DementiaPhase 1NCT07377318
Project CARE-D - Online Caregiver Education for Dementia
A Phase 1 study testing Structured Retrieval Practice, Business as usual learning and Standard Retrieval Practice in people with Dementia, run by Texas Christian University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Managing daily symptoms for people with Alzheimer's Disease or Related Dementia (ADRD) can be challenging and confusing for informal caregivers who are family members or friends and not paid for their assistance. This is due, in part, to gaps in knowledge. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dementia
- What is being tested?
- Structured Retrieval Practice, Business as usual learning and Standard Retrieval Practice
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 May 2025to 31 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- informal caregivers
- located in the United States
- Speak and read English
- free of cognitive deficits that would prevent consenting and/or completing online experimental tasks
Who cannot join
- formal caregivers
- former caregivers who are not currently in a care role for a person living with dementia
- technology issues that cause loss of data (e.g., internet connection failure)
- not finishing the experiment
- significant distractions during experimental tasks
- failure to pass attention or bot checks
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Methods to Enhance Caregivers' Knowledge of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD)
Managing daily symptoms for people with Alzheimer's Disease or Related Dementia (ADRD) can be challenging and confusing for informal caregivers who are family members or friends and not paid for their assistance. This is due, in part, to gaps in knowledge. Ensuring that informal caregivers are properly educated about ADRD symptoms and treatment guidelines is an essential first step for reducing adverse health events that people living with ADRD experience and addressing the substantial emotional and physical burden that caregivers report. The goal of is project is to improve caregiver education to support treatment adherence for ADRD with retrieval practice. This intervention incorporates principles from the science of learning for structuring retrieval practice to optimize learning and that are effective across the lifespan to compensate for gaps in knowledge and processing capabilities including learners who experience associative memory deficits due to age, their own disease state, or other factors.
- Conditions
- Dementia
- Being tested
- Structured Retrieval Practice, Business as usual learning, Standard Retrieval Practice
- Keywords
- dementia care
- Medical subject headings
- Dementia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Structured Retrieval PracticeBehavioural
The primary learning principle driving the proposed learning intervention is retrieval practice. The efficacy of spaced retrieval practice for learning is supported by a large and robust literature. Accurately recalling information during practice increases the probability that information will be accessible later when the stakes are higher. Caregivers studied all 12 BPSD in the learning phase, at their own pace, and then completed retrieval practice trials by answering multiple choice questions. Each multiple choice question had 1 correct answer and 3 incorrect lures. Detailed, corrective, and elaborative feedback was provided after each response to reinforce correct answers and correct wrong responses. The order of learning strategy was randomized per caregiver, and caregivers went through the learning phase a total of three times. Strategy was consistent between trials.
Business as usual learningBehavioural
Caregivers were informed that they would read about 12 BPSD and that they should try their best to read each text as if they were researching the material on their own. Caregivers then studied each of the 12 BPSD, one-by-one, in a webpage format, at their own pace.
Standard Retrieval PracticeBehavioural
Caregivers completed retrieval practice trials during learning by responding to multiple choice questions each with 1 correct answer and 3 incorrect lures. No feedback was provided following their response selections.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Structured Retrieval Practice (SRP) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Structured Retrieval Practice |
| Standard Retrieval Practice | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Standard Retrieval Practice |
| Self-paced Study | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Business as usual learning |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Delayed test performance
proportion correct on the final 2-day delayed test of symptoms and treatments of ADRD. The test will be in multiple-choice format.
Measured: 2 days following first session
Immediate test performance
proportion correct on the immediate (approx. 10 min retention interval) test of symptoms and treatments of ADRD. The test will be in multiple-choice format.
Measured: at the end of the first session; 10 minutes post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (11)
caregiver self-efficacy
Caregiver self-efficacy for symptom management will be measured using the symptom subscale of the Family Caregiver Self-efficacy for Dementia Scale, which includes 5 items. An example item is, "how certain are you right now that you can handle any problems your relative has, like memory loss, wandering, or behavior problems." Responses will be given using a 1 (not at all certain) to 10 (very certain) scale. We will expand this scale to include items that match with our content and our symptom presence, severity, and frequency measure. Specifically, participants will respond to 12 questions using a scale from 1 (not at all certain) to 10 (very certain). An example item is, "how certain are you right now that you can handle when your loved one living with dementia experiences false beliefs or delusions?"
Measured: 2 days following intervention (i.e., session 2 measure)
E-Health Literacy
The E-health Literacy Scale (eHEALS) will be administered to assess perceived skills and comfort related to using internet resources for acquiring health knowledge. The scale includes 10 questions (e.g., I can tell high quality from low quality health resources on the internet). Questions require responding on a Likert sale ranging from 1 to 5 (1-strongly disagree, 2- disagree, 3-undecided, 4-agree, 5-strongly agree; 1-not useful at all, 2-not useful, 3-unsure, 4-useful, 5-very useful; or 1-not important at all, 2-not important, 3-unsure, 4-important, 5-very important). Composite scores will be calculated with higher scores indicate higher e-health literacy.
Measured: 2 days following intervention (i.e., session 2 measure)
Letter and pattern comparison
Perceptual speed will be measured with the Letter Comparison Test and Pattern Comparison Test. The Letter Comparison Test involves 21 letter string pairs to be judged as the same or different. The Pattern Comparison Test involves 30 line patterns to be judged as the same or different. For both comparison tests, participants are given 24 seconds per test to complete as many items as possible, and performance is calculated as the number of items correct. Performance on each test will be calculated as the number of items correct, and a composite score will be calculated per participant.
Measured: 2 days following intervention (i.e., session 2 measure)
Raven's progressive matrices
Non-verbal fluid intelligence will be assessed with a computerized version of Raven's progressive matrices. Participants will complete 18 trials in ascending order in trial normative difficulty . For each trial, a 3 x 3 array will be displayed with 8 geometric figures. The 9th position in the bottom right-hand corner will be empty. Participants will be given 8 geometric figures from which to choose to correctly complete the array. Participants will be given 10 minutes to complete as many trials as possible. Performance will be calculated as the total number of trials correct.
Measured: immediately following the intervention
Vocabulary
General knowledge will be assessed using a common measure of general knowledge in cognitive aging research, the Advanced Vocabulary Test I-v-4 . Participants will be presented with a series of words and required to select the synonym for each word out of five options. Participants are given 4 min per task to complete as many words as possible (36 total problems, 8 min total). The self-paced vocabulary test is presented in a fixed order, and no feedback is provided. Performance is calculated as the number of items correct while adjusting for guessing (i.e., number of items correct - (.2 * number of items incorrect)).
Measured: 2 days following intervention (i.e., session 2 measure)
Medical health knowledge
Participants will complete the Medical Term Recognition Test. The METER is completed on paper. A list of 40 medical words and 40 nonwords are presented. Participants read the list of items and select the ones that they recognize as real words. Participants are instructed not to guess and to only select items they are sure were real words. Performance on the METER is calculated as the number of words correctly recognized.
Measured: 2 days following intervention (i.e., session 2 measure)
Performance during learning
Caregivers' performance during learning will be defined as the percent correct on retrieval practice trials. Specifically, caregivers will respond to multiple choice questions during learning when engaging in retrieval practice, and learning progress will be quantified by aggregating responses across items for each block. Each multiple choice question will have 1 correct answer and 3 incorrect lures, and responses will be scored as 1 (correct) or 0 (incorrect) and then aggregated per participant. This is a quantitative measure that is standard in the science of learning and for which no validated scale is available. Performance on retrieval practice trials for the will be evaluated with item-level analysis (to explore content difficulty) and across each learning block to establish participants' rate-of-learning.
Measured: Baseline
Symptom presence, severity, and frequency
The behavioral and psychological symptoms experienced by the person living with dementia will be rated by the caregiver participants using the updated version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q). This measure includes 12 items that the participant will rate on presence (yes vs. no), severity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), and distress (1 = not distressing at all to 5 = extremely distressing).
Measured: 2 days following intervention (i.e., session 2 measure)
Usability measures
The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) 3 scale will be administered, and scale composite score will be calculated. Example items are, "I find this system easy to use." and "The actual process of using the system is pleasant." Minor adaptations will be implemented to ensure questions are applicable to dementia care. Responses to all questions will be made on a 7-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
Measured: Baseline
Demographic characteristics
This is not a scale measure, and no composite score or subscores are calculated. Instead, these are descriptive data about the sample so they are accurately described for considerations of generalizability. Questions include: age, gender, education level, race/ethnicity, first generation status, member of an underrepresented group, native language, socioeconomic status, occupation, relationship with individual living with Alzheimer's Disease or a related dementia (e.g., child, spouse), information seeking about dementia and caregiving, and duration of caregiving
Measured: Baseline and 2 days following baseline
self-reported subjective health information
Caregivers will self-report co-morbid medical conditions for the PLwD, and will report medication use, rating of health, hospitalizations, access to health insurance for the PLwD. Caregivers will be allowed to skip any questions they desire should they prefer not to report responses to any of these questions. No measurement scale will be used for these self-report questions. Instead, these brief questions are intended to obtain general health information. Example questions include, "does the person have other chronic conditions?" "Does the person living with dementia take any prescription medications?" and "Have you gone to the hospital emergency room (ER) about the person living with dementia's health in the past year (12 months)?" Responses to these questions will be used for descriptive purposes to better understand the sample and will not be aggregated into one measure.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jan 2026
- Study start1 May 2025
- Primary completion31 Aug 2025
- Study completion31 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DementiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Texas Christian University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Uma Tauber, Texas Christian University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07377318
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-153
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Fortinsky RH, Kercher K, Burant CJ. Measurement and correlates of family caregiver self-efficacy for managing dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2002 May;6(2):153-60. doi: 10.1080/13607860220126763.
PubMed 12028884Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Ariel R, Babineau A, Tauber SK. Teaching older adults to use retrieval practice improves their self-regulated learning. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2024 Sep;31(5):823-845. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2023.2271531. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
PubMed 37847784Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 211. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.211
Kaufer DI, Cummings JL, Ketchel P, Smith V, MacMillan A, Shelley T, Lopez OL, DeKosky ST. Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000 Spring;12(2):233-9. doi: 10.1176/jnp.12.2.233.
PubMed 11001602Salthouse, T. A., & Babcock, R. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 763-776. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.763.
Rawson KA, Gunstad J, Hughes J, Spitznagel MB, Potter V, Waechter D, Rosneck J. The METER: a brief, self-administered measure of health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jan;25(1):67-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1158-7. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
PubMed 19885705Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harmon, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service.
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven manual section 4: Advanced progressive matrices. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Nov 14;8(4):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27.
PubMed 17213046Woods SP, Babicz MA, Matchanova A, Sullivan KL, Avci G, Hasbun R, Giordano TP, Fazeli P, Morgan EE. A Clinical Pilot Study of Spaced Retrieval Practice with a Self-Generation Booster to Improve Health-Related Memory in Persons With HIV Disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 Oct 13;36(7):1296-1306. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa130.
PubMed 33517368Tse CS, Balota DA, Roediger HL 3rd. The benefits and costs of repeated testing on the learning of face-name pairs in healthy older adults. Psychol Aging. 2010 Dec;25(4):833-45. doi: 10.1037/a0019933.
PubMed 20718541Sumowski JF, Wood HG, Chiaravalloti N, Wylie GR, Lengenfelder J, DeLuca J. Retrieval practice: a simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Nov;16(6):1147-50. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710001128. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
PubMed 20946709Ringer, T. J., Wong-Pack, M., Miller, P., Patterson, C., Marr, S., Misiaszek, B., Woo, T., Sztramko, R., Vastis, P. G., & Papaioannou, A. (2020). Understanding the educational and support needs of informal caregivers of people with dementia attending an outpatient geriatric assessment clinic. Aging and Society, 40(1), 205-228. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X18000971
Jorge C, Ceto M, Arias A, Blasco E, Gil MP, Lopez R, Dakterzada F, Purroy F, Pinol-Ripoll G. Level of understanding of Alzheimer disease among caregivers and the general population. Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2021 Jul-Aug;36(6):426-432. doi: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2018.03.004. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
PubMed 34238525
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Methods to Enhance Caregivers' Knowledge of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07377318
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024-153
- Conditions
- Dementia
- Keywords
- dementia care
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Texas Christian UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Managing daily symptoms for people with Alzheimer's Disease or Related Dementia (ADRD) can be challenging and confusing for informal caregivers who are family members or friends and not paid for their assistance. This is due, in part, to gaps in knowledge. Ensuring that informal caregivers are properly educated about ADRD symptoms and treatment guidelines is an essential first step for reducing adverse health events that people living with ADRD experience and addressing the substantial emotional and physical burden that caregivers report. The goal of is project is to improve caregiver education to support treatment adherence for ADRD with retrieval practice. This intervention incorporates principles from the science of learning for structuring retrieval practice to optimize learning and that are effective across the lifespan to compensate for gaps in knowledge and processing capabilities including learners who experience associative memory deficits due to age, their own disease state, or other factors.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Structured Retrieval Practice (SRP) | Experimental | Behavioral: Structured Retrieval Practice |
| Standard Retrieval Practice | Active comparator | Behavioral: Standard Retrieval Practice |
| Self-paced Study | Active comparator | Behavioral: Business as usual learning |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- informal caregivers
- located in the United States
- Speak and read English
- free of cognitive deficits that would prevent consenting and/or completing online experimental tasks
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- formal caregivers
- former caregivers who are not currently in a care role for a person living with dementia
- technology issues that cause loss of data (e.g., internet connection failure)
- not finishing the experiment
- significant distractions during experimental tasks
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Structured Retrieval PracticeThe primary learning principle driving the proposed learning intervention is retrieval practice. The efficacy of spaced retrieval practice for learning is supported by a large and robust literature. Accurately recalling information during practice increases the probability that information will be accessible later when the stakes are higher. Caregivers studied all 12 BPSD in the learning phase, at their own pace, and then completed retrieval practice trials by answering multiple choice questions. Each multiple choice question had 1 correct answer and 3 incorrect lures. Detailed, corrective, and elaborative feedback was provided after each response to reinforce correct answers and correct wrong responses. The order of learning strategy was randomized per caregiver, and caregivers went through the learning phase a total of three times. Strategy was consistent between trials. | Behavioural | Structured Retrieval Practice (SRP) |
| Business as usual learningCaregivers were informed that they would read about 12 BPSD and that they should try their best to read each text as if they were researching the material on their own. Caregivers then studied each of the 12 BPSD, one-by-one, in a webpage format, at their own pace. | Behavioural | Self-paced Study |
| Standard Retrieval PracticeCaregivers completed retrieval practice trials during learning by responding to multiple choice questions each with 1 correct answer and 3 incorrect lures. No feedback was provided following their response selections. | Behavioural | Standard Retrieval Practice |
Primary outcome
Delayed test performance
Time frame: 2 days following first session
proportion correct on the final 2-day delayed test of symptoms and treatments of ADRD. The test will be in multiple-choice format.
Immediate test performance
Time frame: at the end of the first session; 10 minutes post-intervention
proportion correct on the immediate (approx. 10 min retention interval) test of symptoms and treatments of ADRD. The test will be in multiple-choice format.
11 secondary outcomes
caregiver self-efficacy
Time frame: 2 days following intervention (i.e., session 2 measure)
E-Health Literacy
Time frame: 2 days following intervention (i.e., session 2 measure)
Letter and pattern comparison
Time frame: 2 days following intervention (i.e., session 2 measure)
Raven's progressive matrices
Time frame: immediately following the intervention
Vocabulary
Time frame: 2 days following intervention (i.e., session 2 measure)
Medical health knowledge
Time frame: 2 days following intervention (i.e., session 2 measure)
Performance during learning
Time frame: Baseline
Symptom presence, severity, and frequency
Time frame: 2 days following intervention (i.e., session 2 measure)
Usability measures
Time frame: Baseline
Demographic characteristics
Time frame: Baseline and 2 days following baseline
self-reported subjective health information
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2026.
- Background: PubMed 12028884Fortinsky RH, Kercher K, Burant CJ. Measurement and correlates of family caregiver self-efficacy for managing dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2002 May;6(2):153-60. doi: 10.1080/13607860220126763.
- BackgroundVenkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
- Background: PubMed 37847784Ariel R, Babineau A, Tauber SK. Teaching older adults to use retrieval practice improves their self-regulated learning. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2024 Sep;31(5):823-845. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2023.2271531. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
- BackgroundStanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 211. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.211
- Background: PubMed 11001602Kaufer DI, Cummings JL, Ketchel P, Smith V, MacMillan A, Shelley T, Lopez OL, DeKosky ST. Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000 Spring;12(2):233-9. doi: 10.1176/jnp.12.2.233.
- BackgroundSalthouse, T. A., & Babcock, R. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 763-776. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.763.
- Background: PubMed 19885705Rawson KA, Gunstad J, Hughes J, Spitznagel MB, Potter V, Waechter D, Rosneck J. The METER: a brief, self-administered measure of health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jan;25(1):67-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1158-7. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
- BackgroundEkstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harmon, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service.
- BackgroundRaven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven manual section 4: Advanced progressive matrices. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
- Background: PubMed 17213046Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Nov 14;8(4):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27.
- Background: PubMed 33517368Woods SP, Babicz MA, Matchanova A, Sullivan KL, Avci G, Hasbun R, Giordano TP, Fazeli P, Morgan EE. A Clinical Pilot Study of Spaced Retrieval Practice with a Self-Generation Booster to Improve Health-Related Memory in Persons With HIV Disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 Oct 13;36(7):1296-1306. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa130.
- Background: PubMed 20718541Tse CS, Balota DA, Roediger HL 3rd. The benefits and costs of repeated testing on the learning of face-name pairs in healthy older adults. Psychol Aging. 2010 Dec;25(4):833-45. doi: 10.1037/a0019933.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Dementia
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Lisdexamfetamine For the Treatment of Conduct Disorder in Children
Conduct Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Structured Retrieval Practice, Business as usual learning and Standard Retrieval Practice in people with Dementia, run by Texas Christian University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Delayed test performance (time frame: 2 days following first session). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07377318, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2026.