HealthyNCT07406061
Ultrasound Imaging of the Head, Neck, and Airway
An observational study of Healthy, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Purpose and Objectives: The main purpose is to test an ultrasound device that can assess the upper airway to create dynamic 4D imaging, which current technology cannot do. Ultrasound waves travel well within soft tissue but are unable to penetrate cartilage, bone, and air-filled structures, obscuring findings which… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Ultrasonography
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Aug 2026to 31 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Normal volunteers ages 18 or higher
Who may be able to join
- Capable of lying stationary in a supine position for the duration of the stud
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Duke Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, 27707
Aubrie Coburn, MS, 919-681-2723, Aubrie.coburn@duke.edu
Melissa Lefevre, BA, 919-668-3601, melissa.lefevre@duke.edu
About this study
Official title: Multi-Dimensional, Real-time Ultrasound Imaging of the Head, Neck, and Airway
Purpose and Objectives: The main purpose is to test an ultrasound device that can assess the upper airway to create dynamic 4D imaging, which current technology cannot do. Ultrasound waves travel well within soft tissue but are unable to penetrate cartilage, bone, and air-filled structures, obscuring findings which are covered by these structures and limiting the ability of the ultrasound to adequately image posterior to the soft tissue upper airway, trachea, or behind the mandible.
Read the detailed description
Ultrasound has been used clinically for over 50 years and it is now the most common imaging method for cardiac and abdominal imaging in the world. Ultrasound system development using phased array techniques began at Duke almost 45 years ago with Duke system, referred to as T1: the T standing for Thaumascan, an early name for the Duke system. Virtually all current ultrasound scanners in the world today use the same basic phased array technology pioneered at Duke using the T1 (and its progeny) device(s). This family of ultrasound systems has been developed in the Department of Biomedical Engineering in collaboration with the Division of Cardiology.
T5 is a high-speed, real-time, 32:1 parallel processed, 2D and 3D ultrasound imaging scanner connected to a 4000 element matrix array, of which 1280 elements are actively used (up to 512 independent transmitters and 1024 independent receivers). The system is capable of acquiring high-speed B- and C-mode grey scale images, real-time orthogonal and parallel images and real-time 2D and 3D ultrasound images. The system is unique in that its components are highly configurable to allow for a variety of different parameter settings to derive the best image quality possible. Uniquely, T5 can image synchronously with multiple transducers at spatially different locations.
This protocol is intended to provide for system modification and initial testing of new ultrasound methods. Changes in the system will be determined mainly by the subjective results of initial or periodic scanning. The first step in this process requires establishing whether head, neck, and airway images are even possible in certain scanning configurations. Included in this is learning how to scan with the device. The second step will determine various subjective image quality comparisons (one system configuration against another). Image quality is determined by assessing system capability for target acquisition, gray scale, and resolution in the resulting images. The third step can be undertaken when adequate images are available. Here, subjective comparisons of results from T5 will be made against those from other conventional imaging methods otherwise obtained in the regular course of a subject's care (as they are available).
This project is investigator funded. It is hoped that the results of this study will be instrumental in the initiation of the applications for funding from governmental or other agencies.
There is broad agreement that ultrasound involves only minimal subject risk. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging from the body surface has been cited by the FDA as an example of a non-significant risk study in the "Investigational Device Exemptions Manual" June, 1996, HHS Publication FDA 96-4159. The transducer in the Duke system uses conventional levels of ultrasound energy, and is at, or below, the ultrasound energy in use today in commercial systems and approved by the Food and Drug Administration (720 mW/cm ; M. 2 I. = 1.9). Thus, there is no added patient risk in the use of this device when compared to conventional ultrasound scanning. Whatever the scanning configurations, the power output of the machine does not increase.
This protocol provides for the acquisition of images of the upper airway to initially establish, then progressively improve, Duke T5 ultrasound system performance in a stepwise fashion. Understanding the purpose and execution of this protocol requires the understanding of the stepwise and iterative processes of:
Step 1: development of scanning procedures Step 2: image improvement Step 3: exploration of image comparisons in small groups of patient
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Ultrasonography
- Keywords
- Ultrasound, Upper airway, ultrasonography
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
UltrasonographyDiagnostic test
Simple ultrasonography imaging
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy participants | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Ultrasonography |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Tracheal diameter (mm)
Ultrasound will be used to scan the exterior of the neck and submandibular region to assess airway dimensions in mm
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2026
- Study start19 Aug 2026
- Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Duke UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07406061
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00116760
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Initially the data will be reviewed and analyzed before considering sharing.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multi-Dimensional, Real-time Ultrasound Imaging of the Head, Neck, and Airway
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07406061
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00116760
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Keywords
- Ultrasound, Upper airway, ultrasonography
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Purpose and Objectives: The main purpose is to test an ultrasound device that can assess the upper airway to create dynamic 4D imaging, which current technology cannot do. Ultrasound waves travel well within soft tissue but are unable to penetrate cartilage, bone, and air-filled structures, obscuring findings which are covered by these structures and limiting the ability of the ultrasound to adequately image posterior to the soft tissue upper airway, trachea, or behind the mandible.
Detailed description
Ultrasound has been used clinically for over 50 years and it is now the most common imaging method for cardiac and abdominal imaging in the world. Ultrasound system development using phased array techniques began at Duke almost 45 years ago with Duke system, referred to as T1: the T standing for Thaumascan, an early name for the Duke system. Virtually all current ultrasound scanners in the world today use the same basic phased array technology pioneered at Duke using the T1 (and its progeny) device(s). This family of ultrasound systems has been developed in the Department of Biomedical Engineering in collaboration with the Division of Cardiology.
T5 is a high-speed, real-time, 32:1 parallel processed, 2D and 3D ultrasound imaging scanner connected to a 4000 element matrix array, of which 1280 elements are actively used (up to 512 independent transmitters and 1024 independent receivers). The system is capable of acquiring high-speed B- and C-mode grey scale images, real-time orthogonal and parallel images and real-time 2D and 3D ultrasound images. The system is unique in that its components are highly configurable to allow for a variety of different parameter settings to derive the best image quality possible. Uniquely, T5 can image synchronously with multiple transducers at spatially different locations.
This protocol is intended to provide for system modification and initial testing of new ultrasound methods. Changes in the system will be determined mainly by the subjective results of initial or periodic scanning. The first step in this process requires establishing whether head, neck, and airway images are even possible in certain scanning configurations. Included in this is learning how to scan with the device. The second step will determine various subjective image quality comparisons (one system configuration against another). Image quality is determined by assessing system capability for target acquisition, gray scale, and resolution in the resulting images. The third step can be undertaken when adequate images are available. Here, subjective comparisons of results from T5 will be made against those from other conventional imaging methods otherwise obtained in the regular course of a subject's care (as they are available).
This project is investigator funded. It is hoped that the results of this study will be instrumental in the initiation of the applications for funding from governmental or other agencies.
There is broad agreement that ultrasound involves only minimal subject risk. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging from the body surface has been cited by the FDA as an example of a non-significant risk study in the "Investigational Device Exemptions Manual" June, 1996, HHS Publication FDA 96-4159. The transducer in the Duke system uses conventional levels of ultrasound energy, and is at, or below, the ultrasound energy in use today in commercial systems and approved by the Food and Drug Administration (720 mW/cm ; M. 2 I. = 1.9). Thus, there is no added patient risk in the use of this device when compared to conventional ultrasound scanning. Whatever the scanning configurations, the power output of the machine does not increase.
This protocol provides for the acquisition of images of the upper airway to initially establish, then progressively improve, Duke T5 ultrasound system performance in a stepwise fashion. Understanding the purpose and execution of this protocol requires the understanding of the stepwise and iterative processes of:
Step 1: development of scanning procedures Step 2: image improvement Step 3: exploration of image comparisons in small groups of patient
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy participants | – | Diagnostic Test: Ultrasonography |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Normal volunteers ages 18 or higher
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Capable of lying stationary in a supine position for the duration of the stud
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| UltrasonographySimple ultrasonography imaging | Diagnostic test | Healthy participants |
Primary outcome
Tracheal diameter (mm)
Time frame: Day 1
Ultrasound will be used to scan the exterior of the neck and submandibular region to assess airway dimensions in mm
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Initially the data will be reviewed and analyzed before considering sharing.
Related trials for Healthy
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Not yet recruiting
Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)
Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Healthy, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Richard E Moon, MD (919-684-6726, richard.moon@duke.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Tracheal diameter (mm) (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2026.