Multiple SclerosisSTARNCT07378566
Intervention to Master Complex Fall Risk Situations in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis (STAR)
A study testing Individual strategies in people with Multiple Sclerosis and Fall, run by Region Örebro County.
Trial summary
People with multiple sclerosis (MS) have a higher fall risk compared to older people and to the general population. A meta-analysis reported that 56% of those with mild to moderate MS, fell at least once during a 3-month period. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Sclerosis, Fall
- What is being tested?
- Individual strategies
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2026to 31 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with MS
- Affected ability to walk du to MS according to the participant
- At least one self-reported fall the last 3 months due to MS according to the participant
Who cannot join
- Unable to walk 100m even with walking device and/or pauses.
- Apparently affected walking ability due to other conditions such as for example orthopedic or other neurological diseases.
- Difficulty to answer questionnaires written in Swedish
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Digitally Supported Intervention to Master Complex Fall Risk Situations in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis - a Multicenter Study (STAR)
People with multiple sclerosis (MS) have a higher fall risk compared to older people and to the general population. A meta-analysis reported that 56% of those with mild to moderate MS, fell at least once during a 3-month period. The risk of falling seems to peak when the walking distance starts to be affected and when walking aids are introduced and the walking distance is as short as 100 m. Previous studies have identified a number of fall risk factors, both relating to MS- symptoms and contextual factors. In a study published in 2025, we reported the complexity of fallsituations and the interaction between triggering factors, contextual factors and activities and circumstances that occurred before the fall incidents . The symptoms when having MS varies between individuals as well as over time. I the planned randomised, controlled multicenter study we move forward, producing individual fallrisk analyses based upon the findings from the study published in 2025, and offer individual strategies. This has not been studied before. All participants will receive general information on how fall risk can be prevented. Those randomised to control group will be offered the intervention after ending of the study. The study will be conducted in two phases starting with an internal pilot study followed by a full scale randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Read the detailed description
The intervention will be based on previous findings i. e., fall risk factors related to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and is an add-on intervention to a general fall risk information.
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis, Fall
- Being tested
- Individual strategies
- Keywords
- falls, prevention
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Individual strategiesBehavioural
This arm will receive an individual analyses of current fall situations and a tailored individual strategy aiming to reduce fall frequency
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | This arm will receive an individual analyses of current fall situations and a tailored individual strategy aiming to reduce fall frequency Receives: Behavioral: Individual strategies |
| Control group | No intervention | This arm will only receive general advice. Will be offered the intervention after ending of the study period |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prospectively self-reported falls (rate, time to fall)
Self-reported falls collected every two weeks during a 6-month period
Measured: every 14th day during 6 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Falls-Efficacy Scale-International score
16 questions regarding level of concern about falling. Scores for each item together adds up to a total that ranges as follows: 16 (no concerns about falling( to 28 (severe concern about falling
Measured: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Activity-specific balance Confidence Scale score
16 questions regarding confidence to remain balance during everyday activities scoring from 0 (no confidence) to 100 (full confidence)
Measured: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Self-rated ability to reduce falls
One question measured using a visual analogue scale 0 (no ability) to 100 (full ability)
Measured: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Self-rated ability to understand one's own fall risk factors
One question using a visual analogue scale 0 (no understanding) to 100 (full understanding)
Measured: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Self-rated fear of falling reducing activities
One question where the person rates whether fear of falling have made them do less activities compared to before (yes, no, don't know, prefer not to answer)
Measured: baseline and immediately after the intervention
12-item MS Walking scale score
Measures self-rated affected walking ability due to MS using 12 items. A score is obtained by subtracting the minimum score possible (=12) from the achieved sum, dividing by the range (=48) and multiplying by 100. Higher scores indicate more limited walking ability
Measured: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2026
- Study start1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study will be conducted in two phases starting with an internal pilot study followed by a full scale RCT
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Region Örebro County
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institution of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Region Gävleborg, Region Västmanland, Sormland County Council, Sweden
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ylva Nilsagard, Region Örebro County
- Investigators
- Ylva E Nilsagård, Ass. prof, Principal investigator, University Healthcare Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07378566
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 285079
- Acronym
- STAR
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Sep 2025
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We aim to publish a study protocol that includes a full description of the study
Publications
Salari N, Darvishi N, Ahmadipanah M, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of falls in the older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jun 28;17(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03222-1.
PubMed 35765037Mazumder R, Murchison C, Bourdette D, Cameron M. Falls in people with multiple sclerosis compared with falls in healthy controls. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e107620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107620. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25254633Nilsagard Y, Gunn H, Freeman J, Hoang P, Lord S, Mazumder R, Cameron M. Falls in people with MS--an individual data meta-analysis from studies from Australia, Sweden, United Kingdom and the United States. Mult Scler. 2015 Jan;21(1):92-100. doi: 10.1177/1352458514538884. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
PubMed 24948687Gunn HJ, Newell P, Haas B, Marsden JF, Freeman JA. Identification of risk factors for falls in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):504-13. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120231. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
PubMed 23237970Carling A, Forsberg A, Nilsagard Y. Falls in people with multiple sclerosis: experiences of 115 fall situations. Clin Rehabil. 2018 Apr;32(4):526-535. doi: 10.1177/0269215517730597. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
PubMed 28901164Nilsagard Y, Lundholm C, Denison E, Gunnarsson LG. Predicting accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis -- a longitudinal study. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Mar;23(3):259-69. doi: 10.1177/0269215508095087.
PubMed 19218300Gunn H, Creanor S, Haas B, Marsden J, Freeman J. Risk factors for falls in multiple sclerosis: an observational study. Mult Scler. 2013 Dec;19(14):1913-22. doi: 10.1177/1352458513488233. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
PubMed 23633067Waneskog AH, Forsberg AS, Nilsagard YE. Exploring the Complexity of Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study. Int J MS Care. 2024 Nov 5;26(Q4):308-314. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2024-020. eCollection 2024 Oct.
PubMed 39502367Nilsagard Y, Udumyan R, Halleberg Nyman M, Waneskog A. Individually designed fall prevention strategies compared to generic strategies for mastering complex fall risk situations in people with multiple sclerosis: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Jul 15;16(7):e115430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115430.
PubMed 42457429
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Digitally Supported Intervention to Master Complex Fall Risk Situations in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis - a Multicenter Study (STAR)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07378566
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STAR / 285079
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis, Fall
- Keywords
- falls, prevention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Region Örebro CountyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institution of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Region Gävleborg, Region Västmanland, Sormland County Council, Sweden
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
People with multiple sclerosis (MS) have a higher fall risk compared to older people and to the general population. A meta-analysis reported that 56% of those with mild to moderate MS, fell at least once during a 3-month period. The risk of falling seems to peak when the walking distance starts to be affected and when walking aids are introduced and the walking distance is as short as 100 m. Previous studies have identified a number of fall risk factors, both relating to MS- symptoms and contextual factors. In a study published in 2025, we reported the complexity of fallsituations and the interaction between triggering factors, contextual factors and activities and circumstances that occurred before the fall incidents . The symptoms when having MS varies between individuals as well as over time. I the planned randomised, controlled multicenter study we move forward, producing individual fallrisk analyses based upon the findings from the study published in 2025, and offer individual strategies. This has not been studied before. All participants will receive general information on how fall risk can be prevented. Those randomised to control group will be offered the intervention after ending of the study. The study will be conducted in two phases starting with an internal pilot study followed by a full scale randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Detailed description
The intervention will be based on previous findings i. e., fall risk factors related to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and is an add-on intervention to a general fall risk information.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study will be conducted in two phases starting with an internal pilot study followed by a full scale RCT
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Individual strategiesThis arm will receive an individual analyses of current fall situations and a tailored individual strategy aiming to reduce fall frequency |
| Control group | No intervention | –This arm will only receive general advice. Will be offered the intervention after ending of the study period |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosed with MS
- Affected ability to walk du to MS according to the participant
- At least one self-reported fall the last 3 months due to MS according to the participant
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Unable to walk 100m even with walking device and/or pauses.
- Apparently affected walking ability due to other conditions such as for example orthopedic or other neurological diseases.
- Difficulty to answer questionnaires written in Swedish
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Individual strategiesThis arm will receive an individual analyses of current fall situations and a tailored individual strategy aiming to reduce fall frequency | Behavioural | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Prospectively self-reported falls (rate, time to fall)
Time frame: every 14th day during 6 months
Self-reported falls collected every two weeks during a 6-month period
6 secondary outcomes
Falls-Efficacy Scale-International score
Time frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Activity-specific balance Confidence Scale score
Time frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Self-rated ability to reduce falls
Time frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Self-rated ability to understand one's own fall risk factors
Time frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Self-rated fear of falling reducing activities
Time frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
12-item MS Walking scale score
Time frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 35765037Salari N, Darvishi N, Ahmadipanah M, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of falls in the older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jun 28;17(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03222-1.
- Results publication: PubMed 25254633Mazumder R, Murchison C, Bourdette D, Cameron M. Falls in people with multiple sclerosis compared with falls in healthy controls. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e107620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107620. eCollection 2014.
- Results publication: PubMed 24948687Nilsagard Y, Gunn H, Freeman J, Hoang P, Lord S, Mazumder R, Cameron M. Falls in people with MS--an individual data meta-analysis from studies from Australia, Sweden, United Kingdom and the United States. Mult Scler. 2015 Jan;21(1):92-100. doi: 10.1177/1352458514538884. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 23237970Gunn HJ, Newell P, Haas B, Marsden JF, Freeman JA. Identification of risk factors for falls in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):504-13. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120231. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 28901164Carling A, Forsberg A, Nilsagard Y. Falls in people with multiple sclerosis: experiences of 115 fall situations. Clin Rehabil. 2018 Apr;32(4):526-535. doi: 10.1177/0269215517730597. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 19218300Nilsagard Y, Lundholm C, Denison E, Gunnarsson LG. Predicting accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis -- a longitudinal study. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Mar;23(3):259-69. doi: 10.1177/0269215508095087.
- Results publication: PubMed 23633067Gunn H, Creanor S, Haas B, Marsden J, Freeman J. Risk factors for falls in multiple sclerosis: an observational study. Mult Scler. 2013 Dec;19(14):1913-22. doi: 10.1177/1352458513488233. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 39502367Waneskog AH, Forsberg AS, Nilsagard YE. Exploring the Complexity of Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study. Int J MS Care. 2024 Nov 5;26(Q4):308-314. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2024-020. eCollection 2024 Oct.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42457429Nilsagard Y, Udumyan R, Halleberg Nyman M, Waneskog A. Individually designed fall prevention strategies compared to generic strategies for mastering complex fall risk situations in people with multiple sclerosis: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Jul 15;16(7):e115430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115430.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We aim to publish a study protocol that includes a full description of the study
Related trials for Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Efgartigimod for the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis
Optic Neuritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Rollover Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Ocrelizumab In Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 3
An Extension Study to Assess Impact of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) on Physical Function and Provide Continued Ocrelizumab Treatment
Multiple Sclerosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Early Versus Late Ofatumumab (Kesimpta®) Use in Austrian RMS-Patients Over 2 Years
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Not yet recruiting
Neurogenetics and Multi-omics of Neuroinflammatory Diseases in Multiplex Families to Improve Patients Health
Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ylva E Nilsagård, Ass. prof principal investigator
University Healthcare Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Individual strategies in people with Multiple Sclerosis and Fall, run by Region Örebro County.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ylva E Nilsagård, Ass. prof (+46 070 609 37 37, ylva.nilsagard@regionorebrolan.se), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prospectively self-reported falls (rate, time to fall) (time frame: every 14th day during 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07378566, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2026.