AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)CT 4 ARDSNCT07400445

Accuracy of the Chest Radiograph for the Diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

An observational study of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), run by Poitiers University Hospital at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The presence of bilateral lung infiltrates on chest imaging is a mandatory criterion for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This retrospective single-center observational study assessed the agreement between chest radiograph interpreted by intensivists and chest computed tomography… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
277 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Jan 2015to 31 Jan 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit of the University Hospital of Poitiers

Who may be able to join

  • Adults admitted to intensive care unit
  • Invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Chest CT performed during ICU stay
  • PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mmHg with positive end-expiratory pressure ≥ 5 cmH2O the day of the CT-scan
  • Chest radiograph performed within ± 24h of CT-scan

Who cannot join

  • Cardiogenic pulmonary edema as the cause of hypoxemia
  • Missing imaging data

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, University Hospital of Poitiers

    Poitiers

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Interobserver Agreement Between Chest Radiograph and Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The presence of bilateral lung infiltrates on chest imaging is a mandatory criterion for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This retrospective single-center observational study assessed the agreement between chest radiograph interpreted by intensivists and chest computed tomography interpreted by radiologists for the diagnosis of ARDS in mechanically ventilated patients with hypoxemia. Chest CT was considered the reference standard. The study evaluated interobserver agreement and diagnostic performance of chest radiography in the overall population and in predefined subgroups.

Read the detailed description

Retrospective, single-center observational study conducted in the medical ICU of University Hospital of Poitiers, France, from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2021. Included were intubated patients with PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mmHg, PEEP ≥5 cmH2O, suspected ARDS except for imaging criterion, who underwent both chest CT and chest radiograph on the same day. Chest CT was interpreted by radiologists and used as reference for ARDS diagnosis. Chest radiographs were interpreted by intensivists. Agreement and diagnostic performance were assessed.

Keywords
acute respiratory distress syndrome, diagnostic imaging, computed tomography, chest radiograph, sensitivity, specificity
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Hypersensitivity

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cohen's kappa coefficient for agreement between chest radiograph interpreted by intensivists and chest CT interpreted by radiologists for ARDS diagnosis.

    0 indicates no agreement and 1 indicates perfect agreement

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Cohen's kappa coefficient for agreement between chest radiograph interpreted by intensivists and chest CT interpreted by radiologists for ARDS diagnosis in the subgroup of patients with moderate-to-severe hypoxemia

    0 indicates no agreement and 1 indicates perfect agreement

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Cohen's kappa coefficient for agreement between chest radiograph interpreted by intensivists and chest CT interpreted by radiologists for ARDS diagnosis in the subgroup of immunocompromised patients

    0 indicates no agreement and 1 indicates perfect agreement

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Cohen's kappa coefficient for agreement between chest radiograph interpreted by intensivists and chest CT interpreted by radiologists for ARDS diagnosis in the subgroup of obese patients

    0 indicates no agreement and 1 indicates perfect agreement

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Cohen's kappa coefficient for agreement between chest radiograph interpreted by intensivists and chest CT interpreted by radiologists for ARDS diagnosis in the subgroup of patients with 4 quadrants involved on chest radiograph

    0 indicates no agreement and 1 indicates perfect agreement

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2015
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2022
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
277 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07400445
Sponsor's protocol ID
29084890
Acronym
CT 4 ARDS
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
30 Jan 2026
Last updated
10 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data will be available on reasonable written request to the principal investigator, one year after publication of the main manuscript.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), run by Poitiers University Hospital at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cohen's kappa coefficient for agreement between chest radiograph interpreted by intensivists and chest CT interpreted by radiologists for ARDS diagnosis. (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in