AzTrials
AzTrials

Psychological Self-talk Interventions in Soccer PerformanceSTFNCT07382518

Effects of Motivational and Instructional Self-Talk on Performance and Stress in Soccer Forwards

A study testing Motivational Self-Talk Training and Instructional Self-Talk Training in people with Psychological Self-talk Interventions in Soccer Performance, run by Beijing Sport University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study investigates the effects of different types of self-talk on performance and stress regulation in soccer forwards. Self-talk is a psychological technique in which athletes use specific verbal cues to guide their thoughts and actions during training and competition. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Motivational Self-Talk Training and Instructional Self-Talk Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
20 Jan 2025to 5 Apr 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male university football players aged 18-25 years
  • Full-time university students regularly engaged in organized football training and competition
  • At least two years of systematic football training experience
  • In good general health at the time of enrollment
  • No musculoskeletal injuries or medical conditions affecting football performance within the previous 6 months
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing
  • Able to understand study procedures and complete soccer-specific performance and decision-making tasks
  • Provided written informed consent prior to participation

Who cannot join

  • History of neurological, psychiatric, or cognitive disorders that could influence decision-making or reaction time
  • Current participation in structured psychological skills training programs (e.g., self-talk training, imagery, mindfulness training) outside routine football practice during the study period
  • Use of medications or substances known to affect cognitive function
  • Presence of any medical condition or injury contraindicating participation in football training or testing
  • Failure to comply with the intervention protocol or outcome assessments

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Beijing Sport University

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Study on the Effects of Different Types of Self-Talk on Strikers in Soccer

This study investigates the effects of different types of self-talk on performance and stress regulation in soccer forwards. Self-talk is a psychological technique in which athletes use specific verbal cues to guide their thoughts and actions during training and competition. Two commonly used forms are motivational self-talk, which focuses on confidence and effort, and instructional self-talk, which focuses on technical and tactical cues.

Thirty-six male soccer forwards of different competitive levels participated in this study. Players were randomly assigned to a motivational self-talk group, an instructional self-talk group, or a control group. The intervention lasted six weeks. Before and after the intervention, participants completed assessments of soccer-specific technical skills, physical performance, and match tactical behavior. Psychological measures of self-efficacy and biological indicators of stress (salivary cortisol) were also collected.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether different self-talk strategies produce different effects depending on players' competitive level and task demands. The findings are expected to provide practical guidance for the use of psychological training strategies in soccer and other team sports.

Being tested
Motivational Self-Talk Training, Instructional Self-Talk Training, No Self-Talk (Usual Training Control)
Keywords
Self-talk, Soccer, Psychological intervention, Athletic performance, Stress regulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Motivational Self-Talk TrainingBehavioural

    Participants received structured motivational self-talk training aimed at enhancing confidence, effort, and persistence during soccer training and match-related tasks. Individualized motivational cue words and phrases were developed and practiced under guidance, and participants were instructed to apply these cues consistently throughout the six-week intervention period.

  • Instructional Self-Talk TrainingBehavioural

    Participants were instructed to apply task-specific instructional self-talk cues to guide technical execution and tactical decision-making during soccer training over a six-week intervention period.

  • No Self-Talk (Usual Training Control)Behavioural

    Participants in the control group continued their regular soccer training and match preparation without receiving any form of structured self-talk instruction. No motivational or instructional self-talk strategies were introduced during the intervention period.

Study groups in NCT07382518
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Motivational Self-TalkExperimentalParticipants in this group received a motivational self-talk intervention designed to enhance confidence, effort, and persistence during soccer training and competition.
Receives: Behavioral: Motivational Self-Talk Training
Instructional Self-TalkExperimentalParticipants in this group received an instructional self-talk intervention focusing on technical execution and tactical decision-making during soccer activities.
Receives: Behavioral: Instructional Self-Talk Training
ControlExperimentalParticipants in the control group continued their regular soccer training without receiving any structured self-talk intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: No Self-Talk (Usual Training Control)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Match-Based Technical and Tactical Performance

    Match-based technical and tactical performance was assessed during regular soccer match play using standardized match analysis procedures. This outcome represents players' overall technical and tactical performance exhibited in a real match context over the intervention period.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Shooting Accuracy

    Shooting accuracy was evaluated using a standardized soccer shooting test. Participants performed a series of shots toward predefined target zones within the goal. Shooting accuracy was calculated as the percentage of successful shots directed into the target areas, with higher percentages indicating better shooting performance.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

  2. Sport Self-Efficacy

    Sport self-efficacy was assessed using the Sport Self-Efficacy Scale, a validated self-report questionnaire designed to measure individuals' perceived confidence in performing sport-related skills and tasks. The scale consists of multiple items rated on a Likert-type scale, yielding a total score ranging from 10 to 50, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived self-efficacy in sport performance contexts.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

  3. Dribbling Run Performance

    Dribbling run performance was assessed using a standardized soccer dribbling run test. Participants completed the task while controlling the ball along a predefined running course, and performance was quantified as total completion time (seconds) recorded under standardized testing conditions.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

  4. Loughborough Soccer Passing Test Performance

    Passing performance was assessed using the Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (LSPT), a standardized and widely used soccer-specific passing assessment. Participants were required to complete a series of prescribed passing and ball-control actions according to the standardized test protocol. Performance was quantified as the total time (seconds) required to complete the test under controlled testing conditions.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

  5. Salivary Cortisol Concentration

    Salivary cortisol concentration was assessed as an index of physiological stress response. Saliva samples were collected using standardized saliva collection procedures and cortisol levels were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods under controlled laboratory conditions.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Feb 2026
  2. Study start20 Jan 2025
  3. Primary completion7 Mar 2025
  4. Study completion5 Apr 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants were randomly assigned to one of three parallel groups (motivational self-talk, instructional self-talk, or control) and received the assigned intervention concurrently throughout the intervention period.
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07382518
Sponsor's protocol ID
2025556H
Acronym
STF
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
27 Jan 2026
Last updated
2 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared due to participant confidentiality and institutional data protection policies.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Motivational Self-Talk Training and Instructional Self-Talk Training in people with Psychological Self-talk Interventions in Soccer Performance, run by Beijing Sport University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Match-Based Technical and Tactical Performance (time frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in