Recurrent Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaNCT07412314
Proton Therapy for Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
A study testing Proton therapy and Proton radiation therapy in people with Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
The above studies show that most of the supportive evidence for the reduction of toxicity and improvement of efficacy of proton therapy for recurrent Nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC) comes from various observational and retrospective studies, lacking high-level evidence-based medical evidence. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Proton therapy and Proton radiation therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 10 Mar 2025to 10 Mar 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx with biopsy confirmation, at stage ≥ T2b and/or with positive lymph nodes, (2) Pathological type WHO I-III
- PS score (according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) standard) 0-1.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Expected survival period ≥ 6 months
- Before treatment, evaluate the tumor range and size of the patient.
- Nutritional and general physical condition must be able to tolerate the recommended radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Who cannot join
- Evidence of distant metastasis in stage IVc
- Patients with isolated recurrence of cervical lymph nodes;
- Patients have participated in other interventional trials for tumors
- Having suffered from other malignant tumors within 5 years (excluding melanoma skin cancer) or tumors originating from the head and neck region Untreated active infections
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong
Yuan taize, Doctor, taize.yuan@ccm.cn
- Recruiting
Guangzhou concord cancer center
Guanzhou, Guangzhou
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Phase II Clinical Study of Proton Therapy for Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
The above studies show that most of the supportive evidence for the reduction of toxicity and improvement of efficacy of proton therapy for recurrent Nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC) comes from various observational and retrospective studies, lacking high-level evidence-based medical evidence. The conduct of this study will explore the safety and efficacy of intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy for recurrent NPC and provide more high-quality evidence-based medical evidence for proton therapy of recurrent cancer.
Read the detailed description
Radiotherapy is the main treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Currently, the 5-year local control rate for NPC is 80% to 85% . However, some patients inevitably experience local recurrence. For early recurrent tumors, salvage surgery can achieve satisfactory tumor control and improve the quality of life for patients, thus being a reasonable treatment option. However, many recurrent tumors are too advanced to be resected. For these unresectable tumors, high-dose re-irradiation is the only potentially curative method. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), as the main treatment for NPC, has achieved encouraging results in local control, survival, and tolerable toxicity. However, there are still two problems with the treatment plan of IMRT for unresectable recurrent NPC: first, the survival of patients is still poor. It has been reported that the 2-year local progression-free survival rate of locally recurrent NPC patients treated with IMRT combined with chemotherapy is approximately 56% to 76.9%, and the 2-year overall survival rate is only 44% to 68%. Second, severe adverse reactions caused by re-irradiation are the most important cause of treatment failure. About 64.9% of patients experience grade 3 to 5 late radiation-related toxicities such as mucosal necrosis and temporal lobe necrosis . Therefore, in recent years, researchers have been trying more advanced radiotherapy techniques to improve the efficacy of patients with unresectable locally recurrent NPC and reduce radiotherapy-related complications.
Proton radiotherapy is currently recognized as the cutting-edge radiotherapy technology internationally, mainly through particle beam irradiation of tumors. Particles enter with low energy and gradually increase energy deposition until a rapid increase occurs within the "Bragg peak", that is, the energy is elevated and released entirely when reaching the tumor site, achieving a "directed explosion" on the tumor, and then rapidly decreases after passing through the tumor site, decaying to 0 within a very short distance, resulting in minimal radiation to the surrounding normal tissues and reducing the occurrence of long-term adverse reactions. Therefore, proton radiotherapy is an ideal and preferred choice for recurrent NPC. However, there are currently few studies on proton and heavy ion therapy for recurrent NPC, and most are retrospective and observational studies. Although some studies have included patients with unresectable locally recurrent NPC who received re-irradiation with protons, they have not provided detailed information on the specific outcomes of these patients . On the other hand, Linda et al.'s historical study reported that the 2-year overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival rates of 16 patients with recurrent NPC who received proton beam re-irradiation (median dose of 60.1 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)) were both 50%, and it caused minimal side effects on the central nervous system. Meanwhile, Dionisi et al. reported that 17 patients (12 of whom were rT4 patients) received proton re-irradiation, with a median follow-up of 10 months: 23.5% of the patients experienced grade ≥ 3 late toxicities; the 18-month OS and local control rates were 54.4% and 66.6%, respectively.
The above studies show that most of the supportive evidence for the reduction of toxicity and improvement of efficacy of proton therapy for recurrent NPC comes from various observational and retrospective studies, lacking high-level evidence-based medical evidence. The conduct of this study will explore the safety and efficacy of intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy for recurrent NPC and provide more high-quality evidence-based medical evidence for proton therapy of recurrent cancer.
- Conditions
- Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Proton therapy, Proton radiation therapy
- Keywords
- proton therapy, recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- Medical subject headings
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Proton therapyRadiation
Treatment planning and target delineation: All patients were in the supine position with the head extended backward, with the mask fixed, and enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans were performed for positioning. The slice thickness was 1.25mm. The gross tumor volume (GTV) included the recurrent primary lesion. The clinical target volume (CTV) included the anatomical expansion of the tumor and the suspicious lesions visible under the microscope. The CTV was defined as an expansion of 5-10mm outside the GTV. Radiation dose and treatment plan: The prescribed dose was 60-66 Gray (Gy) delivered in 30-33 fractions. Plan design and dose verification: The physicist designed radiotherapy plans according to the requirements of the physician. After the radiotherapy plan was designed, it was evaluated and repeatedly optimized by the physician and the physicist until satisfactory results were achieved. Treatment: was required for each treatment session.
Proton radiation therapyDevice
Radiation: Proton Therapy System (ProBeam)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Proton therapy group | Experimental | All patients received proton therapy, with a prescribed dose of 60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions, 5 days per week, for a total of 6-6.5 weeks. Receives: Radiation: Proton therapy; Device: Proton radiation therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of severe late complications
The proportion of subjects whose toxicity reaction is level 3 during the clinical trial period. The researchers record AE that appeared during the clinical trial cycle and grade it according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Measured: From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period
Secondary outcomes (3)
Overall survival time
It is defined as the time interval from enrollment to the point of death due to any cause. If there is no death, it is calculated as the time of the last follow-up.
Measured: From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period
Local progression-free survival time
It is defined as the time interval from the start of the study to the occurrence of tumor progression or death due to any cause. If there is no tumor progression, it is calculated up to the last follow-up time.
Measured: From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period
Short-term treatment responses
The proportion of patients who achieved treatment response at the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 3 months after the radiotherapy to evaluate the short-term therapeutic effect. Treatment response will be assessed according to the The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and categorized as Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD).
Measured: From enrollment to the three-month follow-up period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2026
- Study start10 Mar 2025
- Primary completion10 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Mar 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Recurrent Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Yuan Taize, Study director, private hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07412314
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-IIT-007
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 9 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Phase II Clinical Study of Proton Therapy for Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07412314
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024-IIT-007
- Conditions
- Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Keywords
- proton therapy, recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Guangzhou Concord Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The above studies show that most of the supportive evidence for the reduction of toxicity and improvement of efficacy of proton therapy for recurrent Nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC) comes from various observational and retrospective studies, lacking high-level evidence-based medical evidence. The conduct of this study will explore the safety and efficacy of intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy for recurrent NPC and provide more high-quality evidence-based medical evidence for proton therapy of recurrent cancer.
Detailed description
Radiotherapy is the main treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Currently, the 5-year local control rate for NPC is 80% to 85% . However, some patients inevitably experience local recurrence. For early recurrent tumors, salvage surgery can achieve satisfactory tumor control and improve the quality of life for patients, thus being a reasonable treatment option. However, many recurrent tumors are too advanced to be resected. For these unresectable tumors, high-dose re-irradiation is the only potentially curative method. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), as the main treatment for NPC, has achieved encouraging results in local control, survival, and tolerable toxicity. However, there are still two problems with the treatment plan of IMRT for unresectable recurrent NPC: first, the survival of patients is still poor. It has been reported that the 2-year local progression-free survival rate of locally recurrent NPC patients treated with IMRT combined with chemotherapy is approximately 56% to 76.9%, and the 2-year overall survival rate is only 44% to 68%. Second, severe adverse reactions caused by re-irradiation are the most important cause of treatment failure. About 64.9% of patients experience grade 3 to 5 late radiation-related toxicities such as mucosal necrosis and temporal lobe necrosis . Therefore, in recent years, researchers have been trying more advanced radiotherapy techniques to improve the efficacy of patients with unresectable locally recurrent NPC and reduce radiotherapy-related complications.
Proton radiotherapy is currently recognized as the cutting-edge radiotherapy technology internationally, mainly through particle beam irradiation of tumors. Particles enter with low energy and gradually increase energy deposition until a rapid increase occurs within the "Bragg peak", that is, the energy is elevated and released entirely when reaching the tumor site, achieving a "directed explosion" on the tumor, and then rapidly decreases after passing through the tumor site, decaying to 0 within a very short distance, resulting in minimal radiation to the surrounding normal tissues and reducing the occurrence of long-term adverse reactions. Therefore, proton radiotherapy is an ideal and preferred choice for recurrent NPC. However, there are currently few studies on proton and heavy ion therapy for recurrent NPC, and most are retrospective and observational studies. Although some studies have included patients with unresectable locally recurrent NPC who received re-irradiation with protons, they have not provided detailed information on the specific outcomes of these patients . On the other hand, Linda et al.'s historical study reported that the 2-year overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival rates of 16 patients with recurrent NPC who received proton beam re-irradiation (median dose of 60.1 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)) were both 50%, and it caused minimal side effects on the central nervous system. Meanwhile, Dionisi et al. reported that 17 patients (12 of whom were rT4 patients) received proton re-irradiation, with a median follow-up of 10 months: 23.5% of the patients experienced grade ≥ 3 late toxicities; the 18-month OS and local control rates were 54.4% and 66.6%, respectively.
The above studies show that most of the supportive evidence for the reduction of toxicity and improvement of efficacy of proton therapy for recurrent NPC comes from various observational and retrospective studies, lacking high-level evidence-based medical evidence. The conduct of this study will explore the safety and efficacy of intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy for recurrent NPC and provide more high-quality evidence-based medical evidence for proton therapy of recurrent cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Proton therapy group | Experimental | Radiation: Proton therapy, Device: Proton radiation therapyAll patients received proton therapy, with a prescribed dose of 60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions, 5 days per week, for a total of 6-6.5 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx with biopsy confirmation, at stage ≥ T2b and/or with positive lymph nodes, (2) Pathological type WHO I-III
- PS score (according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) standard) 0-1.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Expected survival period ≥ 6 months
- Before treatment, evaluate the tumor range and size of the patient.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Evidence of distant metastasis in stage IVc
- Patients with isolated recurrence of cervical lymph nodes;
- Patients have participated in other interventional trials for tumors
- Having suffered from other malignant tumors within 5 years (excluding melanoma skin cancer) or tumors originating from the head and neck region Untreated active infections
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Proton therapyTreatment planning and target delineation: All patients were in the supine position with the head extended backward, with the mask fixed, and enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans were performed for positioning. The slice thickness was 1.25mm. The gross tumor volume (GTV) included the recurrent primary lesion. The clinical target volume (CTV) included the anatomical expansion of the tumor and the suspicious lesions visible under the microscope. The CTV was defined as an expansion of 5-10mm outside the GTV. Radiation dose and treatment plan: The prescribed dose was 60-66 Gray (Gy) delivered in 30-33 fractions. Plan design and dose verification: The physicist designed radiotherapy plans according to the requirements of the physician. After the radiotherapy plan was designed, it was evaluated and repeatedly optimized by the physician and the physicist until satisfactory results were achieved. Treatment: was required for each treatment session. | Radiation | Proton therapy group |
| Proton radiation therapyRadiation: Proton Therapy System (ProBeam) | Device | Proton therapy group |
Primary outcome
Incidence of severe late complications
Time frame: From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period
The proportion of subjects whose toxicity reaction is level 3 during the clinical trial period. The researchers record AE that appeared during the clinical trial cycle and grade it according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
3 secondary outcomes
Overall survival time
Time frame: From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period
Local progression-free survival time
Time frame: From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period
Short-term treatment responses
Time frame: From enrollment to the three-month follow-up period
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Mar 2026.
Related trials for Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of BMS-986016 (Relatlimab) to the Usual Immunotherapy After Initial Treatment for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer
Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Use of Investigational Drugs Atezolizumab and/or Bevacizumab With or Without Standard Chemotherapy in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced-Stage Head and Neck Cancers
Clinical Stage IV HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8, Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Becotatug Vedotin Plus Gemcitabine and a PD-1 Inhibitor in Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing Whether Cemiplimab (REGN2810) Plus CDX-1140 Given Prior to Surgery Are Better Than Cemiplimab (REGN2810) Alone in Patients With Stage III-IV Head and Neck Cancer
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Yuan Taize study director
private hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Proton therapy and Proton radiation therapy in people with Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Taize Yuan, M.D., Ph.D. (8620-32506195, taize.yuan@ccm.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of severe late complications (time frame: From enrollment to the three-year follow-up period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2026.