Nursing StudentsNCT07388329
The Effect of Post-Scenario Debriefing and Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice in Anaphylactic Shock Training on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Performance, Self-Confidence, and Satisfaction
A study testing rapid cycle deliberate practice and Post-scenario debriefing in people with Nursing Students and Nursing Education, run by Baskent University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study aims to examine the effect of rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) on nursing students' knowledge, performance, self-confidence, and satisfaction levels regarding anaphylactic shock management. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nursing Students, Nursing Education, Simulation Based Learning
- What is being tested?
- rapid cycle deliberate practice and Post-scenario debriefing
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2026to 15 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- To agree to participate in the study:
- Being a 3rd year nursing student
- Not working as a nurse in a hospital or any healthcare facility
Who cannot join
- • Refusing to participate in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study aims to examine the effect of rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) on nursing students' knowledge, performance, self-confidence, and satisfaction levels regarding anaphylactic shock management. Based on a randomized controlled study design, the study will compare third-year nursing students in terms of RCDP application with traditional analysis methods performed at the end of a scenario. Students, divided into intervention and control groups, will have their knowledge levels, simulation performance, self-confidence, and satisfaction assessed using various scales. The retention of learning and students' subjective learning experiences will also be included in the research. The outcome of this study will determine whether RCDP is an effective method for improving critical clinical decision-making and emergency management skills in nursing students.
- Being tested
- rapid cycle deliberate practice, Post-scenario debriefing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rapid cycle deliberate practiceBehavioural
Unlike traditional debriefing, feedback is provided by pausing the scenario within the simulation. Then the part of the script up to the pause point is repeated.
Post-scenario debriefingBehavioural
Debriefing is performed at the end of the simulation scenario.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | rapid cycle deliberate practice Receives: Behavioral: rapid cycle deliberate practice |
| Control group | Experimental | post-scenario debriefing Receives: Behavioral: Post-scenario debriefing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Nursing students' knowledge level regarding shock and anaphylactic shock: Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock
Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock The 'Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock,' developed by researchers in line with the literature (Ren et al., 2022; Arslan, 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Karadakovan \& Eti Aslan, 2017; Eti Aslan, 2017; Nair \& Peate, 2018), will be administered as follows: a 'Pre-Test' before the training to determine the students' current knowledge level regarding shock and anaphylactic shock; a 'Post-Test' immediately following the simulation application after the training; and a '1st Retention Test' 8 weeks later to measure the retention of learning. The Knowledge Test consists of 25 multiple-choice questions with 5 options each, focusing on knowledge levels regarding shock and anaphylactic shock. This form has been finalized with necessary adjustments based on expert opinions. The maximum score on this test is 100 points, and the minimum is 0 points. A higher score indicates a higher level of knowledge.
Measured: before the intervention, on the day of the intervention, and 8 weeks after the intervention.
Simulation Performance Checklist: Nursing Students' Performance Level Regarding Anaphylactic Shock
Simulation Performance Checklist The 'Simulation Performance Checklist for Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock', created by researchers in line with the literature (Casale et al., 2023; Ren et al., 2022; Arslan, 2021; Dreborg and Him, 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Eti Aslan, 2017; Karadakovan, 2017), will be used to determine students' performance levels. A 'Post-Test' will be administered immediately after the simulation application, and a '1st Retention Test' will be administered after 8 weeks to measure the retention of learning. The checklist consists of 10 items, and each item is scored as "0 = Could not/Did not apply/No", "1 = Did/Applied/Yes". A minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10 can be obtained from the checklist. This form has been finalized after necessary adjustments were made in line with expert opinions.
Measured: on the same day as the intervention and 8 weeks after the intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale: Self-confidence and satisfaction levels of nursing students
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale was developed by Jeffries and Rizzolo (2006), and the Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability study were conducted by Ünver et al. (2017). The scale consists of 12 items and has two sub-dimensions: student satisfaction (5 items) and self-confidence in learning (7 items). The scale is administered using a 5-point Likert scale (1=Strongly disagree - 5=Strongly agree). In the Turkish version, the Cronbach alpha coefficient was found to be between 0.77 and 0.85, showing that it is a valid and reliable measurement tool. A minimum score of 12 and a maximum score of 60 can be obtained from this scale. A score closer to 60 indicates positive results.
Measured: before the intervention and on the day of the intervention
Debriefing Experience Scale
In this study, the Debriefing Experience Scale, developed by Reed (2012) and adapted into Turkish by Uslu et al. (2022), will be used as a data collection tool. The scale consists of 20 items and four sub-dimensions, and is a 5-point Likert type scale. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the Turkish form of the scale were determined as 0.948 for "Evaluation Experience" and 0.951 for "Importance of Item"; the test-retest reliability was ICC=0.999 (p<0.001). It was stated that the Turkish version is valid and reliable. A minimum score of 20 and a maximum score of 100 can be obtained from this scale. A score closer to 100 indicates positive results.
Measured: The simulation applications will be conducted on the same day.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2026
- Study start15 Jan 2026
- Primary completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Nursing StudentsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baskent University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, BETUL SAHIN KILINC, Baskent University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07388329
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 171622998.600-294
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Post-Scenario Debriefing and Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice in Anaphylactic Shock Training on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Performance, Self-Confidence, and Satisfaction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07388329
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 171622998.600-294
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Baskent UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to examine the effect of rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) on nursing students' knowledge, performance, self-confidence, and satisfaction levels regarding anaphylactic shock management. Based on a randomized controlled study design, the study will compare third-year nursing students in terms of RCDP application with traditional analysis methods performed at the end of a scenario. Students, divided into intervention and control groups, will have their knowledge levels, simulation performance, self-confidence, and satisfaction assessed using various scales. The retention of learning and students' subjective learning experiences will also be included in the research. The outcome of this study will determine whether RCDP is an effective method for improving critical clinical decision-making and emergency management skills in nursing students.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Behavioral: rapid cycle deliberate practicerapid cycle deliberate practice |
| Control group | Experimental | Behavioral: Post-scenario debriefingpost-scenario debriefing |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- To agree to participate in the study:
- Being a 3rd year nursing student
- Not working as a nurse in a hospital or any healthcare facility
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- • Refusing to participate in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rapid cycle deliberate practiceUnlike traditional debriefing, feedback is provided by pausing the scenario within the simulation. Then the part of the script up to the pause point is repeated. | Behavioural | Intervention Group |
| Post-scenario debriefingDebriefing is performed at the end of the simulation scenario. | Behavioural | Control group |
Primary outcome
Nursing students' knowledge level regarding shock and anaphylactic shock: Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock
Time frame: before the intervention, on the day of the intervention, and 8 weeks after the intervention.
Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock The 'Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock,' developed by researchers in line with the literature (Ren et al., 2022; Arslan, 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Karadakovan \& Eti Aslan, 2017; Eti Aslan, 2017; Nair \& Peate, 2018), will be administered as follows: a 'Pre-Test' before the training to determine the students' current knowledge level regarding shock and anaphylactic shock; a 'Post-Test' immediately following the simulation application after the training; and a '1st Retention Test' 8 weeks later to measure the retention of learning. The Knowledge Test consists of 25 multiple-choice questions with 5 options each, focusing on knowledge levels regarding shock and anaphylactic shock. This form has been finalized with necessary adjustments based on expert opinions. The maximum score on this test is 100 points, and the minimum is 0 points. A higher score indicates a higher level of knowledge.
Simulation Performance Checklist: Nursing Students' Performance Level Regarding Anaphylactic Shock
Time frame: on the same day as the intervention and 8 weeks after the intervention
Simulation Performance Checklist The 'Simulation Performance Checklist for Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock', created by researchers in line with the literature (Casale et al., 2023; Ren et al., 2022; Arslan, 2021; Dreborg and Him, 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Eti Aslan, 2017; Karadakovan, 2017), will be used to determine students' performance levels. A 'Post-Test' will be administered immediately after the simulation application, and a '1st Retention Test' will be administered after 8 weeks to measure the retention of learning. The checklist consists of 10 items, and each item is scored as "0 = Could not/Did not apply/No", "1 = Did/Applied/Yes". A minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10 can be obtained from the checklist. This form has been finalized after necessary adjustments were made in line with expert opinions.
2 secondary outcomes
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale: Self-confidence and satisfaction levels of nursing students
Time frame: before the intervention and on the day of the intervention
Debriefing Experience Scale
Time frame: The simulation applications will be conducted on the same day.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2026.
Related trials for Nursing Students
Not yet recruiting
The Effectiveness of Comic-based Learning Materials on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence in Dementia Care
Dementia Care Education, Students, Nursing
Not yet recruitingObservational study
AI-Based Model for Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Risk Using Lifestyle Factors Among Senior Nursing Students
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
SELF-ASSESSMENT AND KNOWLEDGE LEVEL OF NURSING STUDENTS' PATIENT SAFETY COMPETENCY
Simulation Training, Nursing Education
Not yet recruiting
Compression-Only Versus Standard Basic Life Support Training in Nursing Students
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Happiness Workshops on Nursing Students' Levels of Psychological Resilience
Psychological Resilience, Nursing Students
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing rapid cycle deliberate practice and Post-scenario debriefing in people with Nursing Students and Nursing Education, run by Baskent University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Nursing students' knowledge level regarding shock and anaphylactic shock: Knowledge Test Regarding Nursing Management in Anaphylactic Shock (time frame: before the intervention, on the day of the intervention, and 8 weeks after the intervention.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2026.