Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)VID LISANCT07426016
Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration
A study testing Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal) and Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Many preterm babies born between 22-28+6 weeks' estimated gestational age (EGA) need surfactant, a medicine that helps the lungs. The goal of the study is to compare the use of video-based visualization to direct visualization during a procedure called less invasive surfactant administration (LISA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 0 hours to 3 days
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal), Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal
- What is being tested?
- Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 Jun 2026to Nov 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 0 hours to 3 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Infants born ≤28 weeks GA successfully resuscitated in the delivery room (DR) and maintained on CPAP • Need for surfactant in the first 36 hours of life based on clinical assessment and/or meeting threshold per unit protocol
Who cannot join
- Infants born ≥29 weeks GA or
- Infants with known congenital anomalies or
- Infants who are determined by the primary care team to receive comfort care only or
- Infants who are intubated at any time prior to surfactant administration
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Parkland Hospital
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Office of Research Administration, 214-645-8300, irb@utsouthwestern.edu
Riti Chokshi, MD
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of Video-Laryngoscopy Intervention or Direct Laryngoscopy for Delivery of Less Invasive Surfactant Administration for Premature Infants
Many preterm babies born between 22-28+6 weeks' estimated gestational age (EGA) need surfactant, a medicine that helps the lungs. The goal of the study is to compare the use of video-based visualization to direct visualization during a procedure called less invasive surfactant administration (LISA). The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1) does one method of visualization have a increased rate of giving the medicine successfully on the first attempt? 2) what benefits are there of each method?
- Being tested
- Video Laryngoscopy, Direct Laryngoscopy
- Keywords
- less invasive surfactant, neonatal, video laryngoscopy
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Atelectasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Video LaryngoscopyProcedure or surgery
Video Laryngoscopy will be used to visualize the vocal cords and place the LISA catheter
Direct LaryngoscopyProcedure or surgery
Direct Laryngoscopy will be used to visualize the vocal cords and place the LISA catheter
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Video Laryngoscopy | Active comparator | A video laryngoscopy will be used to visualize the vocal cords and place the LISA catheter for surfactant administration Receives: Procedure: Video Laryngoscopy |
| Direct Laryngoscopy | Active comparator | Direct laryngoscopy (no camera) will be used to visualize the vocal cords and place the LISA catheter for surfactant administration Receives: Procedure: Direct Laryngoscopy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of first attempt success
Measured: During procedure
Secondary outcomes (19)
Duration of desaturation below 80% SpO2 (sec),
Measured: during procedure
Duration of bradycardia (HR <100 bpm)
Measured: procedure duration
Number of desaturation/bradycardia episodes
Measured: during procedure
Number of surfactant installation attempts
Measured: during procedure
Time to completion of surfactant installation
Measured: during procedure
Time to insertion of thin catheter
Measured: during procedure
Amount of surfactant in stomach at the end of the procedure
Measured: within 5 min after procedure
Mean maximum fractioned inspired O2 used
Measured: during procedure
Lowest oxygen saturation during catheter insertion
Measured: during procedure
Fractionated inspired oxygen (FiO2) at 60 mins post procedure
Measured: 60 minutes post-procedure
Lowest heart rate during catheter insertion
Measured: during procedure
Cross over to alternative method
Measured: during procedure
Incidence of intubation at 72 hours post surfactant administration
Measured: procedure to 72 hours post-procedure
Incidence of pneumothorax
Measured: procedure to 72 hours post-procedure
Incidence of severe (grade III/IV) intraventricular hemorrhage
Measured: Birth to discharge
Continuous Positive Expiratory Pressure (CPAP) at 60 mins post procedure
Measured: 60 minutes post-procedure
Intubation during procedure
Measured: During Procedure
Change in provider during procedure
Measured: during procedure
Survival to discharge or 90 days
Measured: up to 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2026
- Study start11 Jun 2026
- Primary completionJun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Riti Chokshi, MD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Investigators
- Chokshi, MD, Principal investigator, UT SouthwesternShalini Ramachandran, MD, Principal investigator, UT Southwestern
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07426016
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STU20250457
- Acronym
- VID LISA
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Aldana-Aguirre JC, Pinto M, Featherstone RM, Kumar M. Less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation for surfactant delivery in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Jan;102(1):F17-F23. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310299. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
PubMed 27852668Kurepa D, Boyar V, Predtechenska O, Gupta V, Weinberger B, Pulju M, Zaytseva A, Galanti SG, Kasniya G, Perveen S. Video laryngoscopy-assisted less-invasive surfactant administration quality improvement initiative. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Nov;108(6):588-593. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325357. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
PubMed 37028921Riva T, Engelhardt T, Basciani R, Bonfiglio R, Cools E, Fuchs A, Garcia-Marcinkiewicz AG, Greif R, Habre W, Huber M, Petre MA, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Sommerfield D, Theiler L, Disma N; OPTIMISE Collaboration. Direct versus video laryngoscopy with standard blades for neonatal and infant tracheal intubation with supplemental oxygen: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 Feb;7(2):101-111. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00313-3. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
PubMed 36436541Geraghty LE, Dunne EA, Ni Chathasaigh CM, Vellinga A, Adams NC, O'Currain EM, McCarthy LK, O'Donnell CPF. Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Urgent Intubation of Newborn Infants. N Engl J Med. 2024 May 30;390(20):1885-1894. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2402785. Epub 2024 May 5.
PubMed 38709215Garcia-Marcinkiewicz AG, Kovatsis PG, Hunyady AI, Olomu PN, Zhang B, Sathyamoorthy M, Gonzalez A, Kanmanthreddy S, Galvez JA, Franz AM, Peyton J, Park R, Kiss EE, Sommerfield D, Griffis H, Nishisaki A, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Nadkarni VM, McGowan FX Jr, Fiadjoe JE; PeDI Collaborative investigators. First-attempt success rate of video laryngoscopy in small infants (VISI): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020 Dec 12;396(10266):1905-1913. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32532-0.
PubMed 33308472
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Video-Laryngoscopy Intervention or Direct Laryngoscopy for Delivery of Less Invasive Surfactant Administration for Premature Infants
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07426016
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VID LISA / STU20250457
- Keywords
- less invasive surfactant, neonatal, video laryngoscopy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many preterm babies born between 22-28+6 weeks' estimated gestational age (EGA) need surfactant, a medicine that helps the lungs. The goal of the study is to compare the use of video-based visualization to direct visualization during a procedure called less invasive surfactant administration (LISA). The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1) does one method of visualization have a increased rate of giving the medicine successfully on the first attempt? 2) what benefits are there of each method?
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Video Laryngoscopy | Active comparator | Procedure: Video LaryngoscopyA video laryngoscopy will be used to visualize the vocal cords and place the LISA catheter for surfactant administration |
| Direct Laryngoscopy | Active comparator | Procedure: Direct LaryngoscopyDirect laryngoscopy (no camera) will be used to visualize the vocal cords and place the LISA catheter for surfactant administration |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 0 hours to 3 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Infants born ≤28 weeks GA successfully resuscitated in the delivery room (DR) and maintained on CPAP • Need for surfactant in the first 36 hours of life based on clinical assessment and/or meeting threshold per unit protocol
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Infants born ≥29 weeks GA or
- Infants with known congenital anomalies or
- Infants who are determined by the primary care team to receive comfort care only or
- Infants who are intubated at any time prior to surfactant administration
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Video LaryngoscopyVideo Laryngoscopy will be used to visualize the vocal cords and place the LISA catheter | Procedure or surgery | Video Laryngoscopy |
| Direct LaryngoscopyDirect Laryngoscopy will be used to visualize the vocal cords and place the LISA catheter | Procedure or surgery | Direct Laryngoscopy |
Primary outcome
Rate of first attempt success
Time frame: During procedure
19 secondary outcomes
Duration of desaturation below 80% SpO2 (sec),
Time frame: during procedure
Duration of bradycardia (HR <100 bpm)
Time frame: procedure duration
Number of desaturation/bradycardia episodes
Time frame: during procedure
Number of surfactant installation attempts
Time frame: during procedure
Time to completion of surfactant installation
Time frame: during procedure
Time to insertion of thin catheter
Time frame: during procedure
Amount of surfactant in stomach at the end of the procedure
Time frame: within 5 min after procedure
Mean maximum fractioned inspired O2 used
Time frame: during procedure
Lowest oxygen saturation during catheter insertion
Time frame: during procedure
Fractionated inspired oxygen (FiO2) at 60 mins post procedure
Time frame: 60 minutes post-procedure
Lowest heart rate during catheter insertion
Time frame: during procedure
Cross over to alternative method
Time frame: during procedure
Incidence of intubation at 72 hours post surfactant administration
Time frame: procedure to 72 hours post-procedure
Incidence of pneumothorax
Time frame: procedure to 72 hours post-procedure
Incidence of severe (grade III/IV) intraventricular hemorrhage
Time frame: Birth to discharge
Continuous Positive Expiratory Pressure (CPAP) at 60 mins post procedure
Time frame: 60 minutes post-procedure
Intubation during procedure
Time frame: During Procedure
Change in provider during procedure
Time frame: during procedure
Survival to discharge or 90 days
Time frame: up to 90 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 27852668Aldana-Aguirre JC, Pinto M, Featherstone RM, Kumar M. Less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation for surfactant delivery in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Jan;102(1):F17-F23. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310299. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
- Background: PubMed 37028921Kurepa D, Boyar V, Predtechenska O, Gupta V, Weinberger B, Pulju M, Zaytseva A, Galanti SG, Kasniya G, Perveen S. Video laryngoscopy-assisted less-invasive surfactant administration quality improvement initiative. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Nov;108(6):588-593. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325357. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
- Background: PubMed 36436541Riva T, Engelhardt T, Basciani R, Bonfiglio R, Cools E, Fuchs A, Garcia-Marcinkiewicz AG, Greif R, Habre W, Huber M, Petre MA, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Sommerfield D, Theiler L, Disma N; OPTIMISE Collaboration. Direct versus video laryngoscopy with standard blades for neonatal and infant tracheal intubation with supplemental oxygen: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 Feb;7(2):101-111. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00313-3. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
- Background: PubMed 38709215Geraghty LE, Dunne EA, Ni Chathasaigh CM, Vellinga A, Adams NC, O'Currain EM, McCarthy LK, O'Donnell CPF. Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Urgent Intubation of Newborn Infants. N Engl J Med. 2024 May 30;390(20):1885-1894. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2402785. Epub 2024 May 5.
- Background: PubMed 33308472Garcia-Marcinkiewicz AG, Kovatsis PG, Hunyady AI, Olomu PN, Zhang B, Sathyamoorthy M, Gonzalez A, Kanmanthreddy S, Galvez JA, Franz AM, Peyton J, Park R, Kiss EE, Sommerfield D, Griffis H, Nishisaki A, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Nadkarni VM, McGowan FX Jr, Fiadjoe JE; PeDI Collaborative investigators. First-attempt success rate of video laryngoscopy in small infants (VISI): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020 Dec 12;396(10266):1905-1913. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32532-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Recruiting
Amnioinfusion's Protective Effects on Respiratory and Longitudinal Pediatric Outcomes After Intrapartum Meconium Exposure
Neonatal Respiratory Distress Related Conditions, Meconium
Recruiting
Ventilator Pressure and Optimization of Compliance and Hemodynamics
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Lung Diseases and Hypoxia
Active, not recruiting
Measuring Diaphragm Electrical Activity in Neonates Using a Smaller Inter-electrode Distance
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Infant, Premature
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Chest Ultrasound as Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool in Neonatal RDS
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Neonatal Respiratory Distress
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Effect of Automated Oxygen Control on Early-childhood Lung Mechanics
Prematurity, Respiratory Distress Neonatal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Chokshi, MD principal investigator
UT Southwestern
Shalini Ramachandran, MD principal investigator
UT Southwestern
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal) and Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Principal Investigator, MD (214-648-3383, riti.chokshi@utsouthwestern.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of first attempt success (time frame: During procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07426016, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2026.