AzTrials
AzTrials

AnxietyNCT07415772

Effect of cTBS on Startle and TMS-evoked BOLD

A study testing Active TMS in people with Anxiety, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is increasingly being targeted with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to reduce anxiety expression; however, there is little mechanistic evidence supporting an optimized treatment protocol. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Anxiety
What is being tested?
Active TMS
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
140 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Nov 2026to 30 Jun 2031
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Able to give their consent
  • Right-handed
  • Individuals receiving therapy for anxiety must be stable on their regimen for at least 4 weeks prior to study enrollment.

Who cannot join

  • Non-english speaking
  • Any significant medical or neurological problems
  • Current or past non-anxiety-related psychiatric comorbidity, active or history of active suicidal ideation
  • Alcohol/drug problems in the past year or lifetime alcohol or drug dependence
  • Medications that act on the central nervous system
  • History of seizure
Show all 15Show fewer
  • History of epilepsy
  • Increased risk of seizure for any reason
  • Pregnancy, or positive pregnancy test
  • Any medical condition that increases risk for fMRI or TMS
  • Any metal in their body which would make having an MRI scan unsafe
  • Any sort of medical implants
  • Hearing loss
  • Claustrophobia
  • orthostatic hypotension

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-6013

    Nicholas Balderston, PhD, 215-746-3058, nicholas.balderston@pennmedicine.upenn.edu

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Right dlPFC cTBS on Acute Measures of Anxiety, Functional Connectivity, and TMS-evoked BOLD Responses.

The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is increasingly being targeted with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to reduce anxiety expression; however, there is little mechanistic evidence supporting an optimized treatment protocol. Thus, the objective of the current project is to develop an interleaved TMS/fMRI that can assess the effect of neuromodulatory (potentially therapeutic) TMS protocols on neural and behavioral measures related to anxiety expression. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: These results will yield direct evidence that 1 Hz and cTBS modulate brain activity associated with anxiety expression and regulation, thus informing novel TMS based anxiety treatments.

Read the detailed description

The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is increasingly being targeted with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to reduce anxiety expression in anxiety disorders, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, we lack the basic evidence to determine critical details regarding the optimal stimulation parameters including the dose, target, and protocol. In addition, there is little mechanistic evidence for why any particular right dlPFC target/dose/protocol should be effective for a given set of patients. Indeed, there is little consensus as to whether such mechanistic evidence should generalize across disorders. Accordingly, there is a critical need to understand the mechanisms of action underlying neuromodulatory right dlPFC TMS protocols, yet there is not a standardized protocol to yield such evidence. Without a reliable approach to approach to generate such information, it will be difficult or impossible to develop and optimize novel TMS treatments for disorders like PTSD and anxiety. The objective of the current project is to develop a protocol using interleaved TMS/fMRI that can assess the effect of neuromodulatory (potentially therapeutic) TMS protocols on neural and behavioral measures related to anxiety expression. Our central hypothesis is that inhibition of the right dlPFC via cTBS will also inhibit activity throughout its downstream targets, resulting in reduced anxiety, connectivity, and TMS-evoked responses among these downstream circuits during threat. Accordingly, our approach will be to measure anxious arousal, resting state functional connectivity, and TMS evoked BOLD responses before and immediately after 600 pulses of cTBS or sham stimulation in 100 high anxious individuals using a within-subjects crossover design. For anxious arousal, our primary outcome will be anxiety potentiated startle (APS) recorded with electromyography during the neutral, predictable, and unpredictable (NPU) threat paradigm administered in the lab before and after the scanning session. For the interleaved TMS/fMRI runs, our primary outcome will be TMS-evoked BOLD responses in these same downstream regions. This study is innovative because it is the first to combine these technologies to study the effect of neuromodulatory TMS on threat-related TMS-evoked BOLD responses. This project is significant because it will provide future researchers with an systematic approach for evaluating the effectiveness of neuromodulatory TMS protocols on several neural and behavioral indices of anxiety expression. It will also yield direct evidence that cTBS modulate brain activity associated with anxiety expression and regulation.

Conditions
Anxiety
Being tested
Active TMS, Sham TMS
Keywords
anxiety, transcranial magnetic stimulation
Medical subject headings
Anxiety Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Active TMSDevice

    Subjects will receive a continuous 1800 pulse cTBS train to the right dlPFC at 100% of motor threshold. The train will consist of 50 Hz bursts, repeated at intervals of 200 ms (5 Hz) for 40 sec.

  • Sham TMSDevice

    Subjects will receive a series of 100 single pulses to the right dlPFC at 100% of motor threshold. Pulses will be randomly jittered and have an average interpulse interval of 6 ± 4 seconds. Single pulses delivered in such a fashion have been shown to have little or no neuromodulatory effect on subsequent cortical excitability.

Study groups in NCT07415772
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Transcranial Magnetic StimulationOtherA MagVenture MagPro 100X stimulator with a B91 figure-8 coil will be used for the TMS/fMRI rTMS sessions. Motor threshold testing will be done outside of the scanner using a separate MagVenture MagPro 100X with a separate B65 coil.
Receives: Device: Active TMS; Device: Sham TMS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. TMS-evoked BOLD responses

    Subjects will complete 16 minutes of high-resolution multi-band, multi-echo interleaved TMS/fMRI before and after the TMS. During these runs, subjects will receive periodic single pulses of TMS delivered to the right dlPFC. TMS-evoked BOLD responses to these pulses will be the primary outcome measure

    Measured: Subjects will undergo 4 study visits spaced over a 5-week period. On visits 3 (week 2) and 4 (week 5), TMS-evoked BOLD responses will be recorded immediately (within 5 minutes) before and after the intervention.

  2. Anxiety Potentiated Startle

    Subjects will complete the NPU threat task. The primary outcome, APS, will be calculated by subtracting the blink magnitude during the neutral ITI from the unpredictable ITI. We hypothesize that cTBS will reduce APS compared to sham TMS.

    Measured: Subjects will undergo 4 study visits spaced over a 5-week period. On visits 3 (week 2) and 4 (week 5), Anxiety Potentiated Startle will be recorded immediately (within 15 minutes) before and after the intervention.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Feb 2026
  2. Study start1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2031 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2031 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
140 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07415772
Sponsor's protocol ID
860105
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
16 Jan 2026
Last updated
14 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Active TMS in people with Anxiety, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Nicholas Balderston, PhD (12157463058, nicholas.balderston@pennmedicine.upenn.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

TMS-evoked BOLD responses (time frame: Subjects will undergo 4 study visits spaced over a 5-week period. On visits 3 (week 2) and 4 (week 5), TMS-evoked BOLD responses will be recorded immediately (within 5 minutes) before and after the intervention.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in