Enteral Nutrition's Effect on the GutHENNCT07426003
Healthy Volunteers Enteral Nutrition Study (HEN)
A study testing Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 and Crohn's disease exclusion diet in people with Enteral Nutrition's Effect on the Gut, run by James Lewis at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This research study is being conducted to determine the effects of enteral nutrition on healthy people. Enteral nutrition for the purpose of this study refers to the use of a specially developed formula taken by mouth that provides all essential nutrition either in the absence of food or to supplement the intake of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Enteral Nutrition's Effect on the Gut
- What is being tested?
- Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 and Crohn's disease exclusion diet
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Jun 2026to May 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be able to read and understand English
- Must be able to sign a consent form for the study
Who cannot join
- BMI <20 or >30
- Unintentional weight loss of >10% in the last 3-6 months
- Kidney disease
- Diagnosis of cirrhosis
- Taking diuretics
- Anemia - Hemoglobin <lower limit of normal in men or <10 g/dL in women.
Show all 21Show fewer
- Taking iron supplements within 2 weeks for Visit 2.1
- Taking prebiotic or probiotic supplements or any supplement including a multivitamin within 2 weeks of Visit 2.1
- Taking antibiotics less than 4 weeks prior to Visit 2.1
- Diarrhea in the 2 weeks prior to Visit 2.1
- Diabetes mellitus
- Diagnosis of congestive heart failure
- Diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease or celiac disease
- Bowel resection other than an appendectomy
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Intolerance or allergy to nutritional formula, chicken, eggs, apples, banana, potatoes
- Using protein supplements, including powder added to food or drinks within 2 weeks of Visit 2.1
- Baseline bowel frequency less than every 2 days or greater than 3 times daily
- Student or employee of any one of the investigators.
- Anyone who cannot receive study payment (e.g. visa constraints).
- Any condition that the investigator feels may limit the volunteer's ability to complete the study protocol.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
HEN Study General Email contact
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Penn Center for Advance Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Alesia Smith, 445-242-3237, Alesia.Smith@PennMedicine.upenn.edu
About this study
Official title: Healthy Volunteers Enteral Nutrition Study
This research study is being conducted to determine the effects of enteral nutrition on healthy people. Enteral nutrition for the purpose of this study refers to the use of a specially developed formula taken by mouth that provides all essential nutrition either in the absence of food or to supplement the intake of foods. Enteral nutrition can be used for many reasons, such as to gain or lose weight, to treat food allergies, or to reduce inflammation in certain intestinal diseases. We would like to understand the effects of enteral nutrition in the absence of intestinal inflammation.
Read the detailed description
Crohn's disease is an immune mediated condition that can affect any area of the gastrointestinal tract. The etiology is still unclear but is thought to be an aberrant response to the gut microbiota, inducing intestinal and systemic inflammation. Given the role of the immune system in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease, the cornerstone of therapy has been targeted immunosuppression. However, despite the advances in pharmacologic treatments that have been seen in the past 20 years, a significant number of patients either do not respond to therapy or lose response after experiencing a benefit. In addition, immunosuppression is associated with unwanted adverse effects. As such, there is a need to develop therapeutic approaches that address the underlying stimuli that leads to the inflammation of Crohn's disease.
This is an outpatient randomized controlled trial of 20 healthy volunteers who will be assigned to either Partial Enteral Nutrition (PEN) defined as 60% of calories from Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 formula and 40% of calories from the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED) (N=10) vs. Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN) defined as 100% of calories from Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 formula (N=10) for 3 days. The purpose of the study is to understand the changes in colon transit time and the microbiome and metabolome that result from consumption of the assigned diet. Blood and urine will be collected at screening and for 3 of 4 days that the participants are under study observation. Stool will be collected on all 4 days if the participant has a bowel movement on each day. Participants will also be given sitz markers on day one of the study and will undergo one or two x-rays. Diet surveys will also be collected during the 4 days of observation.
Considering the link between gut microbiome and development of inflammatory bowel diseases, there has been a growing interest in dietary modifications aiming to treat or even prevent the development of disease. Dietary therapies are a potential therapeutic alternative in Crohn's disease. Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), the provision of 90% to 100% of daily caloric intake with a meal replacement formula, is as efficacious as corticosteroids in pediatric Crohn's disease and is promoted as a first-line treatment over corticosteroids. However, it is used less in adults as it is not well tolerated and leads to poor adherence. Partial enteral nutrition (PEN), the provision of approximately 50-80% of calories from a meal replacement formula, has emerged as a potential, better tolerated strategy to treat CD. Studies have shown that PEN may help to treat Crohn's disease even though it may not be as efficacious as EEN. The mechanisms by which enteral nutrition may be useful in the treatment of CD are unknown but some evidence points to immunomodulation of the gastrointestinal tract, promoting mucosal healing through changes in cytokine profiles, inducing microbiome changes and decreasing the exposure to food and additives that can reduce the epithelial barrier function.
CDED is characterized by mandatory and optional foods. The mandatory foods are chicken breast, eggs, potatoes, apples and bananas. The optional foods are predominantly a range of fruits and vegetables and non-gluten containing grains. Because EEN and PEN with CDED appear to be comparably efficacious, it suggests that the food which is being excluded is more important than the quantity of formula consumed. This is further evidenced by the observation that the choice of enteral formula does not appear to impact the efficacy of EEN.6
The main barrier to use of EEN or CDED is the restrictive nature of the diet. The investigators hypothesize that better characterization of the biologic effects of EEN and PEN with CDED would allow for development of more liberalized diets that achieve comparable efficacy. The investigators propose to leverage modern omics technologies to characterize the microbiome and metabolome of EEN and PEN with CDED among healthy volunteers to aid in the development of rational and perhaps personalized diets for patients with Crohn's disease. The investigators have elected to conduct this research among healthy volunteers rather than in patients with Crohn's disease so as to avoid the confounding effect of intestinal inflammation.
- Conditions
- Enteral Nutrition's Effect on the Gut
- Being tested
- Kate Farms Peptide 1.5, Crohn's disease exclusion diet
- Keywords
- enteral nutrition, healthy volunteers
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Kate Farms Peptide 1.5Dietary supplement
Kate Farms Peptide 1.5
Crohn's disease exclusion dietOther
This study will use the components of the Crohn's disease exclusion diet Phase 1 which includes chicken breast, eggs, potatoes, bananas and apples
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Partial Enteral Nutrition and the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet | Active comparator | Participants will drink Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 for 60% of their calories and follow the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet for the remainder of their calories Receives: Dietary Supplement: Kate Farms Peptide 1.5; Other: Crohn's disease exclusion diet |
| Exclusive enteral nutrition | Active comparator | Participants will consume Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 exclusively except water, and coffee and tea with no sweetner or cream/milk for 3 days Receives: Dietary Supplement: Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
number of sitz markers at 72 hours
Number of sitz markers that are present in an abdominal x-ray 72 hours after the participant takes the sitz mark capsule
Measured: 72 hours after taking the sitzmark capsule
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2026
- Study start17 Jun 2026
- Primary completionApr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Enteral Nutrition's Effect on the GutStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- James Lewis
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, James Lewis, University of Pennsylvania
- Investigators
- James Lewis, MD, MSCE, Principal investigator, University of Pennsylvania
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07426003
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 860217
- Acronym
- HEN
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Due to the small sample size, there is risk of participant identification. However, we will consider requests to access deidentified data on an individual basis and under a data use agreement.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Healthy Volunteers Enteral Nutrition Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07426003
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HEN / 860217
- Conditions
- Enteral Nutrition's Effect on the Gut
- Keywords
- enteral nutrition, healthy volunteers
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- James LewisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research study is being conducted to determine the effects of enteral nutrition on healthy people. Enteral nutrition for the purpose of this study refers to the use of a specially developed formula taken by mouth that provides all essential nutrition either in the absence of food or to supplement the intake of foods. Enteral nutrition can be used for many reasons, such as to gain or lose weight, to treat food allergies, or to reduce inflammation in certain intestinal diseases. We would like to understand the effects of enteral nutrition in the absence of intestinal inflammation.
Detailed description
Crohn's disease is an immune mediated condition that can affect any area of the gastrointestinal tract. The etiology is still unclear but is thought to be an aberrant response to the gut microbiota, inducing intestinal and systemic inflammation. Given the role of the immune system in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease, the cornerstone of therapy has been targeted immunosuppression. However, despite the advances in pharmacologic treatments that have been seen in the past 20 years, a significant number of patients either do not respond to therapy or lose response after experiencing a benefit. In addition, immunosuppression is associated with unwanted adverse effects. As such, there is a need to develop therapeutic approaches that address the underlying stimuli that leads to the inflammation of Crohn's disease.
This is an outpatient randomized controlled trial of 20 healthy volunteers who will be assigned to either Partial Enteral Nutrition (PEN) defined as 60% of calories from Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 formula and 40% of calories from the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED) (N=10) vs. Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN) defined as 100% of calories from Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 formula (N=10) for 3 days. The purpose of the study is to understand the changes in colon transit time and the microbiome and metabolome that result from consumption of the assigned diet. Blood and urine will be collected at screening and for 3 of 4 days that the participants are under study observation. Stool will be collected on all 4 days if the participant has a bowel movement on each day. Participants will also be given sitz markers on day one of the study and will undergo one or two x-rays. Diet surveys will also be collected during the 4 days of observation.
Considering the link between gut microbiome and development of inflammatory bowel diseases, there has been a growing interest in dietary modifications aiming to treat or even prevent the development of disease. Dietary therapies are a potential therapeutic alternative in Crohn's disease. Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), the provision of 90% to 100% of daily caloric intake with a meal replacement formula, is as efficacious as corticosteroids in pediatric Crohn's disease and is promoted as a first-line treatment over corticosteroids. However, it is used less in adults as it is not well tolerated and leads to poor adherence. Partial enteral nutrition (PEN), the provision of approximately 50-80% of calories from a meal replacement formula, has emerged as a potential, better tolerated strategy to treat CD. Studies have shown that PEN may help to treat Crohn's disease even though it may not be as efficacious as EEN. The mechanisms by which enteral nutrition may be useful in the treatment of CD are unknown but some evidence points to immunomodulation of the gastrointestinal tract, promoting mucosal healing through changes in cytokine profiles, inducing microbiome changes and decreasing the exposure to food and additives that can reduce the epithelial barrier function.
CDED is characterized by mandatory and optional foods. The mandatory foods are chicken breast, eggs, potatoes, apples and bananas. The optional foods are predominantly a range of fruits and vegetables and non-gluten containing grains. Because EEN and PEN with CDED appear to be comparably efficacious, it suggests that the food which is being excluded is more important than the quantity of formula consumed. This is further evidenced by the observation that the choice of enteral formula does not appear to impact the efficacy of EEN.6
The main barrier to use of EEN or CDED is the restrictive nature of the diet. The investigators hypothesize that better characterization of the biologic effects of EEN and PEN with CDED would allow for development of more liberalized diets that achieve comparable efficacy. The investigators propose to leverage modern omics technologies to characterize the microbiome and metabolome of EEN and PEN with CDED among healthy volunteers to aid in the development of rational and perhaps personalized diets for patients with Crohn's disease. The investigators have elected to conduct this research among healthy volunteers rather than in patients with Crohn's disease so as to avoid the confounding effect of intestinal inflammation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Partial Enteral Nutrition and the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: Kate Farms Peptide 1.5, Other: Crohn's disease exclusion dietParticipants will drink Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 for 60% of their calories and follow the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet for the remainder of their calories |
| Exclusive enteral nutrition | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: Kate Farms Peptide 1.5Participants will consume Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 exclusively except water, and coffee and tea with no sweetner or cream/milk for 3 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Must be able to read and understand English
- Must be able to sign a consent form for the study
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- BMI <20 or >30
- Unintentional weight loss of >10% in the last 3-6 months
- Kidney disease
- Diagnosis of cirrhosis
- Taking diuretics
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Kate Farms Peptide 1.5Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 | Dietary supplement | Exclusive enteral nutrition, Partial Enteral Nutrition and the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet |
| Crohn's disease exclusion dietThis study will use the components of the Crohn's disease exclusion diet Phase 1 which includes chicken breast, eggs, potatoes, bananas and apples | Other | Partial Enteral Nutrition and the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet |
Primary outcome
number of sitz markers at 72 hours
Time frame: 72 hours after taking the sitzmark capsule
Number of sitz markers that are present in an abdominal x-ray 72 hours after the participant takes the sitz mark capsule
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Due to the small sample size, there is risk of participant identification. However, we will consider requests to access deidentified data on an individual basis and under a data use agreement.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
HEN Study General Email contact
James Lewis, MD, MSCE principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Kate Farms Peptide 1.5 and Crohn's disease exclusion diet in people with Enteral Nutrition's Effect on the Gut, run by James Lewis at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Raksha Shastry, MPH (267-896-3160, Raksha.Shastry@PennMedicine.upenn.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
number of sitz markers at 72 hours (time frame: 72 hours after taking the sitzmark capsule). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2026.