Impact of Curve Magnitude on Pain and Body Image in Patients With Adolescents Idiopathic Scoliosis

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is considered a risk factor for back and low back pain. Epidemiological studies have shown that, compared with healthy controls, individuals with AIS experience back and/or low back pain more frequently, with greater severity and longer duration, with reported prevalence rates ranging from 23% to 85%. However, the presence, clinical relevance, and determinants of pain in AIS remain controversial. In a systematic review including 15 studies, although 81% of patients with AIS reported severe pain, only 5% of these cases were considered clinically significant. In a prospective study using the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Revised (SRS-22R) questionnaire, no difference in preoperative coronal curve magnitude was observed between patients with and without pain. Another retrospective study reported that patients with thoracic curves experienced more pain compared with those with lumbar curves. Retrospective studies have demonstrated that the lifetime prevalence of back pain is approximately 47% in individuals with AIS and 40% in healthy individuals. However, these studies were limited by unclear definitions of back pain and inconsistent documentation in medical records. In a retrospective study with a 50-year follow-up, individuals with AIS were reported to develop back and/or low back pain regardless of curve magnitude or localization, experiencing more chronic pain and more severe and longer-lasting acute pain than controls. In that study, pain history was not associated with curve severity, and functional capacity in daily and occupational activities was comparable to that of healthy individuals. In another retrospective study, no clear explanatory relationship between spinal deformity and pain was identified, which was attributed to limitations in retrospective pain assessment. Pain intensity and its relationship with activity or rest were not evaluated. Additionally, due to limited assessment of sagittal spinopelvic parameters, the potential effects of sagittal alignment variables, such as sagittal vertical axis or pelvic incidence, were not analyzed. Evidence regarding curve-specific radiological parameters and their relationship with subjective pain scores in AIS remains insufficient. In a study involving surgically indicated AIS patients, lumbar curve magnitude was associated with pain; however, no significant differences were observed when curve type or sagittal characteristics were compared. Although back and low back pain are common in AIS, some studies suggest that pain does not necessarily lead to disability or functional impairment and that curve magnitude may not influence pain severity. Conversely, other reports indicate that increasing curve magnitude may be associated with greater pain, cosmetic deformity, and subjective respiratory discomfort. Overall, the literature lacks consistency regarding pain characteristics, including intensity, duration, localization, relationship with activity, and aggravating or relieving factors. Prospective studies addressing these factors remain limited, and no clear consensus exists regarding the direct effect of curve magnitude or location on pain in AIS. To better understand the burden of pain in AIS and to facilitate effective pain management, systematic assessment of back and low back pain is required, taking into account the multifactorial nature of pain and potential contributing factors. Therefore, a cross-sectional observational study was designed to evaluate the effects of spinal curve severity on pain and body image perception in patients aged 10-18 years diagnosed with AIS. Participants will be recruited from individuals aged 10-18 years diagnosed with AIS who present to the Scoliosis Outpatient Clinic of the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department at Antalya Training and Research Hospital. Individuals with additional comorbidities will be excluded. Participation will be voluntary. Participants will be categorized into three groups based on radiographic Cobb angle measurements: Group I (mild, <20°), Group II (moderate, 21-35°), and Group III (moderate-to-severe, 36-40°). Evaluations will include medical history, physical examination, radiological measurements, structured questionnaires, the pain domain of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22), and the Turkish version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (TR-SAQ). Pain severity will be assessed using the SRS-22 pain domain and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Body image perception will be evaluated using the TR-SAQ. Radiological assessment will be performed subsequently. Standing posteroanterior and lateral spine radiographs will be obtained using a detector measuring 350 × 430 mm, with a source-to-image distance of 2 meters. Images will be acquired with participants standing upright, knees extended, feet shoulder-width apart, and head facing forward. Cobb angles will be measured on standing posteroanterior radiographs, and vertebral rotation will be assessed using the Nash-Moe method. Radiographic measurements will be performed independently by two assessors blinded to clinical data. If the difference between measurements is ≤5°, the mean value will be used; if the difference exceeds 5°, a consensus measurement will be determined. Participants presenting with pain and suspected pathology other than AIS on physical examination will undergo further imaging and laboratory evaluation, and those with additional pathology will be excluded. The study hypotheses are as follows: Pain prevalence increases with increasing curve severity. Pain intensity increases with increasing curve severity. Pain is more frequent in lumbar curves. Vertebral rotation is associated with pain severity. Body image perception worsens with increasing curve severity. A moderate correlation exists between patient-reported and evaluator-assessed body image perception. Sample size was calculated using G*Power version 3.1.9.4 with an effect size of 0.6, statistical power of 90%, two degrees of freedom, and a significance level of 0.05, yielding a required sample size of 66 participants. Allowing for a potential 10% data loss, the final sample size was set at 72 participants. Statistical analyses will be conducted using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics will be presented as frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, maximum, and interquartile range. Normality will be assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and homogeneity of variance using the Levene test. Group comparisons will be performed using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests with appropriate post hoc analyses. Categorical variables will be analyzed using Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Correlations will be evaluated using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients. A p value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.