Odor Identity RatingsNCT07386236
Electrophysiological Representations of Odor Identity Study 2
A study testing odor in people with Odor Identity Ratings, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To identify a neural representation of odor identity, it is necessary to dissociate molecular structure from perceptual identity/similarity. Whether the olfactory system employs a coding scheme in which the similarity between neural features is systematically related to perceptual similarity is unknown. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Odor Identity Ratings
- What is being tested?
- odor
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Mar 2025to 1 Oct 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ages 12 to 65, english speaker, patients undergoing brain surgery for treatment of medically intractable epilepsy
Who cannot join
- screening for history of smell or taste problems
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Naelly Arriaga, 312-503-7244, zelanolab@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Electrophysiological Representations of Odor in the Human Brain Study 2
To identify a neural representation of odor identity, it is necessary to dissociate molecular structure from perceptual identity/similarity.
Whether the olfactory system employs a coding scheme in which the similarity between neural features is systematically related to perceptual similarity is unknown. Experiments for this aim will acquire perceptual responses while manipulating perceptual similarity. In Experiment 1A, we will examine features of neural responses during natural behavior of freely naming odors. In Experiment 1B, we will manipulate perceptual similarity with odor metamers and collect perceptual and neural data on each trial. Preliminary data suggest that the earliest, high-frequency components of the piriform response can optimally decode perceptual identity.
Read the detailed description
Olfactory perception relies on the brain's ability to extract and represent different features of an odor stimulus.
For example, intensity and identity are fundamental features of the olfactory percept that must be encoded separately for accurate perception; the same odor can be encountered at different strengths. Understanding neural representations of olfactory perceptual features is fundamental to understanding the olfactory system, however the neural correlates of odor intensity and identity are poorly understood in the human brain.
The field of olfaction typically uses chemistry as a proxy for perception and focuses on manipulating physical properties of a stimulus to look for neural correlates. For example, chemical concentration and molecular identity are typically used as proxies for odor intensity and identity. However, the world that animals perceive is not a complete representation of physical reality; it is a product of the particular sensory systems that each species has acquired in the course of evolution. To understand how the brain forms representations of perceptual features of odors, we must identify relationships between features of neural responses and perceptual ratings.
While novel behavioral paradigms in rodents can provide good estimates of perceptual ratings of different features of odors (intensity, identity), humans can directly provide perceptual ratings of different features of an odor. Therefore, human work is necessary to fully understand olfactory perception.
The missing link between neural signatures and perceptual properties of odor is a critical gap in our understanding of odor coding. Here, we will combine human intracranial recordings-including direct neural recordings from human olfactory cortex-with simultaneous delivery of precisely controlled odors of varying intensity/identity and trial-by-trial collection of psychophysical ratings to understand how odors are represented in the human brain. Accurate olfactory psychophysical ratings are a critical part of our proposal. Therefore, we will work with leading experts in human psychophysics at Monel Chemical Senses Center, Dr. Pamela Dalton and Dr. Joel Mainland. As Co-Investigators on this grant, their expertise in human psychophysics will combine with my lab's expertise in human olfactory electrophysiology to provide the field with an understanding of the mappings between olfactory perception and neural codes in the human brain. To identify a neural representation of odor identity, it is necessary to dissociate molecular structure from perceptual identity/similarity.
Whether the olfactory system employs a coding scheme in which the similarity between neural features is systematically related to perceptual similarity is unknown. Experiments for this aim will acquire perceptual responses while manipulating perceptual similarity. In Experiment 1A, we will examine features of neural responses during natural behavior of freely naming odors. In Experiment 1B, we will manipulate perceptual similarity with odor metamers and collect perceptual and neural data on each trial. Preliminary data suggest that the earliest, high-frequency components of the piriform response can optimally decode perceptual identity.
- Conditions
- Odor Identity Ratings
- Being tested
- odor
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
odorBehavioural
present odor
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Investigating representations of odor identity in human piriform cortex. | Experimental | Odors will be presented and identified Receives: Behavioral: odor |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Perceived odor identity
Odors of different identities will be presented, and we will obtain behavioral perceptual ratings
Measured: 15 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Feb 2026
- Study start5 Mar 2025
- Primary completion1 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Oct 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Odor Identity RatingsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Northwestern UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Northwestern University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Christina Zelano, Northwestern University
- Investigators
- christina zelano, Principal investigator, Northwestern University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07386236
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 60067814-2
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Electrophysiological Representations of Odor in the Human Brain Study 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07386236
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 60067814-2
- Conditions
- Odor Identity Ratings
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Northwestern UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To identify a neural representation of odor identity, it is necessary to dissociate molecular structure from perceptual identity/similarity.
Whether the olfactory system employs a coding scheme in which the similarity between neural features is systematically related to perceptual similarity is unknown. Experiments for this aim will acquire perceptual responses while manipulating perceptual similarity. In Experiment 1A, we will examine features of neural responses during natural behavior of freely naming odors. In Experiment 1B, we will manipulate perceptual similarity with odor metamers and collect perceptual and neural data on each trial. Preliminary data suggest that the earliest, high-frequency components of the piriform response can optimally decode perceptual identity.
Detailed description
Olfactory perception relies on the brain's ability to extract and represent different features of an odor stimulus.
For example, intensity and identity are fundamental features of the olfactory percept that must be encoded separately for accurate perception; the same odor can be encountered at different strengths. Understanding neural representations of olfactory perceptual features is fundamental to understanding the olfactory system, however the neural correlates of odor intensity and identity are poorly understood in the human brain.
The field of olfaction typically uses chemistry as a proxy for perception and focuses on manipulating physical properties of a stimulus to look for neural correlates. For example, chemical concentration and molecular identity are typically used as proxies for odor intensity and identity. However, the world that animals perceive is not a complete representation of physical reality; it is a product of the particular sensory systems that each species has acquired in the course of evolution. To understand how the brain forms representations of perceptual features of odors, we must identify relationships between features of neural responses and perceptual ratings.
While novel behavioral paradigms in rodents can provide good estimates of perceptual ratings of different features of odors (intensity, identity), humans can directly provide perceptual ratings of different features of an odor. Therefore, human work is necessary to fully understand olfactory perception.
The missing link between neural signatures and perceptual properties of odor is a critical gap in our understanding of odor coding. Here, we will combine human intracranial recordings-including direct neural recordings from human olfactory cortex-with simultaneous delivery of precisely controlled odors of varying intensity/identity and trial-by-trial collection of psychophysical ratings to understand how odors are represented in the human brain. Accurate olfactory psychophysical ratings are a critical part of our proposal. Therefore, we will work with leading experts in human psychophysics at Monel Chemical Senses Center, Dr. Pamela Dalton and Dr. Joel Mainland. As Co-Investigators on this grant, their expertise in human psychophysics will combine with my lab's expertise in human olfactory electrophysiology to provide the field with an understanding of the mappings between olfactory perception and neural codes in the human brain. To identify a neural representation of odor identity, it is necessary to dissociate molecular structure from perceptual identity/similarity.
Whether the olfactory system employs a coding scheme in which the similarity between neural features is systematically related to perceptual similarity is unknown. Experiments for this aim will acquire perceptual responses while manipulating perceptual similarity. In Experiment 1A, we will examine features of neural responses during natural behavior of freely naming odors. In Experiment 1B, we will manipulate perceptual similarity with odor metamers and collect perceptual and neural data on each trial. Preliminary data suggest that the earliest, high-frequency components of the piriform response can optimally decode perceptual identity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Investigating representations of odor identity in human piriform cortex. | Experimental | Behavioral: odorOdors will be presented and identified |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Ages 12 to 65, english speaker, patients undergoing brain surgery for treatment of medically intractable epilepsy
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- screening for history of smell or taste problems
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| odorpresent odor | Behavioural | Investigating representations of odor identity in human piriform cortex. |
Primary outcome
Perceived odor identity
Time frame: 15 minutes
Odors of different identities will be presented, and we will obtain behavioral perceptual ratings
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
christina zelano principal investigator
Northwestern University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing odor in people with Odor Identity Ratings, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Naelly Arriaga, MPH (312-503-7244, zelanolab@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Perceived odor identity (time frame: 15 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2026.