordian Technique Versus Conventional Free Gingival Grafts
A study testing Expanded mesh free gingival graft ( Accordian technique ) and conventional free gingival graft in people with Deficient Keratinized Mucosa and Healthy, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Inadequacy of the attached keratinized tissue (<2 mm) affects the long-term maintenance of prostheses and implants due to poor oral hygiene, plaque accumulation, inflammation, bleeding on probing, gingival recession , attachment loss, and crestal bone loss .Consequently, keratinized tissue augmentation is considered… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Deficient Keratinized Mucosa, Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Expanded mesh free gingival graft ( Accordian technique ) and conventional free gingival graft
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 14 Aug 2024to 1 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with apico-coronal keratinized tissue width less than 2 millimeters
- Edentulous area with at least 2 missing teeth
- No systemic disease or active periodontitis
- Non smoker
- Age ≥ 20 years old .
- Plaque index and bleeding index < 25%.
- Teeth loss with medium to thick gingival biotype (Periodontal probe not visible when inserted into the buccal gingival margin).
- Fully autonomous behavior and expression ability with good compliance.
Who cannot join
- Patients with any systemic disease
- Patients with symptoms such as inflammation, bleeding on probing, or pus discharge.
- Poor oral hygiene
- Adjacent teeth with acute and chronic tooth disease at the implant site
- Smokers ≥ 10 cigarettes/day.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Dimensional Changes of the Keratinized Mucosa in Edentulous Ridges Following Accordian Technique Versus Conventional Free Gingival Grafts: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Inadequacy of the attached keratinized tissue (<2 mm) affects the long-term maintenance of prostheses and implants due to poor oral hygiene, plaque accumulation, inflammation, bleeding on probing, gingival recession , attachment loss, and crestal bone loss .Consequently, keratinized tissue augmentation is considered to compensate for keratinized attached gingival width inadequacy. Lack of keratinized tissue (KT) or KT with a narrow width (≤2 mm) compromise the long-term maintenance of peri-implant tissue health . Peri-implantitis was more frequently detected at dental implants sites with reduced width of KT than at those with adequate KT width.
Free gingival graft (FGG) is regarded as an efficient method with significant clinical application . However, following harvesting larger grafts, some limitations arise in the donor site. Extensive palatal wound may cause discomfort and morbidity for the patient, the rugae area is unsuitable for graft material and the greater palatine artery will be of a great concern.
Read the detailed description
Free gingival graft with accordion technique can expand the tissue up to 50%, and cover the recipient bed 1.5 times longer than the original graft by its alternating incisions on both edges. This avoids high rate of complications and limited amount of palatal mucosa available for grafting. It allows for the harvesting of smaller size, reducing patient morbidity and post-operative pain for augmenting wide areas. The area between the alternate incisions become epithelized with keratinized tissue by creeping of the surrounding tissues . Also, it provides having proper keratinized tissue width at large edentulous areas.
An adequate amount of keratinized tissue is required to maintain periodontal health and gingival recession . In order to preserve gingival health, a 2mm of keratinized gingiva is required. Keratinized tissue width is considered insufficient around teeth if it is below 2mm, where it will be associated with less vertical dimension, uncomfortable brushing, and unfavorable peri-implant conditions. Moreover, it was proven to be a risk factor for the severity of the peri-implant mucositis.
Wide zone of keratinized mucosa has a role in preservation of soft and hard tissue stability around dental implants, and with their long-term maintenance . Thick soft tissues have a positive impact on mucosal margin stability by reducing the mid-buccal soft tissue recession. Dental implants with lower KT width (<2 mm) were more likely to have peri-implantitis than those with adequate KT width (≥2 mm). Moreover, they are associated with higher plaque and bleeding scores .
Soft tissue augmentation is considered to increase the soft tissue volume as well as the keratinized mucosa. These plastic procedures re-establish the functional and biological stability , cleansibilty of the prosthesis and aesthetics . Soft tissue augmentation can be performed prior to implant placement, simultaneously with second stage surgery or after insertion of the final prosthesis.
The free gingival graft (FGG) and the subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) are from the autogenous soft tissue grafting procedures used for the augmentation of keratinized tissue . Free gingival graft is indicated to increase the attached gingiva, elimination of the frenum and muscular attachments, root coverage, and vestibular extension.
The main disadvantage of the autogenous tissue grafts is that the harvesting procedure leads to prolonged healing at the donor site and patient's morbidity . The amount of soft-tissue that can be harvested form the palatal mucosa is often limited thus covering broad mucosal areas can be a real challenge. Also, the hard palate has anatomical limitation of the greater palatine artery at the posterior palate and at the front of the rugae . Patients frequently express discomfort and paresthesia for a few weeks following surgery.
In the augmentation of wide area, we encounter limitations in the autogenous donor tissue, so many grafting modifications have been suggested in an effort to reduce the requirement for a large autograft harvest. In the accordion technique, which was introduced by Rateitschak et al. in 1985, the FGG was enlarged, by making alternating incisions with a scalpel blade at different sides of the graft. Allowing to expand the tissue up to nearly 50%. The strip gingival autograft technique was first described by Han in 1983. In this approach, thin strips of FGGs were positioned parallel to one another and secured to the prepared periosteal bed's most apical extension, allowing the exposed connective tissue area in between the graft strips to mend secondary intention .
In 2004, Akbari proposed a vertical modification of the strip gingival graft. Another modification by Urban et al. by combining the strip gingival graft technique with the xenogeneic collagen matrix (CM) to address the extensive areas of mucogingival alterations resulting from advanced regenerative procedures. One of the most effective techniques for soft tissue augmentation is the apically positioned flap in conjunction with the free gingival graft, even if alternative therapies such as apically positioned flap alone, collagen matrix, and acellular dermal matrix have been developed A recent systematic review and meta-analyses assessed the effectiveness of several surgical techniques intended to restore the adequate level of keratinized mucosa at implant locations . The best method for increasing the amount of keratinized tissue surrounding dental implants is the free gingival graft. When allograft was utilized rather of xenograft, comparable results were documented .
To overcome the limitation of the donor site in the conventional FGG, Rateitschak et al. proposed to modify the harvested graft extra-orally aiming to expand its size by making alternate incisons by 50%, allowing harvesting tissue with smaller size. Consequently, reducing patient morbidity, which is considered the main advantage of the accordion technique. In the healing phase, keratinized tissue from the neighboring area creeps in and epithelializes the spaces between the wounds. This creeping process is not always predictable. One of this method's drawback is the lack of a defined standard for the intervals between incisions that keratinized epithelium from the creeping process can cover. Shrinkage is a normal process following FGG treatment, in contrast to the creeping process.
Correspondingly, this tissue expanding leads to harvesting less tissue and subsequently decreased pain and morbidity. Dimensional changes of the grafted tissue cause not to remain the initial amount of the keratinized mucosa. Studies have documented a wide spectrum of shrinkage, primarily associated with the traditional technique. Therefore, considering the limitations in donor tissue, the accordion technique is a suitable option. However, because there is no set standard for incisions and there may be some creeping and shrinkage involved, conventional and accordion FGG were to be compared for changes in vertical dimensions and clinical outcomes.
One of the main concerns after grafting is shrinkage of the graft, which occurs due to muscle repositioning and muscle contraction after one month from the surgery. The majority of the investigations have focused on the dimensional changes of FGG around teeth with limited evidence in edentulous ridges.
Based on the previous studies, dimensional changes occur after soft tissue augmentation by free gingival graft. Thus, the current trial is conducted to evaluate dimensional changes occurs following conventional free gingival graft and free gingival graft by accordion technique in edentulous ridges prior to implant placement, to reduce patient pain and morbidity in large areas, as well as provide adequate keratinized attached gingiva for the future restoration.
- Conditions
- Deficient Keratinized Mucosa, Healthy
- Being tested
- Expanded mesh free gingival graft ( Accordian technique ), conventional free gingival graft
- Keywords
- free gingival graft, Accordian, keratinized mucosa
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Expanded mesh free gingival graft ( Accordian technique )Procedure or surgery
Free gingival graft by expanded free gingival graft
conventional free gingival graftProcedure or surgery
conventional free gingival graft
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional group ( Accordian Group ) | Experimental | steps from 1-7 as Active comparator group + 7 -Free gingival graft will be harvested from the palatal area, as previously mentioned, with a length of 40% of the mesiodistal length of the recipient area. Intermittent incisions to cover the whole length of the recipient area. 8- The graft will be located at the recipient area, and sutured with interrupted sutures. Receives: Procedure: Expanded mesh free gingival graft ( Accordian technique ) |
| Conventional free gingival graft | Active comparator | 1- Infiltration anesthesia at the recipient area. 2- A horizontal incision, 0.5mm above the mucogingival junction extending along the area of the missing teeth. 3-Two vertical incisions diverging slightly in a corono-apical direction and extending into the alveolar mucosa. 4-The trapezoidal area will be dissected split thickness to expose the periosteum. 5-Infiltration anesthesia at the palatal area. 6-The free gingival graft will be harvested from the palate consisting of epithelial connective tissue of thickness more than 1mm.7- The palatal graft thickness will be determined by the coronal horizontal incision and the releasing incisions. The blade will be inserted perpendicular to the underlying deep tissue layers to a depth equal to the required graft thickness. 8- The graft will be harvested by inclining the blade horizontally, keeping it parallel to the external mucosal plane.9- The graft will be located at the recipient area, and sutured with interrupted sutures. Receives: Procedure: conventional free gingival graft |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Vertical graft shrinkage %
Vertical graft shrinkage will be measured using UNC 15 Periodontal probe from reference point that will be taken (mid of the ridge) from where the graft will be sutured 3 months post-surgery
Measured: Baseline 3 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Apico coronal keratinized tissue width
Changes in keratinized tissue width will be measured with UNC 15 Periodontal probe by roll test from reference point that will be taken (mid of the ridge) from where the graft will be sutured 3 after surgery
Measured: Baseline 3 months
Vestibular depth
Vestibular depth will be measured from reference point that will be taken (mid of the ridge) from where the graft will be sutured to the greatest concavity of the mucobuccal fold by UNC 15 periodontal probe 3 post-surgery
Measured: Baseline 3 months
Keratinized tissue thickness
Keratinized tissue thickness will be measured through transgingival probing by applying local anesthesia and using UNC 15 periodontal probe with a silicone stopper to be inserted perpendicular in the soft tissue until feeling resistance (Hitting buccal bone), at 1, 3 and 5 mm beyond the midcrest of the ridge. Then the distance between the silicone stopper and the tip of the probe will be measured 3 and 6 months after surgery
Measured: Baseline 3 months
Post surgical pain assessment
Readings will be recorded by the patient on the day of surgery, on the next two days after surgery and on the day of suture removal using the VAS which is a descriptive numerical rating scale of 0 to 10 0= No pain 1-3= Mild pain 4-6= Moderate pain 7-10= Severe pain
Measured: Day 1 Day 3 Day 14
Patient satisfaction
A 2-item questionnaire will be given to the patients to be answered using a 7-point answer scale for assessing their satisfaction for the whole procedure and results obtained.
0 is the minimum satisfaction 7 is the maximum satisfaction
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jan 2026
- Study start14 Aug 2024
- Primary completion1 Mar 2026
- Study completion1 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Deficient Keratinized MucosaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized Clinical Trial
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohamed Essam Mohamed Khalifa, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07365865
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FGG by Accordian technique
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dimensional Changes of the Keratinized Mucosa in Edentulous Ridges Following Accordian Technique Versus Conventional Free Gingival Grafts: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07365865
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FGG by Accordian technique
- Conditions
- Deficient Keratinized Mucosa, Healthy
- Keywords
- free gingival graft, Accordian, keratinized mucosa
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Inadequacy of the attached keratinized tissue (<2 mm) affects the long-term maintenance of prostheses and implants due to poor oral hygiene, plaque accumulation, inflammation, bleeding on probing, gingival recession , attachment loss, and crestal bone loss .Consequently, keratinized tissue augmentation is considered to compensate for keratinized attached gingival width inadequacy. Lack of keratinized tissue (KT) or KT with a narrow width (≤2 mm) compromise the long-term maintenance of peri-implant tissue health . Peri-implantitis was more frequently detected at dental implants sites with reduced width of KT than at those with adequate KT width.
Free gingival graft (FGG) is regarded as an efficient method with significant clinical application . However, following harvesting larger grafts, some limitations arise in the donor site. Extensive palatal wound may cause discomfort and morbidity for the patient, the rugae area is unsuitable for graft material and the greater palatine artery will be of a great concern.
Detailed description
Free gingival graft with accordion technique can expand the tissue up to 50%, and cover the recipient bed 1.5 times longer than the original graft by its alternating incisions on both edges. This avoids high rate of complications and limited amount of palatal mucosa available for grafting. It allows for the harvesting of smaller size, reducing patient morbidity and post-operative pain for augmenting wide areas. The area between the alternate incisions become epithelized with keratinized tissue by creeping of the surrounding tissues . Also, it provides having proper keratinized tissue width at large edentulous areas.
An adequate amount of keratinized tissue is required to maintain periodontal health and gingival recession . In order to preserve gingival health, a 2mm of keratinized gingiva is required. Keratinized tissue width is considered insufficient around teeth if it is below 2mm, where it will be associated with less vertical dimension, uncomfortable brushing, and unfavorable peri-implant conditions. Moreover, it was proven to be a risk factor for the severity of the peri-implant mucositis.
Wide zone of keratinized mucosa has a role in preservation of soft and hard tissue stability around dental implants, and with their long-term maintenance . Thick soft tissues have a positive impact on mucosal margin stability by reducing the mid-buccal soft tissue recession. Dental implants with lower KT width (<2 mm) were more likely to have peri-implantitis than those with adequate KT width (≥2 mm). Moreover, they are associated with higher plaque and bleeding scores .
Soft tissue augmentation is considered to increase the soft tissue volume as well as the keratinized mucosa. These plastic procedures re-establish the functional and biological stability , cleansibilty of the prosthesis and aesthetics . Soft tissue augmentation can be performed prior to implant placement, simultaneously with second stage surgery or after insertion of the final prosthesis.
The free gingival graft (FGG) and the subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) are from the autogenous soft tissue grafting procedures used for the augmentation of keratinized tissue . Free gingival graft is indicated to increase the attached gingiva, elimination of the frenum and muscular attachments, root coverage, and vestibular extension.
The main disadvantage of the autogenous tissue grafts is that the harvesting procedure leads to prolonged healing at the donor site and patient's morbidity . The amount of soft-tissue that can be harvested form the palatal mucosa is often limited thus covering broad mucosal areas can be a real challenge. Also, the hard palate has anatomical limitation of the greater palatine artery at the posterior palate and at the front of the rugae . Patients frequently express discomfort and paresthesia for a few weeks following surgery.
In the augmentation of wide area, we encounter limitations in the autogenous donor tissue, so many grafting modifications have been suggested in an effort to reduce the requirement for a large autograft harvest. In the accordion technique, which was introduced by Rateitschak et al. in 1985, the FGG was enlarged, by making alternating incisions with a scalpel blade at different sides of the graft. Allowing to expand the tissue up to nearly 50%. The strip gingival autograft technique was first described by Han in 1983. In this approach, thin strips of FGGs were positioned parallel to one another and secured to the prepared periosteal bed's most apical extension, allowing the exposed connective tissue area in between the graft strips to mend secondary intention .
In 2004, Akbari proposed a vertical modification of the strip gingival graft. Another modification by Urban et al. by combining the strip gingival graft technique with the xenogeneic collagen matrix (CM) to address the extensive areas of mucogingival alterations resulting from advanced regenerative procedures. One of the most effective techniques for soft tissue augmentation is the apically positioned flap in conjunction with the free gingival graft, even if alternative therapies such as apically positioned flap alone, collagen matrix, and acellular dermal matrix have been developed A recent systematic review and meta-analyses assessed the effectiveness of several surgical techniques intended to restore the adequate level of keratinized mucosa at implant locations . The best method for increasing the amount of keratinized tissue surrounding dental implants is the free gingival graft. When allograft was utilized rather of xenograft, comparable results were documented .
To overcome the limitation of the donor site in the conventional FGG, Rateitschak et al. proposed to modify the harvested graft extra-orally aiming to expand its size by making alternate incisons by 50%, allowing harvesting tissue with smaller size. Consequently, reducing patient morbidity, which is considered the main advantage of the accordion technique. In the healing phase, keratinized tissue from the neighboring area creeps in and epithelializes the spaces between the wounds. This creeping process is not always predictable. One of this method's drawback is the lack of a defined standard for the intervals between incisions that keratinized epithelium from the creeping process can cover. Shrinkage is a normal process following FGG treatment, in contrast to the creeping process.
Correspondingly, this tissue expanding leads to harvesting less tissue and subsequently decreased pain and morbidity. Dimensional changes of the grafted tissue cause not to remain the initial amount of the keratinized mucosa. Studies have documented a wide spectrum of shrinkage, primarily associated with the traditional technique. Therefore, considering the limitations in donor tissue, the accordion technique is a suitable option. However, because there is no set standard for incisions and there may be some creeping and shrinkage involved, conventional and accordion FGG were to be compared for changes in vertical dimensions and clinical outcomes.
One of the main concerns after grafting is shrinkage of the graft, which occurs due to muscle repositioning and muscle contraction after one month from the surgery. The majority of the investigations have focused on the dimensional changes of FGG around teeth with limited evidence in edentulous ridges.
Based on the previous studies, dimensional changes occur after soft tissue augmentation by free gingival graft. Thus, the current trial is conducted to evaluate dimensional changes occurs following conventional free gingival graft and free gingival graft by accordion technique in edentulous ridges prior to implant placement, to reduce patient pain and morbidity in large areas, as well as provide adequate keratinized attached gingiva for the future restoration.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized Clinical Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional group ( Accordian Group ) | Experimental | Procedure: Expanded mesh free gingival graft ( Accordian technique )steps from 1-7 as Active comparator group + 7 -Free gingival graft will be harvested from the palatal area, as previously mentioned, with a length of 40% of the mesiodistal length of the recipient area. Intermittent incisions to cover the whole length of the recipient area. 8- The graft will be located at the recipient area, and sutured with interrupted sutures. |
| Conventional free gingival graft | Active comparator | Procedure: conventional free gingival graft1- Infiltration anesthesia at the recipient area. 2- A horizontal incision, 0.5mm above the mucogingival junction extending along the area of the missing teeth. 3-Two vertical incisions diverging slightly in a corono-apical direction and extending into the alveolar mucosa. 4-The trapezoidal area will be dissected split thickness to expose the periosteum. 5-Infiltration anesthesia at the palatal area. 6-The free gingival graft will be harvested from the palate consisting of epithelial connective tissue of thickness more than 1mm.7- The palatal graft thickness will be determined by the coronal horizontal incision and the releasing incisions. The blade will be inserted perpendicular to the underlying deep tissue layers to a depth equal to the required graft thickness. 8- The graft will be harvested by inclining the blade horizontally, keeping it parallel to the external mucosal plane.9- The graft will be located at the recipient area, and sutured with interrupted sutures. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with apico-coronal keratinized tissue width less than 2 millimeters
- Edentulous area with at least 2 missing teeth
- No systemic disease or active periodontitis
- Non smoker
- Age ≥ 20 years old .
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with any systemic disease
- Patients with symptoms such as inflammation, bleeding on probing, or pus discharge.
- Poor oral hygiene
- Adjacent teeth with acute and chronic tooth disease at the implant site
- Smokers ≥ 10 cigarettes/day.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Expanded mesh free gingival graft ( Accordian technique )Free gingival graft by expanded free gingival graft | Procedure or surgery | Interventional group ( Accordian Group ) |
| conventional free gingival graftconventional free gingival graft | Procedure or surgery | Conventional free gingival graft |
Primary outcome
Vertical graft shrinkage %
Time frame: Baseline 3 months
Vertical graft shrinkage will be measured using UNC 15 Periodontal probe from reference point that will be taken (mid of the ridge) from where the graft will be sutured 3 months post-surgery
5 secondary outcomes
Apico coronal keratinized tissue width
Time frame: Baseline 3 months
Vestibular depth
Time frame: Baseline 3 months
Keratinized tissue thickness
Time frame: Baseline 3 months
Post surgical pain assessment
Time frame: Day 1 Day 3 Day 14
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Aug 2026.
Related trials for Deficient Keratinized Mucosa
Not yet recruiting
Apical Flap Repositioning vs. Mucosa Excision With Free Gingival Grafts for Peri-Implant Keratinized Mucosa Augmentation
Keratinized Mucosa Deficiency, Peri-implant Soft Tissue
Recruiting
Adjunctive Keratinized Mucosa Augmentation in Peri-Implantitis
Peri-implantitis, Soft Tissue Augmentation at Dental Implants
Recruiting
Non-Submerged De-Epithelialized Free Gingival Graft Versus Conventional Free Gingival Graft
Deficient Keratinized Mucosa
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Expanded mesh free gingival graft ( Accordian technique ) and conventional free gingival graft in people with Deficient Keratinized Mucosa and Healthy, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Vertical graft shrinkage % (time frame: Baseline 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2026.