AzTrials
AzTrials

OphthalmologyNCT07401459

A Multimodal AI Agent for Ophthalmic Clinical Decision Support

A study testing EyeAgent AI system in people with Ophthalmology and Large Language Models, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of EyeAgent, a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) agent designed to assist ophthalmologists in clinical decision-making. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Ophthalmology, Large Language Models, AI Agent
What is being tested?
EyeAgent AI system
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Mar 2026to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Outpatient participants aged 6 to 75 years.
  • Participants who undergo ophthalmic examinations for medical purposes during the study period.
  • Participants who can produce clear ophthalmic images in both eyes.
  • Agree to participate in this study with written informed consent:
  • Participants aged 18 years or older provide their own consent.
  • Participants aged 6-17 years require consent from a parent or legal guardian.

Who cannot join

  • Participants who are reluctant to participate in this study.
  • Participants presenting with acute or emergency ocular conditions requiring immediate intervention.
  • Participants with poor quality of ophthalmic images, including blurriness, artifacts, underexposure, or overexposure.
  • Other unsuitable reasons determined by the evaluators.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Danli Shi, Dr contact

danli.shi@polyu.edu.hk

China1 site
  • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    Hong Kong

    Xiaolan Chen, 085295822773, xiaolan-xl.chen@connect.polyu.hk

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multimodal AI Agent for Ophthalmology Clinical Decision Support

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of EyeAgent, a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) agent designed to assist ophthalmologists in clinical decision-making. Participants will be recruited from ophthalmology clinics and hospitals in Hong Kong and mainland China. The AI agent acts as a digital co-pilot, analyzing patient images and clinical history to provide diagnostic and management recommendations. The trial aims to determine whether the use of the AI agent improves diagnostic accuracy, treatment decision-making performance, report generation, workflow efficiency, and user satisfaction compared to standard clinical practice.

Read the detailed description

This multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the integration of EyeAgent, a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) agent, in real-world clinical settings. The AI system is designed to support clinicians by analyzing patient data, including ocular images and electronic health records, to aid in image interpretation, diagnosis, and treatment planning.

A total of 300 participants will be randomly assigned to either an AI-assisted care arm or a standard care arm. In the AI-assisted arm, clinicians review the comprehensive report generated by AI agent as a supportive tool before finalizing their independent decisions. The study comprehensively measures diagnostic accuracy, the rate of inappropriate treatment decisions, report generation, workflow efficiency, and user questionnaire.

By comparing these two groups, the trial aims to provide robust evidence on the effectiveness and practical utility of AI-driven clinical decision support in ophthalmology, with the goal of enhancing both the quality and efficiency of patient care.

Being tested
EyeAgent AI system
Keywords
medical AI agent, large language model, ophthalmology, tool integration, clinical decision support, real world study
Medical subject headings
Eye Diseases, Retinal Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EyeAgent AI systemDevice

    EyeAgent is a multimodal AI agent assistant for ophthalmology that integrates imaging, electronic health records, and curated clinical knowledge. In this arm, EyeAgent supports clinicians in clinical consultation, including report generation, diagnostic interpretation, and treatment planning.

Study groups in NCT07401459
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AI-assisted care armExperimentalClinicians perform report generation, diagnosis, and treatment planning with support from the EyeAgent system.
Receives: Device: EyeAgent AI system
Standard care armNo interventionClinicians provide routine ophthalmic care without support from the EyeAgent system.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy rate

    Proportion of diagnoses consistent with a reference expert panel.

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention.

  2. Rate of inappropriate treatment decisions

    The frequency of treatment recommendations (e.g., injection, laser therapy, or observation) that deviate from clinical guidelines as determined by the senior expert panel gold standard. Expert adjudication is conducted post-hoc after the enrollment phase concludes.

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Report quality

    Quality of clinical reports assessed using a structured Expert Report Quality Rubric evaluating five domains: accuracy, completeness, safety, reasoning, and interpretability. Each domain is scored on a 3-point scale (1 = poor, 2 = acceptable, 3 = good). Total scores range from 5 to 15. Higher scores indicate better report quality.

    Measured: Within 1 month after enrollment.

  2. Clinician confidence

    Self-rated confidence in diagnosis and treatment planning measured using a single-item 5-point Likert scale (1 = not confident at all; 5 = extremely confident).

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention.

  3. Workflow efficiency

    Time elapsed from image acquisition to final diagnosis and report completion.

    Measured: During the index diagnostic session.

  4. Satisfaction and usability

    Usability of the AI agent assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a validated 10-item questionnaire scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Each item is scored from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Total SUS scores are calculated according to standard scoring procedures and range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived usability.

    Measured: At the end of each clinician's participation period, approximately 2 months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2026
  2. Study start1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07401459
Sponsor's protocol ID
PolyU-IRB-2025-001
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
17 Nov 2025
Last updated
23 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EyeAgent AI system in people with Ophthalmology and Large Language Models, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Xiaolan Chen (+85295822773, yuewy.wu@connect.polyu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic accuracy rate (time frame: Immediately after the intervention.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in