Evaluation of Zinc Oxide Eugenol and Iodoform-Calcium Hydroxide as Filling Materials in Primary Molar Root Canals Prepared by Rotary and Manual Files

Preservation of primary teeth is essential for maintaining proper mastication, speech development, and arch integrity, as well as for preventing psychological and functional complications arising from premature tooth loss. Pulpectomy remains the treatment of choice for irreversibly infected or necrotic primary teeth, yet the complex root canal morphology, resorptive nature of primary roots, and behavioral management challenges make such procedures technically demanding.

An ideal root canal filling material for primary teeth should be antibacterial, biocompatible, radiopaque, and resorbable at a rate consistent with natural root resorption. It must also be easily manipulated, removable if necessary, and capable of hermetic sealing. Among the commonly used materials, Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) has long been considered the standard due to its antimicrobial and sealing properties; however, its slow resorption and potential for periapical irritation are significant drawbacks. Conversely, Metapex, a premixed iodoform-calcium hydroxide paste, exhibits superior biocompatibility, antibacterial effects, and resorption rates that align more closely with physiological root resorption, making it a promising alternative.

Similarly, biomechanical preparation of root canals can be performed manually or using nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary systems. Manual instrumentation provides tactile feedback and precision but is time-consuming and operator-dependent. Rotary systems, on the other hand, offer improved efficiency, shaping consistency, and reduced chair time-important factors in managing pediatric patients-though they require training and careful use to prevent over-preparation.

This study will enroll 44 primary molars from cooperative, systemically healthy children aged 5-8 years who are indicated for pulpectomy. The teeth will be randomly allocated into four groups:

Rotary instrumentation with Metapex,

Rotary instrumentation with ZOE,

Manual instrumentation with Metapex, and

Manual instrumentation with ZOE.

Clinical evaluation will include assessment of pain using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, mobility using Miller's Mobility Index, and sensitivity using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Radiographic evaluation will be performed using CBCT at baseline, 6, and 12 months to assess root resorption and bone density changes. The primary outcome is radiographic success, defined by physiological resorption and bone healing, while secondary outcomes include clinical success indicators such as absence of pain, swelling, or abnormal mobility.

Data will be statistically analyzed using SPSS (v24). Quantitative variables will be tested for normality and compared using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests, while qualitative data will be analyzed using Chi-square tests.

The findings are expected to clarify whether Metapex or ZOE, when used with rotary or manual preparation techniques, provides superior clinical and radiographic outcomes. Ultimately, the results may guide clinicians toward more effective, biocompatible, and time-efficient pulpectomy protocols in pediatric endodontics, contributing to improved long-term oral health outcomes in children.