Balance AssessmentNCT07412145
How's Your Balance?
An observational study of Balance Assessment and Falls, run by RxFunction Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goals of this observational study are to investigate the following: If there is a relationship between prior falls, single leg stance time, and plantar cutaneous sensitivity as measured by monofilaments. Plantar sensitivity across a broad range of ages. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Balance Assessment, Falls, Plantar Sensation
- What is being tested?
- None AHT
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 23 Aug 2025to Dec 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population is a convenience sample of individuals who agree to participate in research conducted at the Driven to Discover Research Facility at the Fair.
Who may be able to join
- Adults, ages 20 and older
- Able to provide verbal consent
Who cannot join
- Individuals, ages 19 and younger
- Inability to provide verbal consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Driven to Discover Research Facility at the Minnesota State Fair
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108
Clinical Research Project Manager, 6123582141, research@rxfunction.com
Senior Clinical Scientist, 6123582141, research@rxfunction.com
About this study
The goals of this observational study are to investigate the following:
- If there is a relationship between prior falls, single leg stance time, and plantar cutaneous sensitivity as measured by monofilaments.
- Plantar sensitivity across a broad range of ages.
- Self-reported physical function related to balance and mobility using the PROMIS® PROWalk™ questionnaire and balance confidence using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale-6 (ABC-6).
Participants will answer questions about themselves and their balance and falls. Their plantar (bottom of their feet) sensation will also be tested using monofilaments. And they will stand on a force plate with their eyes open and closed in dual and single leg stances for up to 30 seconds.
Read the detailed description
Preserving sensory function, particularly in the feet, is essential for preventing falls and maintaining autonomy and health across the human lifespan. Monofilament testing is a widely used clinical tool for assessing foot sensation. In older adults, this test typically involves applying a standardized nylon filament (commonly the 10g monofilament) to specific sites on the plantar surface of the foot. Loss of sensation detected through monofilament testing often indicates peripheral neuropathy, which can be caused by aging, diabetes, or other conditions affecting nerve function. This sensory impairment significantly impacts postural control by reducing the afferent feedback needed for postural adjustments. Thus, monofilament testing serves as a diagnostic tool and a predictor of fall risk, emphasizing the critical role of sensory feedback in maintaining stability and preventing injury in aging populations.
In addition to monofilament testing, single leg stance time is a strong indicator of balance, functional, and neurological health, with shorter times signaling higher fall risks, particularly in older adults. The unipedal or single leg (limb) stance test measures static postural control and is a valuable, quick screening tool in clinical settings to identify individuals in need of further evaluation or rehabilitation. Inability to hold a one-leg stand for at least 5 seconds is a red flag for potential balance issues, while a 30-second hold indicates good stability. We will expand on existing research by examining plantar sensitivity across ages and exploring links between fall history, unipedal stance time, and plantar cutaneous sensation.
Primary Research Question/Hypothesis What is the relationship between physiological aging and Romberg ratio values during standing balance, and how well can age and somatosensory function explain variation in Romberg ratio values? We hypothesize that older age and reduced somatosensory function will be associated with higher Romberg ratio values (i.e., stronger dependence on vision, suggestive of somatosensory deficits) during standing balance.
Secondary Research Question(s)/Hypothesis
- To what extent does plantar cutaneous sensitivity at different foot sites relate to Romberg ratio values during standing balance, and which site(s) remain significant predictors after controlling for age? We believe that reduced plantar cutaneous sensitivity (higher monofilament thresholds) at medial foot sites will be associated with higher Romberg ratio values, independent of age.
- How are standing Romberg ratio values related to self-reported physical function (PROMIS® PROWalk™) and balance confidence (ABC-6) across different ages? We hypothesize that self-reported physical function and balance confidence will be significant predictors of standing Romberg ratio values, such that lower PROMIS® PROWalk™ scores and lower ABC-6 scores are associated with higher Romberg ratio values, independent of age.
- We will continue to evaluate whether the threshold for loss of balance sensation is lower than that for loss of protective sensation (i.e., inability to feel a 10g monofilament at 2 of 5 sites on the plantar surface of the foot). We hypothesize that impaired balance will be associated with reduced or absent plantar cutaneous sensation, regardless of age.
- Conditions
- Balance Assessment, Falls, Plantar Sensation
- Being tested
- None AHT
- Keywords
- Balance, Falls, Plantar sensation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
None AHTOther
This is an observational study that does not involve any intervention.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| State Fair Attendees | Adults (age 20+) attending the Minnesota State Fair who agree to participate comprise the study group. Receives: Other: None AHT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Dual- and Single-Leg Quiet Standing Tests
The dual- and single-leg quiet standing tests are static balance assessments used to quantify postural sway under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. These tests will be performed on a force plate to determine Romberg ratios. The Romberg ratio compares sway when visual input is removed to sway when visual input is available, providing an index of visual dependence and sensory contribution to upright balance.
Measured: About 4-5 minutes of a single 20-minute session
Secondary outcomes (5)
Anthropometric Information
We will collect information about the participants: age, sex, race, ethnicity, fall history, diagnosis of prediabetes or diabetes, diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy, etc. No Protected Health Information (PHI) will be collected.
Measured: About 4-5 minutes of a single 20-minute session
PROMIS® Physical Function v2.0 PROWalk
Nine items were selected from the 165 items comprising the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Physical Function. Specifically, the selected items measure an individual's ability to perform various activities that involve upright mobility (balance, standing, and walking). Participants rate the nine items on a scale of 1 to 5; the raw scores are converted to T-scores for comparison to national norms.
Measured: About 2-3 minutes of a single 20-minute session
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale-6 (ABC-6)
Powell and Myers developed the 16-item Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale to detect levels of balance confidence in older adults. Schepens et al. (2009) validated a 6-item version of the ABC, using the six most challenging activities from the 16-item scale. The six tasks are rated on a scale of 0 to 100; a score of 0 indicates no confidence and a score of 100 indicates complete confidence when performing the task. The overall score is calculated by adding the individual items then dividing by the total number of items (6). The higher the score, the greater the person's balance confidence; thus, higher scores indicate that subjects are more confident of their balance.
Measured: 2-3 minutes of a single 20-minute session
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-Short Form
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) is a standardized self-report instrument used to assess physical activity across populations. It captures time spent walking, performing moderate and vigorous physical activity, and sitting, typically over the previous 7 days. The IPAQ is available in short and long forms; the short form is commonly used for surveillance and prevalence studies. Responses can be scored to estimate total physical activity, often expressed as MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task)-minutes per week, and to classify activity levels as low, moderate, or high.
Measured: About 2-3 minutes of a single 20-minute session
Monofilament Testing
The Centers for Medicare \& Medicaid Services (CMS) identifies the monofilament test as the means of diagnosing loss of protective sensation (https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/ncd.aspx?NCDId=171). To conduct the test, a clinician applies pressure with various sizes of monofilament to selected parts of the foot and asks the participant to indicate when he/she feels the filament. Per CMS, inability to feel a 10-gram monofilament on at least two of five test sites on either foot indicates loss of protective sensation (LOPS).
Measured: About 2 minutes of a single 20-minute session
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2026
- Study start23 Aug 2025
- Primary completion10 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Balance AssessmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- RxFunction Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lars Oddsson, PhD, Principal investigator, RxFunction Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07412145
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIP 0011
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The sponsor will make a determination on data sharing prior to publication of the results.
Publications
Wood WA, Wood MA, Werter SA, Menn JJ, Hamilton SA, Jacoby R, Dellon AL. Testing for loss of protective sensation in patients with foot ulceration: a cross-sectional study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005 Sep-Oct;95(5):469-74. doi: 10.7547/0950469.
PubMed 16166466Verghese J, Holtzer R, Lipton RB, Wang C. Quantitative gait markers and incident fall risk in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Aug;64(8):896-901. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp033. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
PubMed 19349593Araujo CG, de Souza E Silva CG, Laukkanen JA, Fiatarone Singh M, Kunutsor SK, Myers J, Franca JF, Castro CL. Successful 10-second one-legged stance performance predicts survival in middle-aged and older individuals. Br J Sports Med. 2022 Sep;56(17):975-980. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105360. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
PubMed 35728834Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, Brach J, Chandler J, Cawthon P, Connor EB, Nevitt M, Visser M, Kritchevsky S, Badinelli S, Harris T, Newman AB, Cauley J, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. 2011 Jan 5;305(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1923.
PubMed 21205966Saltzman CL, Rashid R, Hayes A, Fellner C, Fitzpatrick D, Klapach A, Frantz R, Hillis SL. 4.5-gram monofilament sensation beneath both first metatarsal heads indicates protective foot sensation in diabetic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Apr;86(4):717-23. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200404000-00008.
PubMed 15069135Rothrock NE, Kaat AJ, Vrahas MS, O'Toole RV, Buono SK, Morrison S, Gershon RC. Validation of PROMIS Physical Function Instruments in Patients With an Orthopaedic Trauma to a Lower Extremity. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Aug;33(8):377-383. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001493.
PubMed 31085947Richardson JK, Hurvitz EA. Peripheral neuropathy: a true risk factor for falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jul;50(4):M211-5. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.4.m211.
PubMed 7614243Perry SD. Evaluation of age-related plantar-surface insensitivity and onset age of advanced insensitivity in older adults using vibratory and touch sensation tests. Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jan 9;392(1-2):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.08.060. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
PubMed 16183200Parsons SL, Mansfield A, Inness EL, Patterson KK. The relationship of plantar cutaneous sensation and standing balance post-stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Oct;23(5):326-32. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1162396. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
PubMed 27077993Nakamoto M, Ideguchi N, Iwata S, Tomita S, Morimoto N, Fukuda S, Kudo S. Validity and Reliability of Criteria for Plantar Sensation Assessment Using Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament as a Clinically Usable Index. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14092. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114092.
PubMed 36360967Meyer PF, Oddsson LI, De Luca CJ. The role of plantar cutaneous sensation in unperturbed stance. Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jun;156(4):505-12. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1804-y. Epub 2004 Feb 14.
PubMed 14968274Hicks CW, Wang D, Daya N, Juraschek SP, Matsushita K, Windham BG, Selvin E. The association of peripheral neuropathy detected by monofilament testing with risk of falls and fractures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jun;71(6):1902-1909. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18338. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
PubMed 36945108Doi T, Nakakubo S, Tsutsumimoto K, Kurita S, Ishii H, Shimada H. Spatiotemporal gait characteristics and risk of mortality in community-dwelling older adults. Maturitas. 2021 Sep;151:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
PubMed 34446276Carrer P, Trevisan C, Curreri C, Giantin V, Maggi S, Crepaldi G, Manzato E, Sergi G. Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Examination for Predicting Physical Performance and the Risk of Falls in Older People: Results of the Pro.V.A. Longitudinal Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):137-143.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.480. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
PubMed 28939426Bretan O, Pinheiro RM, Corrente JE. Balance and plantar cutaneous sensitivity functional assessment in community-dwelling elderly. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Mar-Apr;76(2):219-24. doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942010000200012.
PubMed 20549083
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- How's Your Balance?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07412145
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIP 0011
- Conditions
- Balance Assessment, Falls, Plantar Sensation
- Keywords
- Balance, Falls, Plantar sensation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- RxFunction Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 23 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goals of this observational study are to investigate the following:
- If there is a relationship between prior falls, single leg stance time, and plantar cutaneous sensitivity as measured by monofilaments.
- Plantar sensitivity across a broad range of ages.
- Self-reported physical function related to balance and mobility using the PROMIS® PROWalk™ questionnaire and balance confidence using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale-6 (ABC-6).
Participants will answer questions about themselves and their balance and falls. Their plantar (bottom of their feet) sensation will also be tested using monofilaments. And they will stand on a force plate with their eyes open and closed in dual and single leg stances for up to 30 seconds.
Detailed description
Preserving sensory function, particularly in the feet, is essential for preventing falls and maintaining autonomy and health across the human lifespan. Monofilament testing is a widely used clinical tool for assessing foot sensation. In older adults, this test typically involves applying a standardized nylon filament (commonly the 10g monofilament) to specific sites on the plantar surface of the foot. Loss of sensation detected through monofilament testing often indicates peripheral neuropathy, which can be caused by aging, diabetes, or other conditions affecting nerve function. This sensory impairment significantly impacts postural control by reducing the afferent feedback needed for postural adjustments. Thus, monofilament testing serves as a diagnostic tool and a predictor of fall risk, emphasizing the critical role of sensory feedback in maintaining stability and preventing injury in aging populations.
In addition to monofilament testing, single leg stance time is a strong indicator of balance, functional, and neurological health, with shorter times signaling higher fall risks, particularly in older adults. The unipedal or single leg (limb) stance test measures static postural control and is a valuable, quick screening tool in clinical settings to identify individuals in need of further evaluation or rehabilitation. Inability to hold a one-leg stand for at least 5 seconds is a red flag for potential balance issues, while a 30-second hold indicates good stability. We will expand on existing research by examining plantar sensitivity across ages and exploring links between fall history, unipedal stance time, and plantar cutaneous sensation.
Primary Research Question/Hypothesis What is the relationship between physiological aging and Romberg ratio values during standing balance, and how well can age and somatosensory function explain variation in Romberg ratio values? We hypothesize that older age and reduced somatosensory function will be associated with higher Romberg ratio values (i.e., stronger dependence on vision, suggestive of somatosensory deficits) during standing balance.
Secondary Research Question(s)/Hypothesis
- To what extent does plantar cutaneous sensitivity at different foot sites relate to Romberg ratio values during standing balance, and which site(s) remain significant predictors after controlling for age? We believe that reduced plantar cutaneous sensitivity (higher monofilament thresholds) at medial foot sites will be associated with higher Romberg ratio values, independent of age.
- How are standing Romberg ratio values related to self-reported physical function (PROMIS® PROWalk™) and balance confidence (ABC-6) across different ages? We hypothesize that self-reported physical function and balance confidence will be significant predictors of standing Romberg ratio values, such that lower PROMIS® PROWalk™ scores and lower ABC-6 scores are associated with higher Romberg ratio values, independent of age.
- We will continue to evaluate whether the threshold for loss of balance sensation is lower than that for loss of protective sensation (i.e., inability to feel a 10g monofilament at 2 of 5 sites on the plantar surface of the foot). We hypothesize that impaired balance will be associated with reduced or absent plantar cutaneous sensation, regardless of age.
Study design
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| State Fair Attendees | – | Other: None AHTAdults (age 20+) attending the Minnesota State Fair who agree to participate comprise the study group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population is a convenience sample of individuals who agree to participate in research conducted at the Driven to Discover Research Facility at the Fair.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adults, ages 20 and older
- Able to provide verbal consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Individuals, ages 19 and younger
- Inability to provide verbal consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| None AHTThis is an observational study that does not involve any intervention. | Other | State Fair Attendees |
Primary outcome
Dual- and Single-Leg Quiet Standing Tests
Time frame: About 4-5 minutes of a single 20-minute session
The dual- and single-leg quiet standing tests are static balance assessments used to quantify postural sway under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. These tests will be performed on a force plate to determine Romberg ratios. The Romberg ratio compares sway when visual input is removed to sway when visual input is available, providing an index of visual dependence and sensory contribution to upright balance.
5 secondary outcomes
Anthropometric Information
Time frame: About 4-5 minutes of a single 20-minute session
PROMIS® Physical Function v2.0 PROWalk
Time frame: About 2-3 minutes of a single 20-minute session
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale-6 (ABC-6)
Time frame: 2-3 minutes of a single 20-minute session
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-Short Form
Time frame: About 2-3 minutes of a single 20-minute session
Monofilament Testing
Time frame: About 2 minutes of a single 20-minute session
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 16166466Wood WA, Wood MA, Werter SA, Menn JJ, Hamilton SA, Jacoby R, Dellon AL. Testing for loss of protective sensation in patients with foot ulceration: a cross-sectional study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005 Sep-Oct;95(5):469-74. doi: 10.7547/0950469.
- Background: PubMed 19349593Verghese J, Holtzer R, Lipton RB, Wang C. Quantitative gait markers and incident fall risk in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Aug;64(8):896-901. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp033. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
- Background: PubMed 35728834Araujo CG, de Souza E Silva CG, Laukkanen JA, Fiatarone Singh M, Kunutsor SK, Myers J, Franca JF, Castro CL. Successful 10-second one-legged stance performance predicts survival in middle-aged and older individuals. Br J Sports Med. 2022 Sep;56(17):975-980. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105360. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
- Background: PubMed 21205966Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, Brach J, Chandler J, Cawthon P, Connor EB, Nevitt M, Visser M, Kritchevsky S, Badinelli S, Harris T, Newman AB, Cauley J, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. 2011 Jan 5;305(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1923.
- Background: PubMed 15069135Saltzman CL, Rashid R, Hayes A, Fellner C, Fitzpatrick D, Klapach A, Frantz R, Hillis SL. 4.5-gram monofilament sensation beneath both first metatarsal heads indicates protective foot sensation in diabetic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Apr;86(4):717-23. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200404000-00008.
- Background: PubMed 31085947Rothrock NE, Kaat AJ, Vrahas MS, O'Toole RV, Buono SK, Morrison S, Gershon RC. Validation of PROMIS Physical Function Instruments in Patients With an Orthopaedic Trauma to a Lower Extremity. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Aug;33(8):377-383. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001493.
- Background: PubMed 7614243Richardson JK, Hurvitz EA. Peripheral neuropathy: a true risk factor for falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jul;50(4):M211-5. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.4.m211.
- Background: PubMed 16183200Perry SD. Evaluation of age-related plantar-surface insensitivity and onset age of advanced insensitivity in older adults using vibratory and touch sensation tests. Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jan 9;392(1-2):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.08.060. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
- Background: PubMed 27077993Parsons SL, Mansfield A, Inness EL, Patterson KK. The relationship of plantar cutaneous sensation and standing balance post-stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Oct;23(5):326-32. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1162396. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
- Background: PubMed 36360967Nakamoto M, Ideguchi N, Iwata S, Tomita S, Morimoto N, Fukuda S, Kudo S. Validity and Reliability of Criteria for Plantar Sensation Assessment Using Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament as a Clinically Usable Index. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14092. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114092.
- Background: PubMed 14968274Meyer PF, Oddsson LI, De Luca CJ. The role of plantar cutaneous sensation in unperturbed stance. Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jun;156(4):505-12. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1804-y. Epub 2004 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 36945108Hicks CW, Wang D, Daya N, Juraschek SP, Matsushita K, Windham BG, Selvin E. The association of peripheral neuropathy detected by monofilament testing with risk of falls and fractures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jun;71(6):1902-1909. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18338. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
- Driven to Discover Research Facility at the Minnesota State FairLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The sponsor will make a determination on data sharing prior to publication of the results.
Related trials for Balance Assessment
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of BMS-986368 in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity
Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity
Recruiting
Effect of an Electromagnetic Trainer on Gait and Balance Recovery After Stroke
Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Interventions to Promote Work-Life Balance Among Students at Gaming Schools
Internet Gaming Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
High Intensity Step Training After Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Posture, Proprioception, Core Stability, and Balance in Weightlifters
Balance Assessment, Kyphosis Postural Thoracic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Lars Oddsson, PhD principal investigator
RxFunction Inc.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Balance Assessment and Falls, run by RxFunction Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Clinical Research Project Manager (6123582141, research@rxfunction.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Dual- and Single-Leg Quiet Standing Tests (time frame: About 4-5 minutes of a single 20-minute session). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07412145, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2026.