AzTrials
AzTrials

Lewy Body Dementia (LBD)TACSDLB2NCT07375771

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Lewy Body Dementia

A study testing Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in people with Lewy Body Dementia (LBD) and Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation, run by IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli at 2 sites in Italy.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, clinical and biological efficacy, and predictors of efficacy of an intervention consisting of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in patients with Lewy Body Dementia (DLB). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
40 participants
Where
2 sitesItaly
Study dates
1 Oct 2025to Sep 2030
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female subjects aged over 18 at the time of signing the informed consent form;
  • Presence of a clinical diagnosis of Lewy body dementia according to clinical criteria (McKeith et al., 2017)

Who cannot join

  • Age younger than that stated in the inclusion criteria;
  • Incapacity to understand;
  • Contraindications for tACS and TMS: patients with cardiac pacemakers and metal implants that are not compatible with electric or magnetic fields, history of epilepsy, current pregnancy (Safety questionnaire)

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni Di Dio - Fatebenefratelli Brescia

    Brescia, Italy, 25125

    Barbara Borroni, MD, +39 0303501358, bborroni@fatebenefratelli.eu

    +39 0303501360, sct.irccs@fatebenefratelli.eu

    Recruiting
  • Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina di Trieste

    Trieste, TS, 34139

    Alberto Benussi, MD, +39 0403994282, benussialberto@gmail.com

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Interventional Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) on Cognitive Performance in Patients With Lewy Body Dementia

The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, clinical and biological efficacy, and predictors of efficacy of an intervention consisting of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in patients with Lewy Body Dementia (DLB).

In neurodegenerative diseases, like DLB, the process of neurodegeneration is accompanied by a significant alteration in oscillatory activity.

Read more

tACS is a neurophysiological method of non-invasive modulation of the excitability of the central nervous system that uses a mild electrical current. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this method in modulating the natural brain oscillation frequencies underlying multiple cognitive processes, such as verbal memory, perception, and working memory. Preliminary data show that single stimulation with occipital α-tACS results in a significant improvement in visuospatial abilities and executive functions in patients wih DLB.

The study is double blind, randomised and placebo-controlled, participants will be randomised into two groups: group 1, participants will receive real tACS for 2 weeks, from Wednesday to Tuesday (5 sessions/week, lasting approximately 60 minutes each); and group 2, participants will receive placebo tACS for 2 weeks (5 sessions/week, lasting approximately 60 minutes each).

Visits will take place at the beginning of the study (T00), after 2 weeks (T02), and 12 weeks (T12, follow-up). During each visit, participants undergo the following procedures: (i) blood sampling, (ii) clinical and neuropsychological assessment, (iii) EEG, and (iv) TMS-EEG. The occurrence of adverse events will be monitored throughout the duration of the study. Specific biomarker analyses will be performed on the blood samples to study the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease and the effect of the experimental intervention.

Being tested
Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation, Sham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation
Medical subject headings
Lewy Body Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transcranial Alternating Current StimulationDevice

    10 sessions (5 days/week for 2 weeks), each consisting in the application of a tACS session (real at 3 mA) at the cortical level for a duration of 60 minutes each.

  • Sham Transcranial Alternating Current StimulationDevice

    10 sessions (5 days/week for 2 weeks), each consisting in the application of a sham tACS session at the cortical level for a duration of 60 minutes each. The electrode placement will be identical to that used for real stimulation. However, the electrical current will be automatically interrupted approximately 5 seconds after the start of stimulation, making it impossible for the patient to distinguish between sham and real stimulation

Study groups in NCT07375771
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental: Real tACSExperimental10 sessions of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (5 sessions/week, 60 minutes/session)
Receives: Device: Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation
Sham Comparator: Sham tACSSham comparator10 sessions of sham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (5 sessions/week, 60 minutes/session)
Receives: Device: Sham Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Protocol

    Safety and tolerability will be assessed in terms of incidence and severity of any adverse events. Safety and tolerability will be monitored throughout the duration of the study.

    Measured: Through study completion, at week 12

  2. Feasibility of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Protocol

    Feasibility will be assessed based on the drop-out rate. Feasibility will be monitored throughout the duration of the study.

    Measured: Through study completion, at week 12

  3. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

    The global cognitive functioning will be assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); MMSE scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating a more preserved cognition.

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 12

  4. Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)

    Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is designed to be a structured clinical interview about neuropsychiatric and behavioral symptoms will be assessed by; the score ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 144 (severe symptoms).

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  5. Qualitive Pentagon Test

    Praxis-constructive abilities will be assessed by Qualitive Pentagon Test; the subject is asked to copy two intersecting pentagons. Qualitive Pentagon Test scores range from 0 to 13, with higher scores indicating a better performance.

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  6. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    Verbal memory will be assessed using the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), including immediate recall (sum of trials), delayed recall after 15 minutes. Scores reflect the number of correctly recalled items.

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  7. Trail Making Test (TMT - AB)

    Executive function will be assessed using the Trail Making Test, including Part A (visual attention and processing speed) and Part B (task switching and cognitive flexibility). Higher completion times reflect poorer performance.

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  8. Clock Drawing Test (CDT)

    Constructional praxis abilities, mental representation skills, and visuospatial planning will be evaluated by Clock Drawing Test (CDT). CDT scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating a better performance.

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  9. Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF)

    Visuoconstructive abilities and visual memory will be assessed by Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure. It requires the subject to copy a complex geometric figure and subsequently reproduce it from meory after a 10 minutes delay. Both tests score from 0 to 36, with higher score indicating a better performance.

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  10. Phonemic Fluency Test

    Cognitive flexibility and verbal fluency will be evalueted by Phonemic Fluency Test. Subject is asked to generate as many words as possible from a given letter within a limited time (60 seconds); higher scores indicate better perfomance.

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  11. Semantic Fluency Test

    Lexical-semantic access and executive functioning will be evalueted by Semantic Fluency Test. Subject is asked to generate as many words as possible from a given category within a limited time (60 seconds); higher scores indicate better perfomance.

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  12. Digit Span Test

    Short-term memory and working memory will be assessed respectively using the Digit Span forward and Digit Span backward. Scores reflect the maximum number of digits recalled in correct order.

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  13. Visual Search Task

    Attention and cognitive flexibility will be assessed using a Visual Search task. Participants will be instructed to identify and select a predefined target each time it appears on the screen. Performance will be quantified by the number of correct detections (hits), missed targets (omissions), and incorrect responses (errors).

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change in Biological Markers

    A venous blood draw (35 ml) will be performed at each timepoint (T0, T02, T12). The samples will be processed for serum, plasma, and DNA extraction. Neurodegeneration biomarkers will be analyzed, specifically changes in plasma neurofilament light (NfL) levels (pg/mL) will be evaluated. The plasma biomarker profile will be evaluated as a predictor of treatment efficacy and correlated with differential treatment response.

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  2. Change in electroencephalography (EEG)

    Using resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) recorded under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, the investigators will assess changes in EEG alpha-band power (8-12 Hz). Alpha power will be quantified from scalp EEG recordings using spectral power analysis performed on the pre-processed EEG data.

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  3. Change in TMS-EEG

    Cortical reactivity and effective connectivity will be assessed by analyzing TMS-evoked potentials, obtained from TMS-EEG coregistration after occipital cortex stimulation.

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 2 and 12

  4. Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL)

    Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL; range 0-6, higher scores indicating worse outcome) assesses the loss of daily self-sufficiency.

    It will be evaluated as predictors of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)

    Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL; range 0-8, higher scores indicating worse outcome) assesses the loss of complex instrumental acitivities.

    It will be evaluated as predictors of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Part III (UPDRS-III)

    Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Part III (UPDRS-III; range 0-132, higher scores indicating worse outcome) assesses motor impairment.

    It will be evaluated as predictors of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response.

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Demographic characteristics

    Demographic characteristics (age, gender, and level of education) will be evaluated as predictors of treatment efficacy and examined for associations with differential treatment response.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jan 2026
  2. Study start1 Oct 2025
  3. Primary completionSep 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study is a double-blind, randomised and placebo-controlled trial, participants will be randomised into two groups: group 1, participants will receive real tACS for 2 weeks; and group 2, placebo tACS 2 weeks. Each participant will receive a total of 2 weeks of intervention, with 5 sessions per week (Wednesday to Tuesday) lasting approximately 60 minutes each.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07375771
Sponsor's protocol ID
TACSDLB2
Acronym
TACSDLB2
Status last verified
Nov 2026
First submitted
1 Dec 2025
Last updated
5 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Aoki Y, Kazui H, Pascal-Marqui RD, Ishii R, Yoshiyama K, Kanemoto H, Suzuki Y, Sato S, Hata M, Canuet L, Iwase M, Ikeda M. EEG Resting-State Networks in Dementia with Lewy Bodies Associated with Clinical Symptoms. Neuropsychobiology. 2019;77(4):206-218. doi: 10.1159/000495620. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

    PubMed 30654367
  • Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmoller J, Brunoni AR, Chen R, Cohen LG, Dowthwaite G, Ellrich J, Floel A, Fregni F, George MS, Hamilton R, Haueisen J, Herrmann CS, Hummel FC, Lefaucheur JP, Liebetanz D, Loo CK, McCaig CD, Miniussi C, Miranda PC, Moliadze V, Nitsche MA, Nowak R, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Poppendieck W, Priori A, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell J, Rueger MA, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wexler A, Ziemann U, Hallett M, Paulus W. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

    PubMed 28709880
  • Amodio P, Wenin H, Del Piccolo F, Mapelli D, Montagnese S, Pellegrini A, Musto C, Gatta A, Umilta C. Variability of trail making test, symbol digit test and line trait test in normal people. A normative study taking into account age-dependent decline and sociobiological variables. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2002 Apr;14(2):117-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03324425.

    PubMed 12092785
  • Bagattini C, Mutanen TP, Fracassi C, Manenti R, Cotelli M, Ilmoniemi RJ, Miniussi C, Bortoletto M. Predicting Alzheimer's disease severity by means of TMS-EEG coregistration. Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Aug;80:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 13.

    PubMed 31077959
  • Benussi A, Cantoni V, Rivolta J, Zoppi N, Cotelli MS, Bianchi M, Cotelli M, Borroni B. Alpha tACS Improves Cognition and Modulates Neurotransmission in Dementia with Lewy Bodies. Mov Disord. 2024 Nov;39(11):1993-2003. doi: 10.1002/mds.29969. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

    PubMed 39136447
  • Bonato C, Miniussi C, Rossini PM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: a TMS/EEG co-registration study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Aug;117(8):1699-707. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jun 22.

    PubMed 16797232
  • Bortoletto M, Veniero D, Thut G, Miniussi C. The contribution of TMS-EEG coregistration in the exploration of the human cortical connectome. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Feb;49:114-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.014. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

    PubMed 25541459
  • Hoy KE, Bailey N, Arnold S, Windsor K, John J, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB. The effect of gamma-tACS on working memory performance in healthy controls. Brain Cogn. 2015 Dec;101:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

    PubMed 26580743
  • Massimini M, Ferrarelli F, Huber R, Esser SK, Singh H, Tononi G. Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep. Science. 2005 Sep 30;309(5744):2228-32. doi: 10.1126/science.1117256.

    PubMed 16195466
  • Monaco M, Costa A, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo GA. Forward and backward span for verbal and visuo-spatial data: standardization and normative data from an Italian adult population. Neurol Sci. 2013 May;34(5):749-54. doi: 10.1007/s10072-012-1130-x. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

    PubMed 22689311
  • Morishima Y, Akaishi R, Yamada Y, Okuda J, Toma K, Sakai K. Task-specific signal transmission from prefrontal cortex in visual selective attention. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jan;12(1):85-91. doi: 10.1038/nn.2237. Epub 2008 Dec 21.

    PubMed 19098905
  • Morrin H, Fang T, Servant D, Aarsland D, Rajkumar AP. Systematic review of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in people with Lewy body dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Mar;30(3):395-407. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217002010. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

    PubMed 28988547
  • Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1.

    PubMed 20633386
  • Treisman AM, Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5. No abstract available.

    PubMed 7351125
  • Ragazzoni A, Pirulli C, Veniero D, Feurra M, Cincotta M, Giovannelli F, Chiaramonti R, Lino M, Rossi S, Miniussi C. Vegetative versus minimally conscious states: a study using TMS-EEG, sensory and event-related potentials. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057069. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

    PubMed 23460826

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in people with Lewy Body Dementia (LBD) and Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation, run by IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli at 2 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Protocol (time frame: Through study completion, at week 12). The study lists 13 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07375771, which also lists 25 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in