Cultural CompetencyCULSENNCT07427147
CULTURAL SENSITIVITY TRAINING
A study testing Cultural Sensitivity Training Program in people with Cultural Competency and Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by Giresun University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This randomized controlled experimental study aims to determine the effect of a cultural sensitivity training program on nursing students' cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness, and ethnocentrism levels. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cultural Competency, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- What is being tested?
- Cultural Sensitivity Training Program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 67 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2025to 30 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Being a fourth-year student enrolled in the Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Giresun University during the 2024-2025 academic year
- Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Being a foreign national student
- Not volunteering to participate in the study
- Withdrawal Criteria:
- Failing to attend at least two training sessions during the study period
- Incomplete or incorrect completion of data collection instruments
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Giresun University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing
Giresun, Central, 28200
About this study
Official title: Determining the Effect of Cultural Sensitivity Training on Nursing Students' Cultural Sensitivity, Cultural Awareness and Ethnocentrism Levels
This randomized controlled experimental study aims to determine the effect of a cultural sensitivity training program on nursing students' cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness, and ethnocentrism levels. Fourth-year nursing students at Giresun University Faculty of Health Sciences are randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group using simple randomization. The experimental group receives a 4-week cultural sensitivity training program (2 hours per week) including interactive lectures, discussions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing activities. The control group continues with the standard nursing curriculum. Data are collected using the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale, Intercultural Awareness Scale, and Ethnocentrism Scale at baseline (pre-test) and after the intervention (post-test). The primary hypothesis is that participants receiving the training will show significant improvements in cultural sensitivity and awareness and a significant decrease in ethnocentrism compared to the control group.
Read the detailed description
Background: Cultural sensitivity and awareness are essential competencies for nursing professionals providing care to diverse patient populations. Ethnocentrism, the tendency to view one's own culture as superior, can negatively affect patient care quality. Structured educational interventions during undergraduate nursing education may enhance culturally competent care delivery.
Study Design: This is a randomized controlled experimental study conducted at Giresun University Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, during April-May 2025. Fourth-year nursing students were selected because they have accumulated both theoretical knowledge and clinical experience and have interacted with individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds.
Sample Size: Power analysis was performed using G*Power 3.1. Based on the effect size of 0.685 reported by Topcu (2019), with 95% power and 5% significance level, a minimum of 60 participants (30 per group) was required. To account for potential attrition, 71 students were enrolled (35 experimental, 36 control). Three students in the experimental group were excluded due to non-attendance, resulting in a final sample of 67 participants (32 experimental, 35 control).
Randomization: Participants were assigned to groups using simple random randomization. An independent biostatistician generated the randomization table using an online calculator (calculatorsoup.com). Groups had only one common class day per week, minimizing cross-contamination risk. Participants were verbally instructed not to share intervention content.
Intervention: The experimental group received a 4-week Cultural Sensitivity Training Program delivered in classroom settings every Monday (11:00-13:00) in two 50-minute sessions. The program content included: Week 1 - Culture concepts, cultural elements, and the relationship between society and culture; Week 2 - Health, illness, and culture relationships including cultural factors in health behaviors and nutrition; Week 3 - Cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness, and ethnocentrism concepts with strategies for reducing ethnocentrism; Week 4 - Transcultural nursing and cultural care models including Leininger's Sunrise Model, Giger and Davidhizar's Transcultural Assessment Model, and Purnell's Cultural Competence Model. Teaching methods included interactive lectures with PowerPoint presentations, group discussions, question-and-answer sessions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing scenarios. The training content was validated by field experts using the DISCERN quality assessment tool.
Control Group: The control group received no cultural sensitivity intervention during the study period. After post-test data collection, the control group also received the Cultural Sensitivity Training Program for ethical considerations.
Outcome Measures: Three validated instruments were used - (1) Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (Chen and Starosta, 2000; Turkish adaptation by Bulduk, Tosun and Ardic, 2010): 24-item, 5-point Likert scale measuring five emotional dimensions of intercultural sensitivity (Cronbach alpha=0.90); (2) Ethnocentrism Scale (Neuliep and McCroskey, 2001; Turkish adaptation by Ustun, 2011): 20-item, 5-point Likert scale (Cronbach alpha=0.92); (3) Intercultural Awareness Scale (Rozaimie et al.; Turkish adaptation by Yakar Karabuga and Alpar, 2017): 9-item, 5-point Likert scale with three sub-dimensions (Cronbach alpha=0.73). A 17-item Descriptive Characteristics Form was also administered.
Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Normality was assessed using skewness and kurtosis coefficients (within ±1.5 range). Parametric tests were used including paired samples t-test for within-group comparisons, independent samples t-test for between-group comparisons, and chi-square test (with Fisher's Exact Test when necessary) for demographic homogeneity. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Instrument reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients.
Ethics: The study was approved by Karadeniz Technical University Health Sciences Scientific Research Ethics Committee (Decision No: 158, Date: December 12, 2024). Institutional permission was obtained from Giresun University Rectorate (Decision No: E-13301833-100-55965, Date: December 13, 2024). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
- Being tested
- Cultural Sensitivity Training Program
- Keywords
- Cultural Sensitivity, Cultural Awareness, Nursing Education, Nursing Students, Cultural Sensitivity Training
- Medical subject headings
- Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cultural Sensitivity Training ProgramBehavioural
A structured 4-week educational program delivered in classroom settings (Mondays 11:00-13:00). Week 1: Culture concepts and society-culture relationship. Week 2: Health, illness and culture relationship. Week 3: Cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness and ethnocentrism. Week 4: Transcultural nursing and cultural care models (Leininger's Sunrise Model, Giger-Davidhizar's Transcultural Assessment Model, Purnell's Cultural Competence Model). Teaching methods include PowerPoint presentations, group discussions, Q\&A sessions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing scenarios.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Cultural Sensitivity Training | Experimental | Fourth-year nursing students receiving a 4-week cultural sensitivity training program consisting of two 50-minute interactive sessions per week, including lectures, discussions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing activities. Receives: Behavioral: Cultural Sensitivity Training Program |
| No Intervention: Standard Curriculum | No intervention | Fourth-year nursing students continuing with the standard nursing curriculum without any additional cultural sensitivity training during the study period. The training program was provided to this group after post-test data collection. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Intercultural Sensitivity Scale Score
Measured using the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (Chen and Starosta, 2000; Turkish adaptation by Bulduk, Tosun and Ardic, 2010). A 24-item, 5-point Likert scale measuring five emotional dimensions: interaction engagement, respect for cultural differences, interaction confidence, interaction enjoyment, and interaction attentiveness. Items 2, 4, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 20, and 22 are reverse scored. Higher scores indicate greater intercultural sensitivity. Cronbach's alpha = 0.90.
Measured: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)
Change in Ethnocentrism Scale Score
Measured using the Ethnocentrism Scale (Neuliep and McCroskey, 2001; Turkish adaptation by Ustun, 2011). A 20-item, 5-point Likert scale with a score range of 20-100. Items 4, 7, 9, 12, 15, and 19 are reverse scored. Higher scores indicate higher levels of ethnocentrism. Cronbach's alpha = 0.92.
Measured: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)
Change in Intercultural Awareness Scale Score
Measured using the Intercultural Awareness Scale (Rozaimie et al.; Turkish adaptation by Yakar Karabuga and Alpar, 2017). A 9-item, 5-point Likert scale with three sub-dimensions: existing cultural awareness (items 1, 6, 8, 9), felt cultural awareness (items 3, 5), and cultural communication awareness (items 2, 4, 7). Score range is 9-45. Lower scores indicate greater intercultural awareness. Cronbach's alpha = 0.73.
Measured: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2026
- Study start1 Apr 2025
- Primary completion20 Apr 2025
- Study completion30 Jun 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cultural CompetencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving a 4-week cultural sensitivity training program or a control group continuing standard nursing curriculum. Both groups were assessed simultaneously at baseline and post-intervention.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Giresun University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07427147
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E-13562490-050.01.04-595443
- Acronym
- CULSEN
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Determining the Effect of Cultural Sensitivity Training on Nursing Students' Cultural Sensitivity, Cultural Awareness and Ethnocentrism Levels
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07427147
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CULSEN / E-13562490-050.01.04-595443
- Keywords
- Cultural Sensitivity, Cultural Awareness, Nursing Education, Nursing Students, Cultural Sensitivity Training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Giresun UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized controlled experimental study aims to determine the effect of a cultural sensitivity training program on nursing students' cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness, and ethnocentrism levels. Fourth-year nursing students at Giresun University Faculty of Health Sciences are randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group using simple randomization. The experimental group receives a 4-week cultural sensitivity training program (2 hours per week) including interactive lectures, discussions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing activities. The control group continues with the standard nursing curriculum. Data are collected using the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale, Intercultural Awareness Scale, and Ethnocentrism Scale at baseline (pre-test) and after the intervention (post-test). The primary hypothesis is that participants receiving the training will show significant improvements in cultural sensitivity and awareness and a significant decrease in ethnocentrism compared to the control group.
Detailed description
Background: Cultural sensitivity and awareness are essential competencies for nursing professionals providing care to diverse patient populations. Ethnocentrism, the tendency to view one's own culture as superior, can negatively affect patient care quality. Structured educational interventions during undergraduate nursing education may enhance culturally competent care delivery.
Study Design: This is a randomized controlled experimental study conducted at Giresun University Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, during April-May 2025. Fourth-year nursing students were selected because they have accumulated both theoretical knowledge and clinical experience and have interacted with individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds.
Sample Size: Power analysis was performed using G*Power 3.1. Based on the effect size of 0.685 reported by Topcu (2019), with 95% power and 5% significance level, a minimum of 60 participants (30 per group) was required. To account for potential attrition, 71 students were enrolled (35 experimental, 36 control). Three students in the experimental group were excluded due to non-attendance, resulting in a final sample of 67 participants (32 experimental, 35 control).
Randomization: Participants were assigned to groups using simple random randomization. An independent biostatistician generated the randomization table using an online calculator (calculatorsoup.com). Groups had only one common class day per week, minimizing cross-contamination risk. Participants were verbally instructed not to share intervention content.
Intervention: The experimental group received a 4-week Cultural Sensitivity Training Program delivered in classroom settings every Monday (11:00-13:00) in two 50-minute sessions. The program content included: Week 1 - Culture concepts, cultural elements, and the relationship between society and culture; Week 2 - Health, illness, and culture relationships including cultural factors in health behaviors and nutrition; Week 3 - Cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness, and ethnocentrism concepts with strategies for reducing ethnocentrism; Week 4 - Transcultural nursing and cultural care models including Leininger's Sunrise Model, Giger and Davidhizar's Transcultural Assessment Model, and Purnell's Cultural Competence Model. Teaching methods included interactive lectures with PowerPoint presentations, group discussions, question-and-answer sessions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing scenarios. The training content was validated by field experts using the DISCERN quality assessment tool.
Control Group: The control group received no cultural sensitivity intervention during the study period. After post-test data collection, the control group also received the Cultural Sensitivity Training Program for ethical considerations.
Outcome Measures: Three validated instruments were used - (1) Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (Chen and Starosta, 2000; Turkish adaptation by Bulduk, Tosun and Ardic, 2010): 24-item, 5-point Likert scale measuring five emotional dimensions of intercultural sensitivity (Cronbach alpha=0.90); (2) Ethnocentrism Scale (Neuliep and McCroskey, 2001; Turkish adaptation by Ustun, 2011): 20-item, 5-point Likert scale (Cronbach alpha=0.92); (3) Intercultural Awareness Scale (Rozaimie et al.; Turkish adaptation by Yakar Karabuga and Alpar, 2017): 9-item, 5-point Likert scale with three sub-dimensions (Cronbach alpha=0.73). A 17-item Descriptive Characteristics Form was also administered.
Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Normality was assessed using skewness and kurtosis coefficients (within ±1.5 range). Parametric tests were used including paired samples t-test for within-group comparisons, independent samples t-test for between-group comparisons, and chi-square test (with Fisher's Exact Test when necessary) for demographic homogeneity. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Instrument reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients.
Ethics: The study was approved by Karadeniz Technical University Health Sciences Scientific Research Ethics Committee (Decision No: 158, Date: December 12, 2024). Institutional permission was obtained from Giresun University Rectorate (Decision No: E-13301833-100-55965, Date: December 13, 2024). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving a 4-week cultural sensitivity training program or a control group continuing standard nursing curriculum. Both groups were assessed simultaneously at baseline and post-intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Cultural Sensitivity Training | Experimental | Behavioral: Cultural Sensitivity Training ProgramFourth-year nursing students receiving a 4-week cultural sensitivity training program consisting of two 50-minute interactive sessions per week, including lectures, discussions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing activities. |
| No Intervention: Standard Curriculum | No intervention | –Fourth-year nursing students continuing with the standard nursing curriculum without any additional cultural sensitivity training during the study period. The training program was provided to this group after post-test data collection. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Being a fourth-year student enrolled in the Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Giresun University during the 2024-2025 academic year
- Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Being a foreign national student
- Not volunteering to participate in the study
- Failing to attend at least two training sessions during the study period
- Incomplete or incorrect completion of data collection instruments
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cultural Sensitivity Training ProgramA structured 4-week educational program delivered in classroom settings (Mondays 11:00-13:00). Week 1: Culture concepts and society-culture relationship. Week 2: Health, illness and culture relationship. Week 3: Cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness and ethnocentrism. Week 4: Transcultural nursing and cultural care models (Leininger's Sunrise Model, Giger-Davidhizar's Transcultural Assessment Model, Purnell's Cultural Competence Model). Teaching methods include PowerPoint presentations, group discussions, Q\&A sessions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing scenarios. | Behavioural | Experimental: Cultural Sensitivity Training |
Primary outcome
Change in Intercultural Sensitivity Scale Score
Time frame: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)
Measured using the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (Chen and Starosta, 2000; Turkish adaptation by Bulduk, Tosun and Ardic, 2010). A 24-item, 5-point Likert scale measuring five emotional dimensions: interaction engagement, respect for cultural differences, interaction confidence, interaction enjoyment, and interaction attentiveness. Items 2, 4, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 20, and 22 are reverse scored. Higher scores indicate greater intercultural sensitivity. Cronbach's alpha = 0.90.
Change in Ethnocentrism Scale Score
Time frame: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)
Measured using the Ethnocentrism Scale (Neuliep and McCroskey, 2001; Turkish adaptation by Ustun, 2011). A 20-item, 5-point Likert scale with a score range of 20-100. Items 4, 7, 9, 12, 15, and 19 are reverse scored. Higher scores indicate higher levels of ethnocentrism. Cronbach's alpha = 0.92.
Change in Intercultural Awareness Scale Score
Time frame: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)
Measured using the Intercultural Awareness Scale (Rozaimie et al.; Turkish adaptation by Yakar Karabuga and Alpar, 2017). A 9-item, 5-point Likert scale with three sub-dimensions: existing cultural awareness (items 1, 6, 8, 9), felt cultural awareness (items 3, 5), and cultural communication awareness (items 2, 4, 7). Score range is 9-45. Lower scores indicate greater intercultural awareness. Cronbach's alpha = 0.73.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cultural Competency
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating in Person Curriculum for Educating Obstetrical Residents on Better Caring for 2 Spirit Metis Patients Using and AI Assisted OSCE.
Cultural Safety, Medical Education
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptation Plan for Culturally Competent Care (PAACI) in the Acute Psychiatric Unit.
Mental Disorders, Cultural Competency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cultural Sensitivity Training Program in people with Cultural Competency and Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by Giresun University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Intercultural Sensitivity Scale Score (time frame: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.