Elbow FracturesEASY AlgorithmNCT07429344
EASY Algorithm Trial (Elbow Trauma Assessment Using Sonography in Children and Youth) Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Point-of-care Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Suspected Elbow Fractures in Children Aged 5 to 15 Years: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
An observational study of Elbow Fractures and Distal Humerus Fracture, run by Timo Munz at 13 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the safety and accuracy of ultrasound as a screening tool to detect broken bones (fractures) in the elbow area in children and youth aged 5 to 15 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 15 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Elbow Fractures, Distal Humerus Fracture, Pediatric Trauma
- How many people
- 543 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2026to 15 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 15 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: All children and adolescents who present to the emergency departments of the participating hospitals with elbow pain following an accident will be screened for inclusion in the study during the study period until the statistically determined required number of cases has been reached.
Who may be able to join
- children and adolescents aged 5-15 years with anamnestic and clinically justified need for the exclusion of a fracture after elbow trauma
Who cannot join
- elbow trauma as part of a polytrauma,
- parents' insufficient German language skills (spoken or written),
- trauma more than 72 hours ago,
- presentation at the emergency room with current, post-traumatic external X-ray images of the affected elbow joint from another clinic or practice,
- open fracture of the affected elbow joint,
- skin avulsion of the affected elbow joint,
- visible deformity of the affected elbow joint,
- and pathological status of peripheral circulation, motor function, and/or sensitivity.
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
13 sites in 1 country
Germany13 sites, 13 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Klinikum St. Marien Amberg
Amberg, 92224
Christian Uhlmann, 0049 9621 380, uhlmann.christian@Klinikum-Amberg.de
- Recruiting
Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln
Berlin, 12351
Florian Bohm, 0049 30 130140, florian.bohm@vivantes.de
- Not yet recruiting
Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch
Berlin, 13125
Stefan Gfroerer, Prof. Dr. med. habil., 0049 30 94010, Stefan.Gfroerer@helios-gesundheit.de
- Recruiting
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 13353
Timo Munz, Dr. med., 0049-30-450666875, timo.munz@charite.de
- Not yet recruiting
Klinikum Chemnitz
Chemnitz, 09116
Jurek Schultz, PD Dr. med. habil., 0049 371 3330, Jurek.Schultz@ukdd.de
- Not yet recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
Dresden, 01307
Philipp Schwerk, 0049 351 4580, Philipp.Schwerk@ukdd.de
- Not yet recruiting
BG Klinikum Duisburg
Duisburg, 47249
Christian Illian, Dr. med., 0049 203 76880, christian.illian@bg-klinikum-duisburg.de
- Not yet recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Nikos Karvouniaris, Dr. med., 0049 761 2700, nikos.karvouniaris@uniklinik-freiburg.de
- Not yet recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20251
Kristofer Wintges, Dr. med., 0049 40 74100, kristofer.wintges@uke.de
- Not yet recruiting
Klinikum Kassel
Kassel, 34125
Sebastian Reineke, Dr. med., 0049 561 9800, Sebastian.Reineke@gnh.net
- Not yet recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck
Lübeck, 23562
Ludger Tüshaus, Dr. med., 0049 451 5000, ludger.tueshaus@uksh.de
- Not yet recruiting
Klinikum Stuttgart
Stuttgart, 70174
Oliver Loose, PD Dr. med., 0049 711 27801, o.loose@klinikum-stuttgart.de
- Not yet recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
Tübingen, 72076
Lukas Bischoff, Dr. med., 0049 7071 290, lukas.bischoff@med.uni-tuebingen.de
About this study
Official title: EASY Algorithm Trial (Elbow Trauma Assessment Using Sonography in Children and Youth) Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Point-of-care Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Suspected Elbow Fractures in Children Aged 5 to 15 Years: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study by the German Section for Pediatric Traumatology (SKT)
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the safety and accuracy of ultrasound as a screening tool to detect broken bones (fractures) in the elbow area in children and youth aged 5 to 15 years. The main question it aims to answer is:
- Can ultrasound reliably show that there is a fracture in the elbow area after an accident?
Participants will:
- Have an ultrasound of their elbow to look for fluid in the joint.
- Have standard X-rays of their elbow to check if there is a fracture.
- Have their medical records checked and answer a phone call 6 weeks later to see how their elbow has healed (only if no fracture was found during the first visit).
- Conditions
- Elbow Fractures, Distal Humerus Fracture, Pediatric Trauma, Radius Fracture, Olecranon Fracture, Supracondylar Humerus Fracture
- Keywords
- EASY Algorithm Trial, pediatric trauma, Diagnostic accuracy, point-of-care ultrasound, elbow fractures, children, Elbow Trauma Assessment using Sonography in Children and Youth, German Section for Pediatric Traumatology (SKT), screening tool, supracondylar humerus fracture
- Medical subject headings
- Elbow Fractures, Humeral Fractures, Distal, Radius Fractures, Olecranon Fracture
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity of sonographic joint effusion
Sensitivity of sonographic joint effusion examination following a standardized procedure and uniform training of the physicians performing the examination in the detection of radiologically confirmed elbow fractures, as assessed by blinded experts.
Measured: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Secondary outcomes (11)
Time required for ultrasound examination
The total time for performing and evaluating the ultrasound examination is measured.
Measured: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
The additional time patients spend in the emergency room due to X-ray examinations
The time that patients and their relatives spend additionally in the emergency room due to X-ray imaging is measured. The time at which the family leaves the treatment room after the ultrasound is noted. Then the time at which the family re-enters the treatment room after the X-ray is performed is noted. The difference is the additional time patients spend in the emergency room due to X-ray imaging.
Measured: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Radiation dose from X-ray imaging (dose area product)
The radiation dose of the initial radiological imaging (dose area product) is recorded.
Measured: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
The initial assessment of the X-ray images by the attending physician in the emergency department
The exact fracture type determined by the attending physician in the emergency department.
Measured: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Treatment of the injury
In the case of a fracture diagnosed by X-ray, the initial treatment is recorded.
If the initial X-ray image shows no fracture, the initial symptomatic treatment is recorded. If there is initially no radiographic evidence of a fracture, a telephone follow-up and file review will be conducted after 6 weeks. Any changes in treatment during the 6 weeks following the initial presentation will be recorded.
Measured: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Exact fracture pattern of the initial X-ray images as determined by blinded experts
The exact fracture pattern of the X-ray images as determined by blinded experts.
Measured: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Radiographic posterior fat pad signs on the initial X-ray images as determined by blinded experts
Radiographic posterior fat pad signs on the initial X-ray images taken during the initial presentation at the emergency room, which are assessed by blinded experts.
Measured: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Interrater reliability of ultrasound findings
The sonographic images from the elbow joint sonography are subsequently re-evaluated by blinded physicians in order to examine interrater variability.
Measured: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Only in cases where there is initially no radiographically confirmed fracture: pain after 6 weeks
If no fracture is initially visible on the initial X-ray, a follow-up telephone call is made after 6 weeks. The child's pain is assessed using the PROMIS® Numeric Rating Scale v1.0 - Parent Proxy Pain Intensity 1a. This is a single-item scale for assessing average pain intensity from the parent's perspective (parent proxy), which has been validated for the 5 to 17 age group. The child's average pain intensity is recorded on a numerical scale from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the most severe pain imaginable"), taking into account the period of the last seven days.
Measured: Day 39-45 (42 days (+/- 3 days) after the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Only in cases where there is initially no radiographically confirmed fracture: function of the upper extremity after 6 weeks
If no fracture is initially visible on the initial X-ray, a follow-up telephone call is made after 6 weeks: The function of the child's upper extremity is assessed using the PROMIS® Parent Proxy Short Form v2.0 - Upper Extremity questionnaire. This is an official, validated short form derived from the PROMIS® item bank for upper extremity function from the parent's perspective (parent proxy). It assesses the limitations of children (aged 5-17 years) in relation to everyday activities that involve the upper extremities. The eight items are rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from "No difficulty" to "Could not do." The final result is represented by the T-score-a standardized value with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Measured: Day 39-45 (42 days (+/- 3 days) after the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Only in cases where there is initially no radiographically confirmed fracture: Medical follow-up appointments and results of possible further radiological imaging
After six weeks, the patient file is reviewed for possible re-examination at the study center. In the event of a re-examination, the date, symptoms, and, if applicable, any X-ray imaging, fracture type, and treatment are documented.
In addition, the parents are contacted by telephone after six weeks and asked about a possible appointment at an external clinic or doctor's office. If such a referral has taken place, the findings and any changes in treatment are recorded. If a bone fracture has been diagnosed for the first time in an external facility due to the same trauma, the X-ray images and findings are requested to be sent to the local study center so that they can be integrated into the patient file.
Measured: Day 39-45 (42 days (+/- 3 days) after the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2026
- Study start2 Mar 2026
- Primary completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Elbow FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 543 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Timo Munz
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital Dresden, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Abteilung für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie BG Unfallklinik Duisburg, University Hospital Freiburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinikum Kassel, Vivantes Hospital Berlin Neukölln, Klinikum Stuttgart, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, University Hospital Lübeck, University Hospital Tuebingen
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Timo Munz, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07429344
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EA2/215/25
- Acronym
- EASY Algorithm
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All IPD collected throughout the trial.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EASY Algorithm Trial (Elbow Trauma Assessment Using Sonography in Children and Youth) Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Point-of-care Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Suspected Elbow Fractures in Children Aged 5 to 15 Years: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study by the German Section for Pediatric Traumatology (SKT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07429344
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EASY Algorithm / EA2/215/25
- Conditions
- Elbow Fractures, Distal Humerus Fracture, Pediatric Trauma, Radius Fracture, Olecranon Fracture, Supracondylar Humerus Fracture
- Keywords
- EASY Algorithm Trial, pediatric trauma, Diagnostic accuracy, point-of-care ultrasound, elbow fractures, children, Elbow Trauma Assessment using Sonography in Children and Youth, German Section for Pediatric Traumatology (SKT)
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 543 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Timo MunzUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital Dresden, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Abteilung für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie BG Unfallklinik Duisburg, University Hospital Freiburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinikum Kassel, Vivantes Hospital Berlin Neukölln, Klinikum Stuttgart, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, University Hospital Lübeck, University Hospital Tuebingen
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the safety and accuracy of ultrasound as a screening tool to detect broken bones (fractures) in the elbow area in children and youth aged 5 to 15 years. The main question it aims to answer is:
- Can ultrasound reliably show that there is a fracture in the elbow area after an accident?
Participants will:
- Have an ultrasound of their elbow to look for fluid in the joint.
- Have standard X-rays of their elbow to check if there is a fracture.
- Have their medical records checked and answer a phone call 6 weeks later to see how their elbow has healed (only if no fracture was found during the first visit).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 15 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- All children and adolescents who present to the emergency departments of the participating hospitals with elbow pain following an accident will be screened for inclusion in the study during the study period until the statistically determined required number of cases has been reached.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- children and adolescents aged 5-15 years with anamnestic and clinically justified need for the exclusion of a fracture after elbow trauma
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- elbow trauma as part of a polytrauma,
- parents' insufficient German language skills (spoken or written),
- trauma more than 72 hours ago,
- presentation at the emergency room with current, post-traumatic external X-ray images of the affected elbow joint from another clinic or practice,
- open fracture of the affected elbow joint,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Sensitivity of sonographic joint effusion
Time frame: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Sensitivity of sonographic joint effusion examination following a standardized procedure and uniform training of the physicians performing the examination in the detection of radiologically confirmed elbow fractures, as assessed by blinded experts.
11 secondary outcomes
Time required for ultrasound examination
Time frame: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
The additional time patients spend in the emergency room due to X-ray examinations
Time frame: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Radiation dose from X-ray imaging (dose area product)
Time frame: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
The initial assessment of the X-ray images by the attending physician in the emergency department
Time frame: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Treatment of the injury
Time frame: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Exact fracture pattern of the initial X-ray images as determined by blinded experts
Time frame: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Radiographic posterior fat pad signs on the initial X-ray images as determined by blinded experts
Time frame: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Interrater reliability of ultrasound findings
Time frame: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Only in cases where there is initially no radiographically confirmed fracture: pain after 6 weeks
Time frame: Day 39-45 (42 days (+/- 3 days) after the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Only in cases where there is initially no radiographically confirmed fracture: function of the upper extremity after 6 weeks
Time frame: Day 39-45 (42 days (+/- 3 days) after the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Only in cases where there is initially no radiographically confirmed fracture: Medical follow-up appointments and results of possible further radiological imaging
Time frame: Day 39-45 (42 days (+/- 3 days) after the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All IPD collected throughout the trial.
Related trials for Elbow Fractures
Active, not recruiting
Treatment of Olecranon Fractures in the Elderly
Olecranon Fracture
Recruiting
This is a Study to Find Out Whether Surgery Using a Metal Plate to Fix a Broken Elbow in Older Adults Leads to Better Recovery and Arm Function Compared to Non-surgical Treatment
Olecranon Fracture
Recruiting
The With Or Without Olecranon K-wires Trial
Olecranon Fracture
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Outcomes After Treatment of Distal Humerus Fractures With the LORRAINE 2.5/3.5 mm Distal Humerus System
Intra-Articular or Extra-Articular Distal Humerus Fracture, Distal Humerus Fracture
Recruiting
Efficacy of the Buzzy System on Pain and Fear Reduction in Elbow Fracture Pin Removal
Elbow Fractures
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Elbow Fractures and Distal Humerus Fracture, run by Timo Munz at 13 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Timo Munz, Dr. med. (0049-30-450666875, timo.munz@charite.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity of sonographic joint effusion (time frame: Day 1 (On the day of enrollment in the study in the emergency department)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2026.