AzTrials
AzTrials

Bloodstream InfectionsCEMP-RDINCT07408544

Clinical Efectiveness of a Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic Method in Bloodstream Infections

An observational study of Bloodstream Infections and Bacteremia and Sepsis, run by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are associated with high morbidity and mortality, and delays in initiating appropriate antimicrobial therapy significantly worsen clinical outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic Test and Standard Microbiological Diagnostic Methods
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Jan 2026to 1 Jan 2027
How long will I take part?
4 Weeks
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population consists of adult hospitalized patients (≥18 years of age) with clinical suspicion of bloodstream infection and a confirmed positive blood culture signal. Eligible participants are recruited from medical and surgical wards as well as intensive care units of a tertiary university hospital. Patients with various underlying comorbid conditions, including immunosuppression and malignancy, are included in order to reflect real-world clinical practice. Only patients with a first episode of bloodstream infection during the study period are eligible for enrollment.

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Clinical suspicion of bloodstream infection
  • Positive blood culture signal
  • Patients managed in hospital wards or intensive care units
  • Ability to provide informed consent (patient or legally authorized representative)

Who cannot join

  • Recurrent episode of the same bloodstream infection
  • Inadequate or insufficient blood culture sample for analysis
  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
  • Death within the first 24 hours after blood culture collection
  • Loss to follow-up during the study period

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Meyha Sahin, Assoc. Prof. Dr. contact

+905374505311

meyha.sahin@medipol.edu.tr

Mehmet Emre Tekinsen, Medical Student contact

+905454753281

mehmet.tekinsen@std.medipol.edu.tr

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

    Istanbul, Bagcılar, 34218

    Meyha Sahin, Assoc. Prof. Dr., 05374505311, meyha.sahin@medipol.edu.tr

    Mehmet Emre Tekinsen, Medical Student, +905454753281, mehmet.tekinsen@std.medipol.edu.tr

    Recruiting

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Clinical Efectiveness of a Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic Method in Bloodstream Infections: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are associated with high morbidity and mortality, and delays in initiating appropriate antimicrobial therapy significantly worsen clinical outcomes. Conventional culture-based microbiological methods require 24-72 hours to provide definitive pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility results, often leading to prolonged use of broad-spectrum empirical therapy. Rapid multiplex PCR-based diagnostic tests have the potential to shorten diagnostic timelines by identifying pathogens and resistance genes within approximately one hour; however, data on their real-world clinical impact remain limited.

This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and diagnostic performance of a multiplex PCR-based rapid diagnostic method applied directly to positive blood culture bottles in adult patients with bloodstream infections. A total of 300 patients (≥18 years) with positive blood culture signals will be randomized 1:1 to either a study group or a control group. In the study group, positive blood cultures will be analyzed using both standard microbiological methods and a multiplex PCR panel, while the control group will undergo standard microbiological diagnostics alone.

Read more

The primary endpoint is time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (OTT), defined as the time from blood culture collection to initiation of the narrowest-spectrum, guideline-recommended antimicrobial agent active against the identified pathogen. Secondary endpoints include time to effective antimicrobial therapy (ETT), time to pathogen identification, antimicrobial escalation or de-escalation rates, length of hospital stay, total duration of antimicrobial therapy, and 28-day all-cause mortality.

Clinical, demographic, and microbiological data will be collected prospectively, including comorbidity indices and severity scores. Randomization will be stratified by ICU versus ward admission, presence of neutropenia, and Charlson Comorbidity Index to ensure balanced groups. Diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex PCR panel will be assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and agreement with standard culture methods.

This study seeks to determine whether rapid multiplex PCR diagnostics can meaningfully improve antimicrobial stewardship and clinical outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections compared with conventional diagnostic workflows.

Read the detailed description

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are among the most severe infectious diseases encountered in hospitalized patients and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Early initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is one of the most important determinants of survival in these patients. However, timely optimization of antimicrobial treatment is frequently limited by delays inherent to conventional culture-based microbiological diagnostic methods, which typically require 24-72 hours to provide definitive pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility results. As a consequence, clinicians often rely on prolonged broad-spectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy, which contributes to antimicrobial resistance, drug-related adverse events, and increased healthcare costs.

Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have enabled the development of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays capable of rapidly detecting common bloodstream pathogens and selected antimicrobial resistance genes directly from positive blood culture bottles. These tests can provide results within approximately one hour, offering the potential to significantly shorten diagnostic timelines and support earlier antimicrobial escalation, de-escalation, or optimization. Despite their increasing availability, there remains limited high-quality evidence regarding the real-world clinical effectiveness of these rapid diagnostic tools, particularly with respect to their impact on antimicrobial stewardship and patient-centered outcomes.

This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and diagnostic performance of a multiplex PCR-based rapid diagnostic panel applied directly to positive blood culture samples in adult patients with bloodstream infections. The study will be conducted in an 810-bed tertiary university hospital and is planned to enroll a total of 300 patients over a 12-month period.

Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with clinical suspicion of bloodstream infection and a positive blood culture signal will be screened for eligibility. Following confirmation of eligibility and informed consent, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the study group or the control group. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated permuted block randomization method and will be stratified by intensive care unit (ICU) versus ward admission, presence of neutropenia, and Charlson Comorbidity Index category to ensure balanced distribution of baseline risk factors between the study arms.

In the study group, positive blood culture samples will undergo rapid testing using a multiplex PCR-based in vitro diagnostic panel in addition to standard microbiological diagnostic methods. The multiplex PCR assay is designed to detect predefined bacterial and fungal pathogens as well as selected antimicrobial resistance genes directly from positive blood culture bottles. DNA extraction will be performed using a rapid, automated nucleic acid extraction system according to the manufacturer's instructions, followed by real-time PCR amplification and detection. Results of the multiplex PCR assay will be available within approximately one hour and will be promptly reported to the treating clinical team. These results may be used to guide antimicrobial management decisions, including early escalation, de-escalation, or optimization of therapy, in conjunction with clinical judgment and institutional treatment guidelines.

In the control group, positive blood culture samples will be processed using standard microbiological diagnostic methods alone, in accordance with routine clinical practice. Standard diagnostics include Gram staining performed directly from positive blood culture bottles, subculture onto appropriate solid media, organism identification using conventional and automated methods such as MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using standardized techniques. Results will be reported to the clinical team as they become available through the routine laboratory workflow.

Definitions of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Time Parameters

To allow precise evaluation of diagnostic timelines and antimicrobial treatment processes, the following time-related variables will be prospectively recorded for all enrolled patients:

  • Time to pathogen identification (TPI) by standard methods is defined as the time from blood culture collection to identification of the causative microorganism using standard culture-based methods.
  • Time to rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) by standard methods is defined as the time from blood culture collection to obtaining the first interpretable antimicrobial susceptibility result from rapid disk diffusion testing applied to the microorganism group determined by Gram staining.
  • Time to pathogen and resistance gene identification (PRGI) by multiplex PCR is defined as the time from blood culture collection to initial identification of the pathogen and antimicrobial resistance genes using the multiplex PCR panel.
  • Time to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by standard methods is defined as the time from blood culture collection to completion of definitive antimicrobial susceptibility testing using standard culture techniques, including automated systems, microdilution, or disk diffusion methods.
  • Time to effective antimicrobial therapy (ETT) is defined as the time from blood culture collection to administration of the first dose of any antimicrobial agent known to be in vitro active against the isolated microorganism, regardless of antimicrobial spectrum.
  • Time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (OTT) is defined as the time from blood culture collection to administration of the first dose of the narrowest-spectrum, guideline-recommended first-line antimicrobial therapy targeting the isolated microorganism. Optimal therapy represents a subset of effective therapy and reflects the most appropriate antimicrobial agent without inclusion of unnecessary broad-spectrum coverage.

Study Endpoints and Outcomes

The primary endpoint of the study is time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (OTT). Secondary endpoints include time to effective antimicrobial therapy (ETT), time to pathogen identification, antimicrobial escalation and de-escalation events, total duration of antimicrobial therapy, length of hospital stay, and 28-day all-cause mortality.

Both effective and optimal antimicrobial therapy classifications will consider all antimicrobial agents administered within 48 hours following blood culture collection and the availability of microbiological and molecular diagnostic results. Discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy for microorganisms determined to represent contamination will be recorded and included in the analysis as time to optimal antimicrobial therapy.

Clinical and demographic data will be collected prospectively for all enrolled patients, including age, sex, hospital location, comorbid conditions, immunosuppressive status, severity of illness scores, presence of intravascular devices, infection source, and source control measures. Time-related variables, including blood culture collection, positive signal detection, diagnostic result availability, and antimicrobial administration, will be recorded with precise timestamps.

Diagnostic performance of the multiplex PCR panel will be evaluated by comparison with standard culture-based methods, which will serve as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and agreement statistics will be calculated for pathogen and resistance gene detection.

All statistical analyses will be performed using standard statistical software. Final analyses will be performed after completion of data collection for all enrolled participants. Continuous variables will be summarized using appropriate descriptive statistics based on data distribution, and categorical variables will be expressed as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons between study groups will be conducted using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests. Survival analyses will be performed to evaluate 28-day mortality, and multivariable regression models may be used to identify independent predictors of clinical outcomes.

This study aims to provide robust evidence regarding the clinical utility of rapid multiplex PCR diagnostics in bloodstream infections and to determine whether their implementation can lead to earlier optimization of antimicrobial therapy, improved antimicrobial stewardship, and better patient outcomes compared with conventional diagnostic workflows.

Being tested
Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic Test, Standard Microbiological Diagnostic Methods
Keywords
Bloodstream Infection, Rapid Diagnostic Test, Multiplex PCR, Molecular Diagnostics, Time to Optimal Therapy
Medical subject headings
Sepsis, Bacteremia, Fungemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic TestDiagnostic test

    The intervention consists of a real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based in vitro diagnostic test applied directly to positive blood culture bottles. Following detection of a positive blood culture signal, an aliquot of the sample is processed for rapid nucleic acid extraction and analyzed using a multiplex PCR panel designed to identify predefined bacterial and fungal pathogens and selected antimicrobial resistance genes. Test results are available within approximately one hour and are reported to the treating clinical team. The multiplex PCR results may be used to inform antimicrobial treatment decisions, including escalation, de-escalation, or optimization of therapy, in conjunction with standard microbiological findings.

  • Standard Microbiological Diagnostic MethodsDiagnostic test

    Standard microbiological diagnostics include routine processing of positive blood cultures according to institutional practice. This consists of Gram staining, subculture on appropriate agar media, organism identification using conventional and automated methods, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed using standardized techniques. Results are reported to the clinical team as they become available and guide antimicrobial management according to usual care.

Study groups in NCT07408544
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Multiplex PCR GroupParticipants with positive blood culture signals undergo rapid multiplex PCR testing in addition to standard microbiological diagnostic methods. Results of the multiplex PCR assay are reported to the clinical team and may be used to guide antimicrobial management.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Multiplex PCR-Based Rapid Diagnostic Test; Diagnostic Test: Standard Microbiological Diagnostic Methods
Standard Diagnostics GroupParticipants with positive blood culture signals receive standard microbiological diagnostic testing only, according to routine clinical practice.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Standard Microbiological Diagnostic Methods

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy

    Time from blood culture collection to administration of the first dose of the narrowest-spectrum, guideline-recommended first-line antimicrobial therapy active against the isolated microorganism.

    Measured: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Time to Pathogen Identification (TPI)

    Time from blood culture collection to identification of the causative microorganism using standard culture-based methods.

    Measured: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days

  2. Time to Pathogen and Resistance Gene Identification (PRGI)

    ime from blood culture collection to initial identification of the pathogen and antimicrobial resistance genes using the multiplex PCR panel.

    Measured: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days

  3. Time to Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (RAST)

    Time from blood culture collection to obtaining the first interpretable antimicrobial susceptibility result from rapid disk diffusion testing.

    Measured: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days

  4. Time to Definitive Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST)

    Time from blood culture collection to completion of definitive antimicrobial susceptibility testing using standard culture-based techniques.

    Measured: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Feb 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2026
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
Target duration
4 Weeks
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07408544
Sponsor's protocol ID
E-66291034-202.3.02-8843
Acronym
CEMP-RDI
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
5 Feb 2026
Last updated
13 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Bloodstream Infections and Bacteremia and Sepsis, run by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Meyha Sahin, Assoc. Prof. Dr. (+905374505311, meyha.sahin@medipol.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy (time frame: Through hospitalization, up to 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in