AzTrials
AzTrials

Post-ERCP Acute PancreatitisLAMP-RNCT07391787

Low-acid Contrast Media for Preventing Post ERCP Pancreatitis

An observational study of Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis, run by Shandong University at 2 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Title: Low-acid contrast media for preventing post ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study (LAMP-R) . Objective: Main objective: This study aims to determine whether low-acid contrast media can reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
What is being tested?
Ioversol, Iopromide and Iohexol
How many people
3,979 participants
Where
2 sitesChina
Study dates
1 Aug 2025to 15 Jan 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: A total of approximately 3,881 eligible ERCP patients were included from five tertiary Grade A centers. All patients signed the informed consent form. Specifically, 2,305 patients were from Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 463 from Linyi People's Hospital, 121 from Qilu Third Hospital of Shandong University, 106 from Dezhou Hospital of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, and 886 from Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 18 to 90 years who underwent ERCP diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were included consecutively.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who did not use contrast media during ERCP
  • Failed ERCP papillary intubation
  • Patients with acute pancreatitis within 3 days before ERCP
  • ERCP stent removal/replacement
  • Patients who had a history of pancreaticoduodenectomy or biliary-enteric anastomosis
  • Patients whose postoperative amylase/lipase levels could not be traced.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

China2 sites
  • Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

    Jinan, Shandong, 250012

  • Qilu hospital, Shandong University

    Jinan, Shandong

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Low-acid Contrast Media for Preventing Post ERCP Pancreatitis: a Multicenter, Retrospective, Cohort Study

Title: Low-acid contrast media for preventing post ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study (LAMP-R) .

Objective:

Read more

Main objective: This study aims to determine whether low-acid contrast media can reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Secondary objective: To investigate the severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis, the incidence rate of other complications, and the risk factors associated with different pH values of contrast media.

Research Design:Multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

Research participants:

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 18 to 90 years who underwent ERCP diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were included consecutively.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who did not use contrast medium during ERCP, failed ERCP papillary intubation, developed acute pancreatitis within 3 days before surgery, ERCP stent removal/replacement, had a history of pancreaticoduodenectomy or biliary-enteric anastomosis, and whose postoperative amylase/lipase levels could not be traced were excluded.

Outcomes:

  1. The rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis and severity of PEP 2. The rate of infection 3. The rate of gastrointestinal bleeding 4. The rate of perforation.

Sample size calculation:

A total of approximately 3,881 eligible ERCP patients were included from five tertiary Grade A centers. Specifically, 2,305 patients were from Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 463 from Linyi People's Hospital, 121 from Qilu Third Hospital of Shandong University, 106 from Dezhou Hospital of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, and 886 from Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital.

Statistical analysis SPSS 27 is used for statistics and analysis, including descriptive analysis, single-factor and multi-factor logistic regression analysis, analysis of variance, t-test, propensity score matching (PSM), etc. Categorical data are presented as counts and proportions, while continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, depending on the distribution. Categorical data are analyzed using χ2 and Fisher's exact test, and continuous data are analyzed using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Primary and secondary outcomes are presented as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Read the detailed description

Introduction

  1. The Clinical Burden of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (PEP) Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a standard procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatobiliary diseases. However, it is associated with significant complications, among which post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most frequent, occurring in 3-10% of all procedures and in 15-20% of high-risk patients. Despite continuous improvements in techniques and preventive strategies, PEP remains a major concern as it prolongs hospitalization, increases healthcare costs, and in severe cases, leads to substantial morbidity and mortality.
  2. Contrast Media as a Potential Etiological Factor in PEP. The pathogenesis of PEP is multifactorial and not fully understood, involving mechanical, thermal, enzymatic, and chemical insults. A key procedural step in ERCP is the injection of contrast media into the pancreaticobiliary ducts. The resultant increase in hydrostatic pressure and the potential chemical irritation of the pancreatic ductal epithelium are hypothesized to trigger the inflammatory cascade leading to PEP. Emerging preclinical evidence suggests that the physicochemical properties of contrast media, particularly acidity (pH), may be a critical modifiable risk factor. Basic science studies indicate that low-pH contrast agents can exacerbate pancreatic injury through TRPV1-dependent pathways and by inducing abnormal calcium signaling, activating NF-κB and calcineurin pathways in acinar cells. For instance, injecting a contrast medium at pH 6.9 caused significant pancreatic edema and damage in animal models, while a solution at pH 7.3 caused minimal injury. These findings highlight a compelling biological plausibility for investigating contrast media characteristics in clinical PEP, yet high-quality clinical evidence is currently lacking.
  3. Rationale and Focus of the Present Study. Building on the mechanistic hypothesis that acidity matters, we conducted preliminary measurements of three commonly used iso-osmolar non-ionic monomeric contrast agents (Iohexol, Iopromide, Ioversol). Notably, after 1:1 dilution with sterile water (a common practice in ERCP), the pH values differ: Iopromide (7.13~7.32), Ioversol (6.54~6.86), and Iohexol (7.25~7.46). This presents a natural experiment to evaluate whether these variations in acidity (pH) influence PEP risk in a real-world clinical setting.

Research method:

A multi-center, retrospective, cohort study.

Date collection:

From the HIS system, the following patient data will be collected: Demographics and History: Gender, age, clinical symptoms, whether it is the first ERCP procedure, history of previous PEP, history of Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction (SOD). Laboratory Tests (pre- and post-ERCP): White blood cell count, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ALT, AST, GGT, ALP, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, amylase, lipase. Imaging Studies: CT, EUS, MRCP findings. Medication \& Procedural Details (from order sheets): Type of contrast media used during ERCP, perioperative use of rectal NSAIDs (e.g., indomethacin suppository), postoperative antibiotic use (yes/no and specific agents). Post-Operative Clinical Course (from medical and nursing records): Occurrence of new abdominal pain (with NRS score), fever (maximum temperature and duration), hematemesis or melena. For PEP patients: length of prolonged hospitalization, severity of PEP (graded based on extended hospital stay and imaging findings).

From the Endoscopic Quality Control System, the following procedural details will be collected: Papillary Anatomy \& Cannulation: Peri-diverticular papilla, difficult cannulation, guidewire entry into the pancreatic duct. Performance of pancreatography, visualization of side branches, pancreatobiliary ductal anomalies. Pre-cut sphincterotomy, papillary balloon dilation (standard or large-balloon), endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) with size classification (small, medium, large). Biliary Disease Specifics (if applicable): Common bile duct (CBD) diameter (<1.0 cm), presence of CBD stones, stone size (<1.0 cm), stone extraction method (balloon vs. basket), placement of a pancreatic duct stent. Final diagnosis, total procedure duration. Stricture Characterization (if applicable): Pathological classification of any stricture (benign, malignant, indeterminate).

Research protocol:

  1. This study retrospectively collected endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) diagnosis and treatment data from five tertiary hospitals. Including patient's information, ERCP procedurel details, and postoperative adverse events were documented in a standardized record form. Data from each participating center were first desensitized and corrected by local data quality control personnel before being consolidated at the main center. The ERCP quality control administrator of the research center then performed unified data desensitization and homogenization to ensure information security and reliable data quality.
  2. Based on the type of contrast agent used during ERCP, patients were categorized into three groups: the acidic contrast agent group (Ioversol), the neutral contrast agent group (Iopromide), and the alkaline contrast agent group (Iohexol). An overall assessment of the data was conducted, and univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify high-risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Both study-derived and well-established PEP risk factors were included as covariates. Using the neutral contrast agent group as the control, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to match ERCP data from the acidic and alkaline contrast agent groups with the neutral contrast agent group, resulting in two separate matched datasets: acid vs. neutral contrast agent and alkaline vs. neutral contrast agent. Balance testing was performed on both matched sets to ensure standardized differences were below 10%, confirming the appropriate the matching.
  3. Finally, two-sample chi-square tests were used to compare the incidence of PEP between the acidic and neutral contrast agent groups and between the alkaline and neutral contrast agent groups, investigating the influence of contrast agent acidity on PEP in a real-world setting.

Outcomes: Primary outcome: The rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis: According to the Cotton criteria and consensus opinions, postoperative pancreatitis is defined as new-onset upper abdominal pain after surgery, with amylase or lipase levels elevated to three times the upper limit of normal, and an extended hospital stay of at least 2 nights.

Secondary outcomes: The severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis and other post-ERCP complications. The severity of PEP is defined as follows: mild pancreatitis requires an extended hospital stay of 2 to 3 days, moderate pancreatitis requires an extended hospital stay of 4 to 10 days, and severe pancreatitis requires an extended hospital stay of more than 10 days. The rate of infection: Postoperative fever (Tmax > 38°C, >24 hours, and excluding infections in other sites, such as pulmonary infection, urinary tract infection, etc.); WBC > 10*10^9/L or < 3*10^9/L, with elevated infection indicators (elevated CRP, PCT); imaging findings suggestive of cholangitis, peribiliary effusion, etc. The rate of bleeding: Postoperative hematemesis or black stool; postoperative hemoglobin (HGB) decrease of more than 20g/L compared to preoperative levels, or requiring blood transfusion; postoperative changes in vital signs (such as increased heart rate, decreased blood pressure, pale complexion, etc.); postoperative emergency endoscopic exploration for hemostasis or imaging findings indicating bleeding in the biliary-pancreatic system, or requiring emergency DSA treatment. The rate of perforation: Postoperative abdominal pain emerges, imaging reveals gas accumulation around the biliary-pancreatic region, or ERCP suggests a potential perforation.

Definition:

Difficult intubation: The surgical record describes it as difficult intubation, with the guidewire repeatedly entering the pancreatic duct. Double guidewire-assisted intubation or pre-cut sphincterotomy-assisted intubation was performed.

Branch pancreatic duct visualization: Defined as the clear visualization of the branch pancreatic duct in ERCP images, or the surgical record describing the presence of visible branch pancreatic duct.

Anatomic abnormalities of the pancreaticobiliary duct: including pancreas divisum, abnormal pancreaticobiliary junction, annular pancreas, and congenital choledochal cyst.

Trans-papillary precut: including trans-pancreaticobiliary sphincter precut, trans-papillary needle knife precut, and fenestration.

EPLBD: A lagre balloon with a diameter of ≥12mm is used to dilate the Oddi's sphincter.

Nipple incision size: Small incision is defined as an incision smaller than 1/3 of the distance from the nipple opening to the lateral edge of the mouth. Medium incision is defined as an incision larger than 1/3 but smaller than 1/2 of this distance. Large incision is defined as an incision larger than 2/3 of this distance.

Operation duration: Defined as the time from the start of nipple cannulation to the end of the operation, representing the time difference between the nipple imaging time and the X-ray time for stent or biliary drainage tube placement in the system workstation.

ERCP failure: defined as failure of papillary cannulation, with no contrast medium injected into the biliary-pancreatic duct.

Quality Control:

To ensure data consistency and quality, data collection is supervised by the principal investigator at each center. All data are then sent to the main center for centralized statistical verification and analysis.

Research plan: August, 2025 - June, 2026.

Being tested
Ioversol, Iopromide, Iohexol
Keywords
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Post ERCP pancreatitis, Contrast media, pH values

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IoversolDrug

    Ioversol was used for intervention in the ERCP procedure, while iopromide was used for controlled. ERCP was performed using endoscopes from different suppliers, and the guidewire assisted method were used for the papillary intubation.

  • IopromideDrug

    Iopromide was used for ERCP procedure as controlled group. ERCP was performed using endoscopes from different suppliers, and the guidewire assisted method were used for the papillary intubation.

  • IohexolDrug

    Iohexol was used for intervention in the ERCP procedure, while iopromide was used for controlled. ERCP was performed using endoscopes from different suppliers, and the guidewire assisted method were used for the papillary intubation.

Study groups in NCT07391787
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IoversolAcidic contrast media, ioversol is used for radiography during ERCP procedure.
Receives: Drug: Ioversol
IopromideNeutral contrast media, iopromide is used for contrast during ERCP procedure.
Receives: Drug: Iopromide
IohexolAlkaline contrast media, iohexol is used for contrast during ERCP procedure.
Receives: Drug: Iohexol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The rate of Post-ERCP pancreatitis

    According to the Cotton criteria and consensus opinions, post-ERCP pancreatitis is defined as new-onset upper abdominal pain after surgery, with amylase or lipase levels elevated to three times the upper limit of normal, and an extended hospital stay of at least 2 nights.

    Measured: Assessed up to 3 days after ERCP procedure.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. The severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis

    The severity of PEP is defined as follows: mild pancreatitis requires an extended hospital stay of 2 to 3 days, moderate pancreatitis requires an extended hospital stay of 4 to 10 days, and severe pancreatitis requires an extended hospital stay of more than 10 days.

    Measured: Assessed up to 10 days after ERCP procedure.

  2. The rate of infection

    Postoperative fever (Tmax > 38°C, >24 hours, and excluding infections in other sites, such as pulmonary infection, urinary tract infection, etc.); WBC > 10*10^9/L or < 3*10^9/L, with elevated infection indicators (elevated CRP, PCT); imaging findings suggestive of cholangitis, peribiliary effusion, etc.

    Measured: Assessed up to 3 days after ERCP procedure.

  3. The rate of gastrointestinal bleeding

    Gastrointestinal bleeding: Postoperative hematemesis or black stool; postoperative hemoglobin (HGB) decrease of more than 20g/L compared to preoperative levels, or requiring blood transfusion; postoperative changes in vital signs (such as increased heart rate, decreased blood pressure, pale complexion, etc.); postoperative emergency endoscopic exploration for hemostasis or imaging findings indicating bleeding in the biliary-pancreatic system, or requiring emergency DSA treatment.

    Measured: Assessed up to 3 days after ERCP procedure.

  4. Perforation

    Perforation: Postoperative abdominal pain emerges, imaging reveals gas accumulation around the biliary-pancreatic region, or ERCP suggests a potential perforation.

    Measured: Assessed up to 3 days after ERCP procedure.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Feb 2026
  2. Study start1 Aug 2025
  3. Primary completion25 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
3,979 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07391787
Sponsor's protocol ID
KYLL-2025-12-013
Acronym
LAMP-R
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
18 Jan 2026
Last updated
6 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis, run by Shandong University at 2 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The rate of Post-ERCP pancreatitis (time frame: Assessed up to 3 days after ERCP procedure.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in