PretermVNTWINCNCT07372495
Cerclage Plus Progesterone vs Progesterone Alone in Twin Short Cervix
A study testing Cervical cerclage and Progesterone in people with Preterm, run by National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology at 6 sites in Vietnam.
Trial summary
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of cervical cerclage combined with progesterone versus progesterone alone in preventing preterm birth among women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix (cervical length ≤ 30 mm). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Preterm
- What is being tested?
- Cervical cerclage and Progesterone
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 260 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesVietnam
- Study dates
- 10 Apr 2026to 30 May 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Maternal age ≥ 18
- Twin pregnancy
- Asymptomatic short cervix (CL≤30mm) at routine ultrasound investigation
- Gestational age at 16+0- 24+0 weeks
Who cannot join
- A potential paticipant who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this trial:
- Women with twin pregnancy in which one or both fetuses are diagnosed with a major structural or congenital abnormality that is likely to influence the composite adverse neonatal outcome.
- Women with a monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy
- A monochorionic twin pregnancy with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome before or at the time of inclusion.
- Patients have indications for vaginal cerclage: Recurrent late miscarriage (from 14 weeks) or preterm birth occurring two or more times.
- Women with dilatation of the cervix diagnosed by ultrasound or physical exam
Show all 11Show fewer
- Women with overt symptoms of preterm labor at the time of measurement of the short cervix (regular contractions, PPROM, recurrent blood loss).
- Women with the presence of fever ≥ 38 degrees Celsius.
- Women with a placenta previa, vasa previa.
- Uterine malformations: unicornuate uterus, bicornuate uterus, uterine septum, fibroid…
- Severe maternal conditions (heart failure, chronic kidney disease, systemic lupus erythematosus …)
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
6 sites in 1 country
Vietnam6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Bac Ninh 1 Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Bac Ninh, Vietnam
Bac Ninh, 220000
Tuoc C Le, MD, MSc, 84983350133, cachmangthanhcong@gmail.com
Hung V Dam, MD, MSC, 8485909334, drhungsn@gmail.com
- Not yet recruiting
Bac Ninh 2 Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Bac Ninh, Vietnam
Bac Ninh, 220000
Bich Thanh T Nguyen, MD, MSc, 84912 585 033, thanhbssan@gmail.com
My Hanh T Le, MD, MSC, 84389981505, svquany@gmail.com
- Recruiting
National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Hanoi, 100000
Anh D Nguyen, Professor, MD, PhD, Director, 84985259999, nguyenduyanh.nhog@gmail.com
Thu Ha T Nguyen, Assoc. Prof., Dep. Director, 84965995599, dr.hanguyen.nhog@gmail.com
- Not yet recruiting
Hung Yen Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Hung Yen, Vietnam
Hung Yen, 160000
Thanh Huyen T Vu, MD, MSc, 84978844859, giamdoc2025f2@gmail.com
Thanh P Tran, MD, MSC, 84988102988, drthanhtran102@gmail.com
- Not yet recruiting
Ninh Binh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Ninh Binh, Vietnam
Ninh Bình, 430000
Dau V Pham, MD, MSc, 84912129565, drdau70@gmail.com
Hue T Pham, MD, MSC, 84943706662, dr.phamhue911@gmail.com
- Not yet recruiting
Quang Ninh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Quang Ninh, Vietnam
Quang Ninh, 200000
Cuong M Bui, MD, MSc, 84912356818, buiminhcuong1975@gmail.com
Trang T Tran, MD, MSC, 84368479884, hoatrangnguyen93yd@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Cervical Cerclage Plus Vaginal Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Alone in Twin Pregnancies With a Short Cervix for Prevention of Preterm Birth: a Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of cervical cerclage combined with progesterone versus progesterone alone in preventing preterm birth among women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix (cervical length ≤ 30 mm). Participants will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group (cerclage plus progesterone) or the control group (progesterone alone).
Read the detailed description
The incidence of multiple pregnancies has increased rapidly over the years mainly due to the resultant widespread use of assisted reproduction techniques. The twin birth rate in the USA has risen 70%, from 19 per 1000 live births in 1980 to 31 per 1000 live births in 2020. Twin pregnancies have a high risk on preterm birth (PTB) which is associated with increased risk of neonatal mortality and long-term morbidity. Around 60% of twin pregnancies deliver prior to 37 weeks and 12% before 34 weeks of gestation, with rates 5 and 8 times higher than the equivalent rates for a singleton pregnancy, respectively. Children born at an early gestational age are at increased risk of short-term morbidities affecting vital organ systems such as lungs, brain, bowels and are at increased risk of severe infection and sepsis. Perinatal mortality is strongly associated with extreme PTB. Survivors are at increased risk for developmental and behavioral disorders. In Vietnam, the rate of twin pregnancies deliver at < 28 weeks was about 11% in 2019. Caring for extremely premature infants is a significant burden for families and society. Therefore, obstetricians have a need for high-quality evidence for effective treatments.
Cervical length measurement (ideally transvaginal) is the preferred method of screening for preterm birth in twins; 25mm is a pragmatic cut-off between 18 and 24 gestational weeks (Grade of recommendation: C). Majority of the studies conducted previously has taken the cut-off cervical length as ≤ 25 mm. A systematic review and meta-analysis (13 retrospective studies and 3 RCTs) showed that cervical cerclage may reduce preterm birth in twin pregnancies with a cervical length <25 mm; however, preterm birth before 37, 34, and 28 weeks remained high (56.7%, 38.8%, and 11.7%, respectively)5, compared with much lower rates in singleton pregnancies (6.2%, 4.7%, and 0.4%). These findings support the need for further studies on preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies with a cervical length >25 mm. In 2025, Yen et al. showed that cervical cerclage was more effective than pessary in twin pregnancies with a cervical length ≤28 mm, particularly in reducing preterm birth <28 weeks, with benefit observed at 25-28 mm. However, preterm birth rates remained high, suggesting that intervention at a higher cervical length threshold may be justified. Given gestational age-related cervical shortening and the substantially higher preterm birth risk in twins, a higher threshold corresponding to the 10th percentile (≤30 mm) has been proposed. Accordingly, we selected ≤30 mm as the intervention threshold in twin pregnancies.
In singleton pregnancies, vaginal progesterone is recommended as the primary intervention for pregnant women with a cervical length less than 25mm with consistently demonstrated effectiveness in preventing premature labor. In cases with a prior spontaneous preterm delivery and a short cervix, the placement of a vaginal cerclage should be considered. Conversely, there is less evidence on the optimal strategy for preventing PTB in twin pregnancies. In twins, IM 17- OHPC and cervical pessary are not indicated in order to prevent PTB. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of vaginal progesterone and cerclage remains unclear. Several randomized trials and systematic reviews reported little or no benefit of cerclage in twin pregnancies. However, these studies were limited by small sample size and large heterogeneity in their inclusion criteria, study populations, and outcomes observed. The data are insufficient to recommend for or against these interventions in the clinical circumstances. Moreover, in the a last few years, an increasing number of studies reporting a potential beneficial role of cerclage in reducing the risk of PTB and adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies have been published. The latest ISUOG practice guidelines (2025) stated that a combined strategy of physical-exam-indicated cerclage, antibiotics, and tocolytics may be considered in asymptomatic twin pregnancy with dilated cervix before 24 weeks of gestation and a cervical cerclage may be considered when the cervical length is ≤ 15 mm before 24 weeks of gestation (grade of recommendation: C). However, these findings are mainly based on observational studies and require confirmation in large and adequately powered RCTs.
In conclusion, there is a lack of well-designed RCT's on the effect of vaginal cerclage in asymptomatic twin pregnancies. We propose a multi-center randomized trial on the effectiveness of vaginal cerclage in women with a twin pregnancy and a short cervix (less than 30mm) in the second trimester with relevant outcomes assessing not only PTB at different cut-offs but also adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
This open label, multi-center, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of cervical cerclage combined with progesterone versus progesterone alone in preventing preterm birth among women with twin pregnancies with a cervix ≤ 30 mm.
Cervical length will be measured routinely in twin pregnancies between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation by qualified doctors via transvaginal ultrasound. Women with a cervical length ≤30 mm will be eligible for the study. Eligible participants will receive a Participant Information Sheet and provide written informed consent after discussion with the investigators. All eligible women will be invited to participate in the study.
Six centers are involved in the study and patients will be stratified by center. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either cerclage plus progesterone or progesterone alone, using block randomization with a variable block size of 4, 6. To ensure allocation concealment, the random lists will be generated by www.sealedenvelope.com. Upon identification of an eligible participant, randomization data will be sequentially accessed an administrative staff who does not involve in clinical intervention. The random allocation will be conveyed to responsible clinicians. Due to the nature of interventions, the obstetricians and patients will not be blinded. Apart from randomization, patients will be managed and treated preterm birth (if present) according to local protocol.
In participants allocated to cerclage plus progesterone group, a Mersilene suture (Ethicon, LLC, United State) will be placed around the cervix in a purse-string fashion and securely tied anteriorly, following the McDonald technique under spinal anesthesia. The intervention needs to be performed before 24+0 weeks of gestation, by a team of dedicated obstetricians in our hospitals (2 to 3 obstetricians in each centers) to ensure the quality of the surgical procedure. For standardization of the cervical cerclage technique, all participating physicians received standardized training before study initiation. Prophylactic antibiotic: First/Second - generation Cephalosporin will be administered intravenously 1 hour before the procedure. In case of reporting an allergy to Cephalosporin, Clindamycin (Dalacin C® 600mg/4ml Pfizer, Belgium) will be used. Additional vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime, from 2 days after receiving cerclage to 37+0/7 week of gestation or preterm birth whatever comes first.
In participants allocated to progesterone alone group, vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime, from after randomization to 37+0/7 week of gestation or in case of preterm birth whatever comes first.
In both group, participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days. At every visit, their compliance was documented by checking the diary and drug purchasing records from the hospital pharmacy. Compliance rate was calculated by dividing the number of progesterone doses used by the number of progesterone doses that should have been used since the last visit. Participants were considered compliant when their drugs used-to-prescribed rate was 80%.
Follow-up examination will be 7 days after randomization and then 2 weeks apart until delivery. At every exam, we perform routine antenatal care and CL measurement, record drug compliance and reveal any adverse events or complications. In case of premature rupture of the membranes, active vaginal bleeding, other signs of preterm labor, or severe discomfort of the participant, the use of cerclage and/or progesterone will be discontinued. Further treatment was indicated per local protocol. All interventions were terminated at 37 weeks or at delivery, whichever came first. Delivery will take place by either spontaneous onset of labor, induction of labor, or elective cesarean section according to national guidelines for twin pregnancies.
In cases where the patient delivers at hospitals that are not among the six study sites, data on neonatal and obstetric outcomes will be collected through telephone follow-up and medical record summaries obtained from the respective healthcare facilities.
The selected outcome measures correspond to the core outcome set established for studies on preterm birth prevention by GONet and the Core Outcomes in Women's Health initiative.
Hospital costs will be measured from hospital costs of patients and neonates.
- Conditions
- Preterm
- Being tested
- Cervical cerclage, Progesterone
- Keywords
- Twin pregnancy, cervical cerclage, Progesterone
- Medical subject headings
- Premature Birth
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cervical cerclageProcedure or surgery
Participants will receive cervical cerclage according to local protocols within one week after randomization. The procedure will be performed by two to three senior clinicians experienced in cerclage in each center, using the McDonald technique.
ProgesteroneDrug
Also called Utrogestan 200mg
Vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime. Participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cerclage plus progesterone | Experimental | Participants will receive cervical cerclage according to local protocols within one week after randomization. The procedure will be performed by three senior clinicians experienced in cerclage, using the McDonald technique. In addition, vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime. Participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days. Receives: Procedure: Cervical cerclage; Drug: Progesterone |
| Progesterone alone | Active comparator | Vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime. Participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days Receives: Drug: Progesterone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Preterm birth < 28 weeks
Number of participants with preterm birth before 28 weeks of gestation
Measured: From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks
Secondary outcomes (37)
Gestational age at birth
Number of completed weeks and days of gestation at the time of delivery, calculated based on the date of embryo transfer for pregnancies conceived via in vitro fertilization (IVF), or by ultrasound measurement of the crown-rump length (CRL) of the larger fetus between 11 weeks and 13 weeks 6 days of gestation, or by head circumference measurement for pregnancies beyond 14 weeks of gestation.
Measured: At birth
Preterm birth < 32 weeks
Number of participants with preterm birth before 32 weeks of gestation
Measured: From randomization until 31 6/7 weeks
Preterm birth < 34 weeks
Number of participants with preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation
Measured: From randomization until 33 6/7 weeks
Preterm birth < 37 weeks
Number of participants with preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation
Measured: From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
Spontaneous preterm birth <28 weeks
Number of participants with spontaneous preterm birth before 28 weeks of gestation, including preterm spontaneous rupture of membranes, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)
Measured: From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks
Spontaneous preterm birth < 32 weeks
Number of participants with spontaneous preterm birth before 32 weeks of gestation, including preterm spontaneous rupture of membranes, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)
Measured: From randomization until 31 6/7 weeks
Spontaneous preterm birth < 34 weeks
Number of participants with spontaneous preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation, including preterm spontaneous rupture of membranes, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)
Measured: From randomization until 33 6/7 weeks
Spontaneous preterm birth < 37 weeks
Number of participants with spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation, including preterm spontaneous rupture of membranes, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)
Measured: From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
Iatrogenic preterm birth < 28 weeks
Number of participants with non-spontaneously before 28 weeks of gestation
Measured: From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks
Iatrogenic preterm birth < 32 weeks
Number of participants with non-spontaneously before 32 weeks of gestation
Measured: From randomization until 31 6/7 weeks
Iatrogenic preterm birth < 34 weeks
Number of participants with non-spontaneously before 34 weeks of gestation
Measured: From randomization until 33 6/7 weeks
Iatrogenic preterm birth < 37 weeks
Number of participants with non-spontaneously before 37 weeks of gestation
Measured: From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
Preterm premature rupture of membranes
Number of participants diagnosed with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), defined as spontaneous rupture of membranes before 37 weeks of gestation and prior to the onset of labor. Diagnosis is based on clinical signs, including pooling of amniotic fluid in the vaginal vault.
Measured: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 37 weeks of gestation
Hospital costs
Total hospital-related cost per participant, including: Direct medical costs (e.g., fees for consultations, medications, antenatal and delivery monitoring, treatment of complications related to cervical cerclage, and neonatal care during hospitalization)
Measured: From randomization to the time of hospital discharge of both the mother and the neonate(s), assessed up to 90 days after delivery
Maternal death
Death of the mother
Measured: From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
Composite of maternal adverse outcome
Number of participants who have any of the following maternal complications: chorioamnionitis, necrosis or rupture of the cervix, preterm premature rupture of the membranes, maternal death
Measured: From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to assessed up to 28 days after delivery
Apgar score at 1 minute
Apgar score at 1 minute
Measured: Assessed at 1 minute after birth
Apgar score at 5 minutes
Apgar score at 5 minutes
Measured: Assessed at 5 minutes after birth
Apgar Score < 7 at 5 minutes
Apgar Score < 7 at 5 minutes
Measured: Assessed at 5 minutes after birth
Birthweight
The weight of the live-born infant measured in grams at birth
Measured: At birth
Number of neonates in need for respiratory supports
Number of neonates requiring respiratory support, including intubation, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC).
Measured: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Length of ventilation
Number of days the neonate required respiratory support with mechanical ventilation (invasive or non-invasive), counted from the initiation of ventilation until final discontinuation.
Measured: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Respiratory distress syndrome
Number of neonates diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), based on clinical signs (chest movement, intercostal retraction, xiphoid retraction, nasal flaring, expiratory grunt) and classified by Silverman score.
Measured: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit
Number of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)
Measured: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Length of neonatal intensive care unit stay
Number of days of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay
Measured: From admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit until neonatal hospital discharge or hospital referral, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Length of neonatal admission
Total number of days of neonatal hospitalization, including stays in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the neonatal department
Measured: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Neonatal infection
Number of neonates with the presence of a clinically ill infant in whom systemic infection is suspected with a positive blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or catheterized/supra-pubic urine culture; or, in the absence of positive cultures, clinical evidence of cardiovascular collapse or an X-ray confirming infection
Measured: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Neonatal seizures
Number of neonates with neonatal seizures
Measured: From delivery to neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Intra-ventricular hemorrhage grades III and IV
Number of neonates diagnosed with grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage by ultrasonography
Measured: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)
Number of neonates diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) based on the clinical signs triad of abdominal distension, gastrointestinal bleeding, and pneumatosis intestinalis (air in bowel wall on abdominal X-ray) classified by Modified Bell's criteria.
Measured: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Neonatal sepsis
Number of neonates diagnosed with neonatal sepsis based on clinical signs (such as temperature instability, respiratory distress, lethargy, feeding difficulties) combined with laboratory evidence of infection (positive blood culture or other sterile site cultures) during the neonatal hospitalization period. The attending neonatologist confirms the diagnosis.
Measured: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Neonatal referred hospital transfer for severe morbidities
Number of neonates referred to other hospitals for severe morbidities
Measured: From birth until referral to another neonatal hospital, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Stillbirth
Number of participants with stillbirth occurring at or after 28 weeks of gestation during the study period.
Measured: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to assessed up to 28 days after delivery
Neonatal deaths
Number of intrapartum, neonatal, and perinatal deaths
Measured: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Composite neonatal adverse outcome
Number of neonates who have any of the following neonatal outcome: neonatal sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage grade III and IV, necrotizing enterocolitis, perinatal death.
Measured: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Maternal side effects
Number of participants with at least one of the following: chorioamnionitis, severe bleeding, cervical necrosis, or cervical rupture
Measured: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
Number of admission episodes for threatened preterm birth
Number of admission episodes for threatened preterm birth
Measured: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2026
- Study start10 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PretermStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized to either cerclage plus progesterone or progesterone alone in a 1:1 ratio with a variable block size of 4 or 6.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Quang Ninh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Quang Ninh, Vietnam, Ninh Binh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Ninh Binh, Vietnam, Bac Ninh 1 Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Bac Ninh, Vietnam, Bac Ninh 2 Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Bac Ninh, Vietnam, Hung Yen Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Hung Yen, Vietnam
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anh D Nguyen, Prof, MD,PhD, Study chair, National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07372495
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NHOG-VN.TWIN CERCLAGE
- Acronym
- VNTWINC
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 24 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Akar B, Ceylan Y, Kahraman A, Kole E, Caliskan E. Centile charts of cervical length in singleton and twin pregnancies between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2023 Jun 7;24(2):114-119. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2023.2022-7-3. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
PubMed 36999666He YTN, Pham HNH, Nguyen TC, Bui TQ, Vuong NT, Nguyen DTN, Le TV, Li W, Le CH, Ho TM, Mol BW, Dang VQ, Vuong LN. Cervical cerclage versus cervical pessary with or without vaginal progesterone for preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies and a short cervix: A two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial. PLoS Med. 2025 Feb 21;22(2):e1004526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004526. eCollection 2025 Feb.
PubMed 39982935van 't Hooft J. A core outcome set for evaluation of interventions to prevent preterm birth: summary for CROWN. BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):666. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14003. No abstract available.
PubMed 27149346van 't Hooft J, Duffy JMN, Daly M, Williamson PR, Meher S, Thom E, Saade GR, Alfirevic Z, Mol BWJ, Khan KS; Global Obstetrics Network (GONet). A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;127(1):49-58. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001195.
PubMed 26646133D'Antonio F, Eltaweel N, Prasad S, Flacco ME, Manzoli L, Khalil A. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies with short cervical length or cervical dilatation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2023 Aug 3;20(8):e1004266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004266. eCollection 2023 Aug.
PubMed 37535682Wu FT, Chen YY, Chen CP, Sun FJ, Chen CY. Outcomes of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies with a short cervical length. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;59(4):508-513. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.05.007.
PubMed 32653121Freegard GD, Donadono V, Impey LWM. Emergency cervical cerclage in twin and singleton pregnancies with 0-mm cervical length or prolapsed membranes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Nov;100(11):2003-2008. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14255. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
PubMed 34476806Roman A, Zork N, Haeri S, Schoen CN, Saccone G, Colihan S, Zelig C, Gimovsky AC, Seligman NS, Zullo F, Berghella V. Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):902.e1-902.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.047. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
PubMed 32592693Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Nicolaides K, Chaiworapongsa T, O'Brien JM, Cetingoz E, da Fonseca E, Creasy G, Soma-Pillay P, Fusey S, Cam C, Alfirevic Z, Hassan SS. Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):42.e1-42.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.877. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
PubMed 23157855Jarde A, Lutsiv O, Park CK, Barrett J, Beyene J, Saito S, Dodd JM, Shah PS, Cook JL, Biringer AB, Giglia L, Han Z, Staub K, Mundle W, Vera C, Sabatino L, Liyanage SK, McDonald SD. Preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies with progesterone, pessary, or cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017 Jul;124(8):1163-1173. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14513. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
PubMed 28176485D'Antonio F, Berghella V, Di Mascio D, Saccone G, Sileo F, Flacco ME, Odibo AO, Liberati M, Manzoli L, Khalil A. Role of progesterone, cerclage and pessary in preventing preterm birth in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jun;261:166-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.023. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
PubMed 33946019Prediction and Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 234. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;138(2):e65-e90. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004479.
PubMed 34293771van Gils L, Dutilh R, Denswil N, Roman A, de Boer MA, Pajkrt E, Oudijk MA. The effectiveness of ultrasound-indicated cerclage for the reduction of extreme preterm birth in twin pregnancies with a short cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2025 Jan;7(1):101555. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101555. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
PubMed 39603526Khalil A, Sotiriadis A, Baschat A, Bhide A, Gratacos E, Hecher K, Lewi L, Salomon LJ, Thilaganathan B, Ville Y. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb;65(2):253-276. doi: 10.1002/uog.29166. Epub 2025 Jan 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 39815396Dang VQ, Nguyen LK, Pham TD, He YTN, Vu KN, Phan MTN, Le TQ, Le CH, Vuong LN, Mol BW. Pessary Compared With Vaginal Progesterone for the Prevention of Preterm Birth in Women With Twin Pregnancies and Cervical Length Less Than 38 mm: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;133(3):459-467. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003136.
PubMed 30741812
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cervical Cerclage Plus Vaginal Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Alone in Twin Pregnancies With a Short Cervix for Prevention of Preterm Birth: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07372495
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VNTWINC / NHOG-VN.TWIN CERCLAGE
- Conditions
- Preterm
- Keywords
- Twin pregnancy, cervical cerclage, Progesterone
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Hospital of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Quang Ninh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Quang Ninh, Vietnam, Ninh Binh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Ninh Binh, Vietnam, Bac Ninh 1 Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Bac Ninh, Vietnam, Bac Ninh 2 Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Bac Ninh, Vietnam, Hung Yen Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Hung Yen, Vietnam
- Study start
- 10 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of cervical cerclage combined with progesterone versus progesterone alone in preventing preterm birth among women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix (cervical length ≤ 30 mm). Participants will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group (cerclage plus progesterone) or the control group (progesterone alone).
Detailed description
The incidence of multiple pregnancies has increased rapidly over the years mainly due to the resultant widespread use of assisted reproduction techniques. The twin birth rate in the USA has risen 70%, from 19 per 1000 live births in 1980 to 31 per 1000 live births in 2020. Twin pregnancies have a high risk on preterm birth (PTB) which is associated with increased risk of neonatal mortality and long-term morbidity. Around 60% of twin pregnancies deliver prior to 37 weeks and 12% before 34 weeks of gestation, with rates 5 and 8 times higher than the equivalent rates for a singleton pregnancy, respectively. Children born at an early gestational age are at increased risk of short-term morbidities affecting vital organ systems such as lungs, brain, bowels and are at increased risk of severe infection and sepsis. Perinatal mortality is strongly associated with extreme PTB. Survivors are at increased risk for developmental and behavioral disorders. In Vietnam, the rate of twin pregnancies deliver at < 28 weeks was about 11% in 2019. Caring for extremely premature infants is a significant burden for families and society. Therefore, obstetricians have a need for high-quality evidence for effective treatments.
Cervical length measurement (ideally transvaginal) is the preferred method of screening for preterm birth in twins; 25mm is a pragmatic cut-off between 18 and 24 gestational weeks (Grade of recommendation: C). Majority of the studies conducted previously has taken the cut-off cervical length as ≤ 25 mm. A systematic review and meta-analysis (13 retrospective studies and 3 RCTs) showed that cervical cerclage may reduce preterm birth in twin pregnancies with a cervical length <25 mm; however, preterm birth before 37, 34, and 28 weeks remained high (56.7%, 38.8%, and 11.7%, respectively)5, compared with much lower rates in singleton pregnancies (6.2%, 4.7%, and 0.4%). These findings support the need for further studies on preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies with a cervical length >25 mm. In 2025, Yen et al. showed that cervical cerclage was more effective than pessary in twin pregnancies with a cervical length ≤28 mm, particularly in reducing preterm birth <28 weeks, with benefit observed at 25-28 mm. However, preterm birth rates remained high, suggesting that intervention at a higher cervical length threshold may be justified. Given gestational age-related cervical shortening and the substantially higher preterm birth risk in twins, a higher threshold corresponding to the 10th percentile (≤30 mm) has been proposed. Accordingly, we selected ≤30 mm as the intervention threshold in twin pregnancies.
In singleton pregnancies, vaginal progesterone is recommended as the primary intervention for pregnant women with a cervical length less than 25mm with consistently demonstrated effectiveness in preventing premature labor. In cases with a prior spontaneous preterm delivery and a short cervix, the placement of a vaginal cerclage should be considered. Conversely, there is less evidence on the optimal strategy for preventing PTB in twin pregnancies. In twins, IM 17- OHPC and cervical pessary are not indicated in order to prevent PTB. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of vaginal progesterone and cerclage remains unclear. Several randomized trials and systematic reviews reported little or no benefit of cerclage in twin pregnancies. However, these studies were limited by small sample size and large heterogeneity in their inclusion criteria, study populations, and outcomes observed. The data are insufficient to recommend for or against these interventions in the clinical circumstances. Moreover, in the a last few years, an increasing number of studies reporting a potential beneficial role of cerclage in reducing the risk of PTB and adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies have been published. The latest ISUOG practice guidelines (2025) stated that a combined strategy of physical-exam-indicated cerclage, antibiotics, and tocolytics may be considered in asymptomatic twin pregnancy with dilated cervix before 24 weeks of gestation and a cervical cerclage may be considered when the cervical length is ≤ 15 mm before 24 weeks of gestation (grade of recommendation: C). However, these findings are mainly based on observational studies and require confirmation in large and adequately powered RCTs.
In conclusion, there is a lack of well-designed RCT's on the effect of vaginal cerclage in asymptomatic twin pregnancies. We propose a multi-center randomized trial on the effectiveness of vaginal cerclage in women with a twin pregnancy and a short cervix (less than 30mm) in the second trimester with relevant outcomes assessing not only PTB at different cut-offs but also adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
This open label, multi-center, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of cervical cerclage combined with progesterone versus progesterone alone in preventing preterm birth among women with twin pregnancies with a cervix ≤ 30 mm.
Cervical length will be measured routinely in twin pregnancies between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation by qualified doctors via transvaginal ultrasound. Women with a cervical length ≤30 mm will be eligible for the study. Eligible participants will receive a Participant Information Sheet and provide written informed consent after discussion with the investigators. All eligible women will be invited to participate in the study.
Six centers are involved in the study and patients will be stratified by center. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either cerclage plus progesterone or progesterone alone, using block randomization with a variable block size of 4, 6. To ensure allocation concealment, the random lists will be generated by www.sealedenvelope.com. Upon identification of an eligible participant, randomization data will be sequentially accessed an administrative staff who does not involve in clinical intervention. The random allocation will be conveyed to responsible clinicians. Due to the nature of interventions, the obstetricians and patients will not be blinded. Apart from randomization, patients will be managed and treated preterm birth (if present) according to local protocol.
In participants allocated to cerclage plus progesterone group, a Mersilene suture (Ethicon, LLC, United State) will be placed around the cervix in a purse-string fashion and securely tied anteriorly, following the McDonald technique under spinal anesthesia. The intervention needs to be performed before 24+0 weeks of gestation, by a team of dedicated obstetricians in our hospitals (2 to 3 obstetricians in each centers) to ensure the quality of the surgical procedure. For standardization of the cervical cerclage technique, all participating physicians received standardized training before study initiation. Prophylactic antibiotic: First/Second - generation Cephalosporin will be administered intravenously 1 hour before the procedure. In case of reporting an allergy to Cephalosporin, Clindamycin (Dalacin C® 600mg/4ml Pfizer, Belgium) will be used. Additional vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime, from 2 days after receiving cerclage to 37+0/7 week of gestation or preterm birth whatever comes first.
In participants allocated to progesterone alone group, vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime, from after randomization to 37+0/7 week of gestation or in case of preterm birth whatever comes first.
In both group, participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days. At every visit, their compliance was documented by checking the diary and drug purchasing records from the hospital pharmacy. Compliance rate was calculated by dividing the number of progesterone doses used by the number of progesterone doses that should have been used since the last visit. Participants were considered compliant when their drugs used-to-prescribed rate was 80%.
Follow-up examination will be 7 days after randomization and then 2 weeks apart until delivery. At every exam, we perform routine antenatal care and CL measurement, record drug compliance and reveal any adverse events or complications. In case of premature rupture of the membranes, active vaginal bleeding, other signs of preterm labor, or severe discomfort of the participant, the use of cerclage and/or progesterone will be discontinued. Further treatment was indicated per local protocol. All interventions were terminated at 37 weeks or at delivery, whichever came first. Delivery will take place by either spontaneous onset of labor, induction of labor, or elective cesarean section according to national guidelines for twin pregnancies.
In cases where the patient delivers at hospitals that are not among the six study sites, data on neonatal and obstetric outcomes will be collected through telephone follow-up and medical record summaries obtained from the respective healthcare facilities.
The selected outcome measures correspond to the core outcome set established for studies on preterm birth prevention by GONet and the Core Outcomes in Women's Health initiative.
Hospital costs will be measured from hospital costs of patients and neonates.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized to either cerclage plus progesterone or progesterone alone in a 1:1 ratio with a variable block size of 4 or 6.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cerclage plus progesterone | Experimental | Procedure: Cervical cerclage, Drug: ProgesteroneParticipants will receive cervical cerclage according to local protocols within one week after randomization. The procedure will be performed by three senior clinicians experienced in cerclage, using the McDonald technique. In addition, vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime. Participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days. |
| Progesterone alone | Active comparator | Drug: ProgesteroneVaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime. Participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Maternal age ≥ 18
- Twin pregnancy
- Asymptomatic short cervix (CL≤30mm) at routine ultrasound investigation
- Gestational age at 16+0- 24+0 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- A potential paticipant who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this trial:
- Women with twin pregnancy in which one or both fetuses are diagnosed with a major structural or congenital abnormality that is likely to influence the composite adverse neonatal outcome.
- Women with a monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy
- A monochorionic twin pregnancy with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome before or at the time of inclusion.
- Patients have indications for vaginal cerclage: Recurrent late miscarriage (from 14 weeks) or preterm birth occurring two or more times.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical cerclageParticipants will receive cervical cerclage according to local protocols within one week after randomization. The procedure will be performed by two to three senior clinicians experienced in cerclage in each center, using the McDonald technique. | Procedure or surgery | Cerclage plus progesterone |
| ProgesteroneAlso: Utrogestan 200mgVaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime. Participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days. | Drug | Cerclage plus progesterone, Progesterone alone |
Primary outcome
Preterm birth < 28 weeks
Time frame: From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks
Number of participants with preterm birth before 28 weeks of gestation
37 secondary outcomes
Gestational age at birth
Time frame: At birth
Preterm birth < 32 weeks
Time frame: From randomization until 31 6/7 weeks
Preterm birth < 34 weeks
Time frame: From randomization until 33 6/7 weeks
Preterm birth < 37 weeks
Time frame: From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
Spontaneous preterm birth <28 weeks
Time frame: From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks
Spontaneous preterm birth < 32 weeks
Time frame: From randomization until 31 6/7 weeks
Spontaneous preterm birth < 34 weeks
Time frame: From randomization until 33 6/7 weeks
Spontaneous preterm birth < 37 weeks
Time frame: From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
Iatrogenic preterm birth < 28 weeks
Time frame: From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks
Iatrogenic preterm birth < 32 weeks
Time frame: From randomization until 31 6/7 weeks
Iatrogenic preterm birth < 34 weeks
Time frame: From randomization until 33 6/7 weeks
Iatrogenic preterm birth < 37 weeks
Time frame: From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
Preterm premature rupture of membranes
Time frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 37 weeks of gestation
Hospital costs
Time frame: From randomization to the time of hospital discharge of both the mother and the neonate(s), assessed up to 90 days after delivery
Maternal death
Time frame: From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
Composite of maternal adverse outcome
Time frame: From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to assessed up to 28 days after delivery
Apgar score at 1 minute
Time frame: Assessed at 1 minute after birth
Apgar score at 5 minutes
Time frame: Assessed at 5 minutes after birth
Apgar Score < 7 at 5 minutes
Time frame: Assessed at 5 minutes after birth
Birthweight
Time frame: At birth
Number of neonates in need for respiratory supports
Time frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Length of ventilation
Time frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Respiratory distress syndrome
Time frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit
Time frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Length of neonatal intensive care unit stay
Time frame: From admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit until neonatal hospital discharge or hospital referral, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Length of neonatal admission
Time frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Neonatal infection
Time frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Neonatal seizures
Time frame: From delivery to neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Intra-ventricular hemorrhage grades III and IV
Time frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)
Time frame: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Neonatal sepsis
Time frame: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Neonatal referred hospital transfer for severe morbidities
Time frame: From birth until referral to another neonatal hospital, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Stillbirth
Time frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to assessed up to 28 days after delivery
Neonatal deaths
Time frame: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Composite neonatal adverse outcome
Time frame: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
Maternal side effects
Time frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
Number of admission episodes for threatened preterm birth
Time frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Apr 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 36999666Akar B, Ceylan Y, Kahraman A, Kole E, Caliskan E. Centile charts of cervical length in singleton and twin pregnancies between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2023 Jun 7;24(2):114-119. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2023.2022-7-3. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
- Results publication: PubMed 39982935He YTN, Pham HNH, Nguyen TC, Bui TQ, Vuong NT, Nguyen DTN, Le TV, Li W, Le CH, Ho TM, Mol BW, Dang VQ, Vuong LN. Cervical cerclage versus cervical pessary with or without vaginal progesterone for preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies and a short cervix: A two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial. PLoS Med. 2025 Feb 21;22(2):e1004526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004526. eCollection 2025 Feb.
- Results publication: PubMed 27149346van 't Hooft J. A core outcome set for evaluation of interventions to prevent preterm birth: summary for CROWN. BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):666. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14003. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 26646133van 't Hooft J, Duffy JMN, Daly M, Williamson PR, Meher S, Thom E, Saade GR, Alfirevic Z, Mol BWJ, Khan KS; Global Obstetrics Network (GONet). A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;127(1):49-58. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001195.
- Results publication: PubMed 37535682D'Antonio F, Eltaweel N, Prasad S, Flacco ME, Manzoli L, Khalil A. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies with short cervical length or cervical dilatation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2023 Aug 3;20(8):e1004266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004266. eCollection 2023 Aug.
- Results publication: PubMed 32653121Wu FT, Chen YY, Chen CP, Sun FJ, Chen CY. Outcomes of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies with a short cervical length. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;59(4):508-513. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.05.007.
- Results publication: PubMed 34476806Freegard GD, Donadono V, Impey LWM. Emergency cervical cerclage in twin and singleton pregnancies with 0-mm cervical length or prolapsed membranes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Nov;100(11):2003-2008. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14255. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 32592693Roman A, Zork N, Haeri S, Schoen CN, Saccone G, Colihan S, Zelig C, Gimovsky AC, Seligman NS, Zullo F, Berghella V. Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):902.e1-902.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.047. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 23157855Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Nicolaides K, Chaiworapongsa T, O'Brien JM, Cetingoz E, da Fonseca E, Creasy G, Soma-Pillay P, Fusey S, Cam C, Alfirevic Z, Hassan SS. Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):42.e1-42.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.877. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 28176485Jarde A, Lutsiv O, Park CK, Barrett J, Beyene J, Saito S, Dodd JM, Shah PS, Cook JL, Biringer AB, Giglia L, Han Z, Staub K, Mundle W, Vera C, Sabatino L, Liyanage SK, McDonald SD. Preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies with progesterone, pessary, or cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017 Jul;124(8):1163-1173. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14513. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 33946019D'Antonio F, Berghella V, Di Mascio D, Saccone G, Sileo F, Flacco ME, Odibo AO, Liberati M, Manzoli L, Khalil A. Role of progesterone, cerclage and pessary in preventing preterm birth in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jun;261:166-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.023. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 34293771Prediction and Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 234. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;138(2):e65-e90. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004479.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Preterm
Not yet recruiting
nCPAP-NAVA-Backup Versus Standard nCPAP for Severe Apnea in Preterm Infants ≤28 Weeks
Apnea of Prematurity
Recruiting
Study of the Influence of Intraperitoneal Insufflation of CO2 by Laparoscopy on the Short-term Evolution of Premature Infants With Ulcerative Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Preterm Birth, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
RecruitingObservational study
Multidimensional Dynamic Early Warning System for Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Multicenter Clinical Study
NEC - Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Recruiting
Optimization of Saturation Targets And Resuscitation Trial (OptiSTART)
Premature Infants, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Anh D Nguyen, Prof, MD,PhD study chair
National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cervical cerclage and Progesterone in people with Preterm, run by National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology at 6 sites in Vietnam.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Thu Ha T Nguyen, Assoc. Prof (84965995599, dr.hanguyen.nhog@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Preterm birth < 28 weeks (time frame: From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07372495, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2026.