Cervical Cancer ScreeningNCT07376031
Cervical Thermal Ablation to Treat Persistent HPV Infection
A study testing Treatment in people with Cervical Cancer Screening and HPV, run by Hvidovre University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Thermal ablation of women ≥40 years of age with persistent Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. A pilot and intervention study. Cervical heat treatment is a relatively new form of treatment19 where a smaller, defined area of the cervix is destroyed by insertion of a heated probe. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer Screening, HPV, Thermal Ablation
- What is being tested?
- Treatment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 131 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2020to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women, age ≥40 years;
- persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection for ≥12 months
- colposcopy referral according to national screening guidelines;
- normal, ASC-US, or LSIL cytology;
- no histologically verified ≥CIN2; and no prior cervical treatment.
Who cannot join
- Women with histologically confirmed ≥CIN2
- biopsies lacking transformation zone tissue
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Thermal Ablation on Persistent HPV Infection in Danish Women ≥40 Years of Age; a Randomized Clinical Study
Thermal ablation of women ≥40 years of age with persistent Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. A pilot and intervention study.
Cervical heat treatment is a relatively new form of treatment19 where a smaller, defined area of the cervix is destroyed by insertion of a heated probe. Cervical heat treatment is already used in specialist medical practice for patients with erythroplakia, contact bleeding, chronic cervicitis and discharged. In a collaboration between Region Zealand and the Capital Region of Denmark, 120 women are randomized to receive thermal ablation for HPV infections without severe disease with a matched control group of 120 women who do not receive ablation. All women are monitored through repeated cervical cytology re-tests at defined follow-up (FU) times. The study cohort consist of 1) sample on enrollment date, 2) 3 months FU sample, 3) 6 months FU sample, 4) 12 months FU sample. All samples are collected in SurePath liquid-based cytology medium and HPV tested using the BD Onclarity HPV test (BD Integrated Diagnostic systems, Sparks, MD)20-22 supplemented by a full genotyping analysis (Seegene, Seoul, Korea)21,23. Methylation status is examined using the QiaSure FAM19A4/miRNA 122-4 methylation test (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
This project element aims to determine whether thermal ablation impact viral clearance compared to the control group, and whether DNA methylation status is significant amongst women who are persistently HPV positive before and after thermal ablation.
Read the detailed description
Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is the etiological cause of precancerous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and ultimately cervical cancer (CC)1. With 50 years of cervical cancer screening in Denmark, CC incidence has been reduced from the peak of 39.6/100.000 in 1966 to 11/100.000 in 20222, but the World Health Organization world elimination goal of 6/100.0003,4 is still in the distance.
Cervical cancer is largely preventable through local treatment of screen-detected cervical precursor lesions also known as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Infection with the HPV virus causes cell changes and cervical cancer5. The HPV virus infects the cells on the surface of the cervix. While most women naturally clear an HPV infection over time, in approx. 10% of all infected women, the HPV infection becomes persistent which is a known risk enhancer6-8. It is unknown why an HPV infection becomes chronic in some but not most women. Lifetime risk of HPV infection is over 80%. In Denmark, all women between 23-65 years are offered screening for cervical cancer at defined intervals. Today, cervical screening is conducted using a combination of cell-based evaluation, cytology, and molecular HPV screening. However, Danish cervical cancer screening is in transit from cytology to molecular HPV based screening to all women aged 30 to 649. A recurrent issue with HPV based screening is the specificity of the screening which leads to many women being referred for monitoring or follow up without having significant disease. The screening program constitute 400,000 individual annual screening samples and approx. 30,000 tissue biopsy sets are derived as follow-up after a positive screening sample. From these, 6500 cone sections results.
Cervical cancer incidence in Denmark displays a double peaked pattern with the highest incidence in women 35-45 years and again in women 70-75 years. The latter peak is closely related to the current exit age from screening which is 64 years compared to 70 in the other Nordic countries. From 2012-2016, the average annual number of new CCs was 371 with 103 annual deaths10. In Denmark, women aged ≥ 60 years accounts for more than half of CC deaths (66%) and almost 30% of new cases10. For older women as well as younger, a clinical challenge is that many carry a persistent HPV infection which may or may not give rise to severe dysplasia possibly preceding cancer. However, current diagnostic methodologies offer no safe way to distinguish between the progressive lesions and persistent, non-progressive HPV infections. This leads to a large group of persistent HPV positive women in extended clinical follow-up regimens without a clear exit strategy and eventually leading to (over)treatment in the form of conization or hysterectomy. DNA methylation of human genes has shown to be particularly sensitive for the detection of cervical cancer and advanced CIN2 or 3 and presumed increased short-term risk of progression to cervical cancer11-17. Absence of host-cell DNA methylation on the other hand, is associated with regression of CIN2/313,17.
This PhD project focusses on whether novel methylation biomarkers can assist in risk-stratification for risk of severe cervical disease in two groups of women with persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infections:
- Women who have received thermal ablation as part of treatment for non-severe cell changes following HPV infection (randomized control trial, Region Zealand)
- Women 60-64 years of age with persistent HPV infections participating in cervical cancer screening in the Capital Region of Denmark If successful, the project will provide needed data to support introduction of molecular triage biomarkers in two different applications; to determine persistent HPV infection after thermal ablation treatment and to risk stratify women aged 60-64 years before conclusion of screening program participation18. The project is a collaboration between 1) Region Zealand and Capital Region of Denmark, and 2) Capital Region of Denmark and Central Denmark Region.
Project element 1: Thermal ablation of women ≥40 years of age with persistent HPV infection. A pilot and intervention study.
Cervical heat treatment is a relatively new form of treatment19 where a smaller, defined area of the cervix is destroyed by insertion of a heated probe. Cervical heat treatment is already used in specialist medical practice for patients with erythroplakia, contact bleeding, chronic cervicitis and discharged. In a collaboration between Zealand and the Capital Region, 120 women are randomized to receive thermal ablation for HPV infections without severe disease with a matched control group of 120 women who do not receive ablation. All women are monitored through repeated cervical cytology re-tests at defined follow up (FU) times. The study cohort consist of 1) sample on enrollment date, 2) 3 months FU sample, 3) 6 months FU sample, 4) 12 months FU sample. All samples are collected in SurePath liquid-based cytology medium and HPV tested using the BD Onclarity HPV test (BD Integrated Diagnostic systems, Sparks, MD)20-22 supplemented by a full genotyping analysis (Seegene, Seul, Korea)21,23. Methylation status is examined using the QiaSure FAM19A4/miRNA 122-4 methylation test (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
This project element aims to determine whether thermal ablation impact viral clearance compared to the control group, and whether DNA methylation status is significant amongst women who are persistently HPV positive before and after thermal ablation.
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer Screening, HPV, Thermal Ablation
- Being tested
- Treatment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TreatmentProcedure or surgery
Thermal ablation was performed using the WISAP Probe 6004/6005/6002 at 65 degrees Celsius for 2 minutes, and at 100 degrees Celsius for 40 seconds as defined in Danish guidelines.
In the absence of visible lesions, the entire transformation zone was treated. For transformation zones extending into the endocervical canal (type 3), treatment was applied to the visible ectocervix, recognizing the technical limitations of thermal ablation for endocervical disease. Ablation treatment was administered as two consecutive treatments 2-3 days apart at the gynecologist´s discretion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| No treatment | No intervention | Women eligible not receiving thermal ablation |
| intervention | Active comparator | thermal ablation was performed using the WISAP Probe 6004/6005/6002 at 65 degrees Celsius for 2 minutes, and at 100 degrees Celsius for 40 seconds as defined in Danish guidelines. In the absence of visible lesions, the entire transformation zone was treated. For transformation zones extending into the endocervical canal (type 3), treatment was applied to the visible ectocervix, recognizing the technical limitations of thermal ablation for endocervical disease. Ablation treatment was administered as two consecutive treatments 2-3 days apart at the gynecologist´s discretion. Receives: Procedure: Treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
HPV test result after 3 and 10 months
HPV test of women after intervention or no treatment at 3 and 10 months after inclusion
Measured: up to 10 months follow-up post intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jan 2026
- Study start1 Jan 2020
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025
- Study completion31 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cervical Cancer ScreeningStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 131 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hvidovre University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jesper Bonde, Hvidovre University Hospital
- Investigators
- Jesper Bonde, PhD, Study chair, AHH-Hvidovre HospitalCharlotte Floridon, MD, Principal investigator, Gynecological Clinic, Holbæk
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07376031
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SJ:845
- Other IDs
- A2971
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD can be shared upon specific requests to the study chair. If request is compliant with current Danish Data Regulations, access will be given in form of an anonymized data sheet with all primary registered data
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Thermal Ablation on Persistent HPV Infection in Danish Women ≥40 Years of Age; a Randomized Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07376031
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SJ:845
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer Screening, HPV, Thermal Ablation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 131 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hvidovre University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Thermal ablation of women ≥40 years of age with persistent Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. A pilot and intervention study.
Cervical heat treatment is a relatively new form of treatment19 where a smaller, defined area of the cervix is destroyed by insertion of a heated probe. Cervical heat treatment is already used in specialist medical practice for patients with erythroplakia, contact bleeding, chronic cervicitis and discharged. In a collaboration between Region Zealand and the Capital Region of Denmark, 120 women are randomized to receive thermal ablation for HPV infections without severe disease with a matched control group of 120 women who do not receive ablation. All women are monitored through repeated cervical cytology re-tests at defined follow-up (FU) times. The study cohort consist of 1) sample on enrollment date, 2) 3 months FU sample, 3) 6 months FU sample, 4) 12 months FU sample. All samples are collected in SurePath liquid-based cytology medium and HPV tested using the BD Onclarity HPV test (BD Integrated Diagnostic systems, Sparks, MD)20-22 supplemented by a full genotyping analysis (Seegene, Seoul, Korea)21,23. Methylation status is examined using the QiaSure FAM19A4/miRNA 122-4 methylation test (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
This project element aims to determine whether thermal ablation impact viral clearance compared to the control group, and whether DNA methylation status is significant amongst women who are persistently HPV positive before and after thermal ablation.
Detailed description
Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is the etiological cause of precancerous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and ultimately cervical cancer (CC)1. With 50 years of cervical cancer screening in Denmark, CC incidence has been reduced from the peak of 39.6/100.000 in 1966 to 11/100.000 in 20222, but the World Health Organization world elimination goal of 6/100.0003,4 is still in the distance.
Cervical cancer is largely preventable through local treatment of screen-detected cervical precursor lesions also known as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Infection with the HPV virus causes cell changes and cervical cancer5. The HPV virus infects the cells on the surface of the cervix. While most women naturally clear an HPV infection over time, in approx. 10% of all infected women, the HPV infection becomes persistent which is a known risk enhancer6-8. It is unknown why an HPV infection becomes chronic in some but not most women. Lifetime risk of HPV infection is over 80%. In Denmark, all women between 23-65 years are offered screening for cervical cancer at defined intervals. Today, cervical screening is conducted using a combination of cell-based evaluation, cytology, and molecular HPV screening. However, Danish cervical cancer screening is in transit from cytology to molecular HPV based screening to all women aged 30 to 649. A recurrent issue with HPV based screening is the specificity of the screening which leads to many women being referred for monitoring or follow up without having significant disease. The screening program constitute 400,000 individual annual screening samples and approx. 30,000 tissue biopsy sets are derived as follow-up after a positive screening sample. From these, 6500 cone sections results.
Cervical cancer incidence in Denmark displays a double peaked pattern with the highest incidence in women 35-45 years and again in women 70-75 years. The latter peak is closely related to the current exit age from screening which is 64 years compared to 70 in the other Nordic countries. From 2012-2016, the average annual number of new CCs was 371 with 103 annual deaths10. In Denmark, women aged ≥ 60 years accounts for more than half of CC deaths (66%) and almost 30% of new cases10. For older women as well as younger, a clinical challenge is that many carry a persistent HPV infection which may or may not give rise to severe dysplasia possibly preceding cancer. However, current diagnostic methodologies offer no safe way to distinguish between the progressive lesions and persistent, non-progressive HPV infections. This leads to a large group of persistent HPV positive women in extended clinical follow-up regimens without a clear exit strategy and eventually leading to (over)treatment in the form of conization or hysterectomy. DNA methylation of human genes has shown to be particularly sensitive for the detection of cervical cancer and advanced CIN2 or 3 and presumed increased short-term risk of progression to cervical cancer11-17. Absence of host-cell DNA methylation on the other hand, is associated with regression of CIN2/313,17.
This PhD project focusses on whether novel methylation biomarkers can assist in risk-stratification for risk of severe cervical disease in two groups of women with persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infections:
- Women who have received thermal ablation as part of treatment for non-severe cell changes following HPV infection (randomized control trial, Region Zealand)
- Women 60-64 years of age with persistent HPV infections participating in cervical cancer screening in the Capital Region of Denmark If successful, the project will provide needed data to support introduction of molecular triage biomarkers in two different applications; to determine persistent HPV infection after thermal ablation treatment and to risk stratify women aged 60-64 years before conclusion of screening program participation18. The project is a collaboration between 1) Region Zealand and Capital Region of Denmark, and 2) Capital Region of Denmark and Central Denmark Region.
Project element 1: Thermal ablation of women ≥40 years of age with persistent HPV infection. A pilot and intervention study.
Cervical heat treatment is a relatively new form of treatment19 where a smaller, defined area of the cervix is destroyed by insertion of a heated probe. Cervical heat treatment is already used in specialist medical practice for patients with erythroplakia, contact bleeding, chronic cervicitis and discharged. In a collaboration between Zealand and the Capital Region, 120 women are randomized to receive thermal ablation for HPV infections without severe disease with a matched control group of 120 women who do not receive ablation. All women are monitored through repeated cervical cytology re-tests at defined follow up (FU) times. The study cohort consist of 1) sample on enrollment date, 2) 3 months FU sample, 3) 6 months FU sample, 4) 12 months FU sample. All samples are collected in SurePath liquid-based cytology medium and HPV tested using the BD Onclarity HPV test (BD Integrated Diagnostic systems, Sparks, MD)20-22 supplemented by a full genotyping analysis (Seegene, Seul, Korea)21,23. Methylation status is examined using the QiaSure FAM19A4/miRNA 122-4 methylation test (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
This project element aims to determine whether thermal ablation impact viral clearance compared to the control group, and whether DNA methylation status is significant amongst women who are persistently HPV positive before and after thermal ablation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| No treatment | No intervention | –Women eligible not receiving thermal ablation |
| intervention | Active comparator | Procedure: Treatmentthermal ablation was performed using the WISAP Probe 6004/6005/6002 at 65 degrees Celsius for 2 minutes, and at 100 degrees Celsius for 40 seconds as defined in Danish guidelines. In the absence of visible lesions, the entire transformation zone was treated. For transformation zones extending into the endocervical canal (type 3), treatment was applied to the visible ectocervix, recognizing the technical limitations of thermal ablation for endocervical disease. Ablation treatment was administered as two consecutive treatments 2-3 days apart at the gynecologist´s discretion. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Women, age ≥40 years;
- persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection for ≥12 months
- colposcopy referral according to national screening guidelines;
- normal, ASC-US, or LSIL cytology;
- no histologically verified ≥CIN2; and no prior cervical treatment.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Women with histologically confirmed ≥CIN2
- biopsies lacking transformation zone tissue
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TreatmentThermal ablation was performed using the WISAP Probe 6004/6005/6002 at 65 degrees Celsius for 2 minutes, and at 100 degrees Celsius for 40 seconds as defined in Danish guidelines. In the absence of visible lesions, the entire transformation zone was treated. For transformation zones extending into the endocervical canal (type 3), treatment was applied to the visible ectocervix, recognizing the technical limitations of thermal ablation for endocervical disease. Ablation treatment was administered as two consecutive treatments 2-3 days apart at the gynecologist´s discretion. | Procedure or surgery | intervention |
Primary outcome
HPV test result after 3 and 10 months
Time frame: up to 10 months follow-up post intervention
HPV test of women after intervention or no treatment at 3 and 10 months after inclusion
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD can be shared upon specific requests to the study chair. If request is compliant with current Danish Data Regulations, access will be given in form of an anonymized data sheet with all primary registered data
Related trials for Cervical Cancer Screening
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Use of cfDNA in Monitoring and Guiding Treatment for Cervical Cancer
Cervical Cancer Screening
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
cfDNA Assay Prospective Observational Validation for Early Cancer Detection and Minimal Residual Disease
Brain Cancer, Breast Cancer
Recruiting
AYAHIV Role-based Responsibilities for Oncology-focused Workforce (ARROW)
Cervical Cancer, Kaposi Sarcoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jesper Bonde, PhD study chair
AHH-Hvidovre Hospital
Charlotte Floridon, MD principal investigator
Gynecological Clinic, Holbæk
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Treatment in people with Cervical Cancer Screening and HPV, run by Hvidovre University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
HPV test result after 3 and 10 months (time frame: up to 10 months follow-up post intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2026.