Breast CancerGALIANCT07418125
Studying the Role of Circulating Tumor Cell Clusters in Patients With High-risk Early Breast Cancer, Study GALIA
A study testing Liquid biopsy in people with Breast Cancer, run by Institute of Oncology Ljubljana at 1 site in Slovenia.
Trial summary
CTCs, CTC clusters, and ctDNA may predict treatment response and survival in high-risk breast cancer, including IBC. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Liquid biopsy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSlovenia
- Study dates
- 7 Feb 2024to 31 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with inflammatory breast cancer, regardless of cancer subtype (stage IIID)
- Patients with non-inflammatory breast cancer: triple-negative and HER2+ subtypes, from stage IIB to IIIA-C
- Adequate health status for neoadjuvant systemic treatment
Who cannot join
- Inflammatory breast cancer stage IV
- Luminal A, luminal B subtypes of non-inflammatory breast cancer
- Stages I-IIA breast cancer
- Inability to understand or communicate in Slovenian
- Inability to follow protocol instructions
- Inappropriate health status for chemotherapy treatment
- Primary treatment with surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Slovenia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
Ljubljana, 1000
Cvetka Grašič Kuhar, MD, 0038615879090, cgrasic@onko-i.si
Cvetka Grašič Kuhar, MD
About this study
CTCs, CTC clusters, and ctDNA may predict treatment response and survival in high-risk breast cancer, including IBC.
Read the detailed description
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in females. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare but aggressive form of the disease, accounting for approximately 2-5% of newly diagnosed breast cancers and exhibiting a worse prognosis than non-inflammatory subtypes. An analysis of treatment outcomes for IBC patients treated at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana (OI) revealed an improvement in overall survival (OS), increasing from 4,7 years for cases diagnosed between 2001-2009 to 10 years for those diagnosed between 2010-2018. This improvement is primarily attributed to targeted therapy for the HER2-positive subtype. Among non-inflammatory breast cancers, the triple-negative subtype is associated with the poorest survival outcomes.
In the past decade, liquid biopsy techniques have been gaining prominence in the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment efficacy. These non-invasive methods enable the tracking of biological markers in bodily fluids, including circulating tumor cells (CTC) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).
CTCs are malignant cells that detach from the primary tumor, enter the bloodstream, and serve as a potential source of metastases in distant organs. However, the circulatory system is a highly hostile environment for these cells, with only 0.1% surviving and successfully extravasating into distant tissues. During circulation, CTCs undergo phenotypic changes. Initially displaying epithelial characteristics, they transition through epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) and mesenchymal phenotypes before reverting to an epithelial state upon tissue colonization, facilitating metastatic seeding.
The number of CTCs in the bloodstream fluctuates. Using the CellSearch® method, CTCs have been detected in 20% of patients with early-stage breast cancer and 80% of those with metastatic disease. The presence of ≥1 CTC per 7,5 mL of blood is an unfavorable prognostic marker for OS in early-stage breast cancer, whereas ≥5 CTCs per 7,5 mL of blood correlates with poorer prognosis in metastatic breast cancer. In IBC, studies have identified ≥1 CTC in 45-84% of patients and ≥5 CTCs in 20-47%.
Recent findings indicate that, in addition to individual CTCs, CTC clusters also circulate in the bloodstream. These clusters exhibit a 20- to 80-fold higher metastatic potential than single CTCs. CTC clusters can be homotypic (composed solely of CTCs) or heterotypic (containing CTCs along with other blood cells, such as neutrophils or platelets). A research group from Milan observed a higher prevalence of CTC clusters in high-risk early-stage breast cancer patients compared to those with metastatic disease.
The isolation of CTC clusters requires specialized techniques. The CellSearch® system, long the only method approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), primarily detects epithelial CTC clusters, leading to the underrepresentation of other phenotypic subtypes in breast cancer patients. More recently, alternative isolation methods based on cell size and deformability have been developed, enabling the identification of a greater number of CTC clusters, including those exhibiting mesenchymal or hybrid epithelial-mesenchymal phenotypes.
During EMT, the expression of mesenchymal-associated genes is upregulated, while epithelial gene expression decreases. This transition is accompanied by cytoskeletal reorganization, loss of intercellular junctions, and disruption of apical-basal polarity, ultimately enhancing cellular motility and promoting an invasive phenotype. The novel finding that CTC clusters are more prevalent in early-stage than in metastatic breast cancer suggests that metastasis via CTC clusters is an early event in disease progression.
At OI, two methods are being investigated for detecting CTCs: magnetic-activated cell separation (MACS), which detects epithelial markers and is similar in principle to the CellSearch® method, and the Parsortix® system, which isolates CTCs based on size and deformability. Findings indicate that the latter is more effective for CTC isolation. In May 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the Parsortix® system, developed by Angle, as a tool for CTC isolation. In the same year, our institution acquired the Parsortix® system, initially for research purposes, with the potential for future implementation in routine clinical practice. To date, two scientific articles have been published on CTCs in international journals, currently a third is being finalized - investigating the relationship between clinicopathological characteristics, CTC count, the presence of CTC clusters and megakaryocytes, and immune-inflammatory marker indices in the blood of patients with non-inflammatory breast cancer in relation to overall survival (OS). The primary focus is on the role of CTC clusters.
Kumar Jolly et al. reported that inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a prototypical malignancy in which metastases predominantly arise through CTC clusters. However, the role of CTC clusters, individual CTCs, and other circulating blood cells (including inflammatory and immune cells) in breast cancer remains incompletely understood, with conflicting findings in the literature. Emerging evidence suggests that hypoxic CTC clusters have a higher metastatic potential, contribute to earlier metastatic onset, and serve as a negative prognostic factor compared to normoxic CTC clusters. Additionally, increasing reports highlight the role of cellular adhesion structures in metastasis. Current research is particularly focused on desmosomes, specifically their subunits plakoglobin and desmoplakin. High plakoglobin expression in the primary tumor has been associated with a shorter time to distant metastasis. Chang et al. reported a correlation between high desmoplakin expression, the structural integrity of CTC clusters, and prolonged CTC survival in circulation, thereby increasing the risk of metastasis. Similarly, high desmoplakin expression has been identified as a negative prognostic factor in other cancers, including cervical, lung, and head and neck carcinomas.
Advancements in CTC and CTC cluster isolation and characterization technologies are enabling increasingly targeted research into the mechanisms of distant metastasis formation. However, establishing CTC cultures and assessing their sensitivity to different therapeutic agents remains a significant challenge. Researchers have reported greater success in this regard using peptide nanoemulsions.
Parallel to CTC research, investigations into circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring are also underway. Winn et al. reported that the genetic profile obtained from ctDNA analysis is complementary to the tumor tissue profile in IBC patients. Tracking ctDNA levels allows for real-time assessment of treatment efficacy and the emergence of therapy resistance.
Throughout the study, evaluation of patient quality of life, with a particular emphasis on cognitive functioning will be performed. This aspect of the research will involve patient representatives from Europa Donna.
Inflammatory breast cancer is a distinct and aggressive subtype of breast cancer with a poorer prognosis than non-inflammatory forms. Among non-inflammatory breast cancers, the triple-negative subtype is associated with the worst clinical outcomes. Investigating CTCs, CTC clusters, and megakaryocytes may provide new insights into the metastatic process of breast cancer. Additionally, monitoring specific ctDNA levels could serve as a valuable tool for assessing treatment efficacy.
This study aims to investigate the prognostic significance of CTC count, CTC clusters, and megakaryocytes as predictive factors for achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer (including inflammatory breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer). Additionally, the role of CTCs, CTC clusters, megakaryocytes, and ctDNA as predictive factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) will be explored.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Liquid biopsy
- Keywords
- breast cancer, ctDNA, liquid biopsy, circulating tumor cell, circulating tumor cluster
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Liquid biopsyDiagnostic test
Also called ctDNA
Additional liquid biopsy to monitor disease
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High risk breast cancer patients | Other | Adult women with inflammatory breast cancer (stage IIID) and non-inflammatory triple negative and HER2+ subtype (stage IIB to IIIA-C) with adequate health status for neoadjuvant systemic treatment Receives: Diagnostic Test: Liquid biopsy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
pCR in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
Measured: before surgery
pCR in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
Measured: immediately after surgery
pCR in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
Measured: 6 months after surgery
pCR in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
Measured: 12 months after surgery
Secondary outcomes (4)
Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)
RFS in patients who are - free of CTCs or CTC clusters at the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, comparing their outcomes with patients who still have CTCs or CTC clusters
Measured: throughout study completion, an average of 2 years
Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)
RFS in patients who are - free of CTCs or CTC clusters after surgery, comparing them with those who still have CTCs or CTC clusters
Measured: throughout study completion, an average of 2 years
Overall Survival (OS)
OS in patients who are - free of CTCs or CTC clusters at the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, comparing their outcomes with patients who still have CTCs or CTC clusters
Measured: throughout study completion, an average of 3 years
Overall Survival (OS)
OS in patients who are - free of CTCs or CTC clusters after surgery, comparing them with those who still have CTCs or CTC clusters
Measured: throughout study completion, an average of 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Feb 2026
- Study start7 Feb 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07418125
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ERIDNPVO-0029/2023
- Acronym
- GALIA
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Studying the Role of Circulating Tumor Cell Clusters in Patients With High-risk Early Breast Cancer, Study GALIA
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07418125
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GALIA / ERIDNPVO-0029/2023
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- breast cancer, ctDNA, liquid biopsy, circulating tumor cell, circulating tumor cluster
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Oncology LjubljanaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
CTCs, CTC clusters, and ctDNA may predict treatment response and survival in high-risk breast cancer, including IBC.
Detailed description
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in females. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare but aggressive form of the disease, accounting for approximately 2-5% of newly diagnosed breast cancers and exhibiting a worse prognosis than non-inflammatory subtypes. An analysis of treatment outcomes for IBC patients treated at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana (OI) revealed an improvement in overall survival (OS), increasing from 4,7 years for cases diagnosed between 2001-2009 to 10 years for those diagnosed between 2010-2018. This improvement is primarily attributed to targeted therapy for the HER2-positive subtype. Among non-inflammatory breast cancers, the triple-negative subtype is associated with the poorest survival outcomes.
In the past decade, liquid biopsy techniques have been gaining prominence in the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment efficacy. These non-invasive methods enable the tracking of biological markers in bodily fluids, including circulating tumor cells (CTC) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).
CTCs are malignant cells that detach from the primary tumor, enter the bloodstream, and serve as a potential source of metastases in distant organs. However, the circulatory system is a highly hostile environment for these cells, with only 0.1% surviving and successfully extravasating into distant tissues. During circulation, CTCs undergo phenotypic changes. Initially displaying epithelial characteristics, they transition through epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) and mesenchymal phenotypes before reverting to an epithelial state upon tissue colonization, facilitating metastatic seeding.
The number of CTCs in the bloodstream fluctuates. Using the CellSearch® method, CTCs have been detected in 20% of patients with early-stage breast cancer and 80% of those with metastatic disease. The presence of ≥1 CTC per 7,5 mL of blood is an unfavorable prognostic marker for OS in early-stage breast cancer, whereas ≥5 CTCs per 7,5 mL of blood correlates with poorer prognosis in metastatic breast cancer. In IBC, studies have identified ≥1 CTC in 45-84% of patients and ≥5 CTCs in 20-47%.
Recent findings indicate that, in addition to individual CTCs, CTC clusters also circulate in the bloodstream. These clusters exhibit a 20- to 80-fold higher metastatic potential than single CTCs. CTC clusters can be homotypic (composed solely of CTCs) or heterotypic (containing CTCs along with other blood cells, such as neutrophils or platelets). A research group from Milan observed a higher prevalence of CTC clusters in high-risk early-stage breast cancer patients compared to those with metastatic disease.
The isolation of CTC clusters requires specialized techniques. The CellSearch® system, long the only method approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), primarily detects epithelial CTC clusters, leading to the underrepresentation of other phenotypic subtypes in breast cancer patients. More recently, alternative isolation methods based on cell size and deformability have been developed, enabling the identification of a greater number of CTC clusters, including those exhibiting mesenchymal or hybrid epithelial-mesenchymal phenotypes.
During EMT, the expression of mesenchymal-associated genes is upregulated, while epithelial gene expression decreases. This transition is accompanied by cytoskeletal reorganization, loss of intercellular junctions, and disruption of apical-basal polarity, ultimately enhancing cellular motility and promoting an invasive phenotype. The novel finding that CTC clusters are more prevalent in early-stage than in metastatic breast cancer suggests that metastasis via CTC clusters is an early event in disease progression.
At OI, two methods are being investigated for detecting CTCs: magnetic-activated cell separation (MACS), which detects epithelial markers and is similar in principle to the CellSearch® method, and the Parsortix® system, which isolates CTCs based on size and deformability. Findings indicate that the latter is more effective for CTC isolation. In May 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the Parsortix® system, developed by Angle, as a tool for CTC isolation. In the same year, our institution acquired the Parsortix® system, initially for research purposes, with the potential for future implementation in routine clinical practice. To date, two scientific articles have been published on CTCs in international journals, currently a third is being finalized - investigating the relationship between clinicopathological characteristics, CTC count, the presence of CTC clusters and megakaryocytes, and immune-inflammatory marker indices in the blood of patients with non-inflammatory breast cancer in relation to overall survival (OS). The primary focus is on the role of CTC clusters.
Kumar Jolly et al. reported that inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a prototypical malignancy in which metastases predominantly arise through CTC clusters. However, the role of CTC clusters, individual CTCs, and other circulating blood cells (including inflammatory and immune cells) in breast cancer remains incompletely understood, with conflicting findings in the literature. Emerging evidence suggests that hypoxic CTC clusters have a higher metastatic potential, contribute to earlier metastatic onset, and serve as a negative prognostic factor compared to normoxic CTC clusters. Additionally, increasing reports highlight the role of cellular adhesion structures in metastasis. Current research is particularly focused on desmosomes, specifically their subunits plakoglobin and desmoplakin. High plakoglobin expression in the primary tumor has been associated with a shorter time to distant metastasis. Chang et al. reported a correlation between high desmoplakin expression, the structural integrity of CTC clusters, and prolonged CTC survival in circulation, thereby increasing the risk of metastasis. Similarly, high desmoplakin expression has been identified as a negative prognostic factor in other cancers, including cervical, lung, and head and neck carcinomas.
Advancements in CTC and CTC cluster isolation and characterization technologies are enabling increasingly targeted research into the mechanisms of distant metastasis formation. However, establishing CTC cultures and assessing their sensitivity to different therapeutic agents remains a significant challenge. Researchers have reported greater success in this regard using peptide nanoemulsions.
Parallel to CTC research, investigations into circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring are also underway. Winn et al. reported that the genetic profile obtained from ctDNA analysis is complementary to the tumor tissue profile in IBC patients. Tracking ctDNA levels allows for real-time assessment of treatment efficacy and the emergence of therapy resistance.
Throughout the study, evaluation of patient quality of life, with a particular emphasis on cognitive functioning will be performed. This aspect of the research will involve patient representatives from Europa Donna.
Inflammatory breast cancer is a distinct and aggressive subtype of breast cancer with a poorer prognosis than non-inflammatory forms. Among non-inflammatory breast cancers, the triple-negative subtype is associated with the worst clinical outcomes. Investigating CTCs, CTC clusters, and megakaryocytes may provide new insights into the metastatic process of breast cancer. Additionally, monitoring specific ctDNA levels could serve as a valuable tool for assessing treatment efficacy.
This study aims to investigate the prognostic significance of CTC count, CTC clusters, and megakaryocytes as predictive factors for achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer (including inflammatory breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer). Additionally, the role of CTCs, CTC clusters, megakaryocytes, and ctDNA as predictive factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) will be explored.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High risk breast cancer patients | Other | Diagnostic Test: Liquid biopsyAdult women with inflammatory breast cancer (stage IIID) and non-inflammatory triple negative and HER2+ subtype (stage IIB to IIIA-C) with adequate health status for neoadjuvant systemic treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with inflammatory breast cancer, regardless of cancer subtype (stage IIID)
- Patients with non-inflammatory breast cancer: triple-negative and HER2+ subtypes, from stage IIB to IIIA-C
- Adequate health status for neoadjuvant systemic treatment
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Inflammatory breast cancer stage IV
- Luminal A, luminal B subtypes of non-inflammatory breast cancer
- Stages I-IIA breast cancer
- Inability to understand or communicate in Slovenian
- Inability to follow protocol instructions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Liquid biopsyAlso: ctDNAAdditional liquid biopsy to monitor disease | Diagnostic test | High risk breast cancer patients |
Primary outcome
pCR in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
Time frame: before surgery
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
pCR in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
Time frame: immediately after surgery
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
pCR in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
Time frame: 6 months after surgery
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
pCR in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters.
4 secondary outcomes
Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)
Time frame: throughout study completion, an average of 2 years
Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)
Time frame: throughout study completion, an average of 2 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: throughout study completion, an average of 3 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: throughout study completion, an average of 3 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Liquid biopsy in people with Breast Cancer, run by Institute of Oncology Ljubljana at 1 site in Slovenia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Slovenia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Klavdija Korošec (00386 1 5879 639, kkorosec@onko-i.si), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
pCR in patients with breast cancer, comparing those with ≥1 CTC, ≥1 CTC cluster, or ≥1 megakaryocyte at diagnosis to those without CTCs, megakaryocytes, or CTC clusters. (time frame: before surgery). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2026.