AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriatic ArthritisUVIPWPNCT07386717

Upadacitinib Versus IL-17 Inhibitors in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis

An observational study of Psoriatic Arthritis and Upadacitinib, run by Peking University First Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease with heterogeneous musculoskeletal and dermatologic manifestations, leading to significant functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2024to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis according to established classification criteria

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis according to established classification criteria
  • Treatment with upadacitinib or an interleukin-17 inhibitor at baseline
  • Availability of baseline and follow-up clinical data over 24 weeks

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of other inflammatory arthritides
  • History of malignancy or severe uncontrolled infection
  • Incomplete clinical data preventing outcome assessment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Peking University First Hospital

    Beijing

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Upadacitinib Versus IL-17 Inhibitors in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: A Cohort Study

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease with heterogeneous musculoskeletal and dermatologic manifestations, leading to significant functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Although targeted therapies such as Janus kinase inhibitors and interleukin-17 inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials, real-world comparative evidence between these treatment strategies remains limited.

This observational cohort study aims to compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib and interleukin-17 inhibitors in patients with PsA over a 24-week follow-up period. By evaluating clinical outcomes under routine clinical practice conditions, this study seeks to provide evidence to support individualized treatment selection in PsA management.

Read the detailed description

This is a real-world, observational cohort study conducted at Peking University First Hospital. Adult patients diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis will be enrolled and followed for 24 weeks in routine clinical practice.

Participants will be categorized into two cohorts based on treatment exposure at baseline: patients receiving upadacitinib and patients receiving interleukin-17 inhibitors. Treatment decisions are made by treating physicians according to standard clinical practice and are not influenced by the study protocol.

Clinical assessments will be performed at baseline and during routine follow-up visits within the 24-week observation period. Effectiveness outcomes will be evaluated across musculoskeletal and dermatologic domains, and safety outcomes will be monitored throughout follow-up. This study does not involve experimental interventions.

Keywords
Interleukin-17 Inhibitors, Upadacitinib, Psoriatic Arthritis
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Psoriatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07386717
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort 1: Upadacitinib-Treated PsA PatientsAdult patients with psoriatic arthritis receiving upadacitinib as part of routine clinical care and followed for 24 weeks.
Cohort 2: IL-17 Inhibitor-Treated PsA PatientsAdult patients with psoriatic arthritis receiving interleukin-17 inhibitors (e.g., secukinumab or ixekizumab) as part of routine clinical care and followed for 24 weeks.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical effectiveness of treatment

    Changes in joint and skin disease activity assessed using validated clinical measures during the 24-week follow-up period.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Feb 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07386717
Sponsor's protocol ID
UVIPWP_V1
Acronym
UVIPWP
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
27 Jan 2026
Last updated
4 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Psoriatic Arthritis and Upadacitinib, run by Peking University First Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical effectiveness of treatment (time frame: Baseline to Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in