VolleyballNCT07425223
Acute Effects of Kinesiology Taping on Performance in Volleyball Players
A study testing Kinesiology Taping in people with Volleyball and Kinesiology Taping, run by Halic University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Kinesiological tape is frequently used to provide support for injured muscles and joints, enhance fascial function, inhibit pain-inducing stimuli, and improve blood and lymph circulation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 19 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Volleyball, Kinesiology Taping, Functional Performance
- What is being tested?
- Kinesiology Taping
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 20 Feb 2026to 20 May 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 19 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Being between 13-19 years of age.
- Being within the full range of active glenohumeral elevation.
- Both the participant and the parent must be volunteers.
- Being a licensed volleyball player for at least one year. - Participants must be female.
- Having previously undergone kinesiological taping and not having developed sensitivity.
Who cannot join
- Participant's unwillingness to participate in the study
- Having an acute or active injury to the shoulder complex within the last 6 months
- Individuals with a history of sensitivity to kinesiological tape
- Presence of a severe cardiopulmonary, orthopedic, or neurological disease
- Presence of physical discomforts such as severe dizziness
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Acute Effects of Kinesiology Taping on Functional Performance in Volleyball Players: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
Kinesiological tape is frequently used to provide support for injured muscles and joints, enhance fascial function, inhibit pain-inducing stimuli, and improve blood and lymph circulation. However, there is no consensus among researchers and practitioners regarding kinesiological taping, particularly its application to improve athletic performance. This study aimed to investigate the acute changes in functional performance of volleyball players who underwent kinesiological taping. Designed as a randomized controlled experimental study, it planned to include 24 licensed female volleyball players from Anadolu Marmara Sports Schools. Players meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized into kinesiological tape (n:12) and sham (dummy-ineffective) tape (n:12) groups. The assessment will consist of a general warm-up program followed by the single-arm hop test for upper extremity strength, speed, and stability; the closed kinetic chain upper extremity endurance test for strength and endurance; and the medicine ball throw test for functional strength. Following the initial assessment, tests will be repeated immediately after facilitative taping of the pectoralis major and anterior deltoid muscles of the athletes. SPSS 24 statistical program will be used for data analysis. Continuous variables will be presented as mean ± standard deviation, and qualitative variables as number and percentage (%). If the assumptions for parametric tests are met, the Independent Samples t-test will be used for comparing independent groups, and the Paired Samples t-test will be used for comparing dependent groups. If the assumptions for parametric tests are not met, the Mann-Whitney U test will be used for comparing independent groups, and the Wilcoxon test will be used for comparing dependent groups. Statistical significance will be accepted at p≤0.05. This study is expected to contribute to performance-enhancing practices in volleyball players by providing evidence-based data on the application method and effectiveness of kinesiological taping for functional performance.
Read the detailed description
Kinesiological tape (KT), developed in the 1970s, has been used in the treatment of various lesions ever since. Its use began to spread after it was first applied to athletic performance at the 2008 Summer Olympics. KT, a narrow strip that can stretch up to 140% of its original length due to its flexible structure, is reported to be effective in reducing movement restriction, increasing proprioceptive input, and stimulating cutaneous mechanoreceptors to reduce pain.
KT is waterproof, heat-resistant, hypoallergenic, elastic, and compatible with human skin. Technically, unlike other tapes, it can be used directly and remain firmly in the tissue for several days. Thus, it is used comfortably and practically in daily life without damaging the skin and without the need for an additional tape.
Kinesiological tape has become more widespread in the field of sports, especially in the last decade, by stretching and offering freedom of movement to the tissue. Kase, the inventor of the tape, stated that KT stimulates large-scale motor activity after cutaneous stimulation. Research into the effects of KT (Taping Techniques) on athletic performance has increased, particularly due to reports that it reaches neurons, facilitates muscle function, and increases muscle tone. KT is thought to both reduce muscle spasms and improve muscles with reduced muscle activation by maintaining optimal muscle tension levels. While KT is considered a method with the potential to regulate muscle activity, support postural control, and improve functional movements, its effects may vary between individuals, and there are contradictions in the results of current scientific data.
KT is thought to improve important performance components such as explosive power and endurance by increasing skin tactile input and activating fascial release mechanisms. However, the results of applied methods have been controversial because the application time and method required to enhance the effect of KT have not been clearly determined. While evidence suggests that KT may be effective in increasing instantaneous power, it is thought that different time periods show maximum effect for each muscle. The variability in the effectiveness of KT on performance determinants, especially differences in control groups and the methods used in taping techniques, are relevant factors. Different strategies may have resulted from heterogeneity in the individuals included in the studies and insufficient sample sizes. Our study aims to provide evidence-based data to the literature and increase the level of evidence by supporting similar studies, taking into account the confusion regarding the applicability and application method of kinesiological tape in athletes.
In volleyball players, upper extremity strength, endurance, speed, and agility parameters are important determinants of performance. Especially in the successful execution of basic athletic patterns such as hitting the ball, blocking, and serving, the strength and endurance of the shoulder and elbow muscles are particularly prominent. Although the use of kinesiological taping is widespread among volleyball players, there are a limited number of studies in the literature. In volleyball players with ankle instability, kinesiological taping was applied to different muscle groups of the lower extremity, and it was found that the tape applied with tension was more effective in increasing balance and functions compared to the tape applied without tension. Another study investigating the acute effect of kinesiological taping applied to the hip adductor muscle group on performance in female volleyball players... The study reported that tape positively affects endurance, strength, and agility, and improves performance. Although current studies show that tape applied to volleyball players can be effective in improving performance, conflicting and inconsistent results can lead to application errors and confusion among clinicians and field experts. To obtain optimal results from the tape application, the tape must be applied to the correct muscle groups using a valid and effective method. Therefore, there is a need for more evidence-based data on this subject, and for randomized controlled trials planned with high-quality and large sample groups. In this context, our study, which aims to contribute to the literature, serves as a guide for field experts and athletes.
- Conditions
- Volleyball, Kinesiology Taping, Functional Performance
- Being tested
- Kinesiology Taping, Sham Taping
- Keywords
- volleyball, kinesiology taping, performance, endurance, speed
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Kinesiology TapingOther
This involves applying kinesiological tape to the pectoralis major and anterior deltoid muscles using facilitation techniques.
Sham TapingOther
Sham taping applied to pectoralis major and anterior deltoid muscles (non-therapeutic application) to mimic taping without intended physiological effect.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Kinesio Group | Experimental | Kinesiological taping will be applied to the participants in the group using the "muscle facilitation technique," a method aimed at facilitating muscle movement. In this technique, the muscle to be treated is brought into a tense position. For facilitation, the tape should be directed from the origin to the insertion direction and applied in the direction of movement. Considering the stretchability of the tape, it will be applied with minimal tension (20-30%), and the end point of the tape will be rounded to prevent peeling of the edges and to increase the length of the tape application. At the end of the application, the tape will be warmed by external friction to ensure complete adhesion to the skin. Receives: Other: Kinesiology Taping |
| Sham Group | Sham comparator | The participants in the group were scheduled to undergo a sham procedure, described as a fake and ineffective application. In this procedure, a KT (tape tape) cut to the same dimensions would be applied ineffectively without any tension or orientation, and the athletes would be blinded to this information. Receives: Other: Sham Taping |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Single-arm hop test
This is a valid measurement method used to test the strength, speed, and stability of the upper extremity. The person being tested stands in a single-arm push-up position next to a step board and, upon receiving the "start" command, jumps onto the step board using only one arm and lands again. The time taken for five repetitions is measured. A shorter time indicates improved performance.
Measured: Baseline and immediately after taping application (within 5 minutes)
Closed kinetic chain upper extremity endurance test
This is a valid test used to measure the strength and endurance of the upper extremity. Two pieces of colored tape are attached to the ground 90 centimeters apart. The athlete being tested waits in a push-up position symmetrically between the tapes. Upon the command to start, they raise their hand and touch the tape on the other side, then repeat on the other side. They are instructed to repeat this for 15 seconds without changing body alignment and parallelism to the ground, and the number of repetitions in 15 seconds is recorded.
Measured: Baseline and immediately after taping application (within 5 minutes)
Medicine Ball Throw Test
Used to evaluate athletes' muscle strength and throwing technique. It also measures coordination, balance, and speed. Athletes stand one step behind a designated line, facing the direction of the throw. A medicine ball (3 kg) is held in both hands behind the head. This position requires the player to use their upper body strength. Participants are instructed to throw the ball as far forward as possible, placing their front foot behind the line. Each throw is recorded by a measurement taken at the point where the ball lands. The measurement is taken from the point where the medicine ball lands to the nearest marked point. The athlete's greatest throw distance is used for analysis.
Measured: Baseline and immediately after taping application (within 5 minutes)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2026
- Study start20 Feb 2026
- Primary completion20 Mar 2026
- Study completion20 May 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for VolleyballStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Halic University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, İrem Çetinkaya, Halic University
- Investigators
- İrem Çetinkaya, PhD, Principal investigator, Haliç University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07425223
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- karanki5
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Acute Effects of Kinesiology Taping on Functional Performance in Volleyball Players: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07425223
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- karanki5
- Conditions
- Volleyball, Kinesiology Taping, Functional Performance
- Keywords
- volleyball, kinesiology taping, performance, endurance, speed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Halic UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 May 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Kinesiological tape is frequently used to provide support for injured muscles and joints, enhance fascial function, inhibit pain-inducing stimuli, and improve blood and lymph circulation. However, there is no consensus among researchers and practitioners regarding kinesiological taping, particularly its application to improve athletic performance. This study aimed to investigate the acute changes in functional performance of volleyball players who underwent kinesiological taping. Designed as a randomized controlled experimental study, it planned to include 24 licensed female volleyball players from Anadolu Marmara Sports Schools. Players meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized into kinesiological tape (n:12) and sham (dummy-ineffective) tape (n:12) groups. The assessment will consist of a general warm-up program followed by the single-arm hop test for upper extremity strength, speed, and stability; the closed kinetic chain upper extremity endurance test for strength and endurance; and the medicine ball throw test for functional strength. Following the initial assessment, tests will be repeated immediately after facilitative taping of the pectoralis major and anterior deltoid muscles of the athletes. SPSS 24 statistical program will be used for data analysis. Continuous variables will be presented as mean ± standard deviation, and qualitative variables as number and percentage (%). If the assumptions for parametric tests are met, the Independent Samples t-test will be used for comparing independent groups, and the Paired Samples t-test will be used for comparing dependent groups. If the assumptions for parametric tests are not met, the Mann-Whitney U test will be used for comparing independent groups, and the Wilcoxon test will be used for comparing dependent groups. Statistical significance will be accepted at p≤0.05. This study is expected to contribute to performance-enhancing practices in volleyball players by providing evidence-based data on the application method and effectiveness of kinesiological taping for functional performance.
Detailed description
Kinesiological tape (KT), developed in the 1970s, has been used in the treatment of various lesions ever since. Its use began to spread after it was first applied to athletic performance at the 2008 Summer Olympics. KT, a narrow strip that can stretch up to 140% of its original length due to its flexible structure, is reported to be effective in reducing movement restriction, increasing proprioceptive input, and stimulating cutaneous mechanoreceptors to reduce pain.
KT is waterproof, heat-resistant, hypoallergenic, elastic, and compatible with human skin. Technically, unlike other tapes, it can be used directly and remain firmly in the tissue for several days. Thus, it is used comfortably and practically in daily life without damaging the skin and without the need for an additional tape.
Kinesiological tape has become more widespread in the field of sports, especially in the last decade, by stretching and offering freedom of movement to the tissue. Kase, the inventor of the tape, stated that KT stimulates large-scale motor activity after cutaneous stimulation. Research into the effects of KT (Taping Techniques) on athletic performance has increased, particularly due to reports that it reaches neurons, facilitates muscle function, and increases muscle tone. KT is thought to both reduce muscle spasms and improve muscles with reduced muscle activation by maintaining optimal muscle tension levels. While KT is considered a method with the potential to regulate muscle activity, support postural control, and improve functional movements, its effects may vary between individuals, and there are contradictions in the results of current scientific data.
KT is thought to improve important performance components such as explosive power and endurance by increasing skin tactile input and activating fascial release mechanisms. However, the results of applied methods have been controversial because the application time and method required to enhance the effect of KT have not been clearly determined. While evidence suggests that KT may be effective in increasing instantaneous power, it is thought that different time periods show maximum effect for each muscle. The variability in the effectiveness of KT on performance determinants, especially differences in control groups and the methods used in taping techniques, are relevant factors. Different strategies may have resulted from heterogeneity in the individuals included in the studies and insufficient sample sizes. Our study aims to provide evidence-based data to the literature and increase the level of evidence by supporting similar studies, taking into account the confusion regarding the applicability and application method of kinesiological tape in athletes.
In volleyball players, upper extremity strength, endurance, speed, and agility parameters are important determinants of performance. Especially in the successful execution of basic athletic patterns such as hitting the ball, blocking, and serving, the strength and endurance of the shoulder and elbow muscles are particularly prominent. Although the use of kinesiological taping is widespread among volleyball players, there are a limited number of studies in the literature. In volleyball players with ankle instability, kinesiological taping was applied to different muscle groups of the lower extremity, and it was found that the tape applied with tension was more effective in increasing balance and functions compared to the tape applied without tension. Another study investigating the acute effect of kinesiological taping applied to the hip adductor muscle group on performance in female volleyball players... The study reported that tape positively affects endurance, strength, and agility, and improves performance. Although current studies show that tape applied to volleyball players can be effective in improving performance, conflicting and inconsistent results can lead to application errors and confusion among clinicians and field experts. To obtain optimal results from the tape application, the tape must be applied to the correct muscle groups using a valid and effective method. Therefore, there is a need for more evidence-based data on this subject, and for randomized controlled trials planned with high-quality and large sample groups. In this context, our study, which aims to contribute to the literature, serves as a guide for field experts and athletes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Kinesio Group | Experimental | Other: Kinesiology TapingKinesiological taping will be applied to the participants in the group using the "muscle facilitation technique," a method aimed at facilitating muscle movement. In this technique, the muscle to be treated is brought into a tense position. For facilitation, the tape should be directed from the origin to the insertion direction and applied in the direction of movement. Considering the stretchability of the tape, it will be applied with minimal tension (20-30%), and the end point of the tape will be rounded to prevent peeling of the edges and to increase the length of the tape application. At the end of the application, the tape will be warmed by external friction to ensure complete adhesion to the skin. |
| Sham Group | Sham comparator | Other: Sham TapingThe participants in the group were scheduled to undergo a sham procedure, described as a fake and ineffective application. In this procedure, a KT (tape tape) cut to the same dimensions would be applied ineffectively without any tension or orientation, and the athletes would be blinded to this information. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 19 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Being between 13-19 years of age.
- Being within the full range of active glenohumeral elevation.
- Both the participant and the parent must be volunteers.
- Being a licensed volleyball player for at least one year. - Participants must be female.
- Having previously undergone kinesiological taping and not having developed sensitivity.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participant's unwillingness to participate in the study
- Having an acute or active injury to the shoulder complex within the last 6 months
- Individuals with a history of sensitivity to kinesiological tape
- Presence of a severe cardiopulmonary, orthopedic, or neurological disease
- Presence of physical discomforts such as severe dizziness
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Kinesiology TapingThis involves applying kinesiological tape to the pectoralis major and anterior deltoid muscles using facilitation techniques. | Other | Kinesio Group |
| Sham TapingSham taping applied to pectoralis major and anterior deltoid muscles (non-therapeutic application) to mimic taping without intended physiological effect. | Other | Sham Group |
Primary outcome
Single-arm hop test
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after taping application (within 5 minutes)
This is a valid measurement method used to test the strength, speed, and stability of the upper extremity. The person being tested stands in a single-arm push-up position next to a step board and, upon receiving the "start" command, jumps onto the step board using only one arm and lands again. The time taken for five repetitions is measured. A shorter time indicates improved performance.
Closed kinetic chain upper extremity endurance test
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after taping application (within 5 minutes)
This is a valid test used to measure the strength and endurance of the upper extremity. Two pieces of colored tape are attached to the ground 90 centimeters apart. The athlete being tested waits in a push-up position symmetrically between the tapes. Upon the command to start, they raise their hand and touch the tape on the other side, then repeat on the other side. They are instructed to repeat this for 15 seconds without changing body alignment and parallelism to the ground, and the number of repetitions in 15 seconds is recorded.
Medicine Ball Throw Test
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after taping application (within 5 minutes)
Used to evaluate athletes' muscle strength and throwing technique. It also measures coordination, balance, and speed. Athletes stand one step behind a designated line, facing the direction of the throw. A medicine ball (3 kg) is held in both hands behind the head. This position requires the player to use their upper body strength. Participants are instructed to throw the ball as far forward as possible, placing their front foot behind the line. Each throw is recorded by a measurement taken at the point where the ball lands. The measurement is taken from the point where the medicine ball lands to the nearest marked point. The athlete's greatest throw distance is used for analysis.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Volleyball
Not yet recruiting
PNF Effects on Volleyball Performance
Sport Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Examining the Health Impact of and Promoting Sitting Light Volleyball in the Greater Bay Area
Physial Disabilities
Not yet recruiting
Eye Dominance-based Visual Training
Eye Dominance-based Visual Training, Volleyball Players
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Cognitive Restructuring Intervention on Competitive State Anxiety and Volleyball Skill Performance Among Female Collegiate Volleyball Players in Guangzhou, China
Competitive State Anxiety, Volleyball Skill Performance
Recruiting
Diaphragmatic Facilitation and Upper Extremity Performance in Volleyball Players
Volleyball Players
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
İrem Çetinkaya, PhD principal investigator
Haliç University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Kinesiology Taping in people with Volleyball and Kinesiology Taping, run by Halic University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Single-arm hop test (time frame: Baseline and immediately after taping application (within 5 minutes)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2026.