The New Possibility of Treating Overactive Bladder With Radiofrequency

A prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted from June 2023 to May 2025. The study enrolled 95 women (N=48 in the study group; N=47 in the placebo group) who presented with confirmed symptoms of OAB and UUI prior to enrollment. Symptom severity and quality of life were assessed using validat-ed questionnaires from the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires (ICIQ), specifically ICIQ-OAB, ICIQ-OABqol, and ICIQ-FLUTSsex. A higher score on these questionnaires indicated a worse quality of life, while a lower score indicated im-provement. Symptomatology was monitored at 3, 6, and 12 months post-RF applica-tion, at which points women completed all three validated questionnaires again. Prior to study commencement, all subjects provided informed consent. Before the initial RF treatment, urine analysis and urine culture were performed on all patients to rule out urinary infections. The study protocol was approved by the National Ethical Committee of the Republic of Slovenia (No.0120-184/2023-2711-15). The study was also submitted to Clinical Trials.gov (NCT 06080217), although it was not completed as RF is not yet an approved device for treating OAB.

2.1. Inclusion Criteria Women with clear signs of OAB who were not currently using pharmacological treatment (antimuscarinics/beta-3 agonists) were included. Patients who had previously used OAB medications but had discontinued them (due to side effects or ineffective-ness) at least 3 months prior to enrollment were also eligible for this study.

2.2. Exclusion Criteria Exclusion criteria included an inserted heart pacemaker, unexplained vaginal bleeding, inflammation of the vagina and/or uterus or uterine appendages, bacterial or viral infections (including urinary tract infections), impaired immune system, sclero-dermia, previous radiation treatment, or burns in the treatment area. Women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) were also ex-cluded from this study. Patients were positioned in the lithotomy position with extended lower extremities. Probes were placed on the lower abdomen, in the bladder area (active probe), and on the lumbar spine (passive probe). A capacitive probe, operating in the "free treat-ment"/"power control" program, delivered high-frequency electricity to the bladder for 20 minutes at a frequency of 1.0 MHz. The energy output was limited to achieve a maximum temperature of 41 °C. Initially, a maximum energy of 75% and a frequency of 0.8 MHz were applied. These parameters were adjusted downward based on patient comfort regarding the amount of heat experienced. Subsequently, the power was re-duced to 50%, and the frequency was increased to 1.0 MHz, which resulted in moderate energy absorption. This energy level was maintained throughout the procedure, with patients absorbing an average of 18-19 kJ of energy.

The placebo (sham) group was also connected to the RF device, with an active probe placed on the bladder area and a passive probe on the lumbar area. The device was activated for 20 minutes but did not emit electricity. Patients in the placebo group were blinded to the fact that their energy had not been delivered. Following the study's conclusion, participants in the placebo group were informed of their random as-signment and were offered the active RF procedure.The primary endpoint was to confirm the statistically significant reduction in OAB and/or UUI symptoms observed in a prior pilot study. The secondary endpoint aimed to determine the optimal frequency for RF reapplication to achieve good Quality of Life (QoL) and maintain minimal symptomatologyPower analysis Based on literature data and our pilot study, we assume that the success rate for RF will be 60% and for placebo 25%. Considering these figures, we assume that we will need 30 patients for each group, but we must take into account the dropout during the study group, as well as in placebo gorup, so we included more patients per group in the study, so a total of 95 patients were included for randomization.

2.4.1. Statistics methods To assess the general characteristics of both groups, either the Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was employed, depending on data distribution.Statistical analy-sis was performed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for the cor-relation of repeated measurements within subjects. A linear GEE model incorporating an identity link function and a Gaussian distribution was fitted. The primary predictors included time, group (study vs. control), and their interaction (time × group), with ad-ditional adjustment for the baseline covariate BMI. The interaction term was specifically included to evaluate whether the effect of time varied between the groups. Separate es-timates of the time effect within each group were derived by combining main and in-teraction effects, and their statistical significance was determined using z-tests.