AzTrials
AzTrials

Apical PeriodontitisNCT07387809

Effectiveness of Laser-activated Photoacoustic Flow in One-visit Revision of Teeth With Apical Periodontitis

A study testing Laser activated irrigation and Sound-activated irrigation in people with Apical Periodontitis, run by University of Zagreb at 1 site in Croatia.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main objective of the clinical randomized study is to examine the effectiveness laser-activated irrigation (LAI) on the removal of intracanal microorganisms and the healing of an inflammatory periapical lesion of a tooth after a one-visit revision of teeth with apical periodontitis. The main questions are: 1. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Apical Periodontitis
What is being tested?
Laser activated irrigation and Sound-activated irrigation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteCroatia
Study dates
15 Jan 2024to Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • teeth tender to percussion, palpation
  • teeth that have a sinus tract and swelling
  • a chronic periapical lesion greater than 5 mm in diameter based on the initial X-ray
  • previous endodontic treatment and root canal filling that is inadequate according to clinical criteria (filling, overfilling, non-homogeneous root canal filling, unfilled root canals)

Who cannot join

  • immunocompromised patients
  • pregnant women
  • teeth with a periodontal pocket depth greater than 3 mm
  • teeth with signs and symptoms of vertical fracture
  • teeth that cannot be restored or prosthetically provided after endodontic treatment
  • use of antibiotic therapy within the last month
  • diagnosis of acute apical abscess

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Croatia1 site
  • School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb

    Zagreb, 10 000

Other trials in Croatia

About this study

Official title: Clinical Investigation of the Effectiveness of Laser-activated Photoacoustic Flow in One-visit Revision of Teeth With Apical Periodontitis

The main objective of the clinical randomized study is to examine the effectiveness laser-activated irrigation (LAI) on the removal of intracanal microorganisms and the healing of an inflammatory periapical lesion of a tooth after a one-visit revision of teeth with apical periodontitis.

The main questions are:

Read more
  1. Does LAI reduces the occurrence of postoperative pain, compared with sonic-activated irrigation?
  2. Is antimicrobial efficacy of LAI greater than the antimicrobial efficacy of sonic-activated irrigation?
  3. Is periapical lesion healing after LAI application better than after sonic-activated irrigation?

Researcher will compare LAI and sonic-activated irrigation in patients with signs and symptoms of chronic apical periodontitis requiring revision. Participants will be assigned to two experimental groups depending on the final root canal disinfection protocol. Postoperative pain will be assessed via a questionnaire that participants will receive after the treatment and which they will complete over a period of seven days. Microbiological samples will be collected from the root canal and real-time PCR analysis will be performed to evaluate antimicrobial efficacy. Assessment of periapical lesion healing will be performed by comparing CBCT scans obtained before the treatment and one year after.

Read the detailed description

Introduction:

Endodontic treatment of teeth involves thorough mechanical removal of microorganisms, necrotic and infected pulp tissue, and chemical disinfection of the endodontic space. Due to the complex morphology of the endodontic space, which includes lateral canals, isthmuses, and apical bifurcations, more than a third of the root canal remains untreated after mechanical treatment, so chemical disinfection is an indispensable addition to mechanical treatment. The work of instruments in the root canal creates a residual layer on the canal walls, and dentin debris created by instrumentation accumulates in the irregularities of the canal and serves as an ideal refuge for remaining bacteria. In addition, the residual layer on the dentin walls can prevent the penetration of irrigant and filler into the dentinal tubules. Therefore, abundant irrigation with irrigant is essential for removing dentin chips from the root canal, but also the residual layer from its walls.

Ultrasonic and laser-activated disinfection are increasingly used to improve the depth of penetration of the irrigant used and thus reduce persistent periradicular inflammation. However a systematic review from 2023 that laser-activated disinfection is significantly better at reducing the number of microorganisms and removing residual layer and dentine debris compared to ultrasonically activated disinfection. It is believed that laser-activated disinfection improves the effectiveness of irrigant in disinfecting the endodontic space by creating secondary cavitations through expansion and subsequent implosion of the liquid. Er:YAG lasers use laser energy to create acoustic waves that move the irrigant and thus improve its flow inside the root canal, which is especially true for the PIPS technique (photon-induced photoacoustic streaming). It is shown that laser-activated disinfection, in vitro, can reduce the number of bacteria in infected canals by 99.5%. Modalities of the Er:YAG laser, such as SWEEPS (shock wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming) and SSP (super short pulse), create a precise concentration of shock waves during irrigation, which enable the washing agent to penetrate deeper into the lateral canals and microscopic tubules, thereby increasing the effectiveness of disinfection. Because of the above, SWEEPS/SSP modalities have significant advantages during endodontic treatment, especially in teeth with complicated root canal morphology.

However, although in vitro studies show that laser-activated irrigation (LAI) is superior to other methods in removing intracanal microorganisms, there are still very few clinical studies. Clinical studies show that the healing of periapical lesions after one year on single-rooted teeth and premolars is the same for all irrigation techniques. However, a higher percentage of healing has also been reported when using the SWEEPS modality. It is also emphasized the need for additional research that would study the effectiveness of LAI in multi-rooted teeth, considering their more pronounced morphology of the endodontic space, on which pulsed laser modalities could be more effective.

There is also increasing emphasis on the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in future studies to assess prognostic factors affecting the outcome of root canal treatment. Periapical radiographs show a more favorable outcome of healing of periapical lesions compared to CBCT, which significantly affects the correct assessment of treatment success. The ESE guidelines recommend clinical and radiographic follow-up for at least one year after endodontic treatment, with the patient's radiation dose as low as possible to achieve the desired level of diagnosis. The use of CBCT with ethical approval is justified in the clinical use of small CBCT scans for research purposes: to evaluate treatment with new protocols, disinfection techniques, which will provide a more objective treatment outcome.

Furthermore, in addition to the evaluation of LAI on the healing of periapical lesions, one of the important issues is the impact of LAI on postoperative pain. Namely, during endodontic procedures, a major problem encountered is postendodontic pain, which, with its incidence of 3-58%, is a relatively common occurrence. Although it has been reported that LAI results in lower levels of postoperative pain, the number of clinical studies is small, and they show conflicting results on whether LAI is superior to other techniques. However, studies which did not find a difference in LAI and ultrasonic irrigation only investigated asymptomatic lesions in primary endodontic treatment. In contrast, it was reportoed that postoperative pain is significantly less intense when LAI is used compared to other techniques in the treatment of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Likewise, a recent meta-analysis showed that pulsed Er:YAG modalities, especially SWEEPS, have a stronger analgesic effect compared to ultrasound irrigation.

Given that the long-term goal of endodontic therapy is to maintain the masticatory and aesthetic function of the teeth, the goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of laser-activated root canal disinfection during a one-visit revision of the treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis.

Objectives:

The main objective of the clinical randomized study is to examine the effectiveness of the Super Short Pulse (SSP) modality of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation (LAI) on the removal of intracanal microorganisms and the healing of an inflammatory periapical lesion of a tooth after a one-visit revision.

Secondary objective:

  1. To examine the effect of the Super Short Pulse (SSP) modality of Er:YAG laser-triggered lavage applied during a single-visit revision, on the occurrence of postoperative pain, compared with sound-triggered lavage.
  2. To compare the antimicrobial efficacy of SSP ER:YAG LAI with the antimicrobial efficacy of sound-activated rinsing
  3. To compare the healing of the periapical lesion after the application of SSP ER:YAG LAI during a one-visit revision of the tooth with the healing of the lesions after the application of sound-activated irrigation

Matherials and methods:

A randomized clinical trial will be conducted at the Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dental Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb (Gundulićeva 5). All procedures in conducting the study were approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb (Approval Number: 05-PA-2-5/2025; Date: 17 February 2025) and are in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Participants Patients with signs and symptoms of chronic apical periodontitis requiring revision will be included in the study. The diagnosis will be determined based on the history, clinical examination, and X-ray analysis.

Inclusion criteria: teeth tender to percussion, palpation, teeth that have a sinus tract and swelling, a chronic periapical lesion greater than 5 mm in diameter based on the initial X-ray (which the patient brings at the first examination) and previous endodontic treatment and root canal filling that is inadequate according to clinical criteria (filling, overfilling, non-homogeneous root canal filling, unfilled root canals).

Exclusion criteria: immunocompromised patients, pregnant women, teeth with a periodontal pocket depth greater than 3 mm, teeth with signs and symptoms of vertical fracture, teeth that cannot be restored or prosthetically provided after endodontic treatment, use of antibiotic therapy within the last month, and diagnosis of acute apical abscess.

All respondents included in the study will sign an informed consent form for the use of personal data and will receive written information about the study. All respondents will be able to withdraw from the study at any time during the study.

Before the start of the endodontic treatment, each subject will be randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups. Randomization will be performed based on the WheelDecide program (www.wheeldecide.com). All phases of endodontic treatment of teeth will be performed by a doctoral student with more than five years of experience in endodontic treatment of teeth. All subjects will undergo a single-visit endodontic treatment of teeth. Subjects will be assigned to two experimental groups depending on the final root canal disinfection protocol. In both groups, the final irrigation protocol will include the following standard sequence of irrigant: 1) 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2) ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and 3) 3% NaOCl.

Group 1. SSP modality of Er:YAG laser activated irrigation In group 1, each irrigant in the final irrigation protocol will be activated by a radial laser attachment (diameter: 400 µm) of an Er:YAG laser (Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia). The laser settings will be: SSP mode, pulse energy 20 mJ, frequency 15 Hz, pulse duration 50 µs according to the factory settings of the Er:YAG laser for laser-activated disinfection and according to the endodontic space disinfection protocol (15).

Group 2. sound-activated irrigation (Smart Lite Pro EndoActivator, DentsplySirona) In group 2, each irrigant in the final irrigation protocol will be activated by the polymer tip of the sonic irrigation device. The tip will be placed 2 mm from the working length of the canal. The activation time will be 30 s for NaOCL, 60 s for EDTA and 30 s for NaOCl.

The endodontic procedure in all subjects will be performed according to modern endodontic treatment guidelines. The endodontic procedure will be performed under local (conduction or infiltration) anesthesia (articaine 4% with adrenaline in a ratio of 1:100,000) and rubber dam isolation. In all subjects, the treatment procedure will be performed with the ProTaperNext rotary system (DentsplySirona, Germany) with mechanical canal treatment instruments with motor settings: 300 rpm and 300 Ncmtorque. The initial working length will be determined with hand instruments: K-file #10 or #15 to the apical foramen (value 0 on the apex locator). During mechanical canal preparation, the canals will be irrigated with a total of 5 ml of 3% NaOCl per canal with 30G SteriTips side vented needles, which will be placed approximately 4 mm from the working length.

After the chemo-mechanical treatment of the canals, a final disinfection protocol will be carried out for each patient, depending on which group they belong to. In each group, the canals will be filled with a calcium silicate-based filler (BioRoot RCS, Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés Cedex, France) using a single gutta-percha stick technique. All teeth will be temporarily closed with glass ionomer cement (Equia Forte, GC, Tokyo, Japan). At the next visit, a permanent composite filling will be placed.

Microbiological sampling and analysis

Microbiological samples will be collected from the root canal:

Sample 1. After trepanation of the tooth Sample 2. After chemo-mechanical canal preparation Sample 3. After final irrigation protocol Strict aseptic conditions will be applied for sample collection during endodontic treatment. The paper swab with which the sample was collected will be placed in a cryochamber containing Tris-EDTA buffer (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, pH = 7.6) and immediately frozen at -20 degrees Celsius. Real-time PCR analysis will be performed.

Quantitative analysis of periapical lesion healing on CBCT images Before the start of endodontic treatment, an initial CBCT image of the target tooth will be made in all patients for the purpose of initial diagnosis, analysis of the anatomy of the endodontic space and assessment of the extent of the periapical lesion, based on which a decision will be made on the therapeutic procedure: endodontic treatment, revision or tooth extraction. The application of CBCT will be carried out according to the guidelines of the European Society of Endodontics. All CBCT images will be made on the same CBCT device with the same imaging parameters (endomod, voxel size 0.085 mm, 450.3 mGy/cm2, 6.3mA, 90kV, 8.7s). All radiation doses to the subjects will be "as low as reasonably achievable" (ALARA).

In order to assess the long-term prognosis of the tooth and decide on future prosthetic or surgical therapy, a control CBCT will be made 12 months later, according to the same parameters as in the first scan.

The healing analysis will be performed by two experienced endodontists with prior calibration. Each endodontist will place each scanned tooth in a specific category according to the following criteria.

  1. New periapical radiolucency
  2. Increased periapical radiolucency
  3. Unchanged periapical radiolucency
  4. Reduced periapical radiolucency according to which a decision will be made on further procedures: endodontic surgery, tooth monitoring, tooth extraction. Any disagreement in the decision will be resolved by discussion until an agreement is reached.

The healing analysis of the lesion will be performed by volumetric assessment using the ITK-SNAP software. Calculation and volumetric assessment in mm3 will be performed with ITK-SNAP with additional shaping, manual adjustment and transfer. In multi-rooted teeth, the defect will be displayed as the sum of individual periapical processes. At the 12-month check-up, all processes smaller than twice the thickness of the periodontal ligament will be counted as 0 mm3, or complete healing.

Postoperative pain assessment after a single-visit dental revision After the procedure, the subjects will receive a questionnaire on the occurrence, duration and intensity of postoperative pain, which they will fill out over a period of seven days.

Statistical procedures The Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Fisher-Freeman-Halton test will be used for statistical analysis. The significance level will be set at 5%. The tests for postoperative pain were the percussion test and the palpation test.

Being tested
Laser activated irrigation, Sound-activated irrigation
Keywords
apical periodontitis, laser-activated irrigation, single-visit revision
Medical subject headings
Periapical Periodontitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laser activated irrigationDevice

    In this group, the final irrigation protocol will be activated by an Er:YAG laser (Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia) in SSP mode.

  • Sound-activated irrigationDevice

    In this group, the final irrigation protocol will be activated by the polymer tip of the sonic irrigation device.

Study groups in NCT07387809
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SSP modality of Er:YAG laser activated irrigationExperimentalIn group 1, irrigant in the final irrigation protocol will be activated by a radial laser attachment (diameter: 400 µm) of an Er:YAG laser (Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia). The laser settings will be: SSP mode, pulse energy 20 mJ, frequency 15 Hz, pulse duration 50 µs according to the factory settings of the Er:YAG laser for laser-activated disinfection and according to the endodontic space disinfection protocol (23).
Receives: Device: Laser activated irrigation
Sound-activated irrigation (Smart Lite Pro EndoActivator, DentsplySirona)Active comparatorIn group 2, each irrigant in the final irrigation protocol will be activated by the polymer tip of the sonic irrigation device. The tip will be placed 2 mm from the working length of the canal. The activation time will be 30 s for NaOCL, 60 s for EDTA and 30 s for NaOCl.
Receives: Device: Sound-activated irrigation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative pain

    Following single-visit revision performed with different irrigation activation techniques, occurance, duration and intensity of postoperative pain will be assessed via a questionnaire. A score of 0 represented no pain, while a score of 10 represented the maximum pain, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.

    Measured: From day 1 after treatment to 7 days postoperatively

  2. Radiographic healing of periapical lesions

    The healing analysis of the lesion will be performed by volumetric assessment using the ITK-SNAP software. Calculation and volumetric assessment in mm3 will be performed with ITK-SNAP with additional shaping, manual adjustment and transfer. In multi-rooted teeth, the defect will be displayed as the sum of individual periapical processes. All processes smaller than twice the thickness of the periodontal ligament will be counted as 0 mm3, or complete healing.

    Measured: At the 12-month

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Microbiological efficiency

    Real-time PCR analysis will be performed to determine bacteria quantity. Samples from the root canal will be collected at the time of first appointment during single visit revision in 3 stages of procedure: 1. after trepanation; 2. after chemo-mechanical preparation and 3. after final irrigation protocol

    Measured: At the baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Feb 2026
  2. Study start15 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completionFeb 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07387809
Sponsor's protocol ID
05-PA-2-5/2025
Other IDs
School of Dental Medicine
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
1 Jan 2026
Last updated
4 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Davies A, Mannocci F, Mitchell P, Andiappan M, Patel S. The detection of periapical pathoses in root filled teeth using single and parallax periapical radiographs versus cone beam computed tomography - a clinical study. Int Endod J. 2015 Jun;48(6):582-92. doi: 10.1111/iej.12352. Epub 2014 Sep 13.

    PubMed 25074727
  • Sabeti M, Harouni A, Gabbay J. Comparing Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Laser-Activated Irrigation for Postoperative Pain Reduction in Endodontics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endod. 2026 Jan;52(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2025.08.002. Epub 2025 Aug 15.

    PubMed 40818665
  • Erkan E, Gundogar M, Uslu G, Ozyurek T. Postoperative pain after SWEEPS, PIPS, sonic and ultrasonic-assisted irrigation activation techniques: a randomized clinical trial. Odontology. 2022 Oct;110(4):786-794. doi: 10.1007/s10266-022-00700-0. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

    PubMed 35267110
  • Liapis D, De Bruyne MAA, De Moor RJG, Meire MA. Postoperative pain after ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation during root canal treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2021 Jul;54(7):1037-1050. doi: 10.1111/iej.13500. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

    PubMed 33595920
  • Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single- and multiple-visit endodontic treatment: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2008 Feb;41(2):91-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01316.x. Epub 2007 Oct 23.

    PubMed 17956561
  • Duncan HF, Kirkevang LL, Peters OA, El-Karim I, Krastl G, Del Fabbro M, Chong BS, Galler KM, Segura-Egea JJ, Kebschull M; ESE Workshop Participants and Methodological Consultant. Treatment of pulpal and apical disease: The European Society of Endodontology (ESE) S3-level clinicalpracticeguideline. Int Endod J. 2023 Oct;56 Suppl 3:238-295.

  • Davies A, Patel S, Foschi F, Andiappan M, Mitchell PJ, Mannocci F. The detection of periapical pathoses using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in endodontically retreated teeth - part 2: a 1 year post-treatment follow-up. Int Endod J. 2016 Jul;49(7):623-35. doi: 10.1111/iej.12500. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

    PubMed 26174351
  • Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Mannocci F. The detection of periapical pathosis using periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 1: pre-operative status. Int Endod J. 2012 Aug;45(8):702-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01989.x. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

    PubMed 22188219
  • Dogan MU, Aricioglu B, Kose TE, Cikman AS, Oksuzer MC. Association between the irrigation-agitation techniques and Periapical Healing of large periapical lesions: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 15;28(7):376. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05758-4.

    PubMed 38878107
  • Martins MR, Carvalho MF, Pina-Vaz I, Capelas JA, Martins MA, Gutknecht N. Outcome of Er,Cr:YSGG laser-assisted treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a blind randomized clinical trial. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014 Jan;32(1):3-9. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3573. Epub 2013 Dec 13.

    PubMed 24328607
  • Josic U, Mazzitelli C, Maravic T, Fidler A, Breschi L, Mazzoni A. Biofilm in Endodontics: In Vitro Cultivation Possibilities, Sonic-, Ultrasonic- and Laser-Assisted Removal Techniques and Evaluation of the Cleaning Efficacy. Polymers (Basel). 2022 Mar 25;14(7):1334. doi: 10.3390/polym14071334.

    PubMed 35406207
  • Do QL, Gaudin A. The Efficiency of the Er: YAG Laser and PhotonInduced Photoacoustic Streaming (PIPS) as an Activation Method in Endodontic Irrigation: A Literature Review. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Summer;11(3):316-334. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.53. Epub 2020 Jun 21.

    PubMed 32802294
  • Jordana J, Tandean JN, Salim JF, Jennifer, Febriastuti C, Sampoerno G. Shock wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS): An alternative to conventional irrigation in endodontic treatment. Conservative Dentistry Journal. 20122. 12:68-72.

  • Blanken J, De Moor RJ, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1: a visualization study. Lasers Surg Med. 2009 Sep;41(7):514-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20798.

    PubMed 19639622
  • Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, Pandher G, Divito E. Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming. J Endod. 2011 Jul;37(7):1008-12. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.016. Epub 2011 May 7.

    PubMed 21689561

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laser activated irrigation and Sound-activated irrigation in people with Apical Periodontitis, run by University of Zagreb at 1 site in Croatia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Croatia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative pain (time frame: From day 1 after treatment to 7 days postoperatively). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07387809, which also lists 20 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in