Neck PainNCT07388706
Body Composition and Cervical Outcomes in Non-Specific Neck Pain
A study testing Clinical Assessment in people with Neck Pain, run by Izmir Democracy University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Non-specific neck pain (NSNP) is a common musculoskeletal condition that significantly affects quality of life, daily activities, and work productivity. Although various physical, postural, and psychosocial factors have been associated with NSNP, the role of body composition in pain and functional outcomes remains… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Neck Pain
- What is being tested?
- Clinical Assessment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 111 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 15 Mar 2026to 15 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- To be between 18-65 years old
- To be diagnosed with non-specific neck pain
- Not having had any surgery related to the cervical region
Who cannot join
- Having a neurological and psychiatric problem that may affect evaluation methods
- Pregnancy and pregnancy suspected
- To be an elite athlete
- Having a malignant disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Body Composition on Pain Threshold, Posture, Cervical Range of Motion, Sensation, and Cervical Function in Individuals With Non-Specific Neck Pain
Non-specific neck pain (NSNP) is a common musculoskeletal condition that significantly affects quality of life, daily activities, and work productivity. Although various physical, postural, and psychosocial factors have been associated with NSNP, the role of body composition in pain and functional outcomes remains unclear. Emerging evidence suggests that muscle and fat mass may influence musculoskeletal pain and related dysfunctions; however, studies examining these relationships in individuals with NSNP using objective measurements are limited. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of body composition on pain threshold, posture, cervical range of motion, sensation, and cervical function in individuals with non-specific neck pain. Individuals diagnosed with NSNP will be recruited from the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic. Participants' body composition, pain threshold, posture, cervical range of motion, sensory function, and cervical disability will be assessed using validated and objective measurement tools. Understanding the relationship between body composition and cervical outcomes in individuals with non-specific neck pain may contribute to early identification of risk factors and support the development of more targeted and effective physical therapy and rehabilitation strategies.
Read the detailed description
Non-specific neck pain (NSNP) is defined as pain located in the posterior and lateral regions of the neck between the superior nuchal line and the first thoracic vertebra, in the absence of neurological or specific pathologies such as fracture, infection, or inflammation. Neck pain is a common and widespread condition with an episodic course that affects a large proportion of the population. It has been reported that at least 80% of individuals experience neck pain and related disorders at some point during their lifetime. Moreover, 30-50% of the general adult population report experiencing neck pain at least once per year. In addition, approximately 25% of outpatient visits to Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation clinics are due to neck pain complaints. For the majority of patients, neck pain is a complex biopsychosocial disorder accompanied by both physical and psychological symptoms. A relationship between the severity of neck pain and disability has been reported, and neck pain has been associated with decreased health-related quality of life, reduced work productivity, limitations in daily activities, and increased utilization of healthcare services. Risk factors for NSNP include prolonged and/or improper computer use, non-ergonomic desk and chair use, physical activity level, poor posture, body mass index (BMI), female sex, longer working hours, fewer hours of sleep, and stress. Body composition refers to the different tissues that make up total body mass, generally expressed as muscle, fat, bone, and residual mass. Analyses of muscle and fat tissues have shown that muscle cells consist of approximately 70% water, 7% fat, and 22% protein. An excess of fat cells in the body exerts an inhibitory effect on muscles, limiting their ability to function effectively and consequently restricting movement. Additionally, in physical fitness assessments, body composition is often evaluated by examining fat mass and fat-free mass. The literature reports that the load applied to the cervical spine is approximately 10-12 lbs when the head is in a neutral position, increasing to 60 lbs when the head is flexed to 60 degrees. Prolonged maintenance of a forward head position results in irritation of the facet joints, ligaments, and soft tissues of the cervical region. This irritation may cause neck pain radiating to the shoulders and upper back. Furthermore, sustained forward head posture may lead to trigger point formation in muscles, joint motion restrictions, disc degeneration, and potential pathologies such as cervical degenerative disc disease, cervical osteoarthritis, or cervical disc herniation. Maintaining proper posture has been identified as an important factor in the management of neck pain.
Chronic neck pain is a multifactorial condition associated not only with various dysfunctions in the cervical region but also with related structures in other parts of the body. In individuals with chronic neck pain, decreased muscle strength and endurance, limitations in joint range of motion, altered muscle activation patterns, forward head posture, impaired proprioception, and psychological dysfunctions have been reported. In chronic neck pain, a reduction in joint position sense and imbalance in the axio-scapular muscles lead to a shift in the body's midline. An anterior shift of the midline results in abnormal postural patterns, primarily forward head posture. This condition contributes to the development of upper crossed syndrome, which encompasses a range of postural impairments including shoulder elevation and protraction, upper thoracic kyphosis (dowager's hump), scapular winging, and reduced thoracic mobility.
Individuals with neck pain may present with movement restrictions, pain, decreased cervical and thoracic segmental mobility, myotomal muscle weakness, postural abnormalities, numbness or paresthesia, reduced muscle flexibility, increased muscle tension accompanied by a predisposition to myofascial trigger point formation, decreased proprioception, reduced endurance of neck muscles, and impaired coordination. Cervical range of motion supports head and neck movement by contributing to head stabilization during activities of daily living and allowing head orientation in various directions. The literature has demonstrated a reduction in cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain, and this limitation has been reported to be associated with neck pain severity and cervical functional status.
Therefore, elucidating the pathology of such pain and its associated factors in terms of frequency and impact on daily life is of great importance, and several studies have been conducted to date to investigate these aspects. Nevertheless, many factors related to the pathology and associated parameters of this type of pain remain unclear. Recently, the relationship between body composition-including muscle and fat mass-and various health problems has been reported, and increasing evidence has emerged regarding the role of body composition in different health conditions. For example, increased fat mass combined with age-related muscle loss has been associated with a higher risk of disability and mortality. On the other hand, some researchers have reported associations between body composition and musculoskeletal pain, demonstrating that greater fat mass and reduced muscle mass as body composition factors are related to musculoskeletal pain. In light of this information, studies investigating the effects of body composition in individuals with non-specific neck pain appear to be limited, particularly with respect to the inclusion of objective measurements.
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Being tested
- Clinical Assessment
- Keywords
- Non-Specific Neck Pain, Body Composition, Cervical Range of Motion, Posture
- Medical subject headings
- Neck Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Clinical AssessmentOther
Participants will undergo clinical assessments including body composition, pain threshold, posture, cervical range of motion, sensory function, and cervical disability. No therapeutic intervention will be applied.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Non-Specific Neck Pain Group | Other | Participants diagnosed with non-specific neck pain Receives: Other: Clinical Assessment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total Body Weight
Total body weight (kg) will be measured using the Tanita BC-700 (Tanita, Japan) body composition analyzer, which uses single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) technology.
Measured: Baseline
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body mass index (BMI, kg/m²) will be calculated automatically by the Tanita BC-700 based on measured body weight and participant-reported height entered into the device prior to measurement.
Measured: Baseline
Total Body Fat Percentage
Total body fat percentage (%) will be assessed using the Tanita BC-700 body composition analyzer based on bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Measured: Baseline
Lower Extremity Fat Percentage
Lower extremity fat percentage (%) will be measured using the Tanita BC-700 body composition analyzer.
Measured: Baseline
Total Body Muscle Percentage
Total body muscle percentage (%) will be assessed using the Tanita BC-700 body composition analyzer.
Measured: Baseline
Lower Extremity Muscle Percentage
Lower extremity muscle percentage (%) will be measured using the Tanita BC-700 body composition analyzer.
Measured: Baseline
Assessment of Pain Threshold
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be evaluated to determine participants' pain sensitivity. A Wagner digital algometer (Wagner Instruments) will be used for PPT assessment. Participants will be seated on a height-adjustable chair with their feet flat on the floor and knees flexed at 90 degrees. The algometer will be applied to the measurement sites at a 90-degree perpendicular angle. Measurements will be taken bilaterally at the following locations: lateral aspect of the C5 spinous process, the midpoint of the upper trapezius, and the midpoint of the deltoid muscle. Each site will be measured three times, with at least a 30-second interval between repeated measurements to prevent sensitization. The value at which the participant first perceives pain will be recorded, and the average of the three measurements will be calculated for each site.
Measured: Baseline
Assessment of Posture
Posture will be evaluated using the New York Posture Rating Scale (NYPRS). This scale was first published in 1958 and assesses the body in 13 different regions for potential postural deviations. Each region is scored as follows: 5 points for correct posture, 3 points for moderate deviation, and 1 point for severe deviation. The total score ranges from 13 to 65 points, with higher scores indicating better overall posture.
Measured: Baseline
Assessment of Cervical Range of Motion
Cervical range of motion (CROM) will be assessed using the Pa Crom Basic - Cervical Range of Motion device. The CROM device is an inclinometer system that relies on gravity and magnetic fields. It consists of two fixed inclinometers for the sagittal and frontal planes, a horizontal-plane inclinometer with a magnetic needle attached to the top of the device, an arm with a ruler for linear measurements, a magnetic cervical collar, and a vertebra-locating arm with a level system. The device is worn like a pair of glasses, resting on the nose, above both ears, and on the forehead. Flexion and extension movements are measured using the inclinometer positioned at the left lateral side of the head, right and left lateral flexion are measured with the inclinometer at the midpoint of the forehead, and right and left rotation movements are measured with the inclinometer on top of the head combined with the magnetic stabilizer.
Measured: Baseline
Assessment of Sensation
Sensation will be assessed using the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test, which evaluates light touch and pressure perception. The therapist applies monofilaments of increasing force (0.086-448 g) from the smallest detectable filament. Testing is performed on the first to fifth fingers, distal to proximal, on anterior and posterior surfaces. The pressure at which the patient first perceives the stimulus is recorded. Responses are marked on a hand map and classified using a color-coded system.
Measured: Baseline
Assessment of Cervical Function
Cervical function will be evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). This questionnaire is used to assess pain originating from the neck and the degree of limitation in daily living activities. It was developed by Dr. Howard in 1980 and consists of a total of 10 items. These items cover areas such as pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleep, and recreation, with each item having six response options. Items are scored from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates no disability and 5 indicates complete disability. The total score can reach 50 points, which is then converted to a percentage. Higher scores indicate a higher level of disability.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2026
- Study start15 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion14 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Neck PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 111 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Izmir Democracy University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Betül Taşpınar, Izmir Democracy University
- Investigators
- Ayşe Sezgi KIZILIRMAK KARATAŞ, asst.prof., Principal investigator, Izmir Democracy UniversityOnur Engin, asst.prof., Principal investigator, Izmir Democracy UniversityÖykü Dündar, std., Principal investigator, Izmir Democracy UniversityBüşra Aydın, Std., Principal investigator, Izmir Democracy UniversityTurna Sümen, std., Principal investigator, Izmir Democracy UniversityNalan Anık, std., Principal investigator, Izmir Democracy UniversityKader İliman, std., Principal investigator, Izmir Democracy UniversityFadıma Kılıç, std., Principal investigator, Izmir Democracy University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07388706
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Non-Specific Neck Pain-35
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Body Composition on Pain Threshold, Posture, Cervical Range of Motion, Sensation, and Cervical Function in Individuals With Non-Specific Neck Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07388706
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Non-Specific Neck Pain-35
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Keywords
- Non-Specific Neck Pain, Body Composition, Cervical Range of Motion, Posture
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 111 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Izmir Democracy UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 14 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Non-specific neck pain (NSNP) is a common musculoskeletal condition that significantly affects quality of life, daily activities, and work productivity. Although various physical, postural, and psychosocial factors have been associated with NSNP, the role of body composition in pain and functional outcomes remains unclear. Emerging evidence suggests that muscle and fat mass may influence musculoskeletal pain and related dysfunctions; however, studies examining these relationships in individuals with NSNP using objective measurements are limited. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of body composition on pain threshold, posture, cervical range of motion, sensation, and cervical function in individuals with non-specific neck pain. Individuals diagnosed with NSNP will be recruited from the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic. Participants' body composition, pain threshold, posture, cervical range of motion, sensory function, and cervical disability will be assessed using validated and objective measurement tools. Understanding the relationship between body composition and cervical outcomes in individuals with non-specific neck pain may contribute to early identification of risk factors and support the development of more targeted and effective physical therapy and rehabilitation strategies.
Detailed description
Non-specific neck pain (NSNP) is defined as pain located in the posterior and lateral regions of the neck between the superior nuchal line and the first thoracic vertebra, in the absence of neurological or specific pathologies such as fracture, infection, or inflammation. Neck pain is a common and widespread condition with an episodic course that affects a large proportion of the population. It has been reported that at least 80% of individuals experience neck pain and related disorders at some point during their lifetime. Moreover, 30-50% of the general adult population report experiencing neck pain at least once per year. In addition, approximately 25% of outpatient visits to Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation clinics are due to neck pain complaints. For the majority of patients, neck pain is a complex biopsychosocial disorder accompanied by both physical and psychological symptoms. A relationship between the severity of neck pain and disability has been reported, and neck pain has been associated with decreased health-related quality of life, reduced work productivity, limitations in daily activities, and increased utilization of healthcare services. Risk factors for NSNP include prolonged and/or improper computer use, non-ergonomic desk and chair use, physical activity level, poor posture, body mass index (BMI), female sex, longer working hours, fewer hours of sleep, and stress. Body composition refers to the different tissues that make up total body mass, generally expressed as muscle, fat, bone, and residual mass. Analyses of muscle and fat tissues have shown that muscle cells consist of approximately 70% water, 7% fat, and 22% protein. An excess of fat cells in the body exerts an inhibitory effect on muscles, limiting their ability to function effectively and consequently restricting movement. Additionally, in physical fitness assessments, body composition is often evaluated by examining fat mass and fat-free mass. The literature reports that the load applied to the cervical spine is approximately 10-12 lbs when the head is in a neutral position, increasing to 60 lbs when the head is flexed to 60 degrees. Prolonged maintenance of a forward head position results in irritation of the facet joints, ligaments, and soft tissues of the cervical region. This irritation may cause neck pain radiating to the shoulders and upper back. Furthermore, sustained forward head posture may lead to trigger point formation in muscles, joint motion restrictions, disc degeneration, and potential pathologies such as cervical degenerative disc disease, cervical osteoarthritis, or cervical disc herniation. Maintaining proper posture has been identified as an important factor in the management of neck pain.
Chronic neck pain is a multifactorial condition associated not only with various dysfunctions in the cervical region but also with related structures in other parts of the body. In individuals with chronic neck pain, decreased muscle strength and endurance, limitations in joint range of motion, altered muscle activation patterns, forward head posture, impaired proprioception, and psychological dysfunctions have been reported. In chronic neck pain, a reduction in joint position sense and imbalance in the axio-scapular muscles lead to a shift in the body's midline. An anterior shift of the midline results in abnormal postural patterns, primarily forward head posture. This condition contributes to the development of upper crossed syndrome, which encompasses a range of postural impairments including shoulder elevation and protraction, upper thoracic kyphosis (dowager's hump), scapular winging, and reduced thoracic mobility.
Individuals with neck pain may present with movement restrictions, pain, decreased cervical and thoracic segmental mobility, myotomal muscle weakness, postural abnormalities, numbness or paresthesia, reduced muscle flexibility, increased muscle tension accompanied by a predisposition to myofascial trigger point formation, decreased proprioception, reduced endurance of neck muscles, and impaired coordination. Cervical range of motion supports head and neck movement by contributing to head stabilization during activities of daily living and allowing head orientation in various directions. The literature has demonstrated a reduction in cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain, and this limitation has been reported to be associated with neck pain severity and cervical functional status.
Therefore, elucidating the pathology of such pain and its associated factors in terms of frequency and impact on daily life is of great importance, and several studies have been conducted to date to investigate these aspects. Nevertheless, many factors related to the pathology and associated parameters of this type of pain remain unclear. Recently, the relationship between body composition-including muscle and fat mass-and various health problems has been reported, and increasing evidence has emerged regarding the role of body composition in different health conditions. For example, increased fat mass combined with age-related muscle loss has been associated with a higher risk of disability and mortality. On the other hand, some researchers have reported associations between body composition and musculoskeletal pain, demonstrating that greater fat mass and reduced muscle mass as body composition factors are related to musculoskeletal pain. In light of this information, studies investigating the effects of body composition in individuals with non-specific neck pain appear to be limited, particularly with respect to the inclusion of objective measurements.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Non-Specific Neck Pain Group | Other | Other: Clinical AssessmentParticipants diagnosed with non-specific neck pain |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- To be between 18-65 years old
- To be diagnosed with non-specific neck pain
- Not having had any surgery related to the cervical region
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Having a neurological and psychiatric problem that may affect evaluation methods
- Pregnancy and pregnancy suspected
- To be an elite athlete
- Having a malignant disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical AssessmentParticipants will undergo clinical assessments including body composition, pain threshold, posture, cervical range of motion, sensory function, and cervical disability. No therapeutic intervention will be applied. | Other | Non-Specific Neck Pain Group |
Primary outcome
Total Body Weight
Time frame: Baseline
Total body weight (kg) will be measured using the Tanita BC-700 (Tanita, Japan) body composition analyzer, which uses single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) technology.
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame: Baseline
Body mass index (BMI, kg/m²) will be calculated automatically by the Tanita BC-700 based on measured body weight and participant-reported height entered into the device prior to measurement.
Total Body Fat Percentage
Time frame: Baseline
Total body fat percentage (%) will be assessed using the Tanita BC-700 body composition analyzer based on bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Lower Extremity Fat Percentage
Time frame: Baseline
Lower extremity fat percentage (%) will be measured using the Tanita BC-700 body composition analyzer.
Total Body Muscle Percentage
Time frame: Baseline
Total body muscle percentage (%) will be assessed using the Tanita BC-700 body composition analyzer.
Lower Extremity Muscle Percentage
Time frame: Baseline
Lower extremity muscle percentage (%) will be measured using the Tanita BC-700 body composition analyzer.
Assessment of Pain Threshold
Time frame: Baseline
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be evaluated to determine participants' pain sensitivity. A Wagner digital algometer (Wagner Instruments) will be used for PPT assessment. Participants will be seated on a height-adjustable chair with their feet flat on the floor and knees flexed at 90 degrees. The algometer will be applied to the measurement sites at a 90-degree perpendicular angle. Measurements will be taken bilaterally at the following locations: lateral aspect of the C5 spinous process, the midpoint of the upper trapezius, and the midpoint of the deltoid muscle. Each site will be measured three times, with at least a 30-second interval between repeated measurements to prevent sensitization. The value at which the participant first perceives pain will be recorded, and the average of the three measurements will be calculated for each site.
Assessment of Posture
Time frame: Baseline
Posture will be evaluated using the New York Posture Rating Scale (NYPRS). This scale was first published in 1958 and assesses the body in 13 different regions for potential postural deviations. Each region is scored as follows: 5 points for correct posture, 3 points for moderate deviation, and 1 point for severe deviation. The total score ranges from 13 to 65 points, with higher scores indicating better overall posture.
Assessment of Cervical Range of Motion
Time frame: Baseline
Cervical range of motion (CROM) will be assessed using the Pa Crom Basic - Cervical Range of Motion device. The CROM device is an inclinometer system that relies on gravity and magnetic fields. It consists of two fixed inclinometers for the sagittal and frontal planes, a horizontal-plane inclinometer with a magnetic needle attached to the top of the device, an arm with a ruler for linear measurements, a magnetic cervical collar, and a vertebra-locating arm with a level system. The device is worn like a pair of glasses, resting on the nose, above both ears, and on the forehead. Flexion and extension movements are measured using the inclinometer positioned at the left lateral side of the head, right and left lateral flexion are measured with the inclinometer at the midpoint of the forehead, and right and left rotation movements are measured with the inclinometer on top of the head combined with the magnetic stabilizer.
Assessment of Sensation
Time frame: Baseline
Sensation will be assessed using the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test, which evaluates light touch and pressure perception. The therapist applies monofilaments of increasing force (0.086-448 g) from the smallest detectable filament. Testing is performed on the first to fifth fingers, distal to proximal, on anterior and posterior surfaces. The pressure at which the patient first perceives the stimulus is recorded. Responses are marked on a hand map and classified using a color-coded system.
Assessment of Cervical Function
Time frame: Baseline
Cervical function will be evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). This questionnaire is used to assess pain originating from the neck and the degree of limitation in daily living activities. It was developed by Dr. Howard in 1980 and consists of a total of 10 items. These items cover areas such as pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleep, and recreation, with each item having six response options. Items are scored from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates no disability and 5 indicates complete disability. The total score can reach 50 points, which is then converted to a percentage. Higher scores indicate a higher level of disability.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2026.
Related trials for Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Strain Counter Strain and Conventional Stretching in School-aged Children With Mechanical Neck Pain Due to Prolong Screen Use
Mechanical Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Alexander Technique Versus Feldenkrais Somatic Training in Patients With Text Neck Syndrome
Text Neck Syndrome
Recruiting
Longitudinal Stripping Massage vs. Percussion Device for Neck Pain: Ultrasound Study.
Chronic Neck Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ayşe Sezgi KIZILIRMAK KARATAŞ, asst.prof. principal investigator
Izmir Democracy University
Onur Engin, asst.prof. principal investigator
Izmir Democracy University
Öykü Dündar, std. principal investigator
Izmir Democracy University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Clinical Assessment in people with Neck Pain, run by Izmir Democracy University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Betül TAŞPINAR, Prof.Dr. (+905066804426, betul.taspinar@idu.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total Body Weight (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2026.