AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasal ObstructionRHINOVENCT07379775

Evaluation of the Reliability of AAR as an Independent Tool for Surgical Indication in Nasal Obstruction

An observational study of Nasal Obstruction, run by Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer at 1 site in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Nasal obstruction (NO) affects ~30% of the population and is a very common reason for consultation in otorhinolaryngology (ORL). In the majority of cases, the origin is inflammatory (allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis) while in a minority of cases, the origin is structural, including septal deviation and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Nasal Obstruction
What is being tested?
preoperative rhinomanometry
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
27 Jan 2026to Mar 2028
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients presenting with nasal obstruction, scheduled for surgery, and having undergone preoperative rhinomanometry

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 18 years or older with nasal obstruction (NO).
  • Patients scheduled for surgery: septoplasty ± turbinoplasty ± rhinoplasty for nasal obstruction.
  • Patients who have undergone a preoperative rhinomanometry assessment.
  • Patients consented to participation

Who cannot join

  • Nasal polyps.
  • Chronic edematous-purulent rhinosinusitis (e.g., cystic fibrosis).
  • Crusting rhinosinusitis (e.g., sarcoidosis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis [Wegener's]).
  • Current or previously treated nasal or sinus tumors, or patients undergoing tumor work-up

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier de la Dracénie

    Draguignan, Var, 83007

    Heritsilavo Eloi RAMILISON, MD, 0494605869 ext. +33, heritsilavo.ramilison@ch-draguignan.fr

    Charly BESSADIER, MD, 0494605869 ext. +33, charly.bessadier@ch-draguignan.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Reliability of Anterior Active Rhinomanometry as an Independent Tool for Surgical Indication in Nasal Obstruction

Nasal obstruction (NO) affects ~30% of the population and is a very common reason for consultation in otorhinolaryngology (ORL). In the majority of cases, the origin is inflammatory (allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis) while in a minority of cases, the origin is structural, including septal deviation and inferior turbinate hypertrophy.

NO significantly impairs patients' quality of life (QoL) and olfactory performance and also represents a contributing factor and comorbidity in asthma and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Several questionnaires for assessing QoL are available and routinely used to evaluate the impact of NO on patients : VAS, NOSE score, SNOT-22, and RhinoQOL score.

Read more

Several objective functional methods for assessing NO have been described : acoustic rhinometry, nasal peak inspiratory flow, and active rhinomanometry. Rhinomanometry is a simple, non-invasive functional assessment method that allows for objective and quantitative analysis of nasal airway patency, thereby complementing the clinical and imaging evaluation of NO.

It has been recommended for the diagnosis of NO in cases of chronic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Rhinomanometry comprises anterior active (AAR), posterior, and per-nasal rhinomanometry. AAR is the most commonly used method and is the only technique routinely available to clinicians. AAR provides precise information regarding the presence of nasal resistance responsible for NO. However, it should not be used as a standalone diagnostic tool due to its poor correlation with QoL questionnaires such as VAS and NOSE.

Whether used alone or in combination with nasal decongestants, AAR provides a high predictive value for the outcomes of septoplasty and laser-assisted turbinoplasty.

When surgery is indicated, its performance depends on:

  • type of obstruction or anatomical abnormality identified on clinical examination and/or computed tomography and/or AAR;
  • patient's symptoms and impairment of QoL NOSE and SNOT-22;
  • failure of a well-conducted first-line medical nasal treatment. Thus, in cases of septal deviation, septoplasty is performed; in cases of inferior turbinate mucosal hypertrophy with failure of medical treatment, turbinoplasty is performed; and in cases of mixed lesions, septo-turbinoplasty is performed.

However, the concordance rate between the surgical technique indicated by clinical examination and computed tomography and the indications suggested by AAR is only 48.5%.

Being tested
preoperative rhinomanometry
Medical subject headings
Nasal Obstruction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • preoperative rhinomanometryProcedure or surgery

    The performance of AAR requires a pressure sensor placed within a facial mask to measure the pressure at the entrance of the ventilated nasal cavity. Another sensor is placed in the nasal vestibule of the contralateral nasal cavity to extrapolate the pressure at the exit of the ventilated nasal cavity. Measurements are therefore performed alternately on the right and left sides, but never on both sides simultaneously.

    AAR can be performed at rest in the seated position after 20 min in the supine position, or during forced inspiration.

    In our practice, AAR is performed without the use of nasal decongestants.

    Normal values of nasal resistance measured by rhinomanometry are as follows:

    • Uninasal resistance ≤ 6 cmH₂O/L/s (or 0.6 Pa/cm³/s);
    • Binasal resistance ≤ 3 cmH₂O/L/s (or 0.3 Pa/cm³/s);
    • Uninasal resistance ≥ 0.6 Pa/cm³/s, with or without vasoconstrictor, suggests septal deviation;
    • Binasal resistance after VC ≥ 0.3 Pa/cm³/s suggests bilateral inferior turbinate hypertrophy
Study groups in NCT07379775
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with nasal obstructionPatients scheduled for surgery who underwent preoperative rhinomanometry
Receives: Procedure: preoperative rhinomanometry

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To evaluate the reliability of an abnormal (vs. normal) binary result of preoperative anterior active rhinomanometry as an independent tool for confirming the indication for endonasal surgery in patients presenting with nasal obstruction.

    The result was considered normal if: Uninasal resistance ≤ 6 cmH₂O/L/s (or 0.6 Pa/cm³/s); Binasal resistance ≤ 3 cmH₂O/L/s (or 0.3 Pa/cm³/s). The criteria is 1) Percentage of patients with an abnormal versus normal preoperative AAR result; and 2) calculation of the positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of AAR as an independent tool for confirming surgical indication.

    Measured: the day of surgery

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. To evaluate the correlation between the preoperative NOSE score and a preoperative AAR considered abnormal.

    Correlation coefficient between the preoperative NOSE score and the preoperative AAR result (normal/abnormal).

    Measured: preoperative visit

  2. To evaluate the correlation between the preoperative SNOT-22 score and a preoperative AAR considered abnormal.

    Correlation coefficient between the preoperative SNOT-22 score and the preoperative AAR result (normal/abnormal)

    Measured: preoperative visit

  3. To assess the improvement in patients' quality of life at 3 months postoperatively using the NOSE score in patients with a preoperative AAR considered abnormal

    Difference between pre- and 3-month postoperative NOSE scores in patients with an abnormal preoperative AAR result

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  4. To assess the improvement in patients' quality of life at 3 months postoperatively using the SNOT-22 score in patients with a preoperative AAR considered abnormal

    Difference between pre- and 3-month postoperative SNOT-22 scores in patients with an abnormal preoperative AAR result

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  5. To assess the improvement in AAR at 3 months postoperatively in patients with a preoperative AAR considered abnormal

    Percentage of AAR results significantly improved at 3 months postoperatively in patients with an abnormal preoperative AAR

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  6. To assess the improvement in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) at 3 months postoperatively in patients with identified obstructive sleep apnea and a preoperative AAR considered abnormal

    Difference between pre- and 3-month postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in patients with identified sleep apnea and an abnormal preoperative AAR result

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  7. To assess the improvement in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence at 3 months postoperatively in patients with identified obstructive sleep apnea and a preoperative AAR considered abnormal.

    Difference between pre- and 3-month postoperative adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with identified sleep apnea and an abnormal preoperative AAR result.

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2026
  2. Study start27 Jan 2026
  3. Primary completionJan 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07379775
Sponsor's protocol ID
2025-CHITS-018
Acronym
RHINOVE
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
23 Jan 2026
Last updated
7 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Nasal Obstruction, run by Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sophie Lafond (0483772062 ext. +33, sophie.lafond@ch-toulon.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To evaluate the reliability of an abnormal (vs. normal) binary result of preoperative anterior active rhinomanometry as an independent tool for confirming the indication for endonasal surgery in patients presenting with nasal obstruction. (time frame: the day of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in