Physical ActivityNCT07393698
Intervention to Improve 24-Hour Movement Behaviors in University Students
A study testing Personalized Online Behavioral Intervention in people with Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour, run by South China Normal University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This study examined whether a personalized, WeChat-based behavioural intervention could help improve how university students allocate their time across daily movement behaviours, including physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, Sleep
- What is being tested?
- Personalized Online Behavioral Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 15 Sep 2023to 30 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 25 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- aged 18-25 years;
- no severe physical or psychological conditions, no contraindications to exercise, and no major surgery in the past six months;
- willingness to wear an accelerometer and participate in the online intervention;
- failure to meet at least one recommendation of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults (18-64 years) for PA, sedentary behaviour, or sleep -
Who cannot join
- Presence of severe physical or psychological conditions that could limit safe participation in physical activity.
- Medical contraindications to exercise or a history of major surgery within the past six months.
- Inability or unwillingness to wear an accelerometer or to engage in the online intervention.
- Meeting all recommendations of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults (18-64 years) at baseline.
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
School of Physical Education and Sports Science
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of a Personalized Online Intervention for Optimizing Time Allocation Across 24-hour Movement Behaviours in College Students: a Randomized Controlled Trial
This study examined whether a personalized, WeChat-based behavioural intervention could help improve how university students allocate their time across daily movement behaviours, including physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep.
University students were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. Participants in the intervention group received individualized guidance, feedback, and behaviour-change support delivered through WeChat. The intervention was designed to help participants develop more balanced daily movement behaviour patterns within a 24-hour day. Participants in the control group continued their usual routines without receiving intervention materials.
Read more
The primary outcome of the study was the time-use composition of 24-hour movement behaviours, reflecting how daily time was distributed across physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Psychological factors related to behaviour regulation, such as motivation, planning, and habit, were also assessed.
The results of this study aim to inform the development of theory-informed, personalized digital interventions that support healthier daily movement behaviour patterns among university students.
Read the detailed description
This randomized controlled behavioural study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a personalized, online intervention based on the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework in optimizing the time-use composition of 24-hour movement behaviours among university students.
Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group received a personalized behavioural program delivered via WeChat. The program was designed to support more optimal allocation of daily time across physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep by targeting key behavioural processes, including reflective, regulatory, and reflexive mechanisms. Intervention content included individualized feedback and behaviour-change support tailored to each participant's movement behaviour profile. The control group did not receive intervention materials and continued their usual daily routines.
The primary outcome was the time-use composition of 24-hour movement behaviours, defined as the relative distribution of time allocated to physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep within a finite 24-hour period. Secondary outcomes comprised psychological constructs related to behaviour regulation, derived from the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework. These constructs included affective attitude, instrumental attitude, perceived capability, perceived opportunity, intention, planning, self-monitoring, identity, and habit, and were assessed using validated Chinese-language self-report questionnaires with established psychometric properties. In the present study, healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours was operationally defined in accordance with the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults, which recommend regular engagement in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, participation in light-intensity physical activity across the day, limited recreational screen time, adequate sleep duration, and regular muscle-strengthening activities.
The study involved a non-clinical population and did not include biomedical or medical health outcomes. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to participation.
- Conditions
- Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, Sleep
- Being tested
- Personalized Online Behavioral Intervention
- Keywords
- time allocation, 24-hour movement behaviour
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Personalized Online Behavioral InterventionBehavioural
The intervention consisted of a personalized, online behavioural program delivered via WeChat, in order to support more optimal allocation of daily time across physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep within a finite 24-hour day. Intervention content was individualized based on each participant's baseline 24-hour movement behaviour profile. Personalized feedback and guidance were based on the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework. participants in the intervention group were invited to attend weekly 30-minute offline group jogging sessions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 24-hour Movement Behaviour Intervention | Experimental | Personalized one-on-one guidance was delivered via WeChat twice weekly, with each session lasting approximately 15 minutes. Guidance content was individualized based on participants' baseline 24-hour movement behaviour profiles, with the explicit aim of promoting more optimal time-use patterns across daily behaviours. In addition, participants were invited to attend weekly, 30-minute offline group jogging sessions, during which heart rate was maintained within individually prescribed target ranges. Participants were encouraged to achieve behaviour goals. Receives: Behavioral: Personalized Online Behavioral Intervention |
| Usual Practice Control | No intervention | Participants allocated to the control group received no intervention during the study period and were asked to maintain their usual lifestyle and daily routines. They did not receive personalized guidance, structured PA sessions, behavioural monitoring, or incentives |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviour
Time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours was objectively assessed using a waist-worn ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer worn continuously for seven consecutive days.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Affective attitude toward healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire)
Affective attitude toward healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours was assessed using three bipolar adjective pairs (unpleasant-pleasant, boring-interesting, and unenjoyable-enjoyable) adapted from established Theory of Planned Behaviour questionnaires (https://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf). Participants responded to a common stem ("In the next week, compliance with healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours is …"), followed by three items. Responses were recorded on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). A mean score was calculated across the three items, with higher scores indicating a more positive affective attitude.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Instrumental attitude toward Healthy 24-Hour Movement Behaviour Time Allocation (Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire)
Instrumental attitude was assessed using three bipolar adjective pairs (harmful-beneficial, worthless-valuable, and bad-good) adapted from established Theory of Planned Behaviour measures (https://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
). Participants responded to a common stem ("In the next week, compliance with healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours is …"), followed by three items (e.g., "In the next week, compliance with healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours is harmful-beneficial"). Responses were recorded on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). A mean score was calculated across the three items, with higher scores indicating a more positive instrumental attitude.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Perceived capability toward healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire)
Perceived capability was assessed using three items adapted from established Theory of Planned Behaviour measures (https://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
). Participants responded to a common stem ("In the next week, compliance with healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours is …"), followed by items assessing perceived ease and capability (e.g., "It is easy for me to comply with healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours in the next week"). Responses were recorded on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). A mean score was calculated across the three items, with higher scores indicating greater perceived capability.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
intention toward healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire)
Intention was assessed using three items adapted from established Theory of Planned Behaviour measures (https://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
). Participants responded to a common stem ("In the next week, compliance with healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours is …"), followed by items assessing behavioural intention (e.g., "I intend to comply with healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours in the next week"). Responses were recorded on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). A mean score was calculated across the three items, with higher scores indicating stronger intention.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Perceived opportunity toward healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Multi-Process Action Control Questionnaire)
Perceived opportunity was assessed using three items adapted from the questionnaire based on the Multi-Process Action Control framework applied to individual physical activity. Items assessed participants' perceived opportunity to comply with healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours over the subsequent week (e.g., "If I really wanted to comply with healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours over the next week, I would have the opportunity to do so"). Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). A mean score was calculated across the three items, with higher scores indicating greater perceived opportunity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Planning towards healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Health Action Process Approach Questionnaire)
Planning was assessed using six items adapted from questionnaires based on the Health Action Process Approach. Items assessed participants' use of planning strategies related to compliance with healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours over the previous week (e.g., "I made regular plans concerning how to comply with healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours in the last week"). Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). A mean score was calculated across the six items, with higher scores indicating greater use of planning strategies.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Self-monitoring toward healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Multi-Process Action Control Questionnaire)
Self-monitoring was assessed using three items adapted from questionnaires based on the Health Action Process Approach. Items assessed participants' engagement in monitoring their time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours over the previous week (e.g., "I kept track of my time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours in a diary or log over the last week"). Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). A mean score was calculated across the three items, with higher scores indicating greater use of self-monitoring strategies.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Identity towards healthy 24-Hour movement behaviour time allocation (Exercise Identity Scale)
Identity was assessed using four items adapted from the Exercise Identity Scale. Items assessed the extent to which engagement in healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours was integrated into participants' self-concept (e.g., "When I describe myself to others, I usually include my involvement in healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours"). Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). A mean score was calculated across the four items, with higher scores indicating stronger identity integration.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Habit towards healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Self-Report Habit Index)
Habit strength was assessed using twelve items adapted from the Self-Report Habit Index. Participants responded to a common stem ("In the last month, compliance with healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours was …"), followed by items assessing behavioural automaticity and repetition (e.g., "… something I do frequently"). Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). A mean score was calculated across the twelve items, with higher scores indicating stronger habit strength.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Feb 2026
- Study start15 Sep 2023
- Primary completion30 Apr 2024
- Study completion30 Apr 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Physical ActivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Intervention group: Personalized one-on-one guidance was delivered via WeChat twice weekly, with each session lasting approximately 15 minutes. Guidance content was individualized based on participants' baseline 24-hour movement behaviour profiles, with the explicit aim of promoting more optimal time-use patterns across daily behaviours. In addition, participants were invited to attend weekly, 30-minute offline group jogging sessions, during which heart rate was maintained within individually prescribed target ranges. The participants were encouraged to achieve behavior goals. Participants allocated to the control group received no intervention during the study period and were asked to maintain their usual lifestyle and daily routines.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- South China Normal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ru ZHANG, South China Normal University
- Investigators
- Ru ZHANG, Principal investigator, South China Normal University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07393698
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SCNU-SPT-2023-175
- Other IDs
- 22YJC890050
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of a Personalized Online Intervention for Optimizing Time Allocation Across 24-hour Movement Behaviours in College Students: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07393698
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCNU-SPT-2023-175
- Conditions
- Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, Sleep
- Keywords
- time allocation, 24-hour movement behaviour
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- South China Normal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study examined whether a personalized, WeChat-based behavioural intervention could help improve how university students allocate their time across daily movement behaviours, including physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep.
University students were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. Participants in the intervention group received individualized guidance, feedback, and behaviour-change support delivered through WeChat. The intervention was designed to help participants develop more balanced daily movement behaviour patterns within a 24-hour day. Participants in the control group continued their usual routines without receiving intervention materials.
The primary outcome of the study was the time-use composition of 24-hour movement behaviours, reflecting how daily time was distributed across physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Psychological factors related to behaviour regulation, such as motivation, planning, and habit, were also assessed.
The results of this study aim to inform the development of theory-informed, personalized digital interventions that support healthier daily movement behaviour patterns among university students.
Detailed description
This randomized controlled behavioural study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a personalized, online intervention based on the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework in optimizing the time-use composition of 24-hour movement behaviours among university students.
Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group received a personalized behavioural program delivered via WeChat. The program was designed to support more optimal allocation of daily time across physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep by targeting key behavioural processes, including reflective, regulatory, and reflexive mechanisms. Intervention content included individualized feedback and behaviour-change support tailored to each participant's movement behaviour profile. The control group did not receive intervention materials and continued their usual daily routines.
The primary outcome was the time-use composition of 24-hour movement behaviours, defined as the relative distribution of time allocated to physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep within a finite 24-hour period. Secondary outcomes comprised psychological constructs related to behaviour regulation, derived from the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework. These constructs included affective attitude, instrumental attitude, perceived capability, perceived opportunity, intention, planning, self-monitoring, identity, and habit, and were assessed using validated Chinese-language self-report questionnaires with established psychometric properties. In the present study, healthy time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours was operationally defined in accordance with the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults, which recommend regular engagement in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, participation in light-intensity physical activity across the day, limited recreational screen time, adequate sleep duration, and regular muscle-strengthening activities.
The study involved a non-clinical population and did not include biomedical or medical health outcomes. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to participation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Intervention group: Personalized one-on-one guidance was delivered via WeChat twice weekly, with each session lasting approximately 15 minutes. Guidance content was individualized based on participants' baseline 24-hour movement behaviour profiles, with the explicit aim of promoting more optimal time-use patterns across daily behaviours. In addition, participants were invited to attend weekly, 30-minute offline group jogging sessions, during which heart rate was maintained within individually prescribed target ranges. The participants were encouraged to achieve behavior goals. Participants allocated to the control group received no intervention during the study period and were asked to maintain their usual lifestyle and daily routines.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 24-hour Movement Behaviour Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Personalized Online Behavioral InterventionPersonalized one-on-one guidance was delivered via WeChat twice weekly, with each session lasting approximately 15 minutes. Guidance content was individualized based on participants' baseline 24-hour movement behaviour profiles, with the explicit aim of promoting more optimal time-use patterns across daily behaviours. In addition, participants were invited to attend weekly, 30-minute offline group jogging sessions, during which heart rate was maintained within individually prescribed target ranges. Participants were encouraged to achieve behaviour goals. |
| Usual Practice Control | No intervention | –Participants allocated to the control group received no intervention during the study period and were asked to maintain their usual lifestyle and daily routines. They did not receive personalized guidance, structured PA sessions, behavioural monitoring, or incentives |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- aged 18-25 years;
- no severe physical or psychological conditions, no contraindications to exercise, and no major surgery in the past six months;
- willingness to wear an accelerometer and participate in the online intervention;
- failure to meet at least one recommendation of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults (18-64 years) for PA, sedentary behaviour, or sleep -
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Presence of severe physical or psychological conditions that could limit safe participation in physical activity.
- Medical contraindications to exercise or a history of major surgery within the past six months.
- Inability or unwillingness to wear an accelerometer or to engage in the online intervention.
- Meeting all recommendations of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults (18-64 years) at baseline.
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Personalized Online Behavioral InterventionThe intervention consisted of a personalized, online behavioural program delivered via WeChat, in order to support more optimal allocation of daily time across physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep within a finite 24-hour day. Intervention content was individualized based on each participant's baseline 24-hour movement behaviour profile. Personalized feedback and guidance were based on the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework. participants in the intervention group were invited to attend weekly 30-minute offline group jogging sessions. | Behavioural | 24-hour Movement Behaviour Intervention |
Primary outcome
Time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviour
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviours was objectively assessed using a waist-worn ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer worn continuously for seven consecutive days.
9 secondary outcomes
Affective attitude toward healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Instrumental attitude toward Healthy 24-Hour Movement Behaviour Time Allocation (Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Perceived capability toward healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
intention toward healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Perceived opportunity toward healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Multi-Process Action Control Questionnaire)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Planning towards healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Health Action Process Approach Questionnaire)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Self-monitoring toward healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Multi-Process Action Control Questionnaire)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Identity towards healthy 24-Hour movement behaviour time allocation (Exercise Identity Scale)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Habit towards healthy 24-hour movement behaviour time allocation (Self-Report Habit Index)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Physical Activity
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ru ZHANG principal investigator
South China Normal University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Personalized Online Behavioral Intervention in people with Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour, run by South China Normal University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time allocation of 24-hour movement behaviour (time frame: Baseline, Week 8 (post-intervention), and Week 16 (follow-up)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2026.