Bloodstream InfectionsCEMP-RDINCT07408544
Clinical Efectiveness of a Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic Method in Bloodstream Infections
An observational study of Bloodstream Infections and Bacteremia and Sepsis, run by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are associated with high morbidity and mortality, and delays in initiating appropriate antimicrobial therapy significantly worsen clinical outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bloodstream Infections, Bacteremia and Sepsis, Fungemia
- What is being tested?
- Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic Test and Standard Microbiological Diagnostic Methods
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2026to 1 Jan 2027
- How long will I take part?
- 4 Weeks
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population consists of adult hospitalized patients (≥18 years of age) with clinical suspicion of bloodstream infection and a confirmed positive blood culture signal. Eligible participants are recruited from medical and surgical wards as well as intensive care units of a tertiary university hospital. Patients with various underlying comorbid conditions, including immunosuppression and malignancy, are included in order to reflect real-world clinical practice. Only patients with a first episode of bloodstream infection during the study period are eligible for enrollment.
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years or older
- Clinical suspicion of bloodstream infection
- Positive blood culture signal
- Patients managed in hospital wards or intensive care units
- Ability to provide informed consent (patient or legally authorized representative)
Who cannot join
- Recurrent episode of the same bloodstream infection
- Inadequate or insufficient blood culture sample for analysis
- Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
- Death within the first 24 hours after blood culture collection
- Loss to follow-up during the study period
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Istanbul, Bagcılar, 34218
Meyha Sahin, Assoc. Prof. Dr., 05374505311, meyha.sahin@medipol.edu.tr
Mehmet Emre Tekinsen, Medical Student, +905454753281, mehmet.tekinsen@std.medipol.edu.tr
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Clinical Efectiveness of a Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic Method in Bloodstream Infections: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are associated with high morbidity and mortality, and delays in initiating appropriate antimicrobial therapy significantly worsen clinical outcomes. Conventional culture-based microbiological methods require 24-72 hours to provide definitive pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility results, often leading to prolonged use of broad-spectrum empirical therapy. Rapid multiplex PCR-based diagnostic tests have the potential to shorten diagnostic timelines by identifying pathogens and resistance genes within approximately one hour; however, data on their real-world clinical impact remain limited.
This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and diagnostic performance of a multiplex PCR-based rapid diagnostic method applied directly to positive blood culture bottles in adult patients with bloodstream infections. A total of 300 patients (≥18 years) with positive blood culture signals will be randomized 1:1 to either a study group or a control group. In the study group, positive blood cultures will be analyzed using both standard microbiological methods and a multiplex PCR panel, while the control group will undergo standard microbiological diagnostics alone.
Read more
The primary endpoint is time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (OTT), defined as the time from blood culture collection to initiation of the narrowest-spectrum, guideline-recommended antimicrobial agent active against the identified pathogen. Secondary endpoints include time to effective antimicrobial therapy (ETT), time to pathogen identification, antimicrobial escalation or de-escalation rates, length of hospital stay, total duration of antimicrobial therapy, and 28-day all-cause mortality.
Clinical, demographic, and microbiological data will be collected prospectively, including comorbidity indices and severity scores. Randomization will be stratified by ICU versus ward admission, presence of neutropenia, and Charlson Comorbidity Index to ensure balanced groups. Diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex PCR panel will be assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and agreement with standard culture methods.
This study seeks to determine whether rapid multiplex PCR diagnostics can meaningfully improve antimicrobial stewardship and clinical outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections compared with conventional diagnostic workflows.
Read the detailed description
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are among the most severe infectious diseases encountered in hospitalized patients and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Early initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is one of the most important determinants of survival in these patients. However, timely optimization of antimicrobial treatment is frequently limited by delays inherent to conventional culture-based microbiological diagnostic methods, which typically require 24-72 hours to provide definitive pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility results. As a consequence, clinicians often rely on prolonged broad-spectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy, which contributes to antimicrobial resistance, drug-related adverse events, and increased healthcare costs.
Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have enabled the development of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays capable of rapidly detecting common bloodstream pathogens and selected antimicrobial resistance genes directly from positive blood culture bottles. These tests can provide results within approximately one hour, offering the potential to significantly shorten diagnostic timelines and support earlier antimicrobial escalation, de-escalation, or optimization. Despite their increasing availability, there remains limited high-quality evidence regarding the real-world clinical effectiveness of these rapid diagnostic tools, particularly with respect to their impact on antimicrobial stewardship and patient-centered outcomes.
This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and diagnostic performance of a multiplex PCR-based rapid diagnostic panel applied directly to positive blood culture samples in adult patients with bloodstream infections. The study will be conducted in an 810-bed tertiary university hospital and is planned to enroll a total of 300 patients over a 12-month period.
Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with clinical suspicion of bloodstream infection and a positive blood culture signal will be screened for eligibility. Following confirmation of eligibility and informed consent, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the study group or the control group. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated permuted block randomization method and will be stratified by intensive care unit (ICU) versus ward admission, presence of neutropenia, and Charlson Comorbidity Index category to ensure balanced distribution of baseline risk factors between the study arms.
In the study group, positive blood culture samples will undergo rapid testing using a multiplex PCR-based in vitro diagnostic panel in addition to standard microbiological diagnostic methods. The multiplex PCR assay is designed to detect predefined bacterial and fungal pathogens as well as selected antimicrobial resistance genes directly from positive blood culture bottles. DNA extraction will be performed using a rapid, automated nucleic acid extraction system according to the manufacturer's instructions, followed by real-time PCR amplification and detection. Results of the multiplex PCR assay will be available within approximately one hour and will be promptly reported to the treating clinical team. These results may be used to guide antimicrobial management decisions, including early escalation, de-escalation, or optimization of therapy, in conjunction with clinical judgment and institutional treatment guidelines.
In the control group, positive blood culture samples will be processed using standard microbiological diagnostic methods alone, in accordance with routine clinical practice. Standard diagnostics include Gram staining performed directly from positive blood culture bottles, subculture onto appropriate solid media, organism identification using conventional and automated methods such as MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using standardized techniques. Results will be reported to the clinical team as they become available through the routine laboratory workflow.
Definitions of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Time Parameters
To allow precise evaluation of diagnostic timelines and antimicrobial treatment processes, the following time-related variables will be prospectively recorded for all enrolled patients:
- Time to pathogen identification (TPI) by standard methods is defined as the time from blood culture collection to identification of the causative microorganism using standard culture-based methods.
- Time to rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) by standard methods is defined as the time from blood culture collection to obtaining the first interpretable antimicrobial susceptibility result from rapid disk diffusion testing applied to the microorganism group determined by Gram staining.
- Time to pathogen and resistance gene identification (PRGI) by multiplex PCR is defined as the time from blood culture collection to initial identification of the pathogen and antimicrobial resistance genes using the multiplex PCR panel.
- Time to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by standard methods is defined as the time from blood culture collection to completion of definitive antimicrobial susceptibility testing using standard culture techniques, including automated systems, microdilution, or disk diffusion methods.
- Time to effective antimicrobial therapy (ETT) is defined as the time from blood culture collection to administration of the first dose of any antimicrobial agent known to be in vitro active against the isolated microorganism, regardless of antimicrobial spectrum.
- Time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (OTT) is defined as the time from blood culture collection to administration of the first dose of the narrowest-spectrum, guideline-recommended first-line antimicrobial therapy targeting the isolated microorganism. Optimal therapy represents a subset of effective therapy and reflects the most appropriate antimicrobial agent without inclusion of unnecessary broad-spectrum coverage.
Study Endpoints and Outcomes
The primary endpoint of the study is time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (OTT). Secondary endpoints include time to effective antimicrobial therapy (ETT), time to pathogen identification, antimicrobial escalation and de-escalation events, total duration of antimicrobial therapy, length of hospital stay, and 28-day all-cause mortality.
Both effective and optimal antimicrobial therapy classifications will consider all antimicrobial agents administered within 48 hours following blood culture collection and the availability of microbiological and molecular diagnostic results. Discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy for microorganisms determined to represent contamination will be recorded and included in the analysis as time to optimal antimicrobial therapy.
Clinical and demographic data will be collected prospectively for all enrolled patients, including age, sex, hospital location, comorbid conditions, immunosuppressive status, severity of illness scores, presence of intravascular devices, infection source, and source control measures. Time-related variables, including blood culture collection, positive signal detection, diagnostic result availability, and antimicrobial administration, will be recorded with precise timestamps.
Diagnostic performance of the multiplex PCR panel will be evaluated by comparison with standard culture-based methods, which will serve as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and agreement statistics will be calculated for pathogen and resistance gene detection.
All statistical analyses will be performed using standard statistical software. Final analyses will be performed after completion of data collection for all enrolled participants. Continuous variables will be summarized using appropriate descriptive statistics based on data distribution, and categorical variables will be expressed as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons between study groups will be conducted using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests. Survival analyses will be performed to evaluate 28-day mortality, and multivariable regression models may be used to identify independent predictors of clinical outcomes.
This study aims to provide robust evidence regarding the clinical utility of rapid multiplex PCR diagnostics in bloodstream infections and to determine whether their implementation can lead to earlier optimization of antimicrobial therapy, improved antimicrobial stewardship, and better patient outcomes compared with conventional diagnostic workflows.
- Conditions
- Bloodstream Infections, Bacteremia and Sepsis, Fungemia
- Being tested
- Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic Test, Standard Microbiological Diagnostic Methods
- Keywords
- Bloodstream Infection, Rapid Diagnostic Test, Multiplex PCR, Molecular Diagnostics, Time to Optimal Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis, Bacteremia, Fungemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic TestDiagnostic test
The intervention consists of a real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based in vitro diagnostic test applied directly to positive blood culture bottles. Following detection of a positive blood culture signal, an aliquot of the sample is processed for rapid nucleic acid extraction and analyzed using a multiplex PCR panel designed to identify predefined bacterial and fungal pathogens and selected antimicrobial resistance genes. Test results are available within approximately one hour and are reported to the treating clinical team. The multiplex PCR results may be used to inform antimicrobial treatment decisions, including escalation, de-escalation, or optimization of therapy, in conjunction with standard microbiological findings.
Standard Microbiological Diagnostic MethodsDiagnostic test
Standard microbiological diagnostics include routine processing of positive blood cultures according to institutional practice. This consists of Gram staining, subculture on appropriate agar media, organism identification using conventional and automated methods, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed using standardized techniques. Results are reported to the clinical team as they become available and guide antimicrobial management according to usual care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Multiplex PCR Group | Participants with positive blood culture signals undergo rapid multiplex PCR testing in addition to standard microbiological diagnostic methods. Results of the multiplex PCR assay are reported to the clinical team and may be used to guide antimicrobial management. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic Test; Diagnostic Test: Standard Microbiological Diagnostic Methods | |
| Standard Diagnostics Group | Participants with positive blood culture signals receive standard microbiological diagnostic testing only, according to routine clinical practice. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Standard Microbiological Diagnostic Methods |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy
Time from blood culture collection to administration of the first dose of the narrowest-spectrum, guideline-recommended first-line antimicrobial therapy active against the isolated microorganism.
Measured: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days
Secondary outcomes (4)
Time to Pathogen Identification (TPI)
Time from blood culture collection to identification of the causative microorganism using standard culture-based methods.
Measured: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days
Time to Pathogen and Resistance Gene Identification (PRGI)
ime from blood culture collection to initial identification of the pathogen and antimicrobial resistance genes using the multiplex PCR panel.
Measured: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days
Time to Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (RAST)
Time from blood culture collection to obtaining the first interpretable antimicrobial susceptibility result from rapid disk diffusion testing.
Measured: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days
Time to Definitive Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST)
Time from blood culture collection to completion of definitive antimicrobial susceptibility testing using standard culture-based techniques.
Measured: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2026
- Study start1 Jan 2026
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bloodstream InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 4 Weeks
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Meyha Sahin, Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
- Investigators
- Meyha Sahin, Principal investigator, Medipol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07408544
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E-66291034-202.3.02-8843
- Acronym
- CEMP-RDI
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Clinical Efectiveness of a Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic Method in Bloodstream Infections: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07408544
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CEMP-RDI / E-66291034-202.3.02-8843
- Conditions
- Bloodstream Infections, Bacteremia and Sepsis, Fungemia
- Keywords
- Bloodstream Infection, Rapid Diagnostic Test, Multiplex PCR, Molecular Diagnostics, Time to Optimal Therapy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Medipol University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are associated with high morbidity and mortality, and delays in initiating appropriate antimicrobial therapy significantly worsen clinical outcomes. Conventional culture-based microbiological methods require 24-72 hours to provide definitive pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility results, often leading to prolonged use of broad-spectrum empirical therapy. Rapid multiplex PCR-based diagnostic tests have the potential to shorten diagnostic timelines by identifying pathogens and resistance genes within approximately one hour; however, data on their real-world clinical impact remain limited.
This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and diagnostic performance of a multiplex PCR-based rapid diagnostic method applied directly to positive blood culture bottles in adult patients with bloodstream infections. A total of 300 patients (≥18 years) with positive blood culture signals will be randomized 1:1 to either a study group or a control group. In the study group, positive blood cultures will be analyzed using both standard microbiological methods and a multiplex PCR panel, while the control group will undergo standard microbiological diagnostics alone.
The primary endpoint is time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (OTT), defined as the time from blood culture collection to initiation of the narrowest-spectrum, guideline-recommended antimicrobial agent active against the identified pathogen. Secondary endpoints include time to effective antimicrobial therapy (ETT), time to pathogen identification, antimicrobial escalation or de-escalation rates, length of hospital stay, total duration of antimicrobial therapy, and 28-day all-cause mortality.
Clinical, demographic, and microbiological data will be collected prospectively, including comorbidity indices and severity scores. Randomization will be stratified by ICU versus ward admission, presence of neutropenia, and Charlson Comorbidity Index to ensure balanced groups. Diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex PCR panel will be assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and agreement with standard culture methods.
This study seeks to determine whether rapid multiplex PCR diagnostics can meaningfully improve antimicrobial stewardship and clinical outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections compared with conventional diagnostic workflows.
Detailed description
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are among the most severe infectious diseases encountered in hospitalized patients and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Early initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is one of the most important determinants of survival in these patients. However, timely optimization of antimicrobial treatment is frequently limited by delays inherent to conventional culture-based microbiological diagnostic methods, which typically require 24-72 hours to provide definitive pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility results. As a consequence, clinicians often rely on prolonged broad-spectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy, which contributes to antimicrobial resistance, drug-related adverse events, and increased healthcare costs.
Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have enabled the development of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays capable of rapidly detecting common bloodstream pathogens and selected antimicrobial resistance genes directly from positive blood culture bottles. These tests can provide results within approximately one hour, offering the potential to significantly shorten diagnostic timelines and support earlier antimicrobial escalation, de-escalation, or optimization. Despite their increasing availability, there remains limited high-quality evidence regarding the real-world clinical effectiveness of these rapid diagnostic tools, particularly with respect to their impact on antimicrobial stewardship and patient-centered outcomes.
This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and diagnostic performance of a multiplex PCR-based rapid diagnostic panel applied directly to positive blood culture samples in adult patients with bloodstream infections. The study will be conducted in an 810-bed tertiary university hospital and is planned to enroll a total of 300 patients over a 12-month period.
Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with clinical suspicion of bloodstream infection and a positive blood culture signal will be screened for eligibility. Following confirmation of eligibility and informed consent, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the study group or the control group. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated permuted block randomization method and will be stratified by intensive care unit (ICU) versus ward admission, presence of neutropenia, and Charlson Comorbidity Index category to ensure balanced distribution of baseline risk factors between the study arms.
In the study group, positive blood culture samples will undergo rapid testing using a multiplex PCR-based in vitro diagnostic panel in addition to standard microbiological diagnostic methods. The multiplex PCR assay is designed to detect predefined bacterial and fungal pathogens as well as selected antimicrobial resistance genes directly from positive blood culture bottles. DNA extraction will be performed using a rapid, automated nucleic acid extraction system according to the manufacturer's instructions, followed by real-time PCR amplification and detection. Results of the multiplex PCR assay will be available within approximately one hour and will be promptly reported to the treating clinical team. These results may be used to guide antimicrobial management decisions, including early escalation, de-escalation, or optimization of therapy, in conjunction with clinical judgment and institutional treatment guidelines.
In the control group, positive blood culture samples will be processed using standard microbiological diagnostic methods alone, in accordance with routine clinical practice. Standard diagnostics include Gram staining performed directly from positive blood culture bottles, subculture onto appropriate solid media, organism identification using conventional and automated methods such as MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using standardized techniques. Results will be reported to the clinical team as they become available through the routine laboratory workflow.
Definitions of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Time Parameters
To allow precise evaluation of diagnostic timelines and antimicrobial treatment processes, the following time-related variables will be prospectively recorded for all enrolled patients:
- Time to pathogen identification (TPI) by standard methods is defined as the time from blood culture collection to identification of the causative microorganism using standard culture-based methods.
- Time to rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) by standard methods is defined as the time from blood culture collection to obtaining the first interpretable antimicrobial susceptibility result from rapid disk diffusion testing applied to the microorganism group determined by Gram staining.
- Time to pathogen and resistance gene identification (PRGI) by multiplex PCR is defined as the time from blood culture collection to initial identification of the pathogen and antimicrobial resistance genes using the multiplex PCR panel.
- Time to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by standard methods is defined as the time from blood culture collection to completion of definitive antimicrobial susceptibility testing using standard culture techniques, including automated systems, microdilution, or disk diffusion methods.
- Time to effective antimicrobial therapy (ETT) is defined as the time from blood culture collection to administration of the first dose of any antimicrobial agent known to be in vitro active against the isolated microorganism, regardless of antimicrobial spectrum.
- Time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (OTT) is defined as the time from blood culture collection to administration of the first dose of the narrowest-spectrum, guideline-recommended first-line antimicrobial therapy targeting the isolated microorganism. Optimal therapy represents a subset of effective therapy and reflects the most appropriate antimicrobial agent without inclusion of unnecessary broad-spectrum coverage.
Study Endpoints and Outcomes
The primary endpoint of the study is time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (OTT). Secondary endpoints include time to effective antimicrobial therapy (ETT), time to pathogen identification, antimicrobial escalation and de-escalation events, total duration of antimicrobial therapy, length of hospital stay, and 28-day all-cause mortality.
Both effective and optimal antimicrobial therapy classifications will consider all antimicrobial agents administered within 48 hours following blood culture collection and the availability of microbiological and molecular diagnostic results. Discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy for microorganisms determined to represent contamination will be recorded and included in the analysis as time to optimal antimicrobial therapy.
Clinical and demographic data will be collected prospectively for all enrolled patients, including age, sex, hospital location, comorbid conditions, immunosuppressive status, severity of illness scores, presence of intravascular devices, infection source, and source control measures. Time-related variables, including blood culture collection, positive signal detection, diagnostic result availability, and antimicrobial administration, will be recorded with precise timestamps.
Diagnostic performance of the multiplex PCR panel will be evaluated by comparison with standard culture-based methods, which will serve as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and agreement statistics will be calculated for pathogen and resistance gene detection.
All statistical analyses will be performed using standard statistical software. Final analyses will be performed after completion of data collection for all enrolled participants. Continuous variables will be summarized using appropriate descriptive statistics based on data distribution, and categorical variables will be expressed as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons between study groups will be conducted using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests. Survival analyses will be performed to evaluate 28-day mortality, and multivariable regression models may be used to identify independent predictors of clinical outcomes.
This study aims to provide robust evidence regarding the clinical utility of rapid multiplex PCR diagnostics in bloodstream infections and to determine whether their implementation can lead to earlier optimization of antimicrobial therapy, improved antimicrobial stewardship, and better patient outcomes compared with conventional diagnostic workflows.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 4 Weeks
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Multiplex PCR Group | – | Diagnostic Test: Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic Test, Diagnostic Test: Standard Microbiological Diagnostic MethodsParticipants with positive blood culture signals undergo rapid multiplex PCR testing in addition to standard microbiological diagnostic methods. Results of the multiplex PCR assay are reported to the clinical team and may be used to guide antimicrobial management. |
| Standard Diagnostics Group | – | Diagnostic Test: Standard Microbiological Diagnostic MethodsParticipants with positive blood culture signals receive standard microbiological diagnostic testing only, according to routine clinical practice. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population consists of adult hospitalized patients (≥18 years of age) with clinical suspicion of bloodstream infection and a confirmed positive blood culture signal. Eligible participants are recruited from medical and surgical wards as well as intensive care units of a tertiary university hospital. Patients with various underlying comorbid conditions, including immunosuppression and malignancy, are included in order to reflect real-world clinical practice. Only patients with a first episode of bloodstream infection during the study period are eligible for enrollment.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 18 years or older
- Clinical suspicion of bloodstream infection
- Positive blood culture signal
- Patients managed in hospital wards or intensive care units
- Ability to provide informed consent (patient or legally authorized representative)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Recurrent episode of the same bloodstream infection
- Inadequate or insufficient blood culture sample for analysis
- Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
- Death within the first 24 hours after blood culture collection
- Loss to follow-up during the study period
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic TestThe intervention consists of a real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based in vitro diagnostic test applied directly to positive blood culture bottles. Following detection of a positive blood culture signal, an aliquot of the sample is processed for rapid nucleic acid extraction and analyzed using a multiplex PCR panel designed to identify predefined bacterial and fungal pathogens and selected antimicrobial resistance genes. Test results are available within approximately one hour and are reported to the treating clinical team. The multiplex PCR results may be used to inform antimicrobial treatment decisions, including escalation, de-escalation, or optimization of therapy, in conjunction with standard microbiological findings. | Diagnostic test | Multiplex PCR Group |
| Standard Microbiological Diagnostic MethodsStandard microbiological diagnostics include routine processing of positive blood cultures according to institutional practice. This consists of Gram staining, subculture on appropriate agar media, organism identification using conventional and automated methods, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed using standardized techniques. Results are reported to the clinical team as they become available and guide antimicrobial management according to usual care. | Diagnostic test | Multiplex PCR Group, Standard Diagnostics Group |
Primary outcome
Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy
Time frame: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days
Time from blood culture collection to administration of the first dose of the narrowest-spectrum, guideline-recommended first-line antimicrobial therapy active against the isolated microorganism.
4 secondary outcomes
Time to Pathogen Identification (TPI)
Time frame: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days
Time to Pathogen and Resistance Gene Identification (PRGI)
Time frame: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days
Time to Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (RAST)
Time frame: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days
Time to Definitive Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST)
Time frame: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bloodstream Infections
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical Value of EMR3 in Sepsis Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Prognosis: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study
Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
Hemodynamic Resuscitation Guided by Non-Invasive Mean Systemic Filling Pressure to Prevent Acute Kidney Injury in Septic Shock
Acute Kidney Injury Due to Sepsis
Recruiting
Veno-arterial Carbon Dioxide Partial Pressure Difference (CO2gap) for Early Resuscitation of Septic Shock
Sepsis - to Reduce Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit, Septic Shock
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate AZD7760 Safety and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Adults (Phase I) and Adults With End-stage Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis With a Central Venous Catheter (Phase IIa)
Staphylococcus Aureus
RecruitingPhase 3
CLARITHROMYCIN TO PREVENT SECONDARY INFECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS FOLLOWING LOWER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS: THE CLASSIFY TRIAL
Sepsis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Meyha Sahin principal investigator
Medipol University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bloodstream Infections and Bacteremia and Sepsis, run by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Meyha Sahin, Assoc. Prof. Dr. (+905374505311, meyha.sahin@medipol.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy (time frame: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2026.