Pain ManagementNCT07389382
The Effectiveness of the Three-dimensional Biochemical Activity Model of Pain
A study testing 3D printed pain biochemical activity training model and PowerPoint Presentations in people with Pain Management and 3D Printing, run by Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Aim: In this study, it was aimed to develop a pain biochemical activity model taken from a three-dimensional printer and fixed by applying epoxy resin and to investigate the effect of this model on nursing students' understanding of the pain mechanism and their motivation to learn. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain Management, 3D Printing, Education Nursing
- What is being tested?
- 3D printed pain biochemical activity training model and PowerPoint Presentations
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 12 May 2024to 12 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Being over 18 years old
- Participating voluntarily in the research
- Not having received any previous training in pain
- Being a native Turkish speaker
Who cannot join
- Being under 18 years old
- Not participating voluntarily in the research
- Having received any previous training in pain
- Not being a native Turkish speaker
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
Zonguldak, Zonguldak Province, 67100
About this study
Official title: Effect of Three-Dimensional Educational Material Developed for Pain Mechanisms on Motivation and Knowledge Levels
Aim: In this study, it was aimed to develop a pain biochemical activity model taken from a three-dimensional printer and fixed by applying epoxy resin and to investigate the effect of this model on nursing students' understanding of the pain mechanism and their motivation to learn.
Methods: The universe of the study consisted of students enrolled in the Biochemistry course at the faculty of nursing of a university in the north of Türkiye during the spring semester of the 2023-2024 academic year. Students were divided into three strata based on their achievement average: high (75 and above), moderate (55-75), and low (54 and below). Forty-five students from each stratum were selected using computer-assisted randomization and assigned to the intervention and control groups. "Student Identification Form", "Pain Mechanism Information Form", "Instructional Material Motivation Scale" and The CONSORT checklist were used to collect data.
- Conditions
- Pain Management, 3D Printing, Education Nursing
- Being tested
- 3D printed pain biochemical activity training model, PowerPoint Presentations
- Keywords
- Pain Management, 3D Printing, Nursing Students, Education, Motivation to learn
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3D printed pain biochemical activity training modelDevice
Computer-generated drawings designed to explain the biochemical mechanism of pain were created using plastic filaments from a 3D printer. Students were divided into small groups of nine using the resulting figures, and the processes of pain mechanisms were explained. At the end of the session, the figures were fixed by applying epoxy resin. After the students poured the epoxy resin onto the models in liquid form, it solidified within six hours, securing the shape as a transparent layer.
PowerPoint PresentationsOther
Students in the control group received one hour of training on pain by the same researcher, using face-to-face instruction and PowerPoint presentations. To avoid interaction between the two laboratories, the control group received training first, followed immediately by the intervention group, who were then transferred to the other laboratory.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Students in the intervention group received one hour of training on pain by the same researcher, using a 3D-printed pain biochemical activity model. Receives: Device: 3D printed pain biochemical activity training model |
| control group | Other | Students in the control group received one hour of training on pain by the same researcher, using face-to-face instruction and PowerPoint presentations. To avoid interaction between the two laboratories, the control group received training first, followed immediately by the intervention group, who were then transferred to the other laboratory. Receives: Other: PowerPoint Presentations |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Student Identification Form
This form including students' age, gender, high school type, native language, whether they choose a career voluntarily, and whether they have received previous training on pain.
Measured: This form consisted of six questions and was administered to students one hour prior to the training.
Pain Mechanism Information Form
The Pain Mechanism Information Form was developed by the researchers based on literature. The developed questionnaire consists of 14 items, each prepared in a short-answer and fill-in-the-blank format. The scope of the Pain Mechanism Information Form includes: Pain physiology and classification, structure of nociceptors and pain transmission pathways, chemical mediators (Bradykinin, Prostaglandin, Serotonin, CGRP, Substance-P, Histamine), peripheral nerve ending release and mast cell activation, and vascular effects of inflammation (vasodilation, edema).
Five experts were consulted to ensure the validity of the Pain Mechanism Information Form. Each item was reviewed for its appropriateness and clarity for the intended learning outcomes and content, and necessary revisions were made based on the expert opinions. To ensure reliability, scoring was assessed for short-answer tests, and the questionnaires were scored separately by two raters. The inter-rater reliability coefficient (Cohen'
Measured: This form was applied to students 15 minutes before the training began and 5 minutes after the training ended.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Instructional Material Motivation Scale
This scale was developed by Tugtekin and Dursun (2022) to measure motivation related to the instructional materials used. It is a one-dimensional, 14-item, 5-point Likert-type self-report scale. High scores on the scale indicate high motivation. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient for the measurement tool in this study was determined to be 0.942. Item-total correlation values ranged from 0.629 to 0.820. Permission for use of the scale was obtained from the author via email.
Measured: This form was applied to students 30 minutes after the training ended.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2026
- Study start12 May 2024
- Primary completion12 Oct 2024
- Study completion12 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain ManagementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dilek Karaman, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07389382
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 428991-579/24
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 27 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ortiz MI, Cuevas-Suarez CE, Carino-Cortes R, Navarrete-Hernandez JJ, Gonzalez-Montiel CA. Nurses knowledge and attitude regarding pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Aug;63:103390. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103390. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
PubMed 35803183Erickson JM, Brashers V, Owen J, Marks JR, Thomas SM. Effectiveness of an interprofessional workshop on pain management for medical and nursing students. J Interprof Care. 2016 Jul;30(4):466-74. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1159185. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
PubMed 27268513Murphy-Smith MT, Samawi Z, Abbott P. Teaching Strategies for Nonpharmacological Pain Management to Nursing Students. Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 Oct;25(5):474-479. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 May 6.
PubMed 38714423Cousins M, Lane-Krebs K, Matthews J, Johnston-Devin C. Student nurses' pain knowledge and attitudes towards pain management over the last 20 years: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105169. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105169. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
PubMed 34653890Alshehri FA, Levett-Jones T, Pich J. Nursing students' knowledge of and attitudes towards pain management: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Aug;139:106207. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106207. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
PubMed 38669861Adillon C, Lozano E, Salvat I. Comparison of pain neurophysiology knowledge among health sciences students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 22;8:592. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1585-y.
PubMed 26493565
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Three-Dimensional Educational Material Developed for Pain Mechanisms on Motivation and Knowledge Levels
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07389382
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 428991-579/24
- Conditions
- Pain Management, 3D Printing, Education Nursing
- Keywords
- Pain Management, 3D Printing, Nursing Students, Education, Motivation to learn
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim: In this study, it was aimed to develop a pain biochemical activity model taken from a three-dimensional printer and fixed by applying epoxy resin and to investigate the effect of this model on nursing students' understanding of the pain mechanism and their motivation to learn.
Methods: The universe of the study consisted of students enrolled in the Biochemistry course at the faculty of nursing of a university in the north of Türkiye during the spring semester of the 2023-2024 academic year. Students were divided into three strata based on their achievement average: high (75 and above), moderate (55-75), and low (54 and below). Forty-five students from each stratum were selected using computer-assisted randomization and assigned to the intervention and control groups. "Student Identification Form", "Pain Mechanism Information Form", "Instructional Material Motivation Scale" and The CONSORT checklist were used to collect data.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Device: 3D printed pain biochemical activity training modelStudents in the intervention group received one hour of training on pain by the same researcher, using a 3D-printed pain biochemical activity model. |
| control group | Other | Other: PowerPoint PresentationsStudents in the control group received one hour of training on pain by the same researcher, using face-to-face instruction and PowerPoint presentations. To avoid interaction between the two laboratories, the control group received training first, followed immediately by the intervention group, who were then transferred to the other laboratory. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Being over 18 years old
- Participating voluntarily in the research
- Not having received any previous training in pain
- Being a native Turkish speaker
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Being under 18 years old
- Not participating voluntarily in the research
- Having received any previous training in pain
- Not being a native Turkish speaker
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3D printed pain biochemical activity training modelComputer-generated drawings designed to explain the biochemical mechanism of pain were created using plastic filaments from a 3D printer. Students were divided into small groups of nine using the resulting figures, and the processes of pain mechanisms were explained. At the end of the session, the figures were fixed by applying epoxy resin. After the students poured the epoxy resin onto the models in liquid form, it solidified within six hours, securing the shape as a transparent layer. | Device | Intervention group |
| PowerPoint PresentationsStudents in the control group received one hour of training on pain by the same researcher, using face-to-face instruction and PowerPoint presentations. To avoid interaction between the two laboratories, the control group received training first, followed immediately by the intervention group, who were then transferred to the other laboratory. | Other | control group |
Primary outcome
Student Identification Form
Time frame: This form consisted of six questions and was administered to students one hour prior to the training.
This form including students' age, gender, high school type, native language, whether they choose a career voluntarily, and whether they have received previous training on pain.
Pain Mechanism Information Form
Time frame: This form was applied to students 15 minutes before the training began and 5 minutes after the training ended.
The Pain Mechanism Information Form was developed by the researchers based on literature. The developed questionnaire consists of 14 items, each prepared in a short-answer and fill-in-the-blank format. The scope of the Pain Mechanism Information Form includes: Pain physiology and classification, structure of nociceptors and pain transmission pathways, chemical mediators (Bradykinin, Prostaglandin, Serotonin, CGRP, Substance-P, Histamine), peripheral nerve ending release and mast cell activation, and vascular effects of inflammation (vasodilation, edema). Five experts were consulted to ensure the validity of the Pain Mechanism Information Form. Each item was reviewed for its appropriateness and clarity for the intended learning outcomes and content, and necessary revisions were made based on the expert opinions. To ensure reliability, scoring was assessed for short-answer tests, and the questionnaires were scored separately by two raters. The inter-rater reliability coefficient (Cohen'
1 secondary outcome
Instructional Material Motivation Scale
Time frame: This form was applied to students 30 minutes after the training ended.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 35803183Ortiz MI, Cuevas-Suarez CE, Carino-Cortes R, Navarrete-Hernandez JJ, Gonzalez-Montiel CA. Nurses knowledge and attitude regarding pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Aug;63:103390. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103390. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 27268513Erickson JM, Brashers V, Owen J, Marks JR, Thomas SM. Effectiveness of an interprofessional workshop on pain management for medical and nursing students. J Interprof Care. 2016 Jul;30(4):466-74. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1159185. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 38714423Murphy-Smith MT, Samawi Z, Abbott P. Teaching Strategies for Nonpharmacological Pain Management to Nursing Students. Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 Oct;25(5):474-479. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 May 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 34653890Cousins M, Lane-Krebs K, Matthews J, Johnston-Devin C. Student nurses' pain knowledge and attitudes towards pain management over the last 20 years: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105169. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105169. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 38669861Alshehri FA, Levett-Jones T, Pich J. Nursing students' knowledge of and attitudes towards pain management: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Aug;139:106207. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106207. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 26493565Adillon C, Lozano E, Salvat I. Comparison of pain neurophysiology knowledge among health sciences students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 22;8:592. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1585-y.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain Management
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Laparoscopic-Assisted TAP Block in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Blockades Neuromuscular
Recruiting
Photobiomodulation for Management of Temporomandibular Disorder Pain
Pain Related to TMD
Recruiting
SIRI Levels Following PENG Block in Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Dysplasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 3D printed pain biochemical activity training model and PowerPoint Presentations in people with Pain Management and 3D Printing, run by Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Student Identification Form (time frame: This form consisted of six questions and was administered to students one hour prior to the training.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07389382, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2026.