Acute Calculous CholecystitisPhase 3NCT07378410
Role of Intra-Operative Aspiration in Distended GB in LC
A Phase 3 study testing Laparoscopic needle in people with Acute Calculous Cholecystitis and Gallbladder Empyema, run by Aswan University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a standard procedure for gallstones and the standard surgical approach for acute calcular cholecystitis, superseding open cholecystectomy for gallbladder (GB) pathologies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Calculous Cholecystitis, Gallbladder Empyema, Gallbladder Mucocele
- What is being tested?
- Laparoscopic needle
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2023to 1 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient with calcular cholecystitis, GB mucocele or GB empyema
- Distended gallbladder: shiny, over distended, long, difficult to grasp and manipulate gallbladder.
- Acute or chronic calcular cholecystitis
Who cannot join
- Obstructive jaundice
- Non distended gallbladder
- Previous upper abdomen operations
- Pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Outcomes of Intra-Operative Aspiration Vs Non-Aspiration for Distended Gallbladder in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a standard procedure for gallstones and the standard surgical approach for acute calcular cholecystitis, superseding open cholecystectomy for gallbladder (GB) pathologies. Despite this progress, mortality rates in high-risk cohorts remain substantial, ranging between 3.7% and 41.0%. Moreover, the recommended modality for mucocele which is defined as distension and marked dilatation of the GB associated with dysfunction is LC.
The routine aspiration showed significant less percentage of GB perforation during surgery with similarity for other factors . However, routine aspiration of the GB during uncomplicated LC is considered an unnecessary intervention and therefore not recommended as a routine practice.
Read more
Accidental GB perforation occurs in about 20% of laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and bile contamination in the abdominal cavity can cause SSI and lead to the formation of a residual abscess or wound infection.
Grasping a thick and distended GB is one of the most common technical difficulties of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. If the GB is distended it should be decompressed it to avoid conversion to open due to bile duct injury or perforation with spillage of bile and gallstones previously, authors had advocated conversion if iatrogenic perforation occurred.
Read the detailed description
This study was conducted on patients with symptomatic calcular cholecystitis presented to Aswan university hospital.
The following parameters were measured intraoperative difficulty.
- Operative time
- Incidence of biliary tree injury
- Higher surgeon consultation
- Conversion into open surgery All groups were followed up for 30 days period for post-operative complication clinically and by sonar.
- Wound infection
- Liver bed bleeding
- Collection in the liver bed
- Peritonitis
- Hospital stays.
- Being tested
- Laparoscopic needle
- Keywords
- Acute Calculous Cholecystitis, Gallbladder Empyema, Gallbladder Mucocele, Distended gallbladder, Intra-operative aspiration
- Medical subject headings
- Cholecystitis, Acute, Cholecystitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laparoscopic needleProcedure or surgery
During classic LC, either with preoperative or accidently intra-operative overdistended GB using a laparoscopic needle to decompress the GB and make the operation much easier
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aspiration group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic needle |
| Non-Aspiration group | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difficulty of the operation
the difficulty will be assessed by the following Operative time, Incidence of biliary tree injury, Higher surgeon consultation and Conversion to open chole
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (4)
Liver bed bleeding
checking post procedures and postoperative through the drain
Measured: 30 days
30-day mortality
follow-up the patient in the outpatient and by phone
Measured: 30 days
Hospital stays.
total stay in the hospital
Measured: 30 days
Peritonitis
incidence of peritonitis in the first week of the operation
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2026
- Study start1 Jul 2023
- Primary completion1 Jan 2026
- Study completion1 Jan 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Calculous CholecystitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- comparing the efficacy of intra-operative Gallbladder content aspiration in overdistended cases with completion of the operation without aspiration
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aswan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ali Hussein Abdelaal, Aswan University
- Investigators
- Ali H Abdelaal, Principal investigator, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07378410
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Asw.Uni./978/9/24
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Barrat C, Champault A, Matthyssens L, Champault G. [Iatrogenic perforation of the gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not influence the prognosis. Prospective study]. Ann Chir. 2004 Feb;129(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anchir.2003.11.011. French.
PubMed 15019851Calik, A., Topaloglu, S., Topcu, S., Turkyilmaz, S., Kucuktulu, U., & Piskin, B. (2007). Routine intraoperative aspiration of gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 21(9), 1578-1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9159-7 Guzmán-Valdivia, G. (2008). Routine Administration of Antibiotics to Patients Suffering Accidental Gallbladder Perforation During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is not Necessary. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 18(6), 547-550. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181809e72 Lee, K.-T., Shan, Y.-S., Wang, S.-T., & Lin, P.-W. (2005). Verres needle decompression of distended gallbladder to facilitate laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: A prospective study. Hepato-Gastroenterology, 52(65), 1388-1392. Lisotti, A., Linguerri, R., Bacchilega, I., Cominardi, A., Marocchi, G., & Fusaroli, P. (2022). EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis-Procedure outcomes and evaluation of mortality predictors. Surgical Endoscopy, 36(1), 569-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08318-z Majumder, A., Altieri, M. S., & Brunt, L. M. (2020). How do I do it: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery, 5, 15-15. https://doi.org/10.21037/ales.2020.02.06 Mishra, R. K. (2022, June 12). Cholecystectomy for Mucocele of Gallbladder. https://www.laparoscopyhospital.com/streamvideo/index.php?pid=536&p=28 Ponsky, J. L. (1991). Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The American Journal of Surgery, 161(3), 393-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(91)90605-D Shea, J. A., Berlin, J. A., Bachwich, D. R., Staroscik, R. N., Malet, P. F., McGuckin, M., Schwartz, J. S., & Escarce, J. J. (1998). Indications for and Outcomes of Cholecystectomy. Annals of Surgery, 227(3), 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199803000-00005 Shirah, B. H., Shirah, H. A., & Albeladi, K. B. (2018). The value of intraoperative percutaneous aspiration of the mucocele of the gallbladder for safe laparoscopic management. Updates in Surgery, 70(4), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0565-x Siddiqui, M. R. S., Sajid, M. S., Nisar, A., Ali, H., Zaborszky, A., & Hasan, F. (2011). A meta-analysis of outcomes after routine aspiration of the gallbladder during cholecystectomy. International Surgery, 96(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.9738/1361.1 Usuba, T., Nyumura, Y., Takano, Y., Iino, T., & Hanyu, N. (2017). Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with accidental gallbladder perforation. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 10(2), 162-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12348 Wood, S., Lewis, W., & Egan, R. (2019). Optimising Surgical Technique in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Review of Intraoperative Interventions. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 23(9), 1925-1932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04296-9
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outcomes of Intra-Operative Aspiration Vs Non-Aspiration for Distended Gallbladder in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07378410
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Asw.Uni./978/9/24
- Keywords
- Acute Calculous Cholecystitis, Gallbladder Empyema, Gallbladder Mucocele, Distended gallbladder, Intra-operative aspiration
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aswan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a standard procedure for gallstones and the standard surgical approach for acute calcular cholecystitis, superseding open cholecystectomy for gallbladder (GB) pathologies. Despite this progress, mortality rates in high-risk cohorts remain substantial, ranging between 3.7% and 41.0%. Moreover, the recommended modality for mucocele which is defined as distension and marked dilatation of the GB associated with dysfunction is LC.
The routine aspiration showed significant less percentage of GB perforation during surgery with similarity for other factors . However, routine aspiration of the GB during uncomplicated LC is considered an unnecessary intervention and therefore not recommended as a routine practice.
Accidental GB perforation occurs in about 20% of laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and bile contamination in the abdominal cavity can cause SSI and lead to the formation of a residual abscess or wound infection.
Grasping a thick and distended GB is one of the most common technical difficulties of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. If the GB is distended it should be decompressed it to avoid conversion to open due to bile duct injury or perforation with spillage of bile and gallstones previously, authors had advocated conversion if iatrogenic perforation occurred.
Detailed description
This study was conducted on patients with symptomatic calcular cholecystitis presented to Aswan university hospital.
The following parameters were measured intraoperative difficulty.
- Operative time
- Incidence of biliary tree injury
- Higher surgeon consultation
- Conversion into open surgery All groups were followed up for 30 days period for post-operative complication clinically and by sonar.
- Wound infection
- Liver bed bleeding
- Collection in the liver bed
- Peritonitis
- Hospital stays.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- comparing the efficacy of intra-operative Gallbladder content aspiration in overdistended cases with completion of the operation without aspiration
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aspiration group | Experimental | Procedure: Laparoscopic needle |
| Non-Aspiration group | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient with calcular cholecystitis, GB mucocele or GB empyema
- Distended gallbladder: shiny, over distended, long, difficult to grasp and manipulate gallbladder.
- Acute or chronic calcular cholecystitis
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Obstructive jaundice
- Non distended gallbladder
- Previous upper abdomen operations
- Pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic needleDuring classic LC, either with preoperative or accidently intra-operative overdistended GB using a laparoscopic needle to decompress the GB and make the operation much easier | Procedure or surgery | Aspiration group |
Primary outcome
Difficulty of the operation
Time frame: 30 days
the difficulty will be assessed by the following Operative time, Incidence of biliary tree injury, Higher surgeon consultation and Conversion to open chole
4 secondary outcomes
Liver bed bleeding
Time frame: 30 days
30-day mortality
Time frame: 30 days
Hospital stays.
Time frame: 30 days
Peritonitis
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2026.
- Background: PubMed 15019851Barrat C, Champault A, Matthyssens L, Champault G. [Iatrogenic perforation of the gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not influence the prognosis. Prospective study]. Ann Chir. 2004 Feb;129(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anchir.2003.11.011. French.
- BackgroundCalik, A., Topaloglu, S., Topcu, S., Turkyilmaz, S., Kucuktulu, U., & Piskin, B. (2007). Routine intraoperative aspiration of gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 21(9), 1578-1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9159-7 Guzmán-Valdivia, G. (2008). Routine Administration of Antibiotics to Patients Suffering Accidental Gallbladder Perforation During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is not Necessary. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 18(6), 547-550. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181809e72 Lee, K.-T., Shan, Y.-S., Wang, S.-T., & Lin, P.-W. (2005). Verres needle decompression of distended gallbladder to facilitate laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: A prospective study. Hepato-Gastroenterology, 52(65), 1388-1392. Lisotti, A., Linguerri, R., Bacchilega, I., Cominardi, A., Marocchi, G., & Fusaroli, P. (2022). EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis-Procedure outcomes and evaluation of mortality predictors. Surgical Endoscopy, 36(1), 569-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08318-z Majumder, A., Altieri, M. S., & Brunt, L. M. (2020). How do I do it: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery, 5, 15-15. https://doi.org/10.21037/ales.2020.02.06 Mishra, R. K. (2022, June 12). Cholecystectomy for Mucocele of Gallbladder. https://www.laparoscopyhospital.com/streamvideo/index.php?pid=536&p=28 Ponsky, J. L. (1991). Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The American Journal of Surgery, 161(3), 393-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(91)90605-D Shea, J. A., Berlin, J. A., Bachwich, D. R., Staroscik, R. N., Malet, P. F., McGuckin, M., Schwartz, J. S., & Escarce, J. J. (1998). Indications for and Outcomes of Cholecystectomy. Annals of Surgery, 227(3), 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199803000-00005 Shirah, B. H., Shirah, H. A., & Albeladi, K. B. (2018). The value of intraoperative percutaneous aspiration of the mucocele of the gallbladder for safe laparoscopic management. Updates in Surgery, 70(4), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0565-x Siddiqui, M. R. S., Sajid, M. S., Nisar, A., Ali, H., Zaborszky, A., & Hasan, F. (2011). A meta-analysis of outcomes after routine aspiration of the gallbladder during cholecystectomy. International Surgery, 96(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.9738/1361.1 Usuba, T., Nyumura, Y., Takano, Y., Iino, T., & Hanyu, N. (2017). Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with accidental gallbladder perforation. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 10(2), 162-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12348 Wood, S., Lewis, W., & Egan, R. (2019). Optimising Surgical Technique in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Review of Intraoperative Interventions. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 23(9), 1925-1932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04296-9
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
SnapChole: An International, Time-Bound Prospective Platform Study of Management Strategies and Outcomes in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Percutaneous Drainage Versus EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage in Poor Surgical Patients With Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute
RecruitingObservational study
Influence of Gut Microbiome in Gallstone Disease
Gall Stone, Gall Stones, Common Bile Duct
Recruiting
Repeat Biliary Point of Care Ultrasound for Detecting Early Acute Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute, Biliary Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Implementation of RICA (ERAS) Guidelines in Grade II Acute Cholecystitis Undergoing Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholecystitis, Acute, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ali H Abdelaal principal investigator
Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Laparoscopic needle in people with Acute Calculous Cholecystitis and Gallbladder Empyema, run by Aswan University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difficulty of the operation (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07378410, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2026.