Bladder CancerNCT07379255
Evaluation of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy for Bladder Cancer Based on Organoid Technology.
An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of using tumor organoid drug sensitivity experiments to guide postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and to assess the application value of tumor organoid drug sensitivity experiments in guiding individualized postoperative adjuvant… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bladder Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Organoid culture
- How many people
- 266 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2025to 31 Dec 2030
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who need to come to the research center for treatment of bladder cancer.
Who may be able to join
- 1. Age between 18 and 80 years, any gender; 2. For patients undergoing radical cystectomy, if the pathology meets inclusion criterion No. 3, tissue from the surgical specimen will be used for organoid culture; 3. Patients with pT3-pT4 and/or lymph node-positive MIBC who require adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery; 4. Patients who can tolerate platinum-based chemotherapy; 5. ECOG performance status of 0-2; 6. According to the investigator's judgment, able to comply with the study protocol, demonstrate good adherence, cooperate with the monitoring of adverse events and efficacy, and comply with follow-up; 7. Willing to voluntarily participate in this clinical trial, understand the study procedures, and have signed the informed consent form to participate in this study.
Who cannot join
- 1. Severe, life-threatening complications occurring after radical cystectomy, such as cardiovascular complications, renal failure, respiratory failure, liver failure, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, and major hemorrhage; 2. Individuals with immunodeficiency or impairment (e.g., patients with AIDS, or those receiving immunosuppressants or radiotherapy); 3. Participants known to be allergic to the study drug, similar drugs, or excipients, or those with an allergic constitution; 4. Individuals taking long-term corticosteroids or with a history of drug abuse or dependence; 5. Individuals planning pregnancy soon, currently pregnant, or breastfeeding; 6. Abnormal blood routine, liver and kidney function, and coagulation indices (considered abnormal if one or more of the following are met):
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤ 1.5 × 10⁹/L;
- White blood cell count (WBC) ≤ 3.0 × 10⁹/L;
- Platelet count (PLT) ≤ 90 × 10⁹/L;
- Hemoglobin (HB) ≤ 90 g/L;
- Total bilirubin (TBIL) ≥ 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) for the institution;
Show all 15Show fewer
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 30 ml/min/1.73m²;
- International normalized ratio (INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) ≥ ULN (excluding patients on anticoagulant therapy, if considered clinically acceptable by the investigator); 7. Other factors that may cause the study to be prematurely terminated, such as:
- <!-- -->
- Patients with a past or current diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML);
- A history of clear neurological or psychiatric disorders, including epilepsy or dementia;
- Comorbidities that pose a serious risk to patient safety or could affect study completion (e.g., severe hypertension, diabetes, thyroid disorders, etc.);
- Other serious diseases requiring combined treatment or with severe laboratory abnormalities;
- Other serious diseases accompanied by familial or social factors that could affect participant safety, or the collection of data and samples;
- Uncontrolled comorbid conditions, including but not limited to ongoing or active infections requiring treatment, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina, or arrhythmias; 8. Individuals deemed by the investigator as unsuitable to participate in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong
Jingchao Liu, +86 18560086740, 15665785012@163.com
About this study
Official title: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Efficacy of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy Drugs for Bladder Cancer Based on Organoid Technology.
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of using tumor organoid drug sensitivity experiments to guide postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and to assess the application value of tumor organoid drug sensitivity experiments in guiding individualized postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Read the detailed description
- Research Background (Presenting the Rationale and Significance of This Study Based on Current Domestic and International Research) Bladder cancer is a malignant tumor originating from the bladder urothelium and ranks first in incidence among urogenital tumors in China. Among these, urothelial carcinoma is the most common, accounting for over 90% of bladder cancer cases [1]. Clinically, based on the depth of tumor invasion into the bladder wall and prognostic characteristics, bladder cancer is classified into non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). MIBC constitutes approximately 20% of newly diagnosed bladder cancer cases [2-3], but its prognosis is significantly worse than that of NMIBC, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of about 60%-70% [4-5]. For patients with T2~T4a stage disease without distant metastasis, radical cystectomy (RC) is typically the standard treatment [2-3]. However, for high-risk patients with pT3-pT4 disease and/or pN+ M0 status, the 5-year survival rate following RC is only 25-35% [2, 6-8]. Therefore, combining systemic therapy with surgery plays a crucial role in reducing tumor progression rates. Multiple retrospective studies have shown that adjuvant chemotherapy after RC can delay recurrence and improve overall survival, providing clinical benefit. Skinner et al. [9] reported the first randomized trial, which demonstrated benefits for the adjuvant chemotherapy group in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) (51% vs. 34%) and overall survival (44% vs. 39%, n.s.) at 5 years. Another prospective randomized trial reported by Freiha et al. investigated the benefit of adjuvant CMV chemotherapy after RC in 50 patients with pT3b-T4, N0/+, M0 disease [10]. Consequently, guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk patients with pT3~pT4 disease or lymph node metastasis [11]. Currently, commonly used adjuvant chemotherapy drugs for bladder cancer include: cisplatin, gemcitabine, methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, paclitaxel... However, the variety of chemotherapy drugs and differing administration methods lead to treatment regimen selection often relying on physicians' clinical experience or specific research findings, lacking a unified standard, and being characterized by empiricism and randomness. Furthermore, some patients exhibit intrinsic resistance to certain chemotherapeutic agents. By the time clinical assessment confirms a patient's insensitivity to the applied drug, severe toxic side effects have often already occurred, potentially even leading to multi-drug resistance (MDR), thereby depriving the patient of the opportunity to choose alternative treatments. Therefore, how to evaluate chemotherapy response, avoid primarily resistant drugs, and directly select highly sensitive agents to achieve individualized chemotherapy has become a research hotspot. The realization of precise cancer treatment heavily relies on drug sensitivity testing. Through precise and individualized chemotherapy drug screening experiments, the most effective and least toxic treatment regimen can be identified for each patient before therapy begins. Developing patient-specific chemotherapy plans represents a new research direction for achieving precision treatment in bladder cancer and improving chemotherapy efficacy. Previously, the more commonly used preclinical models were traditional tumor cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Tumor cell line culture is simple but insufficient to simulate the growth state of tumor cells within the patient's body, and drugs screened using this system have low clinical application value. Although PDX models can simulate in vivo tumor characteristics and preserve the tumor microenvironment, they have significant limitations, such as relatively low stable engraftment rates, long modeling and evaluation cycles (six months to one year), being time-consuming and labor-intensive, making them difficult to generate and utilize for high-throughput drug screening [12-15]. Therefore, to develop more personalized treatment and prevention strategies tailored to an individual's unique genetic, environmental, and lifestyle characteristics, minimizing risks and optimizing medical intervention outcomes, it is imperative to develop drug sensitivity testing models that can simulate the heterogeneity and complexity of bladder cancer. Organoids, specifically Patient-Derived Organoids (PDOs), are three-dimensional organotypic structures formed through the self-assembly of stem cells in vitro. They can differentiate into multiple organ-specific cell types and exhibit cell-cell interactions, cell-extracellular matrix interactions, and spatial organization, thereby recapitulating key functions and structures of real human organs in vitro while maintaining stable phenotypic and genetic characteristics. Compared to two-dimensional tumor cell lines and PDX models, tumor organoids can be cultured directly from a patient's own tissue. These organoids can effectively replicate key properties of the primary tumor, preserve the pathological morphology and biological mechanisms of the patient's tissue, retain tumor heterogeneity and a more authentic tumor microenvironment, and have the advantage of a short growth cycle [16]. This facilitates their use for sensitivity testing of chemotherapy drugs, molecularly targeted agents, anti-tumor antibodies, etc., in clinical cancer patients, predicting patient response to drugs, and holds potential for assisting clinical treatment decision-making. In 2018, a study published in Science reported the use of metastatic gastrointestinal cancer organoids for drug sensitivity testing [17]. This study compared and analyzed the differences in sensitivity to a series of targeted and chemotherapeutic drugs between 21 clinical patients and their corresponding PDOs, demonstrating strong consistency between the two. Compared with the patients' actual therapeutic outcomes, the PDO predictions were robust (sensitivity 100%, specificity 93%, positive predictive value 88%, and negative predictive value 100%). In 2020, Yao Y et al. [18] utilized biopsy tissues from 112 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer to construct 96 rectal cancer organoids. Eighty of these were selected to test their response to chemoradiotherapy, and the results showed that the sensitivity of rectal cancer organoids to chemoradiotherapy was highly consistent with the patients' clinical responses (sensitivity 78%, specificity 92%, accuracy 84%). Subsequently, consistency between PDO drug response and patient clinical response has also been observed in gastric cancer, breast cancer, and other tumors. Yan HHN et al. [19] established a gastric cancer organoid biobank using tumor tissues, adjacent normal tissues, and lymph node metastasis samples from 34 gastric cancer patients. Among them, two cases developed metastasis and received postoperative combination therapy with cisplatin and 5-FU, both showing good responses. Another case received preoperative chemotherapy and showed no response to postoperative capecitabine. Investigating the sensitivity of the PDOs from these three cases to the corresponding compounds revealed that the drug sensitivity of the PDOs was completely consistent with the clinical responses of the respective patients. Guillen KP et al. [20] generated PDX and PDO models from tumor samples of breast cancer patients with endocrine therapy resistance, recurrence, and metastasis, and performed histomorphological, genomic, and drug sensitivity analyses on these samples. The results indicated that both breast cancer PDX and PDO models highly recapitulated the tissue biology and genomics of their source tumors, and their responses to anti-tumor drugs were consistent. In this study, a patient with stage IIA triple-negative breast cancer developed liver metastasis approximately one year after undergoing preoperative chemotherapy and surgery. The researchers conducted in vitro and in vivo drug sensitivity tests on the constructed PDO and PDX models and found that the microtubule inhibitor eribulin had the best therapeutic effect. Based on this finding, the patient was guided to receive eribulin treatment, resulting in complete remission of the liver metastasis lasting nearly 5 months. These studies provide preliminary evidence for the potential of PDOs to guide clinical drug use for cancer patients. Additional research has shown that by comparing the drug response differences between normal organoids and PDOs, highly selective drugs can be identified, which may help reduce toxic side effects in clinical patients. Thus, conducting drug sensitivity testing via PDOs to discover the most suitable drug treatment plan will help improve clinical efficacy for cancer patients, reduce toxic side effects, the risk of drug resistance, and the likelihood of tumor recurrence, maximizing patient benefit. Therefore, leveraging patient-derived bladder cancer organoid models to conduct drug sensitivity testing for adjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, establishing a standardized bladder cancer organoid drug sensitivity testing system, and formulating screening criteria for bladder cancer organoid drug sensitivity testing, will enable the selection of optimal drug combination regimens. This approach can assist in developing novel individualized treatment plans for clinical application and undergo multi-center clinical validation, ultimately achieving true "avatar drug testing."
- Research Question and Objectives (Elucidating the Scientific Questions and Research Objectives)
Research Question: This study employs a clinical controlled trial design to compare the one-year, three-year, and five-year overall survival rates between a patient group receiving interventions guided by organoid drug sensitivity testing and a patient group receiving traditional empirical treatment. Univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analysis will be used to compare the differences in recurrence rates between the two groups. The study aims to evaluate the application value of tumor organoid drug sensitivity experiments in guiding chemotherapy for bladder cancer.
Research Objective: By observing the clinical efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy guided by the tumor organoid drug sensitivity method in bladder cancer patients, this study aims to evaluate the application value of tumor organoid drug sensitivity experiments in guiding individualized chemotherapy for bladder cancer.
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Being tested
- Organoid culture
- Keywords
- Organoid, Bladder Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Organoid cultureOther
Organoid culture of tumor tissue obtained during patient surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Using tumor organoid drug sensitivity experiments to test the sensitivity of a patient's tumor cells to seven chemotherapy drugs and formulate a postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy plan. Receives: Other: Organoid culture | |
| Control group | Select bladder cancer patients who underwent surgery during the same period and received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy according to the empirical regimen as the control group. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
One-year OS ,Three-year OS and five-year OS
One-year overall survival rate, three-year overall survival rate, five-year overall survival rate.
Measured: 2026.01.01-2030.12.31
Secondary outcomes (1)
One-year PFS ,Three-year PFS and five-year PFS
One-year progression-free survival rate, three-year progression-free survival rate, five-year progression-free survival rate.
Measured: 2026.01.01-2030.12.31
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2026
- Study start1 Jan 2025
- Primary completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bladder CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 266 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong Province Third hospital, Taian City Central Hospital, Weifang People's Hospital, Binzhou Medical University, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Jining First People's Hospital, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Linyi People's Hospital, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Zibo Central Hospital, Dezhou Hospital Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07379255
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KYLL-202411-008-2
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 23 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study Protocol for Evaluating the Efficacy of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy Drugs for Bladder Cancer Based on Organoid Technology.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07379255
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KYLL-202411-008-2
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Keywords
- Organoid, Bladder Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 266 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong Province Third hospital, Taian City Central Hospital, Weifang People's Hospital, Binzhou Medical University, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Jining First People's Hospital, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Linyi People's Hospital, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Zibo Central Hospital, Dezhou Hospital Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao)
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of using tumor organoid drug sensitivity experiments to guide postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and to assess the application value of tumor organoid drug sensitivity experiments in guiding individualized postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Detailed description
- Research Background (Presenting the Rationale and Significance of This Study Based on Current Domestic and International Research) Bladder cancer is a malignant tumor originating from the bladder urothelium and ranks first in incidence among urogenital tumors in China. Among these, urothelial carcinoma is the most common, accounting for over 90% of bladder cancer cases [1]. Clinically, based on the depth of tumor invasion into the bladder wall and prognostic characteristics, bladder cancer is classified into non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). MIBC constitutes approximately 20% of newly diagnosed bladder cancer cases [2-3], but its prognosis is significantly worse than that of NMIBC, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of about 60%-70% [4-5]. For patients with T2~T4a stage disease without distant metastasis, radical cystectomy (RC) is typically the standard treatment [2-3]. However, for high-risk patients with pT3-pT4 disease and/or pN+ M0 status, the 5-year survival rate following RC is only 25-35% [2, 6-8]. Therefore, combining systemic therapy with surgery plays a crucial role in reducing tumor progression rates. Multiple retrospective studies have shown that adjuvant chemotherapy after RC can delay recurrence and improve overall survival, providing clinical benefit. Skinner et al. [9] reported the first randomized trial, which demonstrated benefits for the adjuvant chemotherapy group in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) (51% vs. 34%) and overall survival (44% vs. 39%, n.s.) at 5 years. Another prospective randomized trial reported by Freiha et al. investigated the benefit of adjuvant CMV chemotherapy after RC in 50 patients with pT3b-T4, N0/+, M0 disease [10]. Consequently, guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk patients with pT3~pT4 disease or lymph node metastasis [11]. Currently, commonly used adjuvant chemotherapy drugs for bladder cancer include: cisplatin, gemcitabine, methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, paclitaxel... However, the variety of chemotherapy drugs and differing administration methods lead to treatment regimen selection often relying on physicians' clinical experience or specific research findings, lacking a unified standard, and being characterized by empiricism and randomness. Furthermore, some patients exhibit intrinsic resistance to certain chemotherapeutic agents. By the time clinical assessment confirms a patient's insensitivity to the applied drug, severe toxic side effects have often already occurred, potentially even leading to multi-drug resistance (MDR), thereby depriving the patient of the opportunity to choose alternative treatments. Therefore, how to evaluate chemotherapy response, avoid primarily resistant drugs, and directly select highly sensitive agents to achieve individualized chemotherapy has become a research hotspot. The realization of precise cancer treatment heavily relies on drug sensitivity testing. Through precise and individualized chemotherapy drug screening experiments, the most effective and least toxic treatment regimen can be identified for each patient before therapy begins. Developing patient-specific chemotherapy plans represents a new research direction for achieving precision treatment in bladder cancer and improving chemotherapy efficacy. Previously, the more commonly used preclinical models were traditional tumor cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Tumor cell line culture is simple but insufficient to simulate the growth state of tumor cells within the patient's body, and drugs screened using this system have low clinical application value. Although PDX models can simulate in vivo tumor characteristics and preserve the tumor microenvironment, they have significant limitations, such as relatively low stable engraftment rates, long modeling and evaluation cycles (six months to one year), being time-consuming and labor-intensive, making them difficult to generate and utilize for high-throughput drug screening [12-15]. Therefore, to develop more personalized treatment and prevention strategies tailored to an individual's unique genetic, environmental, and lifestyle characteristics, minimizing risks and optimizing medical intervention outcomes, it is imperative to develop drug sensitivity testing models that can simulate the heterogeneity and complexity of bladder cancer. Organoids, specifically Patient-Derived Organoids (PDOs), are three-dimensional organotypic structures formed through the self-assembly of stem cells in vitro. They can differentiate into multiple organ-specific cell types and exhibit cell-cell interactions, cell-extracellular matrix interactions, and spatial organization, thereby recapitulating key functions and structures of real human organs in vitro while maintaining stable phenotypic and genetic characteristics. Compared to two-dimensional tumor cell lines and PDX models, tumor organoids can be cultured directly from a patient's own tissue. These organoids can effectively replicate key properties of the primary tumor, preserve the pathological morphology and biological mechanisms of the patient's tissue, retain tumor heterogeneity and a more authentic tumor microenvironment, and have the advantage of a short growth cycle [16]. This facilitates their use for sensitivity testing of chemotherapy drugs, molecularly targeted agents, anti-tumor antibodies, etc., in clinical cancer patients, predicting patient response to drugs, and holds potential for assisting clinical treatment decision-making. In 2018, a study published in Science reported the use of metastatic gastrointestinal cancer organoids for drug sensitivity testing [17]. This study compared and analyzed the differences in sensitivity to a series of targeted and chemotherapeutic drugs between 21 clinical patients and their corresponding PDOs, demonstrating strong consistency between the two. Compared with the patients' actual therapeutic outcomes, the PDO predictions were robust (sensitivity 100%, specificity 93%, positive predictive value 88%, and negative predictive value 100%). In 2020, Yao Y et al. [18] utilized biopsy tissues from 112 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer to construct 96 rectal cancer organoids. Eighty of these were selected to test their response to chemoradiotherapy, and the results showed that the sensitivity of rectal cancer organoids to chemoradiotherapy was highly consistent with the patients' clinical responses (sensitivity 78%, specificity 92%, accuracy 84%). Subsequently, consistency between PDO drug response and patient clinical response has also been observed in gastric cancer, breast cancer, and other tumors. Yan HHN et al. [19] established a gastric cancer organoid biobank using tumor tissues, adjacent normal tissues, and lymph node metastasis samples from 34 gastric cancer patients. Among them, two cases developed metastasis and received postoperative combination therapy with cisplatin and 5-FU, both showing good responses. Another case received preoperative chemotherapy and showed no response to postoperative capecitabine. Investigating the sensitivity of the PDOs from these three cases to the corresponding compounds revealed that the drug sensitivity of the PDOs was completely consistent with the clinical responses of the respective patients. Guillen KP et al. [20] generated PDX and PDO models from tumor samples of breast cancer patients with endocrine therapy resistance, recurrence, and metastasis, and performed histomorphological, genomic, and drug sensitivity analyses on these samples. The results indicated that both breast cancer PDX and PDO models highly recapitulated the tissue biology and genomics of their source tumors, and their responses to anti-tumor drugs were consistent. In this study, a patient with stage IIA triple-negative breast cancer developed liver metastasis approximately one year after undergoing preoperative chemotherapy and surgery. The researchers conducted in vitro and in vivo drug sensitivity tests on the constructed PDO and PDX models and found that the microtubule inhibitor eribulin had the best therapeutic effect. Based on this finding, the patient was guided to receive eribulin treatment, resulting in complete remission of the liver metastasis lasting nearly 5 months. These studies provide preliminary evidence for the potential of PDOs to guide clinical drug use for cancer patients. Additional research has shown that by comparing the drug response differences between normal organoids and PDOs, highly selective drugs can be identified, which may help reduce toxic side effects in clinical patients. Thus, conducting drug sensitivity testing via PDOs to discover the most suitable drug treatment plan will help improve clinical efficacy for cancer patients, reduce toxic side effects, the risk of drug resistance, and the likelihood of tumor recurrence, maximizing patient benefit. Therefore, leveraging patient-derived bladder cancer organoid models to conduct drug sensitivity testing for adjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, establishing a standardized bladder cancer organoid drug sensitivity testing system, and formulating screening criteria for bladder cancer organoid drug sensitivity testing, will enable the selection of optimal drug combination regimens. This approach can assist in developing novel individualized treatment plans for clinical application and undergo multi-center clinical validation, ultimately achieving true "avatar drug testing."
- Research Question and Objectives (Elucidating the Scientific Questions and Research Objectives)
Research Question: This study employs a clinical controlled trial design to compare the one-year, three-year, and five-year overall survival rates between a patient group receiving interventions guided by organoid drug sensitivity testing and a patient group receiving traditional empirical treatment. Univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analysis will be used to compare the differences in recurrence rates between the two groups. The study aims to evaluate the application value of tumor organoid drug sensitivity experiments in guiding chemotherapy for bladder cancer.
Research Objective: By observing the clinical efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy guided by the tumor organoid drug sensitivity method in bladder cancer patients, this study aims to evaluate the application value of tumor organoid drug sensitivity experiments in guiding individualized chemotherapy for bladder cancer.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | – | Other: Organoid cultureUsing tumor organoid drug sensitivity experiments to test the sensitivity of a patient's tumor cells to seven chemotherapy drugs and formulate a postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy plan. |
| Control group | – | –Select bladder cancer patients who underwent surgery during the same period and received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy according to the empirical regimen as the control group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who need to come to the research center for treatment of bladder cancer.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Age between 18 and 80 years, any gender; 2. For patients undergoing radical cystectomy, if the pathology meets inclusion criterion No. 3, tissue from the surgical specimen will be used for organoid culture; 3. Patients with pT3-pT4 and/or lymph node-positive MIBC who require adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery; 4. Patients who can tolerate platinum-based chemotherapy; 5. ECOG performance status of 0-2; 6. According to the investigator's judgment, able to comply with the study protocol, demonstrate good adherence, cooperate with the monitoring of adverse events and efficacy, and comply with follow-up; 7. Willing to voluntarily participate in this clinical trial, understand the study procedures, and have signed the informed consent form to participate in this study.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- 1. Severe, life-threatening complications occurring after radical cystectomy, such as cardiovascular complications, renal failure, respiratory failure, liver failure, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, and major hemorrhage; 2. Individuals with immunodeficiency or impairment (e.g., patients with AIDS, or those receiving immunosuppressants or radiotherapy); 3. Participants known to be allergic to the study drug, similar drugs, or excipients, or those with an allergic constitution; 4. Individuals taking long-term corticosteroids or with a history of drug abuse or dependence; 5. Individuals planning pregnancy soon, currently pregnant, or breastfeeding; 6. Abnormal blood routine, liver and kidney function, and coagulation indices (considered abnormal if one or more of the following are met):
- <!-- -->
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Organoid cultureOrganoid culture of tumor tissue obtained during patient surgery | Other | Experimental group |
Primary outcome
One-year OS ,Three-year OS and five-year OS
Time frame: 2026.01.01-2030.12.31
One-year overall survival rate, three-year overall survival rate, five-year overall survival rate.
1 secondary outcome
One-year PFS ,Three-year PFS and five-year PFS
Time frame: 2026.01.01-2030.12.31
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (Sac-TMT, MK-2870) and Pembrolizumab (MK-3475A) in Participants With Bladder Cancer (MK-2870-055)
Bladder Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of CTX-009 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Unresectable Advanced, Metastatic or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancers (COMPANION-002)
Biliary Tract Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma
Recruiting
Effect of Cyclic Sighing Breathing Exercise on CRBD, Pain, and Sleep Quality in Patients Undergoing TUR
Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jun Chen (+86 18560084873, chenjunxinxiang@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
One-year OS ,Three-year OS and five-year OS (time frame: 2026.01.01-2030.12.31). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2026.